North Korean Economy Watch

Web Name: North Korean Economy Watch

WebSite: http://www.nkeconwatch.com

ID:237566

Keywords:

Korean,North,Watch,Economy,

Description:

keywords:
description:
North Korean Economy Watch News and analysis of the North Korean economy
Squaring the conflicting news reports on North Koreas border reopening November 4th, 2021

By: Benjamin Katzeff Silberstein

Over the past few days, theres been a flurry of news reports suggesting two seemingly conflicting things: 1) that North Korea may reopen its borders with China and Russia already in November and, 2) that the border closure may remain in effect for several years to come.

First, Yonhap:

North Korea is in the final stage of preparations to reopen its train routes with China following prolonged border controls to stave off the coronavirus, a unification ministry official said Thursday.

The North is expected to first resume cargo transportation via land routes, the official said, though adding its hard to tell exactly when the operations would begin.

Our assessment is that various preparations for the resumption of goods exchange through train routes are at the final stage, the official told reporters on background.

Seoul officials have said signs indicating preparations for trade resumption were detected in the North Korean regions bordering China, such as the construction of quarantine facilities.

Last week, the National Intelligence Service (NIS) told lawmakers the North is in talks with China and Russia to resume train operations across the border and those connecting Sinuiju and Dandong border cities of the North and China, respectively could resume as early as November.

(Source: N. Korea in final preparations to reopen border with China: official, Yonhap News, 4/11/2021.)

In addition, NK News have reported several times over the past few months on satellite imagery showing construction of quarantine facilities near the border with China as well as activity near border crossings suggesting that trade might soon resume.

At the same time, according to media outlets with grassroots sources in North Korea, the authorities have told the population to buckle down and prepare for hard times to continue, as the border lockdown wont ease even partially this year. Daily NK:

In particular, the provincial party said the border closure was not just a measure to protect the people from COVID-19, but also to awaken government organizations, enterprises and people “full of illusions about imported goods” from their delusions. They stressed the need to satisfy the people’s demand for consumer goods with “products produced in our country (North Korea).”

The source added that the party said the goal of the light industry and commercial sectors was to produce “uniquely North Korean light industrial goods” independent of imports by substituting foreign materials for domestic ones, and to supply those goods to the people.

The provincial party also decided to promote domestically produced commercial goods, basic foodstuffs and groceries as good for one’s health as they are eco-friendly, and equal to those of any other country.

The source added that the party said the state would “thoroughly control” the import of raw materials for consumer goods or basic foodstuffs “that we could easily produce and use in our country (North Korea).” He also said the party said that controls could be placed on imports “unapproved by provincial, city or county commercial departments” at local markets “even if the border were reopened.”

Meanwhile, the source said the provincial party told officials that they should understand that the border closure “will never be lifted, even partially” this year and that they should supervise matters well.

(Source: Jong So Yong, N. Korean Cabinet calls on commercial sector to eradicate the import disease, Daily NK, 4/11/2021.)

As I noted on the blog earlier this week, Radio Free Asia has reported that authorities say the border wont open for trade until 2025.

Obviously, you cant keep the border both closed and open it at the same time. So how can these claims be squared? As with all news on North Korea relying on few sources or South Korean intelligence claims, a huge dose of skepticism is warranted. It is of course entirely possible that some of these claims will later prove to be inaccurate. No one knows when border trade might reopen.

But both reports could be true at the same time. Note especially this paragraph in the quote from Daily NK above:

In particular, the provincial party said the border closure was not just a measure to protect the people from COVID-19, but also to awaken government organizations, enterprises and people “full of illusions about imported goods” from their delusions. They stressed the need to satisfy the people’s demand for consumer goods with “products produced in our country (North Korea).”

This goes to the heart of the question about whether the government may be using the pandemic as an opportunity to push for policy changes it would have sought anyway. It has long been a central economic policy goal for North Korea to decrease its reliance on imports and instead improve domestic manufacturing. Kim Jong-un has spoken about it frequently, as did his father before him.

Particularly in this light, it seems possible that the government might resume some border trade with China that is particularly important for its political purposes (or otherwise urgent), such as construction materials, certain machine parts that cannot be domestically manufactured, and potentially fertilizer. At the same time, it might continue the overall border closure in the name of the pandemic, severely limiting the flow of goods, with decreasing the countrys reliance on imports as an important long-term policy goal in mind. So for the general public, the message may remain that they must cope with an economic reality where the border remains largely shuttered, while trade resumes in some strategically important goods.

New time horizon on North Koreas border shutdown? October 31st, 2021

By: Benjamin Katzeff Silberstein

There have been many rumors on when the North Korean government might end the current shutdown and restore the border trade with China to a somewhat normal, pre-pandemic flow. This is a recent data point (among many) on this and should of course be taken with the customary generous pinch of salt, but Radio Free Asia reports that North Koreans have been told the hardships will last at least until 2025:

After the government informed citizens to expect more years of hardship, people complained that they might not be able to last through the coming wintermuch less hold out through the middle of the decade.

“Two weeks ago, they told the neighborhood watch unit meeting that our food emergency would continue until 2025. Authorities emphasized that the possibility of reopening customs between North Korea and China before 2025 was very slim,” a resident of the northwestern border city of Sinuiju, across from China’s Dandong, told RFA’s Korean Service Oct. 21.

“The food situation right now is already clearly an emergency, and the people are struggling with shortages. When the authorities tell them that they need to conserve and consume less food until 2025… they can do nothing but feel great despair,” said the source who requested anonymity for security reasons.

(Source: Jeong Yon Park, North Korea tells hungry citizens to ‘tighten belts’ until 2025, Radio Free Asia, October 26th, 2021.)

Kim Jong-un on North Koreas import problem October 26th, 2021

By: Benjamin Katzeff Silberstein

Over the past few weeks, Kim Jong-un has made a few interesting statements on reducing North Koreas imports reliance. This is not a new theme by any means, and economic self-reliance is, at least in theory, a cornerstone of North Korean ideology. At the same time, the timing is probably no coincidence. The Covid-19 border closure has led to serious shortages of imported goods in particular causing, among other things, a lack of ink and paper to print the domestic currency.

In a speech to the Supreme Peoples Assembly on September 30th, 2021, Kim spoke about the need to strengthen state guidance over the economy, and to make all trade activities in the direction of decreasing the reliance on imports:

대외경제사업에 대한 국가적지도를 심화시켜 모든 무역활동이 경제부문의 수입의존성을 줄이고 자립성을 강화하는 방향에서 확대발전되도록 하며 경제관리분야에서 국가경제지도기관들의 집행력을 강화하고 근로자들의 리익을 보장하기 위한 과학적인 방안들을 진지하게 연구적용할데 대하여 말씀하시였다.

(Source: Choson Sinbo, 김정은원수님께서 력사적인 시정연설 《사회주의건설의 새로운 발전을 위한 당면투쟁방향에 대하여》를 하시였다, Choson Sinbo, September 30th, 2021.)

On October 19th, as reported by Yonhap here, a North Korean TV-broadcast made virtually the same statement, with the addition that the economic guidance organs are taking active action to implement the states decision.

These are merely two data that points document North Korean concerns about import reliance. Again, its nothing new, and I suspect well see more similar statements in the future, perhaps more and more often.

North Koreas October 19th missile test and the economy October 19th, 2021

By: Benjamin Katzeff Silberstein 

North Korean missile tests often lead to discussions about what they can tell us about the countrys overall strategic position and thought. So it is natural to ask after todays missile launch, what does it tell us about North Koreas economic situation? Is it a display of confidence, crisis, or neither?

Im not going to attempt to give a solid, certain answer here, but two things are interesting about the timing and contest.

First, the launch came the day after news reports that trade has expanded significantly between China and North Korea. Imports by China have more than doubled, as have exports from China to North Korea. None of these figures are near pre-pandemic levels, but the increases are still significant. Daily NK reports confirm that the authorities are concerned about and trying to mitigate the soaring prices of imported goods, driven largely by the virtual blockade of the border to China. So from this point of view, the missile launch may express confidence that the domestic economic situation is improving or will soon improve.

Second, and contrary to the above, it may express confidence in North Koreas ability to pull through the current difficulties despite the lack of clear improvements on the horizon. After all, the uptick in trade data may be an anomaly, and whats most important is whether it is part of a longer-term pattern. In other words, a missile launch at a time when the economy is in many ways near a crisis, may attempt signal Pyongyangs ability to persevere and continue its weapons development despite the difficult economic circumstances.

North Korea is more connected to global markets than you might think October 13th, 2021

By: Benjamin Katzeff Silberstein

After a hiatus during the summer following my PhD defense, I now plan to get back to posting regular analyses and news content here. First up, an interesting example of why the North Korean economy is in fact more connected to global commodity markets than many might think.

Over the past few weeks, coal prices have skyrocketed in China, following energy shortages record-high coal prices. In September, the countrys coal imports surged by 76 percent, fueled flooding in one of the countrys main coal producing regions.

Therefore, it shouldnt be surprising that Chinese demand for North Korean coal the commodity at the heart of international sanctions on North Korea is reportedly growing. As Daily NK reports:

According to a source in Pyongyang on Wednesday, there have been noticeably more requests for coal from Chinese traders since North Korea’s national foundation day holiday on Sept. 9. He said there have been several illegal transshipments of coal for export over the last month.

China has recently limited trade with private North Korean traders, dealing instead with official North Korean trading bodies. The source said, however, that Beijing now approves transactions with any North Korean entity that can provide China with coal, including private ones.

In fact, the Chinese government has reportedly launched no particular crackdowns on private imports of North Korean coal.

Rather, according to a source in China, some provincial civil servants in China are advising traders to take care not to get photographed when they transship coal. Essentially, the Chinese government is turning a blind eye to imports of North Korean coal, an internationally sanctioned item. At the same time, they are asking traders to exercise caution, aware that the international community is watching.

(Source: Seulkee Jang, Amid coal shortages, Chinese traders on the hunt for more North Korean coal, Daily NK, 7/10/2021.)

There are several things worth noting about this. First, again, it should not be surprising. Chinas enforcements of sanctions against North Korea depends primarily on whether Beijing believes it to be in the national interest to clamp down on trade or smuggling. Clearly, China now needs cheap coal, and its been a long time since the North Korea issue was at the center of international politics and diplomatic tensions. So there appears to be comparatively little to lose in increasing trade for the moment, although China has been significantly letting up on its sanctions enforcement for several years now, since the days of maximum pressure in 2016–2018.

Second, North Korea still appears to be getting shafted by China, who exploits its position as the almost exclusive monopoly buyer buyer to purchase coal from North Korea at prices lower than world market prices or Chinese domestic prices. The precise proportions are uncertain, but Daily NK reports that China is paying less than half of world market prices for coal imports from North Korea, although their source also notes that the North Korean side is using the global shortage as leverage to jack up prices. In other words, while China may in some sense be North Koreas patron, commercial market logic is much more important in coal trade than often assumed, and China isnt necessarily doing it to help North Korea.

Third, and to tie back to the title of this piece, North Korea, despite its policies of economic autarky, is in fact deeply connected to global commodity markets. This isnt just true for currency prices. Although the size of North Koreas foreign trade remains comparatively abysmal, its economy is, just like most other economies today, tied to the broader dynamics of global supply and demand.

It still remains to be seen how much trade can expand under the current North Korean border shutdown. Though some goods are getting through, the border largely remains under lockdown due to Covid-19 despite intermittent news reports that trade might restart and return to its former scale. As many analysts have noted, Covid-19 has succeeded in closing the border more tightly to trade than most sanctions regimes have. How much Pyongyang is willing to meet Chinese demands and let coal shipments go across the border in larger scale, potentially increasing the countrys exposure to the virus (in the eyes of the leadership) remains to be seen.

Some brief thoughts about North Koreas food situation, late June 2021 June 23rd, 2021

By Benjamin Katzeff Silberstein

By all accounts, the current food situation in North Korea appears difficult. Its a crucially important topic that I unfortunately have not had much time to follow over the past few weeks. A few brief thoughts:

First, its important to keep in mind when hearing phrases such as worst in a decade that North Korea went through an actual famine in the 1990s and early 2000s. So that the food situation has gotten better over the last decade, while the country was arguably still rebounding from the famine, should not come as a surprise.

Second, its difficult to tell precisely how bad things are. Food production estimates, though only approximations, paint a picture of relative shortage compared to the past few years, but still not near disaster levels. North Korean authorities and international organs often sound the alarm bell over looming disasters, while little follow-up is done about what actually happened in the end. Anyone remember the famine warnings in early 2019, by the state and some foreign analysts alike? Its impossible to tell how representative this report by Daily NK is, but if its true, the government is failing to stabilize prices because consumers choose not to buy rice in bulk for cheaper but lower quality from state-owned stores. If the country was approaching a genuine famine, this likely wouldnt be the case.

Third, all this said, things do seem difficult. Bill Brown outlines in an excellent and thorough report here some of the alarming signs: relatively major fluctuations in both exchange rates and food prices. Although price levels arent at levels never seen before, fluctuations like this are relatively unusual. I suspect much of it is driven by future expectations of shortages based on information suggesting that the state will not open the border to China for trade within the foreseeable future.

New Nautilus report on North Koreas energy balance May 4th, 2021

By: Benjamin Katzeff Silberstein

The Nautilus Institute recently published a very interesting report on North Koreas energy balance sheet. Among other things, it contains estimate calculations of the energy intensity of various industrial sectors in the country. You can find it here.

March, 2021: what to make of the rise in North Korea-China trade? April 20th, 2021

By: Benjamin Katzeff Silberstein

According to Chinese customs data, Chinese exports to North Korea increased by 400 times in March, compared to the combined shipments in January and February of this year. As South China Morning Post reports:

Trade between China and North Korea grew to a six-month high in March, figures from Chinese customs show in the latest sign that the two neighbours are easing border restrictions amid tensions with the United States.

Exports from China to North Korea jumped from a paltry US$3,000 in February to US$12.98 million in March, according to Chinese customs data released on Sunday.

That was nearly 400 times more than the US$33,000 combined shipment of January and February, and was the highest by value since September, when China recorded outbound shipments valued at US$18.88 million to the isolated neighbour. Pyongyang imposed strict controls on goods transport ahead of the 75th anniversary of the founding of the ruling Workers’ Party in October.

According to Chinese customs, China imported US$1.308 million of North Korean goods in March, compared with US$1.75 million in February.

(Source: Laura Zhou (and Reuters), China-North Korea trade jumps after pandemic slump but sanctions curb business with Pyongyang, South China Morning Post, April 19th, 2021.)

What to make of this?

It could, of course, be the start of a trend reversal from the past years catastrophically low trade figures. Perhaps the North Korean government has begun to let up on border restrictions. In the past few weeks, news reports have said that China plans on restarting trade and open the new bridge between Sinuiju and Dandong. NK News has found evidence of new disinfection centers for goods on the North Korean side in April. The Russian ambassador to North Korea also recently said in an interview that trade will restart soon.

At the same time, Im not sure these figures themselves give evidence of resumed trade. They could be a mere glitch in the data caused by a change in accounting routines or the like. Just look at the reported figure for Chinese exports to North Korea in February: $3,000. It simply isnt realistic. Perhaps a portion of that months trade was recorded instead for March for reasons related to payments or contracts. China, moreover, ships much more goods to North Korea than whats officially recorded as trade.

As so often, we will simply have to wait and see. When Chinese data is published on the specific items traded, we should also get a better sense of what this trade upswing really means.

Kim Jong-uns claim of the worst-ever situation April 18th, 2021

By: Benjamin Katzeff Silberstein

Perhaps I am late to the game already (the long weekend here in Israel is to blame for that), but it has been puzzling to see the media reporting on Kim Jong-uns claim that North Korea faces its worst-ever economic situation at the moment, under both international sanctions and a self-imposed border lockdown.

It seems that Kims words have been misinterpreted or lost in translation. Colleagues at 38 North have rightly and importantly pointed out that the original Korean-language statement is not nearly as drastic. This is often the case with KCNA articles and translated statements from North Korea:

In the vernacular report, however, this term read kuknanhan (극난한), which would be better translated as “very hard” or even “extremely difficult.”[2] North Korea’s English-language media sometimes omit passages or provide translations that are different from the vernacular text, and without analyzing years’ worth of data, it is impossible to conclude whether they do so deliberately, or if they are simply oversights.

It is clear, however, that Kim did not say “the worst-ever situation” at this event. Even if he had, the North Korean leader has made similar remarks in connection with the country’s current circumstances in recent months. For example, Kim’s opening address at the Eighth Party Congress in January referred to the past five years as a period of “unprecedented, worst-ever trials.”

None of this means that the situation is not bad. But worst-ever would be extremely drastic for a country where the failings of the economic system led to a famine in the 1990s and early 2000s that took the lives of between 600,000-1.5 million people. Todays conditions simply arent grave enough to warrant such comparisons.

Precisely how difficult conditions are remains hard to tell. The Russian ambassador to North Korea recently gave an interview where he said that the countrys food situation is not at all catastrophic, and that there are no signs suggesting an ongoing famine. He is probably right, but at the same time, we should be careful not to extrapolate too much about the situation in the provinces, for example, based on an assessment of the store shelves in Pyongyang. The countrys society is highly stratified and its economy relatively fragmented. The situation in one locality may well be much more dire than in another.

At the same time, we should also be careful not to take Kim Jong-un at his word. What, except for Kims own statement, suggests that todays situation is worse than the one in 1995, after both economic collapse and heavy flooding took a severe toll on the economy? Sure, things are incredibly messy right now, a view that both circumstances and data support. Kims own statement, not least, is another solid data point showing just how grim things appear to be. But famine, meaning large numbers of people dying from starvation or malnourishment, is simply a different dimensions. Let us hope that North Korea does not get there, neither now nor in the future.

There are reasons to believe that it will not. The market system, for its faults and flaws, is able to react to changes in supply and demand, unlike the state distribution system in the 1990s. Moreover, China would likely step in with serious quantities of food aid if the situation got truly disastrous. Many signs suggest that North Korea and China expect to resume and even expand trade in the short-term. Should a drastic need arise, China would likely increase humanitarian shipments as well, although it is far from certain.

More news on trade potentially resuming between North Korea and China April 1st, 2021

By: Benjamin Katzeff Silberstein

Media outlets with sources inside North Korea, such as Daily NK, have reported for some weeks that trade might be restarting between China and North Korea. Daily NK reported in February that the USD-KRW rate began to climb after the 8th Party Congress amid rumors of the border opening again. Now, Nikkei Asia reports, based on anonymous sources in the Chinese border region, that preparations are being made to restart trade:

I heard that North Korea is planning to accept Chinese goods from mid-April, a Chinese man in his 30s at a trading company in Dandong, a city across the Yalu River from North Korea, told Nikkei. He said the information came from the North Korean side and he was preparing to restart his business.

A number of other trading companies also confirmed that bilateral trade is expected to resume in April.

At first, goods will only travel between Dandong and Sinuiju in North Korea, by rail over the Sino-Korean Friendship Bridge, which is the main route of trade between the two countries.

In Sinuiju, COVID-19 testing sites are being prepared. All being well, transport by ship and trucks will also be resumed.

North Korea needs medicines to treat diabetes, infections and other diseases, said a person familiar with the matter. Bilateral trade is in fact Chinese aid to North Korea, the source said. Sources also say that North Korea is asking for chemical fertilizers as the spring seeding season approaches.

In late January 2020, North Korea suspended flight and rail services from China and Russia to prevent coronavirus contagion. Overseas visitors were banned and goods restricted.

Pyongyang partially eased transport restrictions in May last year but reimposed them in October due to another wave of infections in China. Trade by road, rail and sea have almost entirely been suspended.

Meanwhile, a new bridge over the Yalu River is about to open. On March 9, the provincial government of Liaoning in China announced invitations for the tender of safety inspections for the New Yalu River Bridge, saying in those documents that the crossing would soon be open.

(Full article and source: Shin Watanabe and Tsukasa Hadano, China and North Korea to revive trade in April amid US tension, Nikkei Asia, March 30th, 2021.)

Older Entries PagesBusiness resourcesCRS reportsDPRK Digital Atlas (2012)DPRK Economic statisticsMedia, Blogs, Books, FilmsMilitary resourcesNorth Korea Uncovered (Google Earth)Yongbyon Development Page Archives November 2021 October 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 November 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 October 2001 August 2001 May 2001 June 2000 July 1998 November 1997 October 1997 September 1997 June 1997 December 1996 March 1994 September 205 Categories Advertising (36) Agriculture (589) Alcohol (35) Antiques (7) Architecture (39) Biotech (11) Civil society (914) Art (367) Animation (34) Domestic publication (146) Economic Research Journal (5) Kims New Year Address (Joint editorials) (33) Korea Today (4) Film (86) Music (62) Television (52) Cosmetics (20) Dating/Courting (25) Religion (74) Restaurants (66) Sports (186) Basketball (1) Figure skating (3) Football (soccer) (61) Gambling (21) Golf (16) Gymnastics (2) Mass games (48) Olympics (3) Clothing (46) Communications (247) Cell phones (120) Email (16) Internet (68) Intranet (28) Radio (40) Telephones (38) Computing/IT (152) Construction (184) Crime (10) Lawsuits (4) DPRK organizations (907) Companies (234) 516 Construction Company (1) Anju Coal Mining Association (1) Association No.2 (2) Baekdu Company (1) Chamber of Commerce (DPRK) (11) Changgwang Sinyong Corporation (1) Checom Technology Joint Venture Company (2) Cheongusan Trading Company (1) Chollima Steel Kombinat (3) Choson Bongwha Company (1) Chosun Energy (2) Chosun International Development Trust Company (2) Daedong River (1) Daesong Bank (4) Daesong Market (1) Daesong-BAT JV Company (4) Daesung Trading Company (6) Dakor (1) Department Store No. 1 (3) Dongbang Seafood (1) Donghae Marine Products for Exports (1) Electronic Products Development Company (1) Foreign Construction company (1) General Federation of Science and Technology of DPRK (1) Global Interface Company Inc. (1) Goonpyo (1) Gwang Myong IT Center (1) Haedanghwa Foodstuff Company (1) Hana Electronics Company (8) Hesong Trading Corporation (1) Heuimang Investments Group Limited (1) Heung Nam Pharmaceutical Company (2) Heungjin Trading Co. (1) Huichon Machine-tool Plant (1) Hungsong Economic Group (1) Hyesan Youth Cooper Mine (6) Hyoksin Trading Corporation (4) Industrial Tech Co. (1) Jeongchon Mine (1) Kangsung Trading Company (1) Kohas AG (1) Komdok Mine (1) Korea Advertising Company (1) Korea Complex Equipment Import Corporation (1) Korea Computer Center (KCC) (22) Kwangmyong computer network (1) Korea Education Foundation (1) Korea International Chemical Joint Venture Company (1) Korea Kaeson General Trading Corp (1) Korea Kwangsong Trading Corporation (2) Korea Mechanical Industry Co. (1) Korea Mining Development Trading Corporation (aka Kapmun Tosong, KOMID) (17) Korea National Insurance Corporation (10) Korea Natural Resources Trading Corporation (1) Korea Oriental Instant Medicinal Center (1) Korea Pugang Corporation (2) Korea Pugang Mining and Machinery Corporation ltd. (1) Korea Ryongbong General Corp (3) Korea Ryongwang Trading Corporation (1) Korea Sogyong Trading Corporation (2) Korea Taepung International Investment Group (Daepung Investment Group) (29) State Development Bank (9) Korea Tonghae Shipping Company (1) Korea Unpung Joint Operating Company (1) Korean International Trading Company (1) Korean Tangun Trading Corp (aka Chasongdang Trading Co.) (3) Kosun Import-Export (2) Kumunsan Trade Corporation (1) Kwangmyongsong General Corp. (2) Lyongaksan General Trading Company (1) Maebong Company (3) Mansudae creative Company (art studio) (28) Mansudae Overseas Development Group (14) Minjok Insurance General Company (2) Mokong Trading Corporation (2) Myungjin Trade Company (1) Nagwon Financial Joint Venture Corporation (1) Namchongang Trading Corporation (4) Nanam Pharmaceutical Factory (1) National Economic Cooperation Federation (DPRK) (3) Neungra (1) Paekho Arts Trading Company (1) Pakchon Silk Mill (1) Pugang Pharmaceutic Co (1) PyongSu Pharma (10) Pyongyang Informatics Center (PIC) (7) Pyongyang Law Office (1) Pyongyang Myongdang Trading Corporation (1) RUSKOR International Company Ltd (1) Ryonbong General Corporation (6) Ryongaksan General Trading Company (1) Ryonha Machine Tool Factory (JV Company) (3) Saebyol General Company (3) Pyongyang Hemp Textiles Co. (3) Saebyul Coal Mining Complex (1) Samcholli General Corp. (3) Sangwon Cement Factory (2) SEK Studio (5) Sinheung Trade Company (3) Sini JVC (1) Sinji JV group (1) Sino-Ki (2) Sobaeku United Corp (1) Sogyong General Trading Corp (1) Star Bravo (1) Star Joint Venture (2) Sungho-ri concrete tie factory (1) Sunpyong Stuffed Toy Factory (1) Tian Ming Trading Company (1) Tin Ming Alan CG Studio (1) Tongsin International Trading Corporation (1) Tosong Technology Trading Corporation (1) Trans Merits Co. Ltd. (1) Unphasan Pharmaceutical Institute (1) Wolmyongsan Progress Joint Venture (1) Yongdeung mine (1) Yongho Mine (1) Zokwang Trading Company (5) Korean Peoples Army (52) KPA General Political Bureau (6) KPA Publishing Dept. (1) National Defense Commission (85) Ministry of People’s Security (Criminal Police) (25) Ministry of State Security (MPSS, NSA, SSD) (34) State Offices (529) Asia-Pacific Peace Committee (9) Buddhist Alliance (2) Bureau of Special Zone Development (14) Kaesong Development Agency (3) Kaesong Industrial District Development Committee (6) Korea Land Corp. (RoK office) (5) Cabinet (145) Central Trade Supervision Agency (1) Mining Industry Department (4) Ministry for the Electronics Industry (2) Ministry of External Economic Affairs (36) Joint Venture Investment Committee (JVIC) (17) State Economic Development Commission (SEDC) (19) Ministry of Sport (1) Supreme Peoples Assembly (66) Central Broadcasting Station (3) Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) (2) Central Communications Office (1) Christian Federation (5) Committee for Cultural Relations with Foreign Countries (11) Committee for Implementation of the June 15 Joint Decla (1) Convenience Bureau (1) DPRK Copyright Office (2) DPRK-China Joint Guidance Committee (1) Economic Cooperation Office for Overseas Koreans (1) Foreign Economic Cooperation Committee (1) General Bureau of Atomic Energy (3) General Bureau of Capital Construction (1) General Federation of Science and Technology (GFST) (1) Hydrometeorological Service (1) Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation Committee (5) Invention Office of the DPRK (2) Kangkye Munitions Factory (1) Kim Chaek University of Technology (9) Kim Il Sung University (5) Korean Association of Cooks (1) Korean Buddhist Association (3) Korean Cultural Preservation Agency (1) Korean Justice Committee (1) Korean Roman Catholics Association (1) Law Research Institute (1) League of Socialist Working Youth (4) Long Life Research Institute (1) Magicians Association of Korea (1) Mansu Art Studio (3) Maternity Hospital (4) Ministry for Chemical Industries (1) Ministry of Administration (5) Ministry of Agriculture (9) Ministry of Capital City Construction Development (1) Ministry of Commerce (3) Ministry of Communication (2) Ministry of Culture (7) Ministry of Education (2) Ministry of Extractive Industries (2) Ministry of Finance (1) Ministry of Foodstuff and Daily Necessities Industry (5) Ministry of foreign Affairs (15) Ministry of Foreign Trade (21) Council for the Promotion of Foreign Trade (1) Ministry of Forestry (14) Ministry of Land and Environment Conservation (11) Ministry of Land and Marine Transport (5) Ministry of Light Industry (5) Ministry of Metal Industry (2) Ministry of National Resource Development (1) Ministry of People’s Armed Forces (8) Ministry of Post and Telecommunications (14) CHEO Technology Joint Venture Company (2) Ministry of Power and Coal (10) Ministry of Coal Industry (5) Ministry of Electrical Industry (2) Ministry of Procurement and Food Policy (2) Ministry of Public Health (7) Ministry of Railways (12) Ministry of State Inspection (2) Ministry of Trade (3) Ministry of Transportation (2) Musan Mine (12) National Academy of Science (5) National Aerospace Development Administration (NADA) (1) National Coordinating Council for the Environment (2) National Economic Cooperation Federation (2) National Economics Institute (1) National Price Establishment Committee (1) National Real Estate Management Committee (2) National Resources Development Council (4) National Science and Technology Commission (1) Natural Science Academy (1) North Korea Agricultural Research Institute (2) Public Distribiution System (PDS) (90) Pyongyang Academy of Sciences (3) Pyongyang Embroidery Institute (4) Pyongyang Film Studio (4) Pyongyang International Information Center of New Techn (5) Pyongyang University of Medicine (3) Pyongyang University of Science and Technology (17) Pyongyang Wheat Flour Factory (1) Ryongsong Patent Office (1) Second Academy of Natural Sciences (1) Shinuiju Light Industry College (1) State Academy of Sciences (5) Academy of Agricultural Science (1) Branch Academy of Biology (1) Institute of Economy (1) State Administration for Quality Management (2) State Fiscal and Financial Committee (55) Central Bank (25) Daesong Group (8) Foreign Trade Bank (38) Amroggang Development Bank (3) Changgwang Credit Bank (1) Credit Bank Of Korea (1) Korea Kwangson Banking Corp. (6) Koryo Bank (4) Koryo Credit Development Bank (1) Kumgang Bank (2) Tanchon Commercial Bank (13) Yongaksan Bank (1) State Price Commission (1) State Software Industry General Bureau (1) Sunam market (5) Supreme Court (2) Wonsan Agriculture College (1) Workers Party (193) Administration Department (1) Central Committee (116) Central Military Commission (3) Central Miltary Committee (12) Committee of the Korean People’s Army (1) Control Commission (1) Department No. 5 (1) Finance and Accounting Department (8) National Party Congress (8) Political Bureau (12) Secretariat (63) Agitation and Propaganda Department (6) Bureau 38 (4) Bureau 39 (30) Daesung General Bureau (1) Democratic Womens Union (9) Federation of Science and Technology (2) Federation of Trade Unions (7) Office 10 (2) Organization and Guidance Department (13) Administrative Department (KWP) (3) Social Culture Department (1) Socialist Youth League (3) Third Building Secret Service (8) Operational Department (2) United Front Department (8) Economy Department (1) International Department (KWP) (1) Light Industry Department (5) Machine Industry Department (2) Planning and Fiscal Affairs (KWP) (6) Second Economic Committee (1) Office 99 (1) DPRK Policies (367) 150-Day Battle for Production (4) 1946 Land Reform Law (5) 1978 Socialist Labor Law (2) 1990s Famine (56) 2002 Economic reforms (88) 2012 Strong and Prosperous Nation (Kangsong Taeguk) (63) 6.28 Policy on Agriculture (June 28) (27) Arduous March (70) Byongjin (8) Chamber of Commerce Law (Order 946) (2) Chollima (2) Commodities Consumption Level Law (1) Corporate Law (3) Daean (Taean) System (4) Damage Compensation Law (1) DPRK Law on Economic Development Zones (12) Farm Law (1) Five Year Plan (Announced 2016-5) (9) General Equipment Import Law (1) Juche (31) Labor Quantity Law (1) Law of the DPRK on Foreign-invested Bank (1) Law on Bankruptcy (1) Law on Foreign Investment (9) Law on Foreign Trade (1) Law on Foreign-funded Banks (3) Law on Hwanggumphyong (2) Law on Labor Protection (Order 945) (1) Law on Land Leasing (2) Law on Planning the People’s Economy (2) Law on Registration of Foreign-invested Enterprises (2) Law on the Rason Economic and Trade Zone (7) Law on Underground Resources (1) Lawyers Act (1) Market Stimulation Measure (March 2003) (1) May 30 Measures (5.30) (5) Pyongyang City Management Law (2) Real Estate Management Law (6) Regulations on Certification (1) Songbun (9) Songun (37) Statutes (4) Treaties (1) Economic Development Plans (1) Economic reform (1,732) Black markets (286) Foreign direct investment (704) Chosun Fund (3) Joint Ventures (95) Kaesong Hi-Tech Industrial Park (2) Price liberalization (231) Private property (61) Pyongyang International Trade Fair (41) Rason International Trade Fair (8) Sinuiju Special Administrative Region (29) Special Economic Zones (723) Economic Development Zones (2013) (56) Jagang Provincial Manpho economic development zone (3) Jagang Provincial Wiwon industrial development zone (3) Kangwon Provincial Hyondong industrial development zone (3) Nampho City Waudo export processing zone (5) North Hamgyong Provincial Chongjin economic development zone (3) North Hamgyong Provincial Onsong island tourist development zone (5) North Hamgyong Provincial Orang agricultural development zone (3) North Hwanghae Provincial Sinphyong tourist development zone (4) North Hwanghae Provincial Songrim export processing zone (3) North Phyongan Provincial Amnokgang economic development zone (3) Ryanggang Provincial Hyesan economic development zone (2) Sinuiju International Economic Zone (8) South Hamgyong Provincial Hungnam industrial development zone (3) South Hamgyong Provincial Pukchong agricultural development zone (3) Wonsan-Mt. Kumgang International Tourist Zone (16) Economic Development Zones (2014) (19) Chongnam Industrial Development Zone (2) Chongsu tourist development zone (3) Jindo Export Processing Zone (5) Kangryong International Green Model Zone (3) Sukchon Agricultural Development Zone (3) Unjong cutting-edge technological development zone (2) Economic Development Zones (2015) (8) Kyongwon Economic Development Zone (1) Mubong Special Zone for International Tour (2) Sindo Island Economic development Zone (1) Economic Development Zones (2016) (4) Wonsan-Kalma Coastal Tourist Area (4) Economic Development Zones (2017) (1) Kangnam Economic Development Park (1) Special Economic Zones (Established before 2013) (654) Hwanggumphyong and Wihwado Economic Zones (Sinuiju) (52) Kaesong Industrial Complex (KIC) (388) Mt. Kumgang Tourist Special Zone (175) Rason Economic and Trade Zone (Rajin-Sonbong) (148) Education (198) Emigration (168) 2011 emigration statistics (5) 2012 emigration statistics (7) 2013 emigration statistics (1) 2014 Emigration Statistics (4) 2015 Emigration Statistics (8) Energy (416) Coal (114) Dams/hydro (66) Electricity (112) Gasoline (29) Natural Gas (27) Nuclear (124) Yongbyon Development (2007-present) (1) Oil (90) Russian Pipeline (2) Solar (11) Wind (21) Environmental protection (34) Finance (444) Banking (295) Debt (19) Insurance (38) Fiscal monetary policy (362) Food (433) 2011 food shortage debate (5) 2012 food shortage (24) 2013 food shortage (22) 2014 Food Shortage (25) 2015 Food Shortage (15) Forestry (83) Lumber (45) General markets (FMR: Farmers Market) (348) Google Earth (150) Health care (214) Avain Flu (12) Coronavirus (17) Disease prevention (66) Epidemics (45) Indigenous medicine (13) Pediatrics (33) Pharmaceuticals (25) Plastic Surgery (4) SARS (2) Swine Flu (1) High Tech (1) Hoteling (31) Illicit activities (236) Arms shipment (101) Counterfeiting (69) Cyber attacks (3) Drug smuggling (81) Intellectual Property (16) International Aid (535) 2011 aid from South Korea (5) 2012 aid from South Korea (8) 2013 aid from South Korea (11) 2014 aid from South Korea (7) 2015 aid from South Korea (10) International Governments (2,356) Australia (15) Austria (4) Bulgaria (3) Cambodia (11) Canada (3) Chile (1) China (762) China-DPRK Trade Expo (6) Silk Road (1) Tonghua-Dandong Economic Zone (5) Congo (DRC) (2) Cuba (5) Czech Republic (6) Egypt (7) Ethiopia (5) EU (44) France (6) Germany (28) Hong Kong (11) Hungary (1) India (7) Indonesia (1) Iran (23) Ireland (4) Italy (4) Japan (162) Chongryun (83) Japanese Red Army (3) Kenya (1) Kuwait (3) Laos (2) Libya (5) Luxembourg (1) Malaysia (3) Malta (1) Mongolia (19) Myanmar (21) Namibia (1) New Zealand (3) Nicaragua (1) Nigeria (3) Norway (2) Pakistan (3) Poland (3) Qatar (4) Russia (169) Singapore (26) South Africa (4) South Korea (618) Sri Lanka (1) Sweden (11) Switzerland (19) Syria (14) Tanzania (1) Thailand (22) Turkmenistan (1) UAE (3) Uganda (1) UN (347) IAEA (3) U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime (1) UN Central Emergency Response Fund (6) UN Food and Agriculture Organization (58) UN Office for Project Services (1) UN Population Fund (13) UN Security Council (60) UN World Food Program (148) UNCTAD (2) UNDP (55) Tumen River Area Development Programme (TRADP) (11) UNEP (2) UNESCO (10) UNFCC (3) UNICEF (23) United Nations Institute for Training and Research (1) UNWHO (18) WIPO (2) United Kingdom (42) USA (328) 2011 DPRK engagement (4) 2012 DPRK engagement (9) 2013 DPRK engagement (12) 2014 DPRK engagement (9) Venezuela (2) Vietnam (13) Yemen (4) Zimbabwe (9) International Organizaitons (681) Acheon Global Corp. (2) American Association for the Advancement of Science (AA (1) AmeriCares (1) Aminex (6) Anglo-Sino Capital Partners Ltd (2) ASEAN (8) Asian Development Bank (2) Associated Press (2) Bank of Korea (8) Brazil (1) Briquet Sharing Movement (1) British American Tobacco (BAT) (8) British Council (1) Business Executives for National Security (BENS) (1) Caleb Mission (1) CanKor (2) Caritas (3) Center for Applied Studies in International Relations (1) China-DPR Korea Small Investor Association (1) Chiomenti (1) Choson Exchange (24) Christian Friends of Korea (4) Concern (2) Council on Foreign Relations (1) Daedong Credit Bank (17) Datactivity.com (1) Emerson Pacific Group (1) Environmental Protection Institute (1) EU Chamber of Commerce in Korea (2) Eugene Bell Foundation (16) Euro-Asian Business Consultancy (2) European Business Association (22) Export-Import Bank of Korea (1) Fabien Pictet Partners Ltd (2) Far East Marine Transportation (1) Federation of Korean Industries (1) FIFA (2) Financial Action Task Force (FATF) (4) Frederich Ebert Stiftung (1) Friedrich Naumann Foundation (5) Fuller Center (2) GAVI (1) Global Resource Services (1) Goethe Institute (1) Good Friends (50) GPI Consultancy (23) Green One Korea (5) Korean Sharing Movement (5) hangdi Guanqun Investment Co. (1) Hankyoreh Foundation for Reunification and Culture (1) Hanns Seidel Foundation (5) Humedica (1) IMF/World Bank (5) Institute for Far Eastern Studies (126) Institute for Strategy and Reconciliation (1) International Crane Foundation (2) International Vaccine Institute (1) International/Korean Red Cross (39) IRI (1) Jeil Credit bak (1) Johns Hopkins SAIS (1) Join Together Society (ROK) (4) JTS-Korea (1) Jubilee Partners (1) Jungto Society (2) Junior Chamber International (1) Kamaz (1) KEDO (5) Kelvin Chia Partnership (1) Kempinski (1) KIEP-Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (3) Korea Business Consultants (18) Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ROK) (2) Korea Development Institute (3) Korea Economic Institute (3) Korea Energy Economic Institute (1) Korea Industrial Complex Corp. (KICOX) (1) Korea Institute for National Unification (3) Korea International Trade Association (KITA) (7) Korea NGO Council for Cooperation with North Korea (1) Korea Resources Corp. (1) Korea Society (2) Korea Software Financial Cooperative (KSFC) (1) Korea Strategic (1) Korea Trade-Investment Promotion Agency (KOTRA) (14) Korean American Private Exchange Society (1) Korean Assoicates Business Consultancy (1) Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (2) Korean Conference of Religion and Peace (KCRP) (3) Korean Foundation for South-North Economic and Cultural (1) Koryo Asia Ltd. (11) Koryo Tours (51) LFNKR (1) Love North Korean Children (4) Loxley Pacific (1) Maxgro holdings (3) Mennonite Central Committee (2) Mercy Corps (10) Merry Co. (1) Mondo (1) Nanum International (1) National Committee on North Korea (1) Nautilus Institute (8) North East Asia Bank (NEAB) (1) North Korea Intellectuals Solidarity (1) North Korea International Documentation Project (NKIDP) (15) Nosotek (10) Operation USA (1) Orascom Telecom Holding (50) Ora Bank (5) Peace Economic Development Group (2) Peterson Institute (10) Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (ROK) (1) Phoenix Commerical Ventures (9) POSCO (1) Premiere Urgence (2) Pscore (4) Pyonghwa Motors (16) Quintermina AG (1) Rimjingang (8) Samaritans Purse (10) Shelter Box (1) Silibank (3) South-North Cooperation for IT Exchange (1) South-North Korean Economic Cooperation Forum (3) Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SADC) (4) Syracuse University (1) Thomas Payne (1) Triangle Génération Humanitaire (1) U.S.-DPRK Scientific Engagement Consortium (1) Wellspring (1) Welthungerhilfe (2) World Agroforestry Center (2) World Council of Churches (1) World Vision (10) Yanbian Haihua (1) International trade (1,188) Sanctions (4) Labor conditions/wages (278) Leisure (11) Library (14) Manufacturing (342) CNC (25) Light Industry (204) Market prices (3) Military (299) Rocket Tests (4) Paektusan 1 (1) Unha 2 (1) Unha 3 (1) Unha 3-2 (1) Mining/Minerals (201) Copper (27) Gold (46) Graphite (23) Iron Ore (37) Rare Earths (8) Sand (14) Natural disasters (1) Political economy (712) Inter-Korean summit (41) Kim il Sung 1956 (1) Kim Il-sung History (2) Kim Jong Un (105) Kim Jong-ils death (5) Real estate (120) Reatail (3) Revolt (9) Sanctions (3) Statistics (756) Agriculture statistics (106) Demographics (42) Emigration statistics (47) Foreign aid statistics (219) GDP statistics (68) RoK Ministry of Unification (71) South-North Cooperation Fund (1) Trade Statistics (375) Steel (8) Surveillance (1) Tobacco (33) Tourism (305) Toys (1) Transportation (519) Automobiles (153) Aviation (62) Bicycles (15) Pyongyang Metro (16) Railways (205) Sea shipping (164) Uncategorized (276) Urban Economics (10) Water (15) Bookmarks Development BlogDocumentationPluginsSuggest IdeasSupport ForumThemesWordPress Planet Meta Log in Valid XHTML XFN WordPress

North Korean Economy Watch is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

38 North is a project of The Henry L. Stimson Center. Privacy Policy.

TAGS:Korean North Watch Economy 

<<< Thank you for your visit >>>

Websites to related :
Nobex Radio

  keywords:
description:

Home | CEB

  keywords:
description:webdescription
Menu ▼ Confederat

DJ Ord Construction - Custom Lux

  keywords:
description:
Home About Us Projects Services Testimonials Contact

Above Talent Models - Cape Town,

  keywords:
description:

Fiber optic components - optical

  keywords:fiber optic components, optical transceiver, fiber patch cord, fiber optic adapter, connector, attenuator, fiber media converter, fiber optic

Ecotextile News

  keywords:
description:

Home - Detroit Jazz Fest

  keywords:
description:

Just Elementary, Inc.

  keywords:
description:
Articles Comments Just Elementary, Inc. Business e-Valuation

8tracks.com : Attention Required

  keywords:
description:Welcome to 8tracks, the best place for music discovery on the internet. Create your own playlist to share with the world, or lis

Wed Me Pretty - Best of High Key

  keywords:
description:Best of High Key and Low Key Weddings
HomeShop Wedding StationeryPopular Categories Wedding Trends Wedding Venues Wedding Shoes

ads

Hot Websites