Opening Arguments The legal podcast that helps you make sense of the news.

Time 2021-09-21 07:17:04

Web Name: Opening Arguments The legal podcast that helps you make sense of the news.

WebSite: http://openargs.com

ID:196966

Keywords:

legal,podcast,that,

Description:

So many updates, so little time! Listen as Andrew breaks down the developments in five cases: Texas SB8, E. Jean Carroll, Activision Blizzard, Roger Stone, and Pauline Bauer! If you re doubting that he can squeeze all that into one episode, you re not alone!-For show-related questions, check out theOpening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!@oawikiIt s Andrew s favorite thing in the world! No, not Transformers porn Ok, it s Andrew s second favorite thing in the world: Sovereign Citizen nutbaggery. Listen as Andrew breaks down the hilarious, nonsensical gibberish that is: the Sovereign Citizen insurrectionist!-For show-related questions, check out theOpening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!@oawikiAndrew s favorite Constitutional Law expert, Laurence Tribe, has written an op-ed in the Boston Globe arguing that a Massachusetts case called Larkin v. Grendel s Den will end the Texas abortion law. That sounds too good to be true. So, is it too good to be true? Or is it just true? Find out! But that s not all, infact we ve got 2 more segments in this action packed show! There s another glorious Kraken Sanctions update, which includes an itemized bill for $200,000 that Sidney Powell will be picking up. And in the wildcard, we break down an interesting case involving Facebook in Australia. They don t have a pesky Section 230 down under, which leads to some very fascinating results from an American perspective. Also we briefly discuss the Merrick Garland announcement.-For show-related questions, check out theOpening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!@oawikiAndrew breaks down the state of the recall, the porked polls, and Clark v. Weber! Paffrath still seems to be some sort of Democratic frontrunner, but how much of that is real and how much is poll pork? After breaking down the interesting arguments in the suit against the recall, we answer a listener who is critical of our critical opinions of the recall. Were we wrong? Find out!-For show-related questions, check out theOpening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!@oawiki-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!This is not an exaggeration. Sure, technically speaking the Supreme Court hasn t said the magic words we overturn Roe v. Wade but they used the shadow docket to effectively eliminate it. This is bad. Very, very bad. So what exactly happened? What s in the Texas law that SCOTUS allowed to stand? How completely garbage, unprecedented, and counter to the rule of law is this move? Listen the Andrew s expert analysis and find out.-For show-related questions, check out theOpening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!@oawiki-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!-For show-related questions, check out theOpening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!@oawikiToday s episode is. So. Satisfying. It s not just sanctions against all the Kraken lawyers. That alone would already be amazing. But it s ALSO consequences for world s most punchable douchebag Jacob Wohl. It s so, so good. Take a listen. You ve earned it.Ok full disclosure there is a slight amount of bad news regarding Texas Democrats having to return to the state empty handed, since a couple of Democrats refuse to do the right thing and eliminate the filibuster. No sugar coating that one, but we move quickly through that and get to the awesome news!Links: Sanctions order, Texas Dems end quorum-busting efforts, FCC PROPOSES $5 MILLION ROBOCALLING FINE AGAINST JACOB WOHL AND JOHN BURKMAN-For show-related questions, check out theOpening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!@oawiki-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!It s another edition of Ace Associate Morgan Stringer s Pop Law! The media widely reported that Jamie Spears intends to step down as conservator. BUT.. that s a bad law thingy. He actually isn t. Tune in and hear the real law talkin ! Then, we talk about some great news in the battle for trans rights. Hobby Lobby was dealt a loss by the court. On the bad news front though, the Whole Woman s Health v. Paxton decision was horrible. But Mr. Sunshine himself, Andrew Torrez, has a positive spin for us.-For show-related questions, check out theOpening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!@oawikiTerpsichore, who also goes by dozens of slight variations on her name, saw the Kraken nonsense that has led to nothing but sanctions hearing after sanctions hearing and figured why not do more terrible law. She s suing Dominion back for eleventy billion dollars. How is that damages number justified? GFY. What are the alleged counts of defamation? GFY. Where do these horrible lawyers keep coming from and how did they beat Thomas at the bar exam? We ll never know. Hear all about it on today s show! After that, we do some Andrew was wrong, regarding gift taxes and British courts. Plus an email from the one and only Michael Marshall on Telegram and how it does seem to be the app of choice for horrible racists.Links: 26 US Code § 102,  Gift Taxes, House of Lords Wikipedia, Virginia Governor s Council, Terpsichore affidavit, Terpsichore deleted webpage, Tore Maras-Lindeman bio, complaint if you can call it that, ND vs Terp and all her names, Jones v. Trice, 360 S.W.2d 48 (1962)-For show-related questions, check out theOpening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!@oawikiIt s a consequences episode, our favorite genre! Our first bit of great news is that Cuomo resigned. Andrew has a few follow up thoughts on that and our episode on Cuomo, as well as some introductory information on who will be New York s first ever female Governor, Lt. Gov. Kathy Hochul! Then we get to the great news of the Dominion Lawsuit surviving a motion to dismiss. If you ve listened to the show for a while, you might have noticed that defamation suits tend to have a tough time surviving motions to dismiss. That s because our 1st Amendment is very broad. But the Big Liars went so beyond the pale, they re finding out even the 1st Amendment has limits. Yay!-For show-related questions, check out theOpening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!@oawiki

TAGS:legal podcast that 

<<< Thank you for your visit >>>

Hot Websites