Home | Pro-life Profiles

Time 2021-01-03 06:02:35

Web Name: Home | Pro-life Profiles

WebSite: http://prolifeprofiles.com

ID:154930

Keywords:

Pro,Home,Profiles,

Description:

Tom Hoefling, founder and chairman of America's Party and 2020 candidate for President, is committed to the absolute obligation to protect every innocent human life. Cal Zastrow advocates enforcement of the God-given right to life of all preborn children from the beginning of their biological development. American RTL and Leslie Hanks advocate enforcement of the God-given, inalienable right to life of every unborn person from the beginning of their biological development. Judie Brown advocates enforcement of the God-given right to life of all unborn children from the beginning of their biological development. Mike Huckabee continues to defend his support for laws that end with, "and then you can kill the baby", destroying any trust that could be placed in him for the otherwise moral rhetoric that he offers on behalf of the unborn. Rick Santorum attempts to protect the innocent yet he undermines and therefore delays the country's enforcement of the God-given right to life of unborn children by defending abortion regulations that end with words that say, in effect, "and then you can kill the baby." In the years during which Fr. Pavone has fought to protect the unborn, virtually every "conservative" federal judge has come to reject the belief that the unborn child has a right to life. Fr. Frank has yet to acknowledge this tragedy, and that it has been a predicted result of the compromised tactics of supporting "conservative" politicians who kill the many unborn children whom they call "exceptions," and of pro-lifers regulating child-killing. Dan Becker and GRTL thankfully promote the right to life of every unborn person but they undermine that principle by supporting regulations that effectively end with, "and then you can kill the baby." As a Republican primary candidate, Ted Cruz has taken contradictory positions on abortion and it is sobering to realize that his effort to get votes from the Republican base could explain this behavior. National RTL Committee has turned against the fight to protect unborn children by its defense of politicians who ignore abortion when nominating judges, by its staunch opposition to all efforts to enforce the unborn child's right to life, and by repeatedly opposing actual pro-life candidates, even in primaries, while it supports child killing regulations and many flat-out pro-abortion politicians. Concerned Women for America promotes politicians who actively support the killing of millions of unborn children and CWA undermines the nationwide personhood movement which fights for the government to uphold the child's God-given right to life. Focus on the Family with their founder James Dobson attempt to protect the innocent, yet they delay the country's acknowledgment of the God-given right to life of the unborn by undermining personhood efforts and by supporting laws which, like Roe v. Wade itself, regulate how and when an abortionist can "legally" kill a child. Many erroneously believe that because a politician claims to be pro-life, he is. Until his candidacy, where there is a public record, Donald Trump and his family have supported child killing. Now to judge his actions, see the Washington Times ad below that the president woke up to on his first Monday morning in the White House. Contrary to popular belief, Antonin Scalia is not pro-life. He believes that the unborn child does not have a right to life, and, whereas our rights come from God, he claims that such a right would have to come from the majority. He also says that he would strike down a law that was the opposite of Roe v. Wade and that, by his judicial philosophy, if he had been a judge in Germany, he would have been prosecuted in Nuremberg. Mitt Romney gives pro-family speeches to conservatives but has an actual record of being aggressively pro-abortion both before and especially after his claimed "pro-life" conversion. Billy Graham teaches that Christians should support the intentional killing of some children, thus he rejects the God-given right to life of every person from conception. Contrary to popular belief, U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts is not pro-life and rejects the unborn child's right to life. Roberts therefore makes himself an enemy of the unborn child. Any politician, leader, or group not listed in Tier 1 can raise their ranking simply by asking. We will take them at their word. They can simply let us know which Tier describes their commitment to personhood and the God-given right to life of the unborn. (We offer a $100 reward to anyone who can document a serious error in a profile or an incorrect ranking.) For pro-lifers put themselves into four categories: personhood now, personhood whenever, personhood later, and personhood never. Where do you rank?PersonhoodTierSelf-categorizing positions Now1advocates for personhood protection right nowWhenever2advocates for both regulating child killing and personhood not realizingthat defending those who kill some children undermines personhoodLater3works against personhood until our immoral and godless courts approveof the effort to acknowledge the God-given right to lifeNever4denies the personhood and God-given right to life of the unborn by advocating a permanent "legalization" of the intentional killing of some preborn children for various reasons, meaning they are pro-choice with exceptionThe Fourth Tier includes Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin, George W. Bush, and all who use the pro-life title but deny the personhood and God-given right to life of the unborn. Decades of regulating abortion using laws that end with and then you can kill the baby (informed consent, waiting periods, PBA ban, etc.) by pro-family organizations and governing officials have unavoidably undermined personhood and have moved leaders downward from the top tiers toward the fourth. (See more, and others on the 4th Tier.) Meanwhile the personhood movement pulls people upward to the first tier to reject both the regulation of murder and the so-called "exceptions", and to instead advocate now for personhood. God didn't care about all the fruit Eve did not eat; nor did He mention all the women David did not violate; nor list the children whom Herod did not kill. God looks at the exceptions.The Third Tier includes those in the pro-life industry who actually oppose and undermine personhood efforts and advocate only regulating murder with laws that end with the meaning, and then you can kill the baby, including National Right To Life, Americans United for Life, and Focus on the Family. (See more, and others on the 3rd Tier.)The Second Tier includes pro-lifers like Randall Terry, Janet Folger Porter and Priest's for Life's Rev. Frank Pavone who promote both regulations and personhood. (See more, and others on the 2nd Tier.) These defenders of life do not yet realize that their advocacy of personhood is contradicted and undermined when they defend exceptions and ask judges to uphold laws that say if you wait 24 hours then you can kill the baby. This double-minded strategy resulted in an overwhelmingly pro-choice federal judiciary even though pro-life Republican presidents nominated 60% of our federal judges.The First Tier consists of those who fight now for the personhood of unborn children and do not undermine that effort by simultaneously advocating contradictory child-killing regulations. First tier pro-life leaders include Leslie Hanks of Colorado Right To Life, Judie Brown of American Life League, Ambassador Alan Keyes of America's Independent Party, and Cal Zastrow of Personhood USA! (See more, and other 1st Tier Leaders)! The personhood movement spearheaded by these men and women has returned hope and the vision of victory to Christians fighting for the innocent!The Tendency to Decay: Consider moral entropy. The strategy of defending those with "exceptions" and of regulating child killing made it an easy slide, or even unintentionally pushed, thousands of first-tier ministers and famous pro-lifers down to the second and third, and even to the fourth tier. See for example Ann Coulter, Pat Robertson, and Billy Graham. This slide through moral relativism includes Pat Robertson who actually defended on CNN the atrocities of China’s forced abortion program, and Billy Graham who has slid to where he writes that he actually approves of Christians who kill handicapped and some other preborn children, and a thousand more ministers who would likely have followed principled leadership but who now themselves actually oppose protecting by love and by law certain unborn children. After decades of moral compromise by our Christian leaders on, of all things, the intentional killing of innocent children, today millions of self-identifying evangelical Christians and Catholics, many of whom claim to be pro-life, voted in 2012 for the aggressively pro-abortion Barack Obama. Why? Because moral relativism cannot be controlled. When national ministries support politicians (like Mitt Romney) who advocate some abortion, then millions of churchgoers will support candidates who advocate any abortion. That's leadership. But in the wrong direction. Being pro-life means to advocate for the right to life of the unborn. Thus those in the fourth tier reject personhood altogether and by definition therefore are not even pro-life. Please be a Tier 1 pro-lifer and only support Tier 1 leaders and groups!

TAGS:Pro Home Profiles 

<<< Thank you for your visit >>>

Hot Websites