LENGIBATSANDZAKO

Time 2021-10-17 06:05:15

Web Name: LENGIBATSANDZAKO

WebSite: http://ninaewapenda.blogspot.com

ID:205500

Keywords:

LENGIBATSANDZAKO,

Description:

keywords:
description:
LENGIBATSANDZAKO

Facebook BadgeMatanje Wamphuno-ngaNdunyungu Phiri

Create your badge Friday, June 20, 2014 Malema booted out, EFF walks - Times LIVEMalema booted out, EFF walks - Times LIVE: "
Graphic video shows police open fire on miners - YouTube: 'via Blog this' (VIDEO IS MERE ADDITION BY BLOG AUTHOR AND NOT PART OF ORIGINAL ARTICLE ON 'BLOG THIS')
Economic Freedom Fighters leader Julius Malema ended his first week of debatein parliament dramatically, leading a walkout of his MPs after being ejectedfrom the House.



Thandi Modise, chairman of the National Council ofProvinces, had asked Malema to withdraw a statement he made on Wednesday, inwhich he said the ANC had massacred the Marikana mineworkers killed in August2012.

Modise ruled that the EFF leader's remarks were"unparliamentary" because they suggested that the government haddecided to kill the people of Marikana.

"Honourable members, having perused Hansard, I havearrived at the conclusion that the statements made by the honourable Malema areunparliamentary and do not accord with the decorum of this house. Althoughmembers enjoy freedom of speech during the proceedings of this house, thisfreedom is subject to limitations imposed by the constitution and jointrules," said Modise before ordering Malema to withdraw his massacrecomments.


Malema refused to withdraw the statement.

He remained defiant last night and instead again tried to
justify his assertion.

"Chair, when people say 'reduce crime', you come hereand say the ANC has reduced crime. And when police kill people, you don't wantus to come here and say the ANC government has killed people, that isinconsistent, honourable chair," he said.

In a sharp exchange with a controlled Modise, Malemaremained stubborn and refused to withdraw on two occasions.

"I won't do that; I am sorry I won't do that . Imaintain [that] the government of the ANC killed people in Marikana," saidMalema in his exchange with Modise.

"You leave me no choice but to ask you leave theHouse," she said.


As he packed his belongings prior to leaving the chamber,his 25 MPs disrupted the proceedings by shouting at Modise,"reminding" her that she was premier of North West when the Marikanakillings took place.

"You were the premier, Thandi ... mercenaries ...murderers," they shouted.

As they marched out of the chamber, the EFF lawmakerschanted "Malema o tshela thupa (Malema is giving them a hiding)". But this just brought more trouble down on Malema and the MPswho walked out with him.

ANC MP Mamoloko Kubayi said there should be an investigation
of the EFF caucus for bringing parliament into disrepute.


"The rules do create the opportunity for us to doexactly as you recommend; we shall do so," Modise said.



ANC Chief Whip Stone Sizani said the behaviour of EFF MPs
was "atrocious and had never been seen in the 20-year history of thisdemocratic parliament".













Posted byat2:48 AM1 comment: Older PostsHomeSubscribe to:Posts (Atom)JACOB ZUMA SHUTS DOWN PHIRI SALARY WITHOUT PROVOCATIONAS OF NOVEMBER 1 2014 I WILL BE PUBLISHING WHATEVER I SHALL HAVE PERSONALLY FOUND OUT BEHIND ZUMA'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL REASONS FOR MY SALARY SHUTDOWN

THE SEPTEMBER JUDICIAL CALLS FOR EXPLANATION MADE TO JACOB ZUMA SANDF MINIONS IN VAIN

Lawyers' emails are going unanswered by the SANDF, as to over why the Goodman Manyanya Phiri suspended by Jacob Zuma and Zuma's Ombudsman Temba Templeton Matanzima at gunpoint in 2010, is not getting paid as of 15 September 2014.


Even phonecalls by same lawyers of Phiri's (LIPCO) will sometimes get an SANDF Human Resources Person saying something like ["I have got the system in front of me here but I may not check for Phiri"]

Phiri has gone into the war footing over the situation and threatens to walk into someone's SANDF Human Resource office next week to personally find out why he, and his 4-year-old daughter over whom he is single-parenting after an amicable divorce last year, are being starved and possibly set for sequestration by Phiri's ABSA Bank as G.M. Phiri Savings Account Number 9074472391 (unless Phiri gets paid tomorrow the 15th) has been by Zuma's nameless commander been starved of R70,000 which is Phiri's legal salary).
Nothing has been told Phiri why his salary has been stopped. Phiri's Zuma-supported enemies in the SANDF know Phiri's official residence in Lyttelton (or at least they knew it when they in 2010 sent 6 heavily-armed military policemen for the purpose clearly of mowing down Phiri). Thererefore, and very surely, IF THERE IS ANY COMPLIANCE LIEUTENANT COLONEL GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI HAD TO COMPLY WITH IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN HIS OWN SALARLY RECEIPT, communication should have (where other commununication media might have failed) been sent to Lyttelton Residence.

This did not happen. And everything spells malice!
Clearly there is malice prepense here, but Phiri's LIPCO lawyers will continue sending more emails to the SANDF to inquire, phoning some more, until the truth outs as to WHO ORDERED PHIRI SALARY SHUTDOWN AND FOR WHAT REASON TO THE EXTENT OF NOT FOLLOWING SOME PROCEDURES BEFOREHAND?.

LIPCO, whose VIP-card-carrying member Phiri is, is a powerful mediation tool for soldiers in South Africa. And a team of three LIPCO mediators are working on the Phiri issue right now, namely Ms Ilke Bosman, Mr Byron Govender and Mr Ayanda Mahlangu. The threesome are for Phiri kaleidoscopical specimen of South Africa's Rainbow Nation and Phiri is confident they will break this new deadlock and clear provocation on the part of politically-embattled Mr Jacob Zuma and Minions in his SANDF. For that matter, Jacob Zuma must answer about his Nkandla Homestead and not start shutting down colonels' salaries without any apparent reason.
Who does not know it that Phiri was suspended by Zuma because of writing about corruption in Zuma's own SANDF and Department of Defence? But Phiri argues that he has for about a year now written absolutely nothing negative about Jacob Zuma, and in fact written about nothing else whatsoevr in the past 6 months or so. And so Phiri's conclusion is that Mr Zuma is a clear desperado if to order someone in his SANDF kick a dog lying down like Phiri has been turned into, for the past four years of suspension by Zuma and Matanzima.
Alternatively Mr Zuma is simply unamenable and intolerant to a peaceable relationship with his fellow citizen, Phiri: Zuma thinks he is God. But now Phiri will be walking into Zuma's Army offices next week, if Phiri's salary matter is not remedied with speed. Let Zuma capture Phiri and murder him, if that is the intention and trap behind the salary shutdown. Phiri will walk in there with military police for company as orders stand. But if Phiri should be reported disappeared after Zuma's minions shall either have murdered him (which has always been the intention anyway)...

....If that happens, please phone the Team of Three Lipco lawyers as aforementioned on +270118312700/0118312700, email the Chief Mediator among the three LIPCO lawyers (ilkea@lipco.co.za OR 24 HOURS DIAL LIPCO EMERGENCY NUMBERS 0825682676/0825541116
It is high time Mr Jacob Zuma was taught the lesson that South Africa is a constitutional republic and not some exile camp in Tanzania, Mozambique, or Angola where the Zumas were torturing and murdering fighters who opposed their excesses and corruption.
Phiri has been buoyed by friends and relatives who have been supporting him and his daughter, Tamara 4, for the past 30 days of starvation by Mr Jacob Zuma. I have been particularly touched by two Pretorians (a senior male white military officer, a black attorney (who works like a dynamo in his own practice), as well as a housemother and owner of a big creche) who have all come forward for the adoption of Tamara just in case Zuma kills Phiri. Papers and affidavits are already afoot in order for me to grant my daughter to one of those potential adopters. The mother of my child has after the divorce gone missing in her own motherland, the Kingdom of Swaziland and has over 15 months now never even bothered to come and see her own daughter.
If anybody reading this would like to help me, I am begging (but never, as an officer, grovelling or supplicating) just deposit any amount into my Savings Account (ABSA) Number 9074472391, G.M. Phiri. It will be highly appreciated because I doubt very much if Zuma's minion or two who ordered my salary shutdown will change their minds on 15 October 2015: these are dyed-in-the-wool goodfornothings who got too used to exile tactics of toadying up to autocratic leaders like Zuma and as such, there is no way without Zuma's sayso that they will reverse my salary shutdown.
The alternative to your help, my readership, is frightful: I will be sequestrated by the banks.
Thanks in advance, but apologies for any grammatical errors: I had no chance to revise this as I am working from an Internet Cafe in Pretoria..SOUTH AFRICAN QUOTES ABOUT QUOTES"If you are a member of the ANC you should be ashamed because you are part of a group which failed our people. Take that T-shirt and use it to scrub the floor. If you use it as a night dress, you will have nightmares." JULIUS MALEMAART MEETS POLITICS: SOUTH AFRICA************************************BRAVE NEW WORLD!MALEMA MADMAN OR MESSIAH?(YOU CAN IF YOU FOLLOW THIS LINK(ONE MALEMA INTERVIEW PART 3), GET MORE ON HIS NEWEST THOUGHT PROCESSES)WHY DO AFRICANS IN GENERA REMAIN THE 'THE MOST DESPISED RACE ON THE PLANET'?THE MORE INTROSPECTIVE SOLUTIONS TO THE AFRICAN'S DISMAL FAILURES....THE MORE EXTROSPECTIVE SOLUTIONS TO THE AFRICAN'S DISMAL FAILURES...Chief Justice of South Africa's Constitutional Court in front ofwhom my pleas shall be laid officially bare in my fight against Jacob Zuma overhis wanton disregard in matters relating to rule of law at the expense of atleast one South African called Mr Goodman Manyanya Phiri, a lieutenant colonelin South Africas National Defence Force



Of course, once money has been asap deposited into Phiri account, I will talk to my Bank (ABSA/Barclays in South Africa) to transfer your donation to a separate account vouchsafed by revenue laws of the Republic, whereupon I will transfer the money to my attorney and advocates fighting my case against an under-educated Jacob Zuma who thinks South Africa can be ruled by political 'majoritarianism' rather than by the rule of law!
MERRY CHRISTMAS AND A VERY HAPPY NEW YEAR TO YOU GLOBAL READER OF MY BLOG, BUT BLOG-OWNER AND I SOUTH AFRICAN LIEUTENANT COLONEL GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI IS HEREBY TENDERING A PLEA TO YOU PERSONALLY FOR FIVE MILLLION RAND (R5 OOO OOO) DONATE TO ME THAT AMOUNT WHICH WILL ENABLE ME TO FIGHT MR JACOB ZUMA IN COURT AND WIN AGAINST HIM TOO! I MEAN BEING ELECTED IN MANGAUNG BY 3000 RACIALLY- OR TRIBALLY-COMPROMISED DELEGATES 'JUST BECAUSE 'ZUMA BELONGS TO THE VERY MAJORITY NGUNI TRIBE WHERE ZUMA AND NELSON MANDELA COME FROM' DOES NOT MAKE MR-ZUMA-YOU FEARED BY GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI' Rule your country, Sir; but till my last breath, I intend to challenge you for your corruption, your profligacy, and your disregard for rule of law in the Republic of South Africa and Africa's 'hottest' economy for that matter. As of now, I am asking for any good Samaritan(s) to help pay money for my lawyers who must defend me at the Constitutional Court (Headed by Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng) against your strings in 27-year-old-persecution acts by you Mr Zuma against Phiri since exile
IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
(REPUBLIC OFSOUTH AFRICA)

CASE NO.
In the matter between

GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI Applicant

and

THE PRESIDENT, REPUBLICOF SOUTH AFRICA, N.O1ST Respondent

And

THE MINISTER OF DEFENCE ANDVETERANS AFFAIRS2ND Respondent

And

THE DIRECTOR, MILITARY PROSECUTIONS ,DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE 3RD Respondent

and
THESECRETARY FOR DEFENCE 4TH Respondentand
THECHIEF OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONALDEFENCE FORCE 5TH Respondent
And
THEGENERAL OFFICER COMMANDINGTHE SOUTHAFRICANARMYS INTELLIGENCE FORMATION6TH Respondent

and
THECHIEF OF STAFF(ACTING) OF THE SOUTH AFRICANARMY INTELLIGENCE FORMATION7TH Respondent


FOUNDINGAFFIDAVIT

I, the undersigned,
GOODMANMANYANYA PHIRI
do hereby state under oathas follows:


1.
THE PARTIES
1.1Iam an adult male, and a Lieutenant Colonel in the South African National DefenceForce (the SANDF) at Army Headquarters, Dequar Road, Pretoria. I am theApplicant in this matter.
1.1.1 Thefacts contained herein are within my personal knowledge unless the contrary isexpressly stated and are, to the best of my knowledge and belief, both true andcorrect.
1.2The First Respondent is the President ofthe Republic of South Africa, who is cited herein in his capacity as theCommander in Chief of the South African Armed Forces and the highest office inthe South African National Defence Force. His address for the purposes ofservice in this application is situated at the State Attorney, 8thFloor, Manaka Heights, 167 Andries Street, Pretoria.

1.3The2ND Respondent is the Minister of Defence and Military VeteransAffairs, cited in her capacity as the Political Head of the Department ofDefence, and whose address for the purposes of service in this application is situatedat the State Attorney, 8th Floor, Manaka Heights, 167 AndriesStreet, Pretoria.
1.4The 3RD Respondent is theDirector, Military Prosecutions, Department of Defence; whose address forservice in this matter is the State Attorney, 8th Floor, ManakaHeights, 167 Andries Street, Pretoria..
1.5The 4TH Respondent is theSecretary for Defence whose address for service in this matter is the StateAttorney, 8th Floor, Manaka Heights, 167 Andries Street, Pretoria.
1.6The 5TH Respondent is the Chiefof the South African National Defence Force whose address for service in thismatter is the State Attorney, Fedsure Forum, 8th Floor, ManakaHeights, 167 Andries Street, Pretoria.
1.7The 6TH Respondent is theGeneral Officer Commanding the South African Armys Intelligence Formationwhose address for service in this matter is the State Attorney, 8thFloor, Manaka Heights, 167 Andries Street, Pretoria.

1.8The7TH Respondent is the Acting Chief of Staff of the South AfricanArmys Intelligence Formation whose address for service in this matter is theState Attorney, Fedsure Forum, Cnr Van de Walt and Pretorius Streets, Pretoria,Gauteng.
2.
INTRODUCTION
2.1Thisis an application to this Honourable Court for various urgent and interim orders as well as final orders in thefollowing terms:
2.1.1 An order dispensing with the forms ofservice and Notice periods required in this Honourable Court in terms of Rule6(12) of the Rules of this Honourable Court.
2.1.2 Urgent stay of my arraignment before theMilitary Court on 4 November 2011 as planned by the 2ND to the 7THRespondents in terms of Part A of the Notice of Motion pending theinvestigation and resolution by the 1st Respondent, of my grievancewhich I initially submitted with my superior in terms of the policy andprocedure in The Defence Act and the Military Disciplinary SupplementaryMeasures Act, on 7 March 2001 and which grievance remains outstanding to date.
2.1.3 An order that the 1ST Respondentmust comply with the provisions of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act,Act No. 3 of 2000 in that he must investigate and resolve my grievance which Ilodged with his office on 6 November 2002 in terms of the policy and procedureof the SANDF after the failure to address the grievance by certain officials inthe SANDF who are my superiors but are of junior rank to the 1STRespondent.
2.14 An order that the 1ST Respondentmust report to this Honourable Court within 6 months of the Order of thisHonourable Court as to how he would have complied with the terms of this Order.
2.15 In part B of the Notice of Motion,an order that the Respondents are finally interdicted from charging me before the Military Court inrespect of the blogging of information pertaining to my grievance which I filedwith the 1ST Respondent and/ or any related charges.
2.16An order directing that the Respondents pay the costs of these
proceedings

2.1.7 Any other relief that the HonourableCourt might find appropriate after hearing the application.

URGENCYThis case isextremely urgent because I have been informed by the officials of theRespondent that I must attend at their office on 4 November 2011 for thepurposes of the new charges to be read out to me.
3.
BRIEFBACKGROUND FACTS
3.1 The Respondents and I (excluding the 1STRespondent) are involved in a 10 year legal battle concerning my persecution bythe Respondents for exposing certain corrupt practices by officials of theSouth African National Defence Force. The case is now on appeal in theConstitutional Court under case number CCT87/2011. The case arose because in the periodbetween 2000 and March 2001, while I was attending at the South African ArmyCollege (the College), there were allegations of racial disharmony among themembers of the College community.
The allegations received widespreadpublicity in the media. In the period between February and March 2001. As aresult, an investigation was ordered by the Army Chief, then Lieutenant GeneralGilbert Lebeko Ramano, to inquire into the allegations.
3.2 On 6th March 2001 theInspector General, Brigadier General Enoch Mashoala, and his assistant Inspectors,Colonels Oupa Mokalake and Magdalena White (the Inspectors), arrived at theCollege to carry out the investigation. On that day Brigadier General Mashoala(the Inspector) addressed the students at the College, and invited any personwith information in regard to the racial disharmony to make submissions to theInspectors; and at that very moment, being a senior student by rank, I raisedmy hand and informed the Inspector General that I had the knowledge of all thefacts about the racial disharmony at the College.
3.3 The Inspectors spent a full month at theCollege investigating the allegations of racial disharmony at the College; andbefore the end of that period, on 06th March 2001, I went to the Inspectorsoffice to make submissions, since I had not been given the opportunity despitemy offer to give information to the investigators.
3.4 Colonel White informed me that I was late;and that the investigation had been completed and a report already finalised. Ifelt that the door had been shut unreasonably against me; as I had indicated inan open audience that I would be of great assistance in the investigation. Accordingly,on 7th March 2001 I lodged my own grievance against the Inspectorsincluding the Inspector General for disregarding my submissions. A copy of mygrievance is attached as Annexure A.Please also refer to Annexure Bwhich is the letter of acknowledgement of receipt.
3.5 To my surprise, on 9th March2001, I was given notice to appear before the Military Court for misconduct.Eleven (11) charges were proffered against me; ranging from using threateningor insulting language, insubordination or disobeying lawful commands, ofconduct prejudicial to military discipline; to riotous or unseemingly behaviourand common law crimen iniuria. Apparently,the charges related to incidents that had allegedly happened in February 2001.A copy of the charges is annexed hereto as AnnexureC.
3.6 The charges are extremely serious in themilitary culture and environment; and if I am convicted of any one of them, aprison term and expulsion from the SANDF might be imposed.
3.7 Subsequently, during the proceedings inthe Military Court, some of the Respondents witnesses referred to the InspectorGenerals report made after the investigation of racial disharmony at theCollege.
My Counsel could not duly crossexamine the witnesses as I had not been furnished with the Inspectors report.
3.8 It is common caused between theRespondents and I that I made an urgent application to the North Gauteng HighCourt for, inter alia, an order tocompel the Respondents to furnish me with all the documents that were necessaryfor my defence, before the proceedings in the Military Court could proceed andthat the order was granted.
3.9 It is further common cause that a disputeensued as to whether the Respondents had complied with that order, theoutstanding issue now being whether or not the Respondents furnished me withthe South African Army Inspector Generals report involving Phiri et al at South African Army College.Herein, I have referred to that report as the Inspector Generals report.

3.10 On26th July 2005 the Respondents applied in the North Gauteng HighCourt, before the Honourable Sithole J for an order, inter alia, declaring that they had complied with the Court Orderand that the proceedings before the Military Court should proceed. Their applicationwas dismissed with costs.
3.11 The Respondents appealed the dismissal oftheir application to the Full Bench of the North Gauteng High Court. The FullBench as per the Honourable Tuchten J upheld the appeal with costs; and setaside the High Court Judgment in Case number A478/08.
3.12 I applied for special leave to appeal to theSupreme Court of Appeal in case number and my application was dismissed on 16August 2011.
3.13 I have now applied for the special leave ofthe Constitutional Court to appeal that decision in Case number CCT87/2011, onthe grounds, inter alia that my Constitutionalrights to a fair trial, to protection of the law and to the adjudication of mycivil disputes by an independent and impartial court in terms of the Constitutionof the Republic of South Africa, 1996 are being jeopardised. The case is stillpending.
3.14In the meantime my own grievance which Ilodged with the Respondents on 7 March 2001 remains unattended and unresolvedby the Respondents to date. Over the years and under pressure of thepersecution orchestrated by the Respondents particularly through the aforesaidMilitary Court charges, I have sought in vain to escalate and seek urgentresolution of my grievance with the Respondents. The main reason that I have made these effortsis that if a full scale investigation is made into the events that my grievancerelate to it will be found that I am in fact a whistleblower who was persecutedfor exposing certain senior army officials who engaged in corrupt andscandalous activities such as the giving of sexual favours in order to pass coursesand the precipitation of racial disharmony at the college. I thereforeescalated the grievance in terms of the stipulated procedures of the SouthAfrican National Defence Force. However, there was never a substantive responseto my grievance. Instead the Respondents and many other co-conspirators in theSANDF have persecuted and sought to expel me from the SANDF without just causebecause they do not want the whole world to know of the rottenness within theirranks. After making many attempts to be heard through the stipulated channelsto no avail I decided to publicly name and shame the perpertrators of the vicesand my persecutors. I created a blog on the World Wide Web wherein I posted allthe vital information starting to the beginning of the strife between me andthe Respondents at the SANDF in 2001 and highlighting all my efforts to beheard. Further I kept updates of developments relating to my persecution forexposing the truth. On the--- day of April 2011 theRespondents applied for an interdict to stop me from publicising all thisinformation through the internet. After taking legal advice I agreed to stoppublishing this information on the internet and the parties settlementagreement was duly made an Order of Court before the Honourable -----J. The order specifically stated that theRespondents should not use the facts of that matter against me in the future.In fact this was one of the main reasons why I was inclined to agree to thisOrder, in order to keep peace between myself and the Respondents in the future.I am however puzzled that the Respondents now seek to charge me in the MilitaryCourt for the very same reason, my publishing on the internet of theinformation of my long-standing dispute with the Respondents, notwithstandingthe Respondents undertaking in the High Court at the time of the settlementorder.I have made numerous attempts to makepeace with the Respondents out of Court. In 2003 to 2004 after the originalOrder by the Honourable Claasen J, mylegal team and I attended several meetings with the Respondents in order toreach some finality in the matters between us, to no avail. This year myattorneys made telephone calls to the Respondents attorneys to seek a meeting,without success. My attorneys also wrote a letter, attached as Annexure C to seek a meeting to resolve the casesbetween me and the Respondents . This letter was never responded to.Instead, I was telephoned by ___ of theRespondents and informed that I must appear before--- on 4 November 2011 fornew proceedings to be initiated in the Military Court arising out of thepublishing of the information pertaining to my grievance on the internet. Theprocedure of the Military Court proceedings are that the charges are onlycommunicated to me in person on the day in question and I sign for them. I willonly obtain a copy of the charge sheet at a later stage when disclosure for thepurposes of the trial is being made. I am therefore unable to produce anydocumentary proof of the impending charges but I have been reliably informed bythe Respondents representatives that I will again be arraigned on 4 November2011. I have a long history of persecution by the Respondents manifestingthrough the pending Military Courtcharges and their concerted efforts to ensure that I do not get justice ashighlighted by their failure to provide the documents which I require in orderto defend myself and their unwillingness to resolve our differences out ofcourt. I am therefore convinced that the Respondents will grab any opportunityto bring me down that may present itself and will even create suchopportunities because they are desperate to get rid of me in the SANDF. I haveno doubt that these new charges being brought up in contravention of theRespondents own earlier commitment not to use the facts that were subject totheir application against me in April 2011 against me, are a ploy to finish meoff since I have now taken the old charges of 2001 to the Constitutional Courtand the Respondents are concerned that those charges of 2001 may beunsuccessful in pulling me down because there are high prospects of success inmy case. This is a new attempt which I have good reason to be very apprehensiveof, given the suffering that I have gone through at the hands of theRespondents.


CLEARRIGHTIhave the right to the protection of the law in terms of section 9 of theConstitution of the Republic of South Africa,1996. Section 9 reads as follows: 9.(1)Everyone is equal before the law and has the right to equal protection andbenefit of the law.

The Respondents are using theCourts, in particular the Military Court as a means of punishing me for beingthe whistle-blower at the SA Army College in 2001. Their deliberate exclusionof my contributions to the investigations that took place at the college isclear testimony of this. I have a clear right to be protected fromdiscrimination and/ or persecution on the basis that I was an outspoken criticof the vices that infested the SA Army College.
 Further, I have a clearConstitutional right to freedom of conscience and freedom of expression as persection 15(1) and 16(1) of the Constitution of South Africa, 1996. It wouldhave haunted my conscience not to expose the corruption at the College. I also have a right emanating fromthe settlement agreement that we made in April 2011 from any proceedingsemanating from the facts that gave rise to the settlement agreement.
 In addition and very critically, Ihave a right to just administrative action in terms of section 33 of theConstitution of South Africa, 1996 and in terms of the Promotion ofAdministrative Justice Act (PAJA). I have the right to have my grievanceproperly investigated and resolved by the Respondents, the 1stRespondent in particular since the grievance is now with his office. PAJAspecifically grants me the following rights:

The right to be told in advance of theprocedural steps that will be taken to address my grievance.
The right to be informed of my rights inrelation to the whole process.
The right to have my side of the storyconsidered before a decision is made.
The right to be informed what the decision isand of my rights to any appeal or review procedures available.
The right to be given reasons for thedecision.
The right to challenge the decision in Court.The failure of the Respondents toaddress my grievance in the aforesaid manner means that they have not onlyviolated my rights but also contravened the law. They have dirty hands andshould not be allowed to continue using the legal process to fulfil theirunholy intentions of punishing me for exposing the rot in the SANDF andsilencing me through harassment. It is my humble submission that the Respondentsare estopped from proceeding with any action against me in respect of the sameissues which they deliberately fail to address in terms of the dictates ofadministrative justice and my right to be heard.

IRREPARABLE HARM The charges which the Respondentsintend to bring against me are simply an addition to the persecution that I amalready going through at the hands of the Respondents. For the past 10 years Ihave tremendously suffered in my finances, my career as well as my emotionaland social well-being due to the first charges as the matter continues in theCourts. I have become a classic example of persecution on the grounds ofconscience and expression in that I chose not to remain silent over the corruption,sex scandals and the racism at the SA Army College. The charges against me wereinstituted on 9th March 2001, after I had lodged my complaint on 6thMarch 2001in a strategic move to silence me.
6.2This therefore shows clearly that the SANDFauthorities had decided to ignore or to cover-up whatever was going on at theCollege. And so, when I laid a formal complaint against the Inspectors forrefusing to accept my further submissions on the matter, it meant that I wantedto reveal what the SANDF authorities had decided not to reveal.
Shouldthe Respondents proceed to charge me again, I may expect another decade ofincessant persecution at their hands. It boggles my mind that the Respondentswould want to spend more than 10 years in court trying to stop me from gettingall the information and documents I require in order to prepare for my defenceagainst the charges that they drummed up against me. If the Respondents were just, fair orreasonable they would have long given me all the documents, specifically theInspector Generals report. If it indeed does not exist as they sometimes say,the Respondents would have at the very least produced a sworn statement fromtheir Information Officer or any other senior official attesting to thateffect. Despite the fact that the State Attorney who is the Respondents ownlawyers once suggested this at one of our meetings in 2004 the Respondents haveadamantly refused to do so. I can expect the same wanton disregard for myrights to be heard, my right to protection of the law, my right not bediscriminated against, my freedom of conscience and my freedom of expressionthat the Respondents have already displayed. I have been previously harassedand raided at my residential place by 6 armed officers in April 2011 when theRespondents brought the interdict against me. I am therefore fearful that suchunpalatable drama might recur since the Respondents are still bent on floutingmy human and Constitutional rights. I therefore humbly request this HonourableCourt to stop the Respondents from harassing me again through such spuriouscharges, particularly not before they have fully investigated and adjudicatedon my grievance, which is now with the President of the State who is also the Commanderin Chief of the Armed Forces.
The purpose for instituting theproceedings against me in the Military Court, has always been and still remainsto stop me from revealing what the SANDF authorities had decided to cover up;and to punish me for my concern that some of what was going on at the College,should not be allowed in the SANDF. I humbly request this Honourable Court toprotect me from such vindictiveness
I have been litigating forten years in regard to the whole dispute with the Respondents, I have run outof funds. I applied for legal aid butwas turned down. The new charges being brought by the Respondents would drag meinto other legal processes given that my experience with them is that theywould not conduct the proceedings fairly as required by law.
7.2The Court is further requested to note thatpartly due to my genuine desire to reach finality in the disputes I have withRespondents and partly because of the financial hardships I find myself due tothe incessant litigation with the Respondents, I sought to resolve the disputeoutside the court. In this regard, I had hoped that there was a high possibilitythat the matter would be resolved by an intervention of the Commander in Chief,the President. I also expected the Respondent to give due deference to such interventionand wait for the Presidents response to my request to intervene. Instead theywent ahead and applied for an order to resume the proceedings before the MilitaryCourt. In addition, they are now seeking to bring new charges, which clearly ismeant to further frustrate and persecute me. Should this Honourable Court notgrant an Order stopping the Respondents from doing so, I will be ruined.

BALANCE OF CONVENIENCEIhave considered waiting until the Respondents have officially charged me beforebringing this application. However, this will not be helpful to me as thedamage will already have been done. It is undoubted that the Respondents willcharge me on 4 November 2011 unless this Honourable Court orders them not to doso. By so doing, they will set in motion a whole string of effects on me suchas additional trauma, a hold on my career, another legal battle to fight giventheir history of denial of my rights and consequently more legal bills for me topay, which puts me and my family in dire straits. On the other hand my owngrievance lodged in 2001 remains unattended, whereas such investigation andventilation of my issues would actually resolve all the Respondents cases against me. Should theRespondents verily believe that I am indeed guilty of all the things that theyaccuse me of, resolving my own grievance will at the most exonerate me and atthe very least open their eyes to some highly mitigating factors. TheRespondents might even change their thinking about me if only they approached mygrievance with openness of mind and a commitment to get to the root of theissues. The issues between me and the Respondents are questions relating to thevalues and integrity of the SANDF and therefore this nation. It is onlybefitting that the 1ST Respondent who is the highest ranking officerin the SANDF and whose national duties also include the protection of thevalues and integrity of the nation be given an opportunity to investigate, makefindings on and determine on my grievance. I believe that once this has beendone the charges against me will either be seen for what they truly are, namelypersecution for my outspokenness against corruption, sex scandals and racism orthey will be withdrawn by the Respondents upon their realisation that I shouldbe applauded rather than prosecuted for exposing such vices.

Isubmit that I stand to lose everything should the Respondents not be stoppedfrom charging me again before the 1ST Respondents attends to mygrievance. Hence my prayer for both urgent and interim relief as well as finalrelief. In contrast the Respondents stand to lose nothing if this order isgranted. They will simply have to let justice take its course, the 1STRespondent must decide on my grievance first.
On or around 27 March 2011 I was physicallysuspended from the SANDF (albeit my first suspension with the effect that I wasreduced to office furniture reporting to work doing nothing else) occurredaround December 2002. Every other person that might have been involvedin this matter at the College, except me, have long moved on with their normallives. Thus the proceedings which the Respondents insist to bring before theMilitary Court, are only about me; my career, my freedom, my future and that ofmy family. I submit therefore, that the Respondents will not be prejudiced ifan interdict in terms of the Notice of Motion is granted. On the contraryhowever, if it is not granted, I will face further persecution and suffering asI have already explained above. I respectfully submit that the balance ofconvenience favours the granting of the Orders as prayed for in the Notice ofMotion.

NO OTHER REMEDYI have no other recourse totake other than to approach this Honourable Court for relief. As already statedabove I duly followed the procedures for submitting a grievance in the SANDF.My grievance is now with the highest office in the land. However nothing hasbeen done to substantially deal with the issues that I have raised. I haveapproached the Respondents to try to resolve our differences out of court to noavail. My only remedy is to approach this Honourable Court for an Interdict.

In the premises, I humblysubmit that I have made out a case for the granting of an Interdict both on anurgent and Interim basis and on a final basis as set out in the Notice ofMotion; and I beseech the Honourable Court to grant the orders set out in theNotice of Motion.
GOODMANMANYANYA PHIRIDEPONENT

I CERTIFY that thisaffidavit has been sworn to and signed before me at PRETORIA on this .. day of May 2011,by the above deponent who understands the contents hereof, that he has noobjection against taking the prescribed oath and considers the oath as bindingon his conscious, which oath was taken by me, as required by law.

_______________________ COMMISSIONER OFOATHS


FULLNAMES: .
ADRESS:.
CAPACITY:..
AREA:...




HERE IS THE OTHER CASE (OR TWO) GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI NEEDS TO GET RESOLVED WITH MR JACOB ZUMA, HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MOGOENG MOGOENG OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA.


""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""





IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTHAFRICA
[HELDAT BRAAMFONTEIN]
CASE NO : CASE REF: 437 / 2011
In the matter between :

GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI Appellant

And


THE MINISTER OF DEFENCE 1ST Respondent
DIRECTOR : MILITARY PROSECUTIONSDEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE 2ND Respondent

FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT


I, the undersigned

GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI
do hereby declare under oath as follows :
1.
1.1I am the Applicant in these proceedings.
1.2The facts deposed herein arewithin my personal knowledge save where as otherwise stated; and are to thebest of my knowledge both true and correct.
2.
Iconfirm that the attached NOTICE AND GROUNDS OF APPEAL AGAINST REFUSAL TO GRANTLEAVE TO APPEAL BY THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL IN TERMS OF RULE 19 OF THECONSTITUTIONAL COURT RULES was prepared on my behalf by my legalrepresentatives under my instruction and that I wish to incorporate it fullyherein as part of my evidence. I confirmthat this matter relates to the failure by the State to provide me with acrucial document in the trial in which I am prosecuted in the Military Court asper Annexure GMP4 the charge sheet.It is important for me to get information as to the investigations conducted,witnesses interviewed, the compilation of witnesses statements and the reportsfiled / submitted to those concerned interalia, the sought-after report (i.e. South African Inspector GeneralsReport involving Phiri et al at theSouth African Army College for the period February to March 2001. This, ofcourse, is for the purposes of preparing and conducting my defence as furtherexpounded by my legal representatives in the attached Notice and Grounds ofAppeal.
2.2 I was not invited to make a contribution tothe investigation despite the fact that firstly,
I was the first in offering to give information and, secondly, and according to the Charge Sheet now, I am supposed to have created such a furore at the College that I was deemed deserving of being the only one prosecuted from all those 100 or so other students and college staff who walked scot-free out of the investigations for racial disharmony. Indeed, I did reasonably request an opportunity to make my submissions to the investigations from day one February 6 2001 (resulting in a promise), as well as even prior to the arrival of the Inspector General where I was asking for opportunity to expose to college authorities a white instructor who was inciting racial confrontation on one hand, and a black instructor who was giving free marks to a student or two on the basis of sexual favours. Both General Mashoala (the Inspector General) and his subordinates declared me as having knocked too late on their door when I tried to remind them on 6 March 2001 about their promise to hear me a month before.

I found the aforegoing very strange as I was assured bythe Brigadier General (Mashoala) that I would receive an audience from theInspectors and my submissions would also be considered. Thus my letter ofredress of wrongs to the Chief of Army, dated the 6th March 2001against the Brigadier General M.E. Mashoala in his capacity as President/Chairmanof Chief Armys Board of Inquiry, Preliminary Investigation, CommandersInvestigation or whatever term they want to call the investigation conducted atthe SA Army College Feb March 2001.
Idenied that the Respondents furnished me with the document as reflected inAnnexure SBM1 to their AnsweringAffidavit before the Supreme Court of Appeal. What the Respondents did was topresent a doctored document, namely SBM1as a way of confusing issues and in order to falsely convince the court thatthey had furnished the correct document.
Thiswas a deliberate ploy to give an impression by using the language of ClaassenJs order,that they had complied with it. Other differences include the factthat SBM1 was signed by hand andthat it is also very obviously retyped since the contents do not correspondwith that of the original document. These subtle changes were meant to hoodwinkthe Full Bench of the North Gauteng High Court into believing that theRespondents had given me the requisite documents. Proof of this will befurnished at the appeal hearing should this Honourable Court grant me specialleave to appeal as per the Notice of Motion.
Quite shockingly, the Respondents gave a second versionthat a written and comprehensive Inspector Generals Report as per court order of Claassen J, South African Inspector Generals Reportinvolving Phiri et al the South African Army College; February to March 2001.[Dated: some time between February and March 2001] does not exist, and the fullbench, now supported by the Supreme Court of Appeal, it is submittederroneously agreed.

I am not in possession of any written andcomprehensive Inspector Generals Report as percourt order Claassen J; I submit it is simply because the Respondentssteadfastly refuse to provide me with same for malicious reasons to prejudiceme in the Military trial. I strongly believe that the said report does existand in that regard I rely on the respondents own version in a documententitled Decision Brief under the topic Modus Operandi (PH6, page 2) where they say that the report was produced and distributedto those concerned. I further respectfully submit that these restricteddocuments are in the custody of the Respondents.
I respectfully submit that the said deponents mutatingversion is blatantly contradictory, self-destructive and unrealistic as theRespondents relentlessly try to truncate the report therein sought, byexcluding its material contents i.e. that of witnesses statements orcomplainants statements or alternatively interview sheets compiled.
Based on theaforegoing, it is therefore not far-fetched nor inconceivable as I humblysubmit, that the said document does in fact exist and that I am entitled to thecontents thereof i.e. witnesses statements in order to have a fair trial, beable to fully prepare and properly defend myself in the proceedings before theMilitary Court. If the Respondents claim would be true (which I insist it isnot) that the report which I seek does not exist, what baffles me is that therehas never been any attempt on the Respondents part throughout this dispute tofurnish an affidavit from the Information Officer in compliance with thePromotion of Access to Information Act.
The Inspector Generals Report produced some time inFebruary and March 2001 (rather than the excuse dated 25 June 2001) remains crucialto my defence against the charges I am facing before the Military Court, uponwhich premise it will be argued interalia in the Military Court, that the said charges were provoked by myinsistence to make formal contributions relating to the initial investigationsinto racial disharmony at the SA Army College Feb March 2001 as well as being a whistle-blower in terms of which I held evidence to besubmitted to the said Inspectors relating toracial disharmony at the SA Army College Feb March 2001, as envisagedin terms of the Protected Disclosure Act No.26 of 2000.
WHEREFORE I pray for an Order in terms of the Notice ofMotion. THUS DONE AND SWORN TO AT PRETORIA THIS______DAYOF________2011

______________ DEPONENT

IHEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEPONENT HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THAT HE/SHE KNOWS ANDUNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THIS AFFIDAVIT, WHICH WAS SIGNED AND SWORN BEFOREME AT ___________________ ON THIS ____ DAY OF ________________, THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED INGOVERNMENT NOTICE NO. R1258 OF 21 JULY 1972, AS AMENDED, AND GOVERNMENT NOTICENO. R1648 OF 19 AUGUST 1977, AS AMENDED, HAVING BEEN COMPLIED WITH.
________________________________ COMMISSIONEROF OATHS


NAME:ADDRESS:CAPACITY:







INTHE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELDAT BLOEMFONTEIN CaseNo. Ref Case No.A474/08In the matter betweenGOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI Applicant AND
THE MINISTER OF DEFENCEFirst RespondentDIRECTOR, MILITARY PROSECUTIONS,DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCESecond Respondent______________________________________________________________________FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT______________________________________________________________________I,the undersigned, GOODMANMANYANYA PHIRI,do hereby make oath and state as follows: 1. Iam an adult lieutenant colonel in the South African National Defence Force withmy address of employment situated at Army Headquarters, Pretoria. My addressfor service in this matter is c/o my attorneys Messrs Muzah Attorneys of Suite212 Rentbel Towers, Bureau Lane, Pretoria Central, Pretoria, c/o correspondentsMessrs ____________of ______, Bloemfontein. 2.Iam the applicant in this matter and the facts contained herein are, unless thecontrary is expressly stated, within my personal knowledge and are to the bestof my knowledge and belief both true and correct.3.TheFirst Respondent is the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans Affairs,currently the Honourable Ms Lindiwe Nonceba Sisulu, in her official capacity asassigned powers and functions in terms of the Constitution Act. Her address forservice is c/o her attorneys of record The State Attorney, 4th Floor, Fedsure Forum , Cnr Van derWalt and Pretorius Streets, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa. LOOKING FORWARD TO ADDRESSCONFIRMATION4.TheSecond Respondent is The Director, Military Prosecutions, Department ofDefence, with his address for service in this matter also c/o The StateAttorney, 4th Floor, Fedsure Forum, Cnr Van der Walt and PretoriusStreets, Pretoria Gauteng. THE PURPOSEOF THIS APPLICATION
5.Thisis an application in terms of Rule 12(3) and Rule 6(3) of the Supreme Court ofAppeal Rules as amended, for condonation for the late application for leave toappeal to this Honourable Court and for leave to appeal to this HonourableCourt, respectively. Judgment was passed by the Full Bench of the Gauteng NorthHigh Court on 12 November 2010 against me. I should have applied for leave toappeal timeously to this Honourable Court, within the specified period of 20working days after the judgment. However, due to financial constraints and thehope that my grievances would be addressed out of court, as I will more fullyexplain below, I did not apply for leave to appeal within the stipulatedperiod. I now bring before this Honourable Court the circumstances which led tomy failure to apply for leave to appeal timeously, together with a frankassessment of the prospects of success of my case on the merits. I request thisHonourable Court to favourably consider my explanation for the delay and myprospects of success on the merits and to thus grant me condonation for thelate application for leave to appeal. I therefore request leave to apply forleave to appeal out of time.
6.Secondly,I am also simultaneously applying for leave to appeal to this Honourable Courton the basis that there are high prospects that a different court might reach adifferent decision to the one made by the Gauteng North High Court when itruled against me on 12 November 2010.7.Theultimate purpose of this matter is to successfully appeal against the whole ofthe judgment of the Gauteng North High Court of 12 November 2010 in which thecourt ruled in favour of the Respondents herein that they had complied with theprevious High Court judgment as per Judge Claasen, in which (Claasen order) itwas held that I am entitled to have accessto the reports wherein my name is mentioned, particularly the reportemanating from the South African Army College investigation (by the Armys Inspector General andTeam of two subordinates Mokalake and White) into racial disharmony inFebruary to March 2001. Access to this report is crucial to enable me toconduct my defence in the military court case pending against me in Case Number98007693PE.8.Iultimately seek further to obtain an order directing the Respondents to supplycopies of the documents or reports to me as per the Honourable Judge Claasensorder, for the purposes as aforesaid of the preparation and the conduct of mydefence at the Military Judges Court.
9.Ialso seek an order suspending the proceedings at the Court of Senior MilitaryJudge, pending that I be supplied with the relevant document(s) and/ or report(s).The Respondents (Applicants in the court aquo) have not complied with the order of the High Court as per theHonourable Judge Claasen in Case Number 7697/04.10.I therefore seek an order in the followingspecific terms on appeal:
i.The hearing in the Court of Senior Military Judge, Reference No.98007693PE against Applicant be stayed pending the orders prayed for underprayers 3 and 4a herein AND THAT IN THE EVENT THAT RESPONDENT DECLARES DOCUMENTS ARE LOST OR DONOT EXIST THE CHARGES BE DROPPED AS ALLEGING RACIAL CONFRONTATION BETWEENAPPLICANT AND COLONEL KLEYNHANS.
ii.Lieutenant Colonel GoodmanManyanya Phiri is entitled to have access to documents and / or informationheld by the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans Affairs/ and or any ofher/his delegated subordinates, in exercising or protecting his rights in thetrial pending in the military court;
iii.The Minister of Defence and MilitaryVeterans Affairs and/ or any of her delegated subordinates be ordered anddirected to furnish Applicant with the following document(s) namely, the SouthAfrican Army Inspector Generals Report involving Goodman Manyanya Phiri andothers at the South African Army College, dated anytime between February toMarch 2001
iv.Granting Lieutenant ColonelGoodman Manyanya Phiri such further or alternative relief as this court deemsfit
v.Ordering that theRespondents herein, jointly and severally, the one paying the other to beabsolved, pay the costs of this appeal including the costs of the applicationfor leave to appeal.
11.Insummary therefore, the purpose of this application is to request thecondonation of this Honourable Court for failure to apply for leave to appealto it timeously, secondly to request the leave of the Court to apply for leaveto appeal out of time and ultimately to apply for leave to appeal to thisHonourable Court on the grounds that there are good prospects that thisHonourable Court might find differently from the Court a quo.
BRIEF BACKGROUND FACTS TO THIS APPLICATION12.Iam a male member of the officer corps of the South African National DefenceForce ipso facto commissioned theretoby the President of the Republic of South Africa. I might as well add that, as isthe case with all other officers, I am definitely not a member of theother corps or men comprising of mere candidates to the officer corps or eventroops, like privates, corporals, sergeants, staff sergeants, and sergeantmajors etc. all of whom, rather than from the State President, do get theirranks by a mere warrant from the Minister of Defence. I therefore enjoy direct and lawful access toThe State President just as long as I have followed the channels of command ofall those above me: colonel, brigadier general, major general, lieutenantgeneral and General Chief of the SANDF (as of this writing, Acting Chief,Lieutenant General SollyShoke).Withoutassuming anything about my profession, I need to highlight that officers, beingapart from men or troops in movies caricatured by gun battles, expletives,chain-smoking, drunkenness, brawls and sexual activities, I as an officer, agentleman and the thinking machine for the troops, am (together with myfellow officers in our corps) not only expected to uphold the highest standard oftruthfulness, social decorum, sobriety and all that is best in humancivilization (or face dishonourable discharge and dismissal), but I am alsogoverned by a code of conduct spelling out loyalty to my commander in chief andhead of state (at this instance President Zuma) via his chain of command alluded toearlier: the General (Chief of the SANDF), Lieutenant Generals, Major Generals,Brigadier Generals, Colonels, Lieutenant Colonels, Majors, Captains,Lieutenants.
Inall, the most hated qualities in me as an officer, or any other officer forthat matter, are gluttony, drunkenness, failure to protect troops or even anappetite to exploit the troops juniority (for sex or any other undueadvantage). However, the two worstthings an officer like me can do is to be disloyal to his government (atraitor) and to be a coward. In the lastregard, albeit none of the SANDF officers I know are cowards, I need to informthis Court that because of the high level of intimidation exemplified currentlyby an armed raid of my house conducted by then Acting Chief of the SANDFLieutenant General Temba Templeton Matanzima who was attempting by clear orderof Jacob Zuma to to either take away evidence I have of the 2001 racialconflict and college corruption weighing heavily against the said MatanzimasEastern Cape tribe (or have me assassinated OR BOTH INTENTIONS), it has beenvery difficult to get statements under oath to support my plea to thiscourt, let alone having those fewdeponents I have to (per signature) attest, as per court rules, to have read thefounding affidavit of Goodman Manyanya Phiri.I hope the Honourable Court will understand the reality of the situationof utter fear for the likes of Lieutenant General Matanzima in unravelling thecurrent case dating as far back as 2001.
Inany event, here is the genesis of the now four court encounters between me andthe Respondent, outside her Department of Defence and Military VeteransAffairs. During the last few months ofthe Year 2000 I, already a lieutenant colonel by rank, was nominated to attenda course with some 90 (fifty) officer-corps students (majors by rank) at theSouth African Army College, a course that was immediately torn apart from thevery beginning, by black-officer drunkenness, sex favours for promotion and racialconflict (meaning some blacks were angry about other blacks who were not oftheir own tribe; some blacks were angry about whites; some whites were angryabout some blacks; and some whites were angry about all blacks).In that vein I must mention that theCollege was run by a Commandant whose tribe or ethnic group is from the EasternCape, just like the once-Acting Chief of the SANDF, the aforementioned TembaTempleton Matanzima. For those blackmajors who had ethnic links with the Eastern Cape (particularly, Student LeaderKgotso Edmund Matli and self-professed cousin of both former President Nelson Mandelaand Lieutenant General Matanzima: one female Major Bobelo-Zini), the similarly-Eastern-Capeblack racial hue of the Commandant did with impunity open an avenue for the breaking of practically all decorum ofofficership. So, and very much againstthe rules governing the officer corps as so well stated in my intro, there was theEastern-Cape-black-race-promoted rampant sex on the college and drunkennessthat even sucked in at least one of the male black instructors of the collegewho ended up unfairly passing at least one ex-Eastern-Cape female student whowas otherwise doomed to fail but dared not, just because she could apparentlygive the requisite sex to a corrupt instructor and she had powerful names torely on, like the aforementioned Mandela and Matanzima.
Everytime white seniors of the college and other whites who were students with ustried to stop the rot led by black Eastern Cape, they were wrongfully told by boththe Mandela/Matanzima female cousin Major Bobelo and Student Leader Major Matli thatthose whites were essentially beinganti-black-government or anti-black people. Us black students, particularlymyself, who joined the whites in condemning this ungentlemanly profligacy by members of this tribe of theEastern Cape on course with us, were also essentially labelled puppets ofwhite people and everything was done and said by both the powerful StudentLeader Matli and Mandela/Matanzima Cousin Bobelo-Zini (who was later joinedby her sex-for-promotion instructor Lieutenant Colonel Raymond Lentsoe, acourse leader or deputy principal of the course) to make us look bad or evento falsely accused us of being the fomentors of college black racism. For more information on what was happening atthat College back then in 2001, I wishto attach the affidavits of two fellow students, a white female Gertruida Bam,a white male Herman Claassen, who together or separately witnessed the collegedrunkenness, the fraternization between Mandela/Matanzima Cousin StudentBobelo-Zini and habitually-intoxicated Instructor Raymond Lentsoe, whosubsequently passed the major corruptly.As of this affidavit, Bobelo-Zini, unable to say boo to a goose for herrank, is ranked brigadier general crucially because of the corruption she andthe aforementioned Lentsoe got themselves involved with back in 2001.
13.DuringFebruary to March 2001 certain investigations into the allegations of racialdisharmony were ordered by Army Chief then Lieutenant General Gilbert LebekoRamano and subsequently conducted by Army Inspector General Enock Muiseng Mashoalaand his sub-inspectors Colonels Oupa Mokalake and Magdalena White at theinstitution. Being born also in theEastern Cape and also being subsequently insincere in his investigation in thatCollege, the said Mashoala compounded the problem of the racial disharmony,rather than solved it. However, I needto highlight the fact that by this time of the racial struggle as instigated bythe aforementioned black grouping with an Eastern-Cape link, too many whitemembers of the College, students and teachers alike, had as a reaction alsodeveloped a negative racial attitude towards blacks. Some of them whites who were apparently bosomfriends of Course Chief Instructor (CI) one Colonel Kleynhans, I even caughtred-handed planning ways and means of racially fighting back an anti-whiteMajor Matli, which I duly reported to all the college authorities only to makemore enemies for myself from the white racist grouping this time round, overand above my original enemies, the Eastern Cape black tribal grouping ofMandela-Matanzima Cousin Bobelo-Zini and Matli, the student leader.
Inany case, as a senior student by rank and by virtue of being informed of theracial troublemakers who came from both camps black and white, I, even in thepresence of Inspector General Mashoala, volunteered to give information to himand his investigators in relation to pinpointing individual troublemakers inthe racial conflict but he and his team patently went into a methodical andaggressive campaign to secretly call to attestation under oath viva voce and bymeans of written submissions practically every individual student and teacherwho mattered in the issue while avoiding me (even where I was as clearlynegatively implicated as attested by the joint statement of Colonels Lentsoe and Kleynhans the Chief Instructor or CI, which seeEnclosureas attached) for the entire month-long investigation by theInspector Generals team of the aforesaidthreesome (February 06-March 06, 2001). Shortly thereafter and to myutter surprise, I was on 09 March 2001 formally warned for military courtappearance, on charges which emanated from the said investigations. Thesecharges were brought in terms of the Military Disciplinary Code as read withthe Defence Act No. 44 of 1957 as amended, as well as the Military DisciplinarySupplementary Measures Act. A total of 11 charges, including 5 alternativecharges was pressed against me. These chargesare of a serious nature, including inter alia, Using Threatening,Insubordinate or Insulting Language; Conduct Prejudicial to MilitaryDiscipline; Riotous or Unseemly Behaviour and common law Crimen Injuria. Dueto the seriousness of these charges, they carry upon conviction, a mandatoryprison sentence of not more than 6 months. In addition, should I be convicted Istand to lose my employment and my employment benefits in terms of the DefenceAct and the Military Disciplinary Supplementary Measures Act. The copies of thecharge sheet as well as the averment of Colonels Kleynhans and Lentsoe willform part of the record that will be presented to this Honourable Court onappeal. 14.Itbecame clear at the commencement of my trial that the charges were based on thestatements of this certain witness (Colonel Johan Hendrik Beyers Kleynhansand his corroborator Colonel Raymond Atlholang Lentsoe) who made reference tothe Inspector Generals Investigation (c. 06 Feb-06Mar 2001) and the subsequentreport to which I have already alluded above. Of course, I am not certain ofthe exact date of this report but it was definitely finalized on or about 06 March2001 and very much three days, at least, to the day (09 March 2001) I wascharged (among other allegations as alluded to above) for calling a certainwhite senior a white racist. This report is of tremendous importance to mydefence because it immediately preceded my 09 March arraignment before theMilitary Court. I believe that this report contains certain crucial informationwhich will absolve me before theMilitary Court. My belief is further reinforced by the fact that since 2001 theRespondents have (inclusive of theiraction of essentially refusing to come before Judge Claasen for the purpose ofgiving account under Case Number 7697/04) fought tooth and nail against meaccessing or possessing this report. 15.Initially,and after several fruitless attempts to obtain the documents which I requiredin order to properly prepare for and conduct my defence in the Military Courtin 2001, I brought an application in the Military Court in early 2002 for thosedocuments to be furnished to me. The Military Court ruled that it had no powerto make such an order.
16. Iimmediately resorted to the procedure afforded by the Promotion of Access toInformation Act, No. 2 of 2000. However, this also failed because one Major H.S. Pretorius (the Information Officer for the Respondents), in spite of aclear-cut disabusal on my part, incorrectly dug his heels in alleging that thedocuments were required by myself for the purposes of civil litigation againstthe Department of Defence and thus were not, according to his reading of theAct, covered by the said Act. I was thusleft high and dry.
17.Inearly 2003, the Second Respondent sought to recommence the proceedings againstme before the Military Court. However, the case had to be adjourned again aftermy Senior Military Defence Counsel correctly indicated that I as yet had to befurnished with the all-important documents which I required in order toeffectively defend the matter.18. Despitethat clarion call of mine through my Senior Military Defence Counsel, theadjournment came and went and yet the documents continued to be denied me. Whenthe matter resumed it was before a new judge, namely Judge Piet Retief Venter,who initially refused to await the provision of these documents. However, hereluctantly postponed the trial again after I had applied for his recusal onthe basis of his bias against me, though he still dismissed the application forhis own recusal.19.Imust state that in the entirety of the period of all these postponements of thetrial, both my Senior Military Defence Counsel and I kept knocking on theRespondents various doors, requesting that the documents be furnished to me,to no avail. Suffice it to say, I have neversimply sought to delay the administration of justice as is frequently allegedby the Respondents, but I have actively sought the proper information whichwould enable me to conduct my defence and thus to bring the matter of thesecharges to finality and a definitive closure. There is a trail of various correspondencebetween my attorneys and the Respondents which bear testimony that I was andstill am actively seeking finality. Because of the limitation to only 30 pagesfor this application, limited to the barest essential facts for the Court togrant me both the condonation and the leave to note an appeal, I am unable tobring these papers into this application as it is.. However, these documents form part of thewhole record of appeal which will be brought before this Honourable Court inthe prosecution of the appeal itself. Thus, just to reiterate, I actively seekthe proper conclusion of the trial which remains pending before the MilitaryCourt but I cannot accede to such finality being brought at the expense of myaccess to and possession of information which I believe will absolve me fromthe preferred charges.
20. Imust also mention that despite general resistance towards complying with myrequests, at several stages during our exchanges the Respondents and/ or theirdelegated subordinates like General Sphiwe Nyanda then Chief of the SANDF didpop up a glimmer of hope that created in me a legitimate expectation of beingon course to be ultimately furnished with the requested documents because they kepton giving assurances to myself, to mySenior Military Defence Counsel and to my attorneys for the High Court that these would be furnished. However, theynever honoured those commitments and in fact ultimately somersaulted and allegedthat I had already been furnished with ALL the documents, as early as 2004(post-Claasen Judgment at the High Court), when I had in fact been giveneverything but the most crucial document which is the report issued by theoffice of Army Inspector General Mashoala and sub-inspectors Mokalake andWhite, dated on or about 06 March 2001 and very prior to my arraignment March09, 2001.
21.As for how I was left with no option butto appeal for remedies from the High Court through Judge Claasen, this is howthe matter panned out, just for some semblance of more detail. On or about 26 February 2004 the thenthree-year-old military trial against me resumed before Senior Military JudgeMichael Albertus Venter who outrightly and surprisingly blamed me for causingthe delay due to my insistence that I should receive the requisite documentsand reports before the trial could proceed in the honourable Court of SeniorMilitary Judge. In total disregard for the due administration of justice, the honourableCourt of Senior Military Judge ordered that the trial continues and I wasforced to plead. I pleaded not guilty to all the charges against me. TheProsecution called their first two witnesses (Colonel Edward Frans Drost and anindividual who (Colonel Raymond Atlholang Lentsoe) as admitted by the Respondents,had also three years before participated in the since-controversial ArmyCollege investigations and their subsequently hidden report at the behest ofArmy Inspector General Mashoala and his sub-inspectors White and Mokalake) andthey both testified against me, making inthe process yet again reference to the documents which I had all along beenrequesting, particularly the Army Inspector Generals Report that was finalizedon or about 06 March 2001. My defence Counsel could not proceed without accessto those documents so we reserved the right to cross-examine those twowitnesses. Thereafter the matter was postponed to 23 March 2004.

22. It is at that exact meantime ofpostponement that I approached the High Court (via Honourable Judge Claasen) onan urgent basis for an order inter alia, halting the Military Court trial untilsuch time as I would be furnished with the specified documents and any otherdocument relevant to the trial. The High Court as per the Honourable JudgeClaasen granted that order on 23 March 2004 in Case Number 7697/04.

23.On 19 April 2004 the Respondents wrote aletter to my attorneys, enclosing certain documents in purported complete compliancewith the order of Judge Claasen. These Enclosures and the accompanying letter(s)are also part of the record which will be before this Honourable Court onappeal, should this Honourable Court be with us in our application herein.

24.From the onset, I disputed that theRespondents had completely complied with the order because the documents thatthey provided were not only lacking the full complement ordered by JudgeClaasen, but they were too often individually truncated with the result thatthe most essential elements thereof (like minutes or statements of participantsetc) were clearly either cut out and simply replaced with ineffectual factscopy-and-paste style or whole swathes of supposedly-recorded documentarymaterial was patently and simply excluded for the obvious purposes of denyingme good defence when the trial recommences at the military court. This proteston my part was ventilated to Respondents by way of a letter addressed from my attorneysto the Respondents attorneys on 03 May 2004. This letter also forms part ofthe record. 25.On 25 July 2005, the Respondentsapproached the High Court (Via Honourable Acting Judge Sithole), under adifferent case number, effectively approaching a different judge (other thanthe Honourable Judge Claasen who was the custodian of the original High Courtorders), for an order that they had fully complied with the order of 23 March2004 (Claasens). I opposed the application and filed an answering affidavitwhich will also form part of the record on appeal. The High Court, as per HonourableSithole (Acting Judge), found against the Applicants (Respondents herein) thatthey had not in toto complied with the order of Judge Claasen of 23 March 2004.
26. The Respondents appealed against thedecision to the Full Bench of the Gauteng NorthHigh Court, leading to the latters judgment of 12 November 2010, whichI now seek to appeal against. I am convinced that the judgment was erroneousand a different court might find differently from the court a quo as stated in the attached Notice of Motion.


REASONSFOR THE DELAY27.I submit that I did not willfully failto apply for leave to appeal within the stipulated time frames. I had verycogent reasons which are as follows:
i.I am in a difficultfinancial position due to this prolonged dispute between the Respondents andmyself. As I have already stated above, this matter has spanned well over aperiod of 10 years now. The proceedings in the High Court have especiallysapped my financial resources as I have effectively had to fund three differentsets of proceedings in the High Court. In order to approach this HonourableCourt, I also needed to properly instruct my legal team, including the paymentof a deposit to cover their fees. It is now well known (and this HonourableCourt is invited to take judicial notice of the fact) that legal costs arerelatively high in South Africa. I am an employee of the Respondents, pittedagainst an employer whose resources far exceed my own and I am expected or atleast I need to meet them at their own level, in terms of legal representation.I am not just finding it very difficult to do so, I am standing already atfinancial ruination having sold every valuable of my household in order to stayafloat. In fact I am taking legal advice on whether or not the Respondentsshould be responsible for the payment of my legal fees since this is a disputerelating to my employment with the SANDF. However, in the meantime and sincethere is no guarantee that the opinion I will get will endorse that my legalexpenses be taken care of by the state or even that the Respondents will agreeto such an opinion, I must fund my own legal battles against them. I mustconfess to this Honourable Court that my delay in approaching the Court was dueto these very financial constraints.
ii.Secondly, and partly becauseof the financial hardships that I have already mentioned above, I have soughtto resolve this dispute outside the formal court proceedings. I have writtenletters to various institutions which I viewed as relevant and key to theresolution of this matter out of court. In this regard please find attached thefollowing documents which are proof of these engagements:a. Letterfrom the Office of the President of South Africa and Commander in Chief of theArmed Forces dated 13 October 2010 hard copy with electronic copy on https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=vpid=explorerchrome=truesrcid=0B2zhhdKEUk9ZMzhhYTM5NWMtNzQ1MS00NjIzLWJmMDAtNmU5NzQxMjAzZTFhhl=en(This was a presidential reply in response to my own letter to The Presidentand SANDF Commander In Chief dated 08 October 2010 https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B2zhhdKEUk9ZZDU5Njk0NGMtNTZhNS00YTViLWJiZjgtZTc1OGUxNjcxMjFjhl=enb. Letterof acknowledgment from the Interim National Defence Force Service Commissiondated 31 October 2010 (responding to their own copy of the letter written thePresidency)c. Letterof acknowledgment from the Public Protector dated 03 March 2010. (responding totheir own copy of the letter written the Presidency)d. Letterfrom Legal Aid Board South Africa dated 12 October 2010. This letter alsoconfirms the financial constraints that I am experiencing in funding this 10-yearold legal war because Legal Aid Board actually referred to my request for themto provide me with legal assistance in this matter. I have still not received asubstantive response on my request.
28.Iparticularly gave deference to the Presidential intervention which I was highlyanticipating in this matter. I was also expecting the Respondents to do thesame and to reciprocally pray for the President deign us his intervention sincewe are all under the authority of the National President and Our Commander-in-Chief.However, seeing that the Respondents have now resumed the Military Court trial asof an urgent fax (SANDF File Number LEGSATO TT/R/106/7) dated 11 March 2011, Iam now sure that the Respondents would like this matter to be finalized nowhereelse but within the four walls of the courtroom, except that they are convincedI have no legal recourse but to dance to their tune of being found guilty anddismissed from the Force without due legal process of sufficient ventilation ofthe charges on their part. Finding itimpossible to bow down to this clear act of injustice, I have, to the point ofstarving myself and my family, garnered what limited financial resources inorder to come before this Honourable Court.
MERITS OF THE APPEAL ITSELF29.I humbly submit that prospects standhigh for me to succeed in this appeal just on the merits of this case.. Theinitial judgments of the High Court before both the Honourable Judge Claasen andsubsequently Acting Judge Sithole were in my favour, though for slightlydifferent reasons than those which I am raising before this Honourable Court. Forthe purposes of such, please refer to the Notice of Motion for my detailedgrounds of Appeal. The fact that, out of a total of three High Court judgments,two did find in my favour is in itselfindicative of the great likelihood that this is a matter which a differentCourt might not only see differently, but may well find in my favour.30.I am especially confident that thisHonourable Court will be with me in my submission that the Respondents have notin toto complied with the order of the High Court as per the Honourable JudgeClaasen on 23 March 2004, in that they have not furnished me with all thedocuments that I require in order to conduct my defence. I am particularlyunhappy that the very report on which they decided to charge me (the InspectorGeneral Mashoala-and-sub-inspectors report that was finalized on or about 06March 2001) is still being withheld from me. This confirms my belief that thewhole case against me before the Military Court is fabricated and maliciouslybrought by the people who feared that I would expose their corruption, racism andtribalism when I in vain volunteered to participate in the Army InspectorGenerals investigation. The required report will help me to prove myinnocence. I am confident that this Honourable Court will vindicate my right tojustice.


CONCLUSION31.I humbly submit that this applicationmeets the criteria for the granting of condonation and leave to note an appealout of time and also for the granting of the special leave of this HonourableCourt to appeal to it as envisaged in Rule 12(3) and Rule 6(3) of the Rules ofthe Supreme Court of Appeal. The reasons for the delay in the late applicationfor leave to appeal are cogent and were not of my own making. They were due tomy unfortunate position of having to pay my last cent in order to obtainjustice in this matter, which as Ive already explained, is weighing heavily onme. Furthermore, I was very hopeful for an out-of-court resolution of the issues,at least for the provision of the relevant documents to the Military Courtproceedings without me having to resort to court again, but this was not to be,since the Respondents have not yielded. I am therefore left with no option butto approach this Honourable Court in this manner.
32.I also respectfully submit that it is inthe best interest of justice and the human rights protected in the Constitutionof The Republic of South Africa, 1996, that this Honourable Court hears my caseon appeal. I am on trial in the Court of Senior Military Judge, which carriesthe same (if not more serious) personal repercussions as a criminal trial. AllI am requesting is that I be given all and sufficient documents to enable me todefend myself, a defence which I otherwise only too eager to mount. TheRespondents, however, using the States resources which are abundantly available to them, seekto thwart the due fulfillment of a just process by denying me access to andpossession of that documentation. I urge this Honourable Court to overlook alland any procedural mishaps that the Court might in its discretion hold meaccountable for and to accordingly proceed to hear this matter nonetheless, alldue to the serious human rights consequences and the public-interest this casehas been commanding ever since 2001. The need for this Honourable Courtresolving the issues in the matter asreferred to above (and as will more fully appear in the full record ofproceedings) far outweighs any niggle to show disapproval for anyclumsiness on my part. I therefore humbly urge this Court to allowthis matter to proceed to this Honourable Court on appeal.
WHEREFOREI pray for an order in the terms set out in the Notice of Motion to which thisaffidavit is attached.
_____________________________ GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI

I certifythat the Deponent has sworn to and signed this affidavit before me at________ onthe________ day of______________2011, the Regulations contained in theGovernment notice No. R1258 of 21 July 1972, as amended, having been compliedwith in that the Deponent confirms that he knows and understands the contentsof this affidavit, that he has no objection to taking the prescribed oath andthat he considers the oath as binding on his conscience.

COMMISSIONEROF OATHS




++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This is a Year 2013 PLEA FROM GOOD SAMARITANS OUT THERE FOR FIVE-MILLION-RAND-DONATION IN ORDER TO DEFEAT ZUMA IN A COURT CASE AGAINST OR A FEW MORE OTHERS). ACCOUNT NUMBER FOR ENABLING PHIRI TO FIGHT A POTENTIALLY-SUCCESFUL COURT CASE AGAINST MR JACOB ZUMA IN SOUTH AFRICA IS 9074472391-ABSA-SAVINGS-ACCOUNT-CENTURION-PRETORIA-SOUTH-AFRICA-FOR-GOODMAN-MANYANYA-PHIRI.




Chief Justice of South Africa's Constitutional Court in front ofwhom my pleas shall be laid officially bare in my fight against Jacob Zuma overhis wanton disregard in matters relating to rule of law at the expense of atleast one South African called Mr Goodman Manyanya Phiri, a lieutenant colonelin South Africas National Defence Force



Of course, once money has been asap deposited into Phiri account, I will talk to my Bank (ABSA/Barclays in South Africa) to transfer your donation to a separate account vouchsafed by revenue laws of the Republic, whereupon I will transfer the money to my attorney and advocates fighting my case against an under-educated Jacob Zuma who thinks South Africa can be ruled by political 'majoritarianism' rather than by the rule of law!
MERRY CHRISTMAS AND A VERY HAPPY NEW YEAR TO YOU GLOBAL READER OF MY BLOG, BUT BLOG-OWNER AND I SOUTH AFRICAN LIEUTENANT COLONEL GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI IS HEREBY TENDERING A PLEA TO YOU PERSONALLY FOR FIVE MILLLION RAND (R5 OOO OOO) DONATE TO ME THAT AMOUNT WHICH WILL ENABLE ME TO FIGHT MR JACOB ZUMA IN COURT AND WIN AGAINST HIM TOO! I MEAN BEING ELECTED IN MANGAUNG BY 3000 RACIALLY- OR TRIBALLY-COMPROMISED DELEGATES 'JUST BECAUSE 'ZUMA BELONGS TO THE VERY MAJORITY NGUNI TRIBE WHERE ZUMA AND NELSON MANDELA COME FROM' DOES NOT MAKE MR-ZUMA-YOU FEARED BY GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI' Rule your country, Sir; but till my last breath, I intend to challenge you for your corruption, your profligacy, and your disregard for rule of law in the Republic of South Africa and Africa's 'hottest' economy for that matter. As of now, I am asking for any good Samaritan(s) to help pay money for my lawyers who must defend me at the Constitutional Court (Headed by Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng) against your strings in 27-year-old-persecution acts by you Mr Zuma against Phiri since exile
IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
(REPUBLIC OFSOUTH AFRICA)

CASE NO.
In the matter between

GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI Applicant

and

THE PRESIDENT, REPUBLICOF SOUTH AFRICA, N.O1ST Respondent

And

THE MINISTER OF DEFENCE ANDVETERANS AFFAIRS2ND Respondent

And

THE DIRECTOR, MILITARY PROSECUTIONS ,DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE 3RD Respondent

and
THESECRETARY FOR DEFENCE 4TH Respondentand
THECHIEF OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONALDEFENCE FORCE 5TH Respondent
And
THEGENERAL OFFICER COMMANDINGTHE SOUTHAFRICANARMYS INTELLIGENCE FORMATION6TH Respondent

and
THECHIEF OF STAFF(ACTING) OF THE SOUTH AFRICANARMY INTELLIGENCE FORMATION7TH Respondent


FOUNDINGAFFIDAVIT

I, the undersigned,
GOODMANMANYANYA PHIRI
do hereby state under oathas follows:


1.
THE PARTIES
1.1Iam an adult male, and a Lieutenant Colonel in the South African National DefenceForce (the SANDF) at Army Headquarters, Dequar Road, Pretoria. I am theApplicant in this matter.
1.1.1 Thefacts contained herein are within my personal knowledge unless the contrary isexpressly stated and are, to the best of my knowledge and belief, both true andcorrect.
1.2The First Respondent is the President ofthe Republic of South Africa, who is cited herein in his capacity as theCommander in Chief of the South African Armed Forces and the highest office inthe South African National Defence Force. His address for the purposes ofservice in this application is situated at the State Attorney, 8thFloor, Manaka Heights, 167 Andries Street, Pretoria.

1.3The2ND Respondent is the Minister of Defence and Military VeteransAffairs, cited in her capacity as the Political Head of the Department ofDefence, and whose address for the purposes of service in this application is situatedat the State Attorney, 8th Floor, Manaka Heights, 167 AndriesStreet, Pretoria.
1.4The 3RD Respondent is theDirector, Military Prosecutions, Department of Defence; whose address forservice in this matter is the State Attorney, 8th Floor, ManakaHeights, 167 Andries Street, Pretoria..
1.5The 4TH Respondent is theSecretary for Defence whose address for service in this matter is the StateAttorney, 8th Floor, Manaka Heights, 167 Andries Street, Pretoria.
1.6The 5TH Respondent is the Chiefof the South African National Defence Force whose address for service in thismatter is the State Attorney, Fedsure Forum, 8th Floor, ManakaHeights, 167 Andries Street, Pretoria.
1.7The 6TH Respondent is theGeneral Officer Commanding the South African Armys Intelligence Formationwhose address for service in this matter is the State Attorney, 8thFloor, Manaka Heights, 167 Andries Street, Pretoria.

1.8The7TH Respondent is the Acting Chief of Staff of the South AfricanArmys Intelligence Formation whose address for service in this matter is theState Attorney, Fedsure Forum, Cnr Van de Walt and Pretorius Streets, Pretoria,Gauteng.
2.
INTRODUCTION
2.1Thisis an application to this Honourable Court for various urgent and interim orders as well as final orders in thefollowing terms:
2.1.1 An order dispensing with the forms ofservice and Notice periods required in this Honourable Court in terms of Rule6(12) of the Rules of this Honourable Court.
2.1.2 Urgent stay of my arraignment before theMilitary Court on 4 November 2011 as planned by the 2ND to the 7THRespondents in terms of Part A of the Notice of Motion pending theinvestigation and resolution by the 1st Respondent, of my grievancewhich I initially submitted with my superior in terms of the policy andprocedure in The Defence Act and the Military Disciplinary SupplementaryMeasures Act, on 7 March 2001 and which grievance remains outstanding to date.
2.1.3 An order that the 1ST Respondentmust comply with the provisions of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act,Act No. 3 of 2000 in that he must investigate and resolve my grievance which Ilodged with his office on 6 November 2002 in terms of the policy and procedureof the SANDF after the failure to address the grievance by certain officials inthe SANDF who are my superiors but are of junior rank to the 1STRespondent.
2.14 An order that the 1ST Respondentmust report to this Honourable Court within 6 months of the Order of thisHonourable Court as to how he would have complied with the terms of this Order.
2.15 In part B of the Notice of Motion,an order that the Respondents are finally interdicted from charging me before the Military Court inrespect of the blogging of information pertaining to my grievance which I filedwith the 1ST Respondent and/ or any related charges.
2.16An order directing that the Respondents pay the costs of these
proceedings

2.1.7 Any other relief that the HonourableCourt might find appropriate after hearing the application.

URGENCYThis case isextremely urgent because I have been informed by the officials of theRespondent that I must attend at their office on 4 November 2011 for thepurposes of the new charges to be read out to me.
3.
BRIEFBACKGROUND FACTS
3.1 The Respondents and I (excluding the 1STRespondent) are involved in a 10 year legal battle concerning my persecution bythe Respondents for exposing certain corrupt practices by officials of theSouth African National Defence Force. The case is now on appeal in theConstitutional Court under case number CCT87/2011. The case arose because in the periodbetween 2000 and March 2001, while I was attending at the South African ArmyCollege (the College), there were allegations of racial disharmony among themembers of the College community.
The allegations received widespreadpublicity in the media. In the period between February and March 2001. As aresult, an investigation was ordered by the Army Chief, then Lieutenant GeneralGilbert Lebeko Ramano, to inquire into the allegations.
3.2 On 6th March 2001 theInspector General, Brigadier General Enoch Mashoala, and his assistant Inspectors,Colonels Oupa Mokalake and Magdalena White (the Inspectors), arrived at theCollege to carry out the investigation. On that day Brigadier General Mashoala(the Inspector) addressed the students at the College, and invited any personwith information in regard to the racial disharmony to make submissions to theInspectors; and at that very moment, being a senior student by rank, I raisedmy hand and informed the Inspector General that I had the knowledge of all thefacts about the racial disharmony at the College.
3.3 The Inspectors spent a full month at theCollege investigating the allegations of racial disharmony at the College; andbefore the end of that period, on 06th March 2001, I went to the Inspectorsoffice to make submissions, since I had not been given the opportunity despitemy offer to give information to the investigators.
3.4 Colonel White informed me that I was late;and that the investigation had been completed and a report already finalised. Ifelt that the door had been shut unreasonably against me; as I had indicated inan open audience that I would be of great assistance in the investigation. Accordingly,on 7th March 2001 I lodged my own grievance against the Inspectorsincluding the Inspector General for disregarding my submissions. A copy of mygrievance is attached as Annexure A.Please also refer to Annexure Bwhich is the letter of acknowledgement of receipt.
3.5 To my surprise, on 9th March2001, I was given notice to appear before the Military Court for misconduct.Eleven (11) charges were proffered against me; ranging from using threateningor insulting language, insubordination or disobeying lawful commands, ofconduct prejudicial to military discipline; to riotous or unseemingly behaviourand common law crimen iniuria. Apparently,the charges related to incidents that had allegedly happened in February 2001.A copy of the charges is annexed hereto as AnnexureC.
3.6 The charges are extremely serious in themilitary culture and environment; and if I am convicted of any one of them, aprison term and expulsion from the SANDF might be imposed.
3.7 Subsequently, during the proceedings inthe Military Court, some of the Respondents witnesses referred to the InspectorGenerals report made after the investigation of racial disharmony at theCollege.
My Counsel could not duly crossexamine the witnesses as I had not been furnished with the Inspectors report.
3.8 It is common caused between theRespondents and I that I made an urgent application to the North Gauteng HighCourt for, inter alia, an order tocompel the Respondents to furnish me with all the documents that were necessaryfor my defence, before the proceedings in the Military Court could proceed andthat the order was granted.
3.9 It is further common cause that a disputeensued as to whether the Respondents had complied with that order, theoutstanding issue now being whether or not the Respondents furnished me withthe South African Army Inspector Generals report involving Phiri et al at South African Army College.Herein, I have referred to that report as the Inspector Generals report.

3.10 On26th July 2005 the Respondents applied in the North Gauteng HighCourt, before the Honourable Sithole J for an order, inter alia, declaring that they had complied with the Court Orderand that the proceedings before the Military Court should proceed. Their applicationwas dismissed with costs.
3.11 The Respondents appealed the dismissal oftheir application to the Full Bench of the North Gauteng High Court. The FullBench as per the Honourable Tuchten J upheld the appeal with costs; and setaside the High Court Judgment in Case number A478/08.
3.12 I applied for special leave to appeal to theSupreme Court of Appeal in case number and my application was dismissed on 16August 2011.
3.13 I have now applied for the special leave ofthe Constitutional Court to appeal that decision in Case number CCT87/2011, onthe grounds, inter alia that my Constitutionalrights to a fair trial, to protection of the law and to the adjudication of mycivil disputes by an independent and impartial court in terms of the Constitutionof the Republic of South Africa, 1996 are being jeopardised. The case is stillpending.
3.14In the meantime my own grievance which Ilodged with the Respondents on 7 March 2001 remains unattended and unresolvedby the Respondents to date. Over the years and under pressure of thepersecution orchestrated by the Respondents particularly through the aforesaidMilitary Court charges, I have sought in vain to escalate and seek urgentresolution of my grievance with the Respondents. The main reason that I have made these effortsis that if a full scale investigation is made into the events that my grievancerelate to it will be found that I am in fact a whistleblower who was persecutedfor exposing certain senior army officials who engaged in corrupt andscandalous activities such as the giving of sexual favours in order to pass coursesand the precipitation of racial disharmony at the college. I thereforeescalated the grievance in terms of the stipulated procedures of the SouthAfrican National Defence Force. However, there was never a substantive responseto my grievance. Instead the Respondents and many other co-conspirators in theSANDF have persecuted and sought to expel me from the SANDF without just causebecause they do not want the whole world to know of the rottenness within theirranks. After making many attempts to be heard through the stipulated channelsto no avail I decided to publicly name and shame the perpertrators of the vicesand my persecutors. I created a blog on the World Wide Web wherein I posted allthe vital information starting to the beginning of the strife between me andthe Respondents at the SANDF in 2001 and highlighting all my efforts to beheard. Further I kept updates of developments relating to my persecution forexposing the truth. On the--- day of April 2011 theRespondents applied for an interdict to stop me from publicising all thisinformation through the internet. After taking legal advice I agreed to stoppublishing this information on the internet and the parties settlementagreement was duly made an Order of Court before the Honourable -----J. The order specifically stated that theRespondents should not use the facts of that matter against me in the future.In fact this was one of the main reasons why I was inclined to agree to thisOrder, in order to keep peace between myself and the Respondents in the future.I am however puzzled that the Respondents now seek to charge me in the MilitaryCourt for the very same reason, my publishing on the internet of theinformation of my long-standing dispute with the Respondents, notwithstandingthe Respondents undertaking in the High Court at the time of the settlementorder.I have made numerous attempts to makepeace with the Respondents out of Court. In 2003 to 2004 after the originalOrder by the Honourable Claasen J, mylegal team and I attended several meetings with the Respondents in order toreach some finality in the matters between us, to no avail. This year myattorneys made telephone calls to the Respondents attorneys to seek a meeting,without success. My attorneys also wrote a letter, attached as Annexure C to seek a meeting to resolve the casesbetween me and the Respondents . This letter was never responded to.Instead, I was telephoned by ___ of theRespondents and informed that I must appear before--- on 4 November 2011 fornew proceedings to be initiated in the Military Court arising out of thepublishing of the information pertaining to my grievance on the internet. Theprocedure of the Military Court proceedings are that the charges are onlycommunicated to me in person on the day in question and I sign for them. I willonly obtain a copy of the charge sheet at a later stage when disclosure for thepurposes of the trial is being made. I am therefore unable to produce anydocumentary proof of the impending charges but I have been reliably informed bythe Respondents representatives that I will again be arraigned on 4 November2011. I have a long history of persecution by the Respondents manifestingthrough the pending Military Courtcharges and their concerted efforts to ensure that I do not get justice ashighlighted by their failure to provide the documents which I require in orderto defend myself and their unwillingness to resolve our differences out ofcourt. I am therefore convinced that the Respondents will grab any opportunityto bring me down that may present itself and will even create suchopportunities because they are desperate to get rid of me in the SANDF. I haveno doubt that these new charges being brought up in contravention of theRespondents own earlier commitment not to use the facts that were subject totheir application against me in April 2011 against me, are a ploy to finish meoff since I have now taken the old charges of 2001 to the Constitutional Courtand the Respondents are concerned that those charges of 2001 may beunsuccessful in pulling me down because there are high prospects of success inmy case. This is a new attempt which I have good reason to be very apprehensiveof, given the suffering that I have gone through at the hands of theRespondents.


CLEARRIGHTIhave the right to the protection of the law in terms of section 9 of theConstitution of the Republic of South Africa,1996. Section 9 reads as follows: 9.(1)Everyone is equal before the law and has the right to equal protection andbenefit of the law.

The Respondents are using theCourts, in particular the Military Court as a means of punishing me for beingthe whistle-blower at the SA Army College in 2001. Their deliberate exclusionof my contributions to the investigations that took place at the college isclear testimony of this. I have a clear right to be protected fromdiscrimination and/ or persecution on the basis that I was an outspoken criticof the vices that infested the SA Army College.
 Further, I have a clearConstitutional right to freedom of conscience and freedom of expression as persection 15(1) and 16(1) of the Constitution of South Africa, 1996. It wouldhave haunted my conscience not to expose the corruption at the College. I also have a right emanating fromthe settlement agreement that we made in April 2011 from any proceedingsemanating from the facts that gave rise to the settlement agreement.
 In addition and very critically, Ihave a right to just administrative action in terms of section 33 of theConstitution of South Africa, 1996 and in terms of the Promotion ofAdministrative Justice Act (PAJA). I have the right to have my grievanceproperly investigated and resolved by the Respondents, the 1stRespondent in particular since the grievance is now with his office. PAJAspecifically grants me the following rights:

The right to be told in advance of theprocedural steps that will be taken to address my grievance.
The right to be informed of my rights inrelation to the whole process.
The right to have my side of the storyconsidered before a decision is made.
The right to be informed what the decision isand of my rights to any appeal or review procedures available.
The right to be given reasons for thedecision.
The right to challenge the decision in Court.The failure of the Respondents toaddress my grievance in the aforesaid manner means that they have not onlyviolated my rights but also contravened the law. They have dirty hands andshould not be allowed to continue using the legal process to fulfil theirunholy intentions of punishing me for exposing the rot in the SANDF andsilencing me through harassment. It is my humble submission that the Respondentsare estopped from proceeding with any action against me in respect of the sameissues which they deliberately fail to address in terms of the dictates ofadministrative justice and my right to be heard.

IRREPARABLE HARM The charges which the Respondentsintend to bring against me are simply an addition to the persecution that I amalready going through at the hands of the Respondents. For the past 10 years Ihave tremendously suffered in my finances, my career as well as my emotionaland social well-being due to the first charges as the matter continues in theCourts. I have become a classic example of persecution on the grounds ofconscience and expression in that I chose not to remain silent over the corruption,sex scandals and the racism at the SA Army College. The charges against me wereinstituted on 9th March 2001, after I had lodged my complaint on 6thMarch 2001in a strategic move to silence me.
6.2This therefore shows clearly that the SANDFauthorities had decided to ignore or to cover-up whatever was going on at theCollege. And so, when I laid a formal complaint against the Inspectors forrefusing to accept my further submissions on the matter, it meant that I wantedto reveal what the SANDF authorities had decided not to reveal.
Shouldthe Respondents proceed to charge me again, I may expect another decade ofincessant persecution at their hands. It boggles my mind that the Respondentswould want to spend more than 10 years in court trying to stop me from gettingall the information and documents I require in order to prepare for my defenceagainst the charges that they drummed up against me. If the Respondents were just, fair orreasonable they would have long given me all the documents, specifically theInspector Generals report. If it indeed does not exist as they sometimes say,the Respondents would have at the very least produced a sworn statement fromtheir Information Officer or any other senior official attesting to thateffect. Despite the fact that the State Attorney who is the Respondents ownlawyers once suggested this at one of our meetings in 2004 the Respondents haveadamantly refused to do so. I can expect the same wanton disregard for myrights to be heard, my right to protection of the law, my right not bediscriminated against, my freedom of conscience and my freedom of expressionthat the Respondents have already displayed. I have been previously harassedand raided at my residential place by 6 armed officers in April 2011 when theRespondents brought the interdict against me. I am therefore fearful that suchunpalatable drama might recur since the Respondents are still bent on floutingmy human and Constitutional rights. I therefore humbly request this HonourableCourt to stop the Respondents from harassing me again through such spuriouscharges, particularly not before they have fully investigated and adjudicatedon my grievance, which is now with the President of the State who is also the Commanderin Chief of the Armed Forces.
The purpose for instituting theproceedings against me in the Military Court, has always been and still remainsto stop me from revealing what the SANDF authorities had decided to cover up;and to punish me for my concern that some of what was going on at the College,should not be allowed in the SANDF. I humbly request this Honourable Court toprotect me from such vindictiveness
I have been litigating forten years in regard to the whole dispute with the Respondents, I have run outof funds. I applied for legal aid butwas turned down. The new charges being brought by the Respondents would drag meinto other legal processes given that my experience with them is that theywould not conduct the proceedings fairly as required by law.
7.2The Court is further requested to note thatpartly due to my genuine desire to reach finality in the disputes I have withRespondents and partly because of the financial hardships I find myself due tothe incessant litigation with the Respondents, I sought to resolve the disputeoutside the court. In this regard, I had hoped that there was a high possibilitythat the matter would be resolved by an intervention of the Commander in Chief,the President. I also expected the Respondent to give due deference to such interventionand wait for the Presidents response to my request to intervene. Instead theywent ahead and applied for an order to resume the proceedings before the MilitaryCourt. In addition, they are now seeking to bring new charges, which clearly ismeant to further frustrate and persecute me. Should this Honourable Court notgrant an Order stopping the Respondents from doing so, I will be ruined.

BALANCE OF CONVENIENCEIhave considered waiting until the Respondents have officially charged me beforebringing this application. However, this will not be helpful to me as thedamage will already have been done. It is undoubted that the Respondents willcharge me on 4 November 2011 unless this Honourable Court orders them not to doso. By so doing, they will set in motion a whole string of effects on me suchas additional trauma, a hold on my career, another legal battle to fight giventheir history of denial of my rights and consequently more legal bills for me topay, which puts me and my family in dire straits. On the other hand my owngrievance lodged in 2001 remains unattended, whereas such investigation andventilation of my issues would actually resolve all the Respondents cases against me. Should theRespondents verily believe that I am indeed guilty of all the things that theyaccuse me of, resolving my own grievance will at the most exonerate me and atthe very least open their eyes to some highly mitigating factors. TheRespondents might even change their thinking about me if only they approached mygrievance with openness of mind and a commitment to get to the root of theissues. The issues between me and the Respondents are questions relating to thevalues and integrity of the SANDF and therefore this nation. It is onlybefitting that the 1ST Respondent who is the highest ranking officerin the SANDF and whose national duties also include the protection of thevalues and integrity of the nation be given an opportunity to investigate, makefindings on and determine on my grievance. I believe that once this has beendone the charges against me will either be seen for what they truly are, namelypersecution for my outspokenness against corruption, sex scandals and racism orthey will be withdrawn by the Respondents upon their realisation that I shouldbe applauded rather than prosecuted for exposing such vices.

Isubmit that I stand to lose everything should the Respondents not be stoppedfrom charging me again before the 1ST Respondents attends to mygrievance. Hence my prayer for both urgent and interim relief as well as finalrelief. In contrast the Respondents stand to lose nothing if this order isgranted. They will simply have to let justice take its course, the 1STRespondent must decide on my grievance first.
On or around 27 March 2011 I was physicallysuspended from the SANDF (albeit my first suspension with the effect that I wasreduced to office furniture reporting to work doing nothing else) occurredaround December 2002. Every other person that might have been involvedin this matter at the College, except me, have long moved on with their normallives. Thus the proceedings which the Respondents insist to bring before theMilitary Court, are only about me; my career, my freedom, my future and that ofmy family. I submit therefore, that the Respondents will not be prejudiced ifan interdict in terms of the Notice of Motion is granted. On the contraryhowever, if it is not granted, I will face further persecution and suffering asI have already explained above. I respectfully submit that the balance ofconvenience favours the granting of the Orders as prayed for in the Notice ofMotion.

NO OTHER REMEDYI have no other recourse totake other than to approach this Honourable Court for relief. As already statedabove I duly followed the procedures for submitting a grievance in the SANDF.My grievance is now with the highest office in the land. However nothing hasbeen done to substantially deal with the issues that I have raised. I haveapproached the Respondents to try to resolve our differences out of court to noavail. My only remedy is to approach this Honourable Court for an Interdict.

In the premises, I humblysubmit that I have made out a case for the granting of an Interdict both on anurgent and Interim basis and on a final basis as set out in the Notice ofMotion; and I beseech the Honourable Court to grant the orders set out in theNotice of Motion.
GOODMANMANYANYA PHIRIDEPONENT

I CERTIFY that thisaffidavit has been sworn to and signed before me at PRETORIA on this .. day of May 2011,by the above deponent who understands the contents hereof, that he has noobjection against taking the prescribed oath and considers the oath as bindingon his conscious, which oath was taken by me, as required by law.

_______________________ COMMISSIONER OFOATHS


FULLNAMES: .
ADRESS:.
CAPACITY:..
AREA:...Zuma-beleagueredLieuteanat Colonel Goodman Manyanya Phiri and Family around early Year 2013



FOR R5 Million PHIRI IS READY TO FIGHT MR ZUMA AFTER HIS DEFEAT AGAINST MR MOTLANTHEACCOUNT NUMBER FOR ENABLING ME TO FIGHT A POTENTIALLY-SUCCESFUL COURT CASE AGAINST MR JACOB ZUMA IN SOUTH AFRICA IS 9074472391-ABSA-SAVINGS-ACCOUNT-CENTURION-PRETORIA-SOUTH-AFRICA-FOR-GOODMAN-MANYANYA-PHIRI.

This is an update for Year 2012 DECEMBER 25 FOR FIVE-MILLION-RAND-DONATION PLEA IN ORDER TO DEFEAT ZUMA IN A COURT CASE AGAINST OR A FEW OTHERS).
Of course, once depostited into my account, I will talk to my Bank (ABSA in South Africa) to transfer your donation to a separate account vouchsafed by revenue laws of the Republic, whereupon I will transfer the money to my attorney and advocates fighting my case against an under-educated Jacob Zuma who thinks South Africa can be ruled by political 'majoritarianism' rather than by the rule of law!
MERRY CHRISTMAS AND A VERY HAPPY NEW YEAR TO YOU GLOBAL READER OF MY BLOG, BUT BLOG-OWNER AND I SOUTH AFRICAN LIEUTENANT COLONEL GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI IS HEREBY TENDERING A PLEA TO YOU PERSONALLY FOR FIVE MILLLION RAND (R5 OOO OOO) DONATE TO ME THAT AMOUNT WHICH WILL ENABLE ME TO FIGHT MR JACOB ZUMA IN COURT AND WIN AGAINST HIM TOO! I MEAN BEING ELECTED IN MANGAUNG BY 3000 RACIALLY- OR TRIBALLY-COMPROMISED DELEGATES 'JUST BECAUSE 'ZUMA BELONGS TO THE VERY MAJORITY NGUNI TRIBE WHERE ZUMA AND NELSON MANDELA COME FROM' DOES NOT MAKE MR-ZUMA-YOU FEARED BY GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI' Rule your country, Sir; but till my last breath, I intend to challenge you for your corruption, your profligacy, and your disregard for rule of law in the Republic of South Africa and Africa's 'hottest' economy for that matter. As of now, I am asking for any good Samaritan(s) to help pay money for my lawyers who must defend me at the Constitutional Court (Headed by Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng) against your strings in 27-year-old-persecution acts by you Mr Zuma against Phiri since exile




ZUMAPHOID-MANDELASQUE NGUNI-XHOSA-ZULU TRIBALISM AT ITS BEST:Jacob Zuma (centre with individuals coming from, out of nine provinces of the Republic of South Africa, FLANKED by a preponderant at least four (4) of the ANC Mangaung Top-six-2012-Mangaung-elected big-wigs who are born in the Nguni-speaking provinces of the Eastern Cape of Nelson Mandela and Zuma's Zulu-speaking KwaZulu-Natal viz. Zuma, Zweli Mkhize,Baleka Mbete and Gwede Mantashe). None of these six individuals come from South Africa's Pedi-speaking ethnicity ranked among the top-three or four ethnicities of the Republic in terms of both demographics and membership to the great ANC of ours. And none also come from Goodman Manyanya Phiri's fellow Siswati-speaking Mpumalanga Province despite the fact that Mpumalanga-Province's Swazi-speaking one Mr Provincial Premier David Mabuza supported Jacob Zuma's campaign to the hilt for Mangaung Conference. Mandelasque-Xhosa-Nguni tribalists like SANDF's Brigadier General Mlandeli Kula say openly that [Arch-tribalists Mandela and Company's strategy from as early as the 1940s of the ANC is to make sure that powerful nations like Swazi, Pedi, Tsonga/Shangaan/Tonga SHOULD NEVER BE ALLOWED IN ANC POWER 'because they have relatives across the borders of South Africa'] which is what explains why tribalist delegates have elbowed out supposedly-Tswana-speaking Kgalema Motlanthe from the ANC Top 6. The other people targeted for exclusion by Mandela's fellow tribalists are Zulus, BUT ZUMA AND MKHIZE (the man in the whitest top) ARE USED BY THE MANDELAS AS FRONTMEN TO RULE SOUTH AFRICA BECAUSE OF THEIR LIMITED KNOWLEDGE OF BOTH SOUTH AFRICAN ETHNOGRAPHY AND ANC HISTORY (if not for sheer personal greed of incumbets). JACOB ZUMA HIMSELF IS USED BY THE MANDELASQUE-BLACK RACISTS-CUM-TRIBALISTS OF SOUTH AFRICA AS A MERE STOOGE PRESIDENT KEPT IN POWER BY WONDERFUL MANDELA'S PEOPLE VIA THE SPY TAPES THAT TO THIS DAY HAVE SAVED HIM FROM A TIME IN JAIL AND MADE HIM SOUTH AFRICA'S STATE PRESIDENT DESPITE 80% DISAPPROVAL BY THIS NATION. For that matter is political-science asininity to claim that 'Cyril Ramaphosa and Venda-speaker 'as ANC Deputy President for Party President Zuma' is now the second most powerful man in the ruling African National Congress Party', for any party is controlled mainly by the Secretary General and in this case, Mr Mandela's fellow-Xhosa-Nguni-speaker...standing tallest between two women on that picture...IS THE BOSS OF THE ANC AND HAS BEEN THE BOSS FOR THE PAST FOUR YEARS OF ZUMA'S REGIME ORDERING EVEN THE MINISTER OF DEFENCE LINDIWE SISULU TO CONTINUE PERSECUTING PHIRI FOR EXPOSING MANDELASQUE-XHOSA TRIBALISM , SEX-FOR-PROMOTION AND OTHER ILLS INT HE SOUTH AFRICAN NATINAL DEFENCE FORCE WHICH IS SUPPOSED TO BE ORDERED AND CONTROLLED FROM THE UNION BUILING BY JACOB ZUMA RATHER THAN FROM THE ANC PARTY HEADQUARTERS IN JOHANNESBURG WHERE GWEDE MANTASHE IS THE BOSS.'



WOE BETIDE US SOUTH AFRICANS!
AS, FROM PAST EXPERIENCE WITH JACOB ZUMA


1.THERE IS BOUND TO BE MORE SEX-FOR PROMOTION IN THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE AND VETERANS' AFFAIRS FAVOURING ZUMA'S FELLOW NGUNIS LIKE ZULU- AND XHOSA-SPEAKERS (OF THE TYPE OF BRIGADIER GENERALS WINNIE ZINI-BOBELO) ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF SWAZI-, ENGLISH-, NDEBELE-, AFRIKAANS-, TSWANA-, PEDI- AND SOTHO-SPEAKERS (AMONG OTHER MINORITIES OPPRESSED ON THESE SHORES EVER SINCE 1994 BY MANDELASQUE-XHOSA-NGUNI TRIBALISM NOW CHAMPIONED BY MANDELA'S STUDENT, THE KWAZULU-NATAL-BORN JACOB ZUMA WITH A MINIMAL EDUCATION THAT, MUCH AGAINST ZULU CULTURE AS FORMULATED BY ZULU NATIONAL FOUNDER SHAKA ZULU, TELLS ZUMA HE CAN SLEEP AROUND WITH ANY WOMAN IF POSSESSED BY AN ERECTION.






2.THERE IS BOUND TO BE MORE MILITARY POLICE SENT TO OUR HOMES ARMED TO THE TEETH FOR NO CRIME AGAINST US EXCEPT REPORTING TO ZUMA HIMSELF, REPORTING TO THE NATION, AND REPORTING TO THE WORLD ABOUT THE CORRUPTION AND RAVAGES GOING ON IN THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL DEFENCE FORCE (AND MAYBE OTHER DEPARMENTS AS WELL) BECAUSE OF THIS MANDELASQUE-ZUMAPHOID CANKER OF TRIBALISM, BLACK RACISM AND OBJECTIFICATION OF WOMAN SEXUALITY IN ZUMA'S SOUTH AFRICA.






3.THERE IS GOING TO BE MOREPOLITICIZATIONOF THE SOUTH AFRICAN ARMY (SANDF) BY JACOB ZUMA WHEREBY TO BE PROMOTED TO HIGHER POSITION (AS ZUMA'S POLITICAL MASTER RE-ELECTED PARTY SECRETARY GENERAL GWEDE MANTASHE OF MANDELA'S EASTERN CAPE TRIBES WILL SAY) ['TO BE PROMOTED OR ASSISTED AS A PHIRI COLONEL FACING CONSTRUCTIVE DISMISSAL IN THE SANDF ARMY] 'YOU HAVE TO BE A MEMBER FIRST OF THE RULING AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS. OF COURSE, MANTASHE AND ZUMA (BOTH OF THEM BENEFICIARIES OF TO RETENTION OF THEIR ORIGINAL POSITIONS VIA A MATERIALLY-COMPROMISED PARTY-DELEGATES) ARE IN MY VIEW THE GREATEST "RUBBISHERS" OF SOUTH AFRICA'S NATIONAL CONSTITUTION AND A DOCUMENT WHICH OUTLAWS POLITICIZATION OF THE ARMY IN THE WAY THAT JACOB ZUMA AND PREDECESSORS HAVE POLITICIZED IT BY OVERSTAFFING IT WITH RELATIVES OF NELSON MANDELA AND THE WAY THAT THE TWO POLITICIANS DEMAND RULING-PARTY-MEMBERSHIP PRIOR TO AN OFFICER'S PROMOTION OR ACCORDING OF THAT PARTICULAR OFFICER'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.






4.THERE IS BOUND TO BE MORE DISREGARD TO THE RULE OF LAW WITH COURTS USED TO SILENCE PHIRI-ILK CRITICS OF THE ZUMA REGIME AND PEOPLE WILL CONTINUE TO BE CHARGED PER ZUMA'S ORDERS AND AS AND WHEN THEY START DEFENDING THEMSELVES FROM SUCH CHARGES THEY WILL BE EXPECTED AND FORCED BY THE ZUMA REGIME TO PAY FOR THEMSELVES EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE, LIKE PHIRI, STILL CIVIL SERVANTS WHO OUGHT TO BE ENJOYING PROSECUTION DEFENCE AT STATE EXPENSE (ZUMA HIMSELF, AND HIS BUDDY AND CORRUPT POLICE CHIEF JACKIE SELEBI WERE DEFENDED AT STATE EXPENSE TO THE TUNE TO ABOUT 20 MILLION RAND, TOGETHER: BUT OF COURSE, THEY ARE BOTH OF THEM MEMBERS OF AN ORGANIZATION TURNED BY ZUMA AND MANDELA INTO A GRAVY TRAIN, THE ANC FORMED BY THE SELF-SAME PHIRI'S ANCESTORS!)






5. THERE IS GOING TO BE MORE PLEAS BY SOME OF US, PLEADING TO THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY TO ASSIST US, CONSIDERING THE NKANDLA-RESIDENCE SCANDAL, AGAINSTNOUVEAU RICHEZUMA'S POWER-ABUSE BORN OUT OF HIS GENERAL SHEER IGNORANCE, EDUCATION-SHYNESS, ALONGSIDE ZUMA'S FELLOW-NOUVEAU-RICHES WHO AS DELEGATES OF THE ANC'S MANGAUNG CONFERENCE, AND DUE TO THEIR MATERIALGRATITUDEANDAPPRECIATIONFOR THE GOVERNMENT POSITIONS GIVEN THEM BY BOTH MANDELA AND ZUMA, HAVE RE-VOTED THE LATTER IN POWER OF OUR ANCESTORS'ORGANIZATION, THE ANC. WE PLEAD WITH THEINTERNATIONALCOMMUNITY TO ALLOW ZUMA AND MANDELA TO PROSPER BUT PLEASE LET SUCH PROSPERTIY NOT BE AT THE EXPENSE OF PEOPLE WHOSE CRIME MAY BE JUST THAT, AS PER NELSON MANDELA'S TRIBAL STRATEGY, 'THEY, LIKE LIEUTENANT COLONEL GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI, 'DO NOT BELONG TO THEIR COLLECTIVE NGUNI RACE (ZULU-AND XHOSA-SPEAKING)'. THIS SHOULD BE VIEWED AS A VERY STRIDENT CALL TO THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY, CONSIDERING THAT SOUTH AFRICA (INCLUSIVE OF THE DELEGATES THAT OVERWHELMINGLY RE-ELECTED ZUMA TO POWER) STANDS AS A LEAST-EDUCATED NATIONS IN THE WORLD EVEN PER CONTINENTAL-AFRICAN STANDARS, JOHANNESBURG-SKYSCRAPERS-NOTWITHSTANDING. BUT MAYBE THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY MUST FIRST GIVE A CHANCE TO NGUNI'S THEMSELVES TO SALVAGE US FROM THEIR WAYWARD SONS MANDELA AND ZUMA!






6.........THERE IS BOUND OVER AND ABOVE THE CURRENT YEARS OF EXILING OF OUR FAMILIES BY ZUMA'S PREVIOUS XHOSA-SPEAKING MASTERS OLIVER TAMBO AND CLARENCE MAKWETU GOING TO BE OVER AND ABOVE THE 18 YEARS OF EXILING OF OUR FAMILIES AND TURNING A DEAF-EAR-TO BY EVEN ARCH-BISHOP DESMOND TUTU'S TRUTH AND RECONCIALIATION AN ADDED SEVEN YEARS OF UNWARRANTED EXILE ALL JUST BECAUSE SOME 2000 (IN CONTRADISTINCTION TO NON-NGUNI MOTLANTHE'S 1000) HAVE VOTED JACOB ZUMA IN ON THE TICKETS MOST PROBABLY OF NGUNI MAJORITY IN SOUTH AFRICA COMBINED WITH JOBS GIVEN IN GOVERNMENT ON THE BASIS OF RACE BY ALL NGUNI PRESIDENTS MANDELA, THABO MBEKI, AND NOW JACOB ZUMA!








7.I MEAN, GOOD NEWS IS: THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF ZULU- AND XHOSA-SPEAKERS ARE NOT AS RACIST AS NELSON MANDELA AND JACOB ZUMA POST 1994 AND I KNOW WE WILL AS ALL SOUTH AFRICANS WIN THIS WAR AGAINST ZUMA'S RACISM MANGAUNG VICTORY NOTWITHSTANDING! THAT IS BY THE WAY ALSO HOW APARTHEID WAS AT LAST DEFEATED BECAUSE OF THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF ETHNIC-EUROPEANS OF SOUTH AFRICA HATING THE SYSTEM DESPITE ELECTION AND REELECTION OF THE THEN HORRIBLE NATIONAL PARTY OF APARTHEID! SO, JACOB ZUMA HAS NO FUTURE, HOWEVER GRAND HE FEELS AFTER HIS PYRRHIC VICTORY IN MANGAUNG!

































Dr Pixley Seme, ANC Intellectual Founder (HE WAS A TONGA/MOROKA OF ZULU STOCK AND THAT IS WHY MR ZUMA AND ANC PRESIDENT ZUMA, A ZULU HIMSELF, CARES NEXT TO TO NOTHING ABOUT HIS LEGACY, DEFINITELY NOT AFTER LEARNING HIS POLITICS FROM A NELSON MANDELA WHO NOT APPARENTLY HAD AN ISSUE AGAINST SEME'S ZULUS, BUT ALSO HAD A PATERNAL ANCESTOR NGUBENCUKA WHO WAS AT ODDS WITH THE ZULU FOUNDER SHAKA ZULU)



MOGOENG MOGOENG CHIEF JUSTICE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA DO RESCUE PHIRI FROM JACOB ZUMAAS BACKGROUND INFO,CLICK IT HERETO FOLLOW HOW MANDELASQUE RACISM-PRO-EASTERN-CAPE WAS BROUGHT INTOTHE SANDF BY ZUMA AND MASTERSth of Office:South Africa's Highest Judge:
Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng
being sought and beseeched legal refuge by Phiri after 27 years of Zuma anti-constitutionalabuse after abuseby a Mr Jacob Zuma whose only idea of constitutional justice needs must only accrueto a race ofthe Eastern Cape where Zuma's mentor and former fellow-Robben-Island-Prisoner Nelson Mandela comes from. Phiri is ethnically Malawian South African and without Mogoeng's aggressive intervention in a counry ruled by Zuma'stribalism and xenophobia, it is now onlythe international communitythat just might rescue Phiri andthe rest ofthe country busy rotting under Zuma and his condonement of racially-motivated corruption in Zuma's South African National Defence Force-leadership style.THE ENGLISH SPARKS (1/9) THAT STARTED THE ZUMA-CONSUMING CONFLAGRATIONJudge President Ngoepe(Pic Courtesy IOL News)




(An August9-2012 Picture update in honour of South African women black or white who toooften under Mr. Jacob Zuma are still suffering a double yoke of living underpowerful Zuma-like, if male-chauvinistic and godlike, men who see all women assexual objects first and citizenesses of South Africas Republic secondover and above being the wrong skin colour where under Jacob Zuma blackpro-Mandelas Xhosa-speaking Eastern Cape is the most superior colour or race.
In thepicture right at centre is Mr. Bernard Ngoepe.
Ngoepe isno ordinary civilian where matters military dominate this blog. Ngoepe ishere in the company of no ordinary other gentleman and ladies either, but I amreturning to the ladies shortly.
Anyway, Mr.Ngoepe knows Mr. Jacob Zumas SANDF like the back of his hand, definitely morethan any of the uniformed officers of South Africa military under Zumadoes. This is so because all cases involving soldiers and seamen and womenfall for automatic review by none other than Mr. Ngoepe and (seeing that courtcases in the military are used by Jacob Zuma to settle political, racial andeven male chauvinist scores) Mr. Ngoepe is for that reason either or both theproblem and the solution of woman objectification for sex happening in theSANDF mainly pro-Eastern Cape uniformed male black racists.
Afterhearing that Ngoepe was amenable to litigants extra-judicial communicationsand in fact did receive a letter from Zumas cabinet Minister for Defenceto [hurry up with the case of the Phiri who must be soonest dismissed from theSANDF], I quid-pro-quo sensitized Mr. Ngoepe about my case by means of givinghim in 2010 a copy of the videos (a good number of them) pictured on the leftof this post together with the copy to Jacob Zuma and the Bosielo CommissionBosielo Commission; and I was hoping as a solution giver Ngoepewould handle the Goodman Manyanya Phiri with more sensitivity, being an obviouscase of Zuma shooting down a whistle-blower and covering up for a cousin(Zini-Bobelo) his Robben-Island-Pal-cum-mentor-in-black-racism-for-the-NguniMr. Nelson Mandela. As a reader you have on this page and even column anadumbration as to how self-professed Mandela Cousin Zini-Bobelo fornicated forpromotion with lascivious army lecturer Raymond Lentsoe in Henchman Zumas army.
For more on how IapprisedJudge President Ngoepe:Readthrough allthe highlighted paragraphs hereunder; andthenclick on any ofthemto lead youto a receipt signaturefromthe judge's office.

You will find Judge President Bernard Ngoepes11-October-2010 receipt (per signature of Personal Assistant Ilanka Elsebethwith contact Telephone Number +27 12314 9003) of communication and sensitizationfrom Phiri by means of even 8 videos prior to them going on-line about theMandelasque-Xhosa-racially-motivated acts of corruption and victimization ofwhistle-blowing Phiri in Zumas SANDF leadership style.
A signature from Ngoepes office indeed, amongother signatures as of for offices of His Excellency President Zumas;
His Majesty Swazilands King Mswati III (as thecultural head of all Swazi-speakers in Southern Africa and an ethnicityalongside BaSotho, BaTswana and Afrikaaners, particularly targeted forvictimization by Zuma-leadership-styled armys black racist generalspro-Mandelas tribe of the Eastern Cape Province with in particular oneBrigadier General Alfred Mlandeli Kula who, over and above the inhumane way andthe underpromotion these SADF members fromtheseethnic groups sufferunder Zuma and predecessors leadership style, habitually, publicly and withimpunity jibes these uniformed South-African minorities with the words: [SouthAfrica belongs to us Xhosas because we do not have a homeland beside SouthAfrica and I do not understand what you Swazi-, Sotho-, Tswana-, Shangaan oreven Afrikaans-speakers want in the South African National Defence forcedemanding even promotion. Go back to your homelands Swaziland, Lesotho,Botswana, Mozambique and Holland])
His Excellency Tanzanian President Jakaya Kikwete (ascustodian to my daughter Thoko and my son Maziri together with my wife Leonildewho, against all national and international law are for the 18thyear nowdisallowed along racial lines by Jacob Zuma from repatriating from Tanzania allas a revenge for Phiris blowing of the whistle against Zumas personalinvolvement in violently implementing Mandelasque Xhosa racism in the camps ofTanzanian exile and a practise that Zuma has of 2011 resumed in South Africaabusing his power as head of state albeit via controversial spy tapes, andharassing Phiri with armed soldiers);
His Excellency Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe;
The Bosielo Commission into [sources soldiersunhappiness wit Zumas leadership style of the SANDF];
Legal Aid Board (where I in vain pleaded forstate financial assistance in my case like Zumas corruption case and JackieSelebis was so assisted);
NationalProsecution Authority (with the hope in vainthat they could intervene and startprosecuting the SANDF generals who areleading corrupt activities, negligentlydestroying property of the SANDF andsexually exploiting vulnerable femaleemployees of the Defence Department all ofwhich being motivated by the impunityof theMandelasque-black-racism-pro-Eastern-Cape-Province ravaging the SouthAfricanArmy on Jacob Zumas watch and earlier).


Whileoriginally and the way all judges should be viewed (and are viewed) indemocracies of the world I had viewed Mr. Bernard Ngoepe as a symbol of refugewhere I could run to as a corruption whistle-blower at the hands of Jacob Zuma(just like I was self-same Zumas victim in Dakawa-Morogoro-Tanzania mid-80when Zuma and his fellow-racists pro-Eastern-Cape did their dress rehearsalsfor damaging both the non-sexist standing of the 100-year-old ANC and therespect accorded to all women in South Africa and the world).
Little didI know that by requesting Mr. Ngoepe Division of the Supreme Court of SouthAfrica (Gauteng North) for assistance I was committing legal suicide; forNgoepe not only went ahead to essentially panel beat the prosecutions caselevelled against Phiri in the SANDF on 2001 March 9, but he appealed toemotions of judges by appointing an all-white full-bench to look into a blackPhiri who had allegedly called yet another white in the army a racist where allprosecutors for Phiri in the army were made to be white, all judges of the armywere to be white. Interestingly, this was Ngoepes full bench to look ata case Ngoepe unprocedurally allowed to happen in his Division because Ngoepesown Judge Claassen made an uncontested finding in my favour that a Board ofEnquiry Dated pre-March-09 2001should be given to Phiri, and yet the sameNgoepe allowed the Zuma litigant side to open the same matter resolved via asecond judge (Sithole), although I know now this was because Ngoepe hadreceived a letter from Zumas Defence Minister to expedite this proceduralanomaly where to this day Judge Claasens orders have been shown contempt of byMr. Jacob Zuma with the collaboration of Top Judge Bernard Ngoepeinterestingly, Ngoepe is the self-same judge who signed an Anton Templar onJacob Zuma while his masters from the Eastern Cape like Thabo Mbeki wanted todiscard him like a used condom and maybe Mr. Ngoepe is making up with Zuma nowin power by means of deliberately mishandling the Phiri case.
Comingagain to the picture above, one must state that at least one of the ladies inpicture with Ngoepe (they help Ngoepe to review all cases of soldiers andseamen and women of Zumas rule of the SANDF) got her rank and promotionthrough a catfight with another married woman one Mrs Annemarie Myburgh whoended winning the fight, for emotional/sexual relationship with theirsupervisor one Mr. Dunstan Smart, if a sworn affidavit by a Smarts fellowlawyer, Bheki Simelane is anything to go by particularly where he would underoath attest:While [Rear Admiral Smart and his apparent illicitsweetheart {who is also his subordinate}] were an item they appearedinfatuated and besotted with each other. They say love is blind. Onat least two occasions as I [Colonel Simelane and Rear Admiral Smarts othersubordinate] was coming out of my office I would see the two kissing eachother in the passage. Not wanting to disturb them I would draw back intomy office until the coast would have cleared as it were. Also withColonel Anne-Marie Myburgh the story went round atChiefMilitary Legal Services during 2000 that her husband had secured a lucrativejob in the UK and would soon be leaving with her family.It was notto be, according to this story.Admiral Smart was said to be holdingon to another mans wife.One white lady was heard complaining tosay, But cant Admiral Smart let go of [Brigadier] General [Anne-Marie]Myburgh?
The plans of the family were apparently scuppered andthe trip overseas was aborted allegedly because of the Honourable AdmiralSmart. To date, on the said white ladies version, Admiral Smart does notappear to have let go of the then Colonel (now Brigadier General) Myburgh. In [the]Zulu they say Asiwumbi singawulali= even in matters of sexual liaisons,expect no such thing as a freebies (idiomatic expression freely translated byPhiri.)The wordmaking rounds here in the AGs [Attorney Generals] Office is that AdmiralSmart uses members of the staff to his convenience and when he is done withyou, you are history. Just like a used condom. To me, when I hearthat, I would say to myself, yes I know that one of them is[his one-timesweetheart-apparent]. Notwithstanding that she tried to use AdmiralSmart as a reference when applying for directors posts, it was not tobe. She lost out. Ousted by the said new arrival [ColonelAnne-Marie Myburgh] in 1998...By Colonel Bheki Qedusizi PenuellSimelane).
Now whenwhistle-blowing Phiri is to be charged for trying to blurtfornication-for-promotion by Mandela-cousin Zini-Bobelo, lo and behold MrsAnnemarie Myburgh and an ilk of Zini-Bobelo if we believe Simelane, is nowDIRECTOR OF SOUTH AFRICAS MILITARY JUDGES AND I ASK WHAT JUSTICE IS PHIRIEXPECTED TO GET FROM MILITARY JUDGES UNDER THE COMMAND OF A POSSIBLE PROSTITUTEIN HIGH PLACES UNDER JACOB ZUMA?The bottomline for Zumas strategy in destroying Africa is this:If you can treat any (SANDF)uniformed woman officer as a sex object, it goes to reason that no woman ischastity safe in South Africa under Mr. Jacob Zumas rule: at least noneblack or white of our mothers, our wives, our daughters, our sisters or ourfemale cousins are safe here.
Mr. Ngoepeis falling snugly into the pattern of atrocities of Jacob Zumas back inyestercenturys Dakawa (c. 1985) where wives and daughters of other SouthAfricans were, objectified by Zumas gendarmerie all in pursuit of black racismpro-Mandelas Eastern Cape. Wives were per Zumas knowledge and say-soraped, husbands even buried alive while everybody who had come from the EasternCape was treated as mini-god or goddess as the uneducated 100% ZuluboyIntelligence Chief of All ANC and MK was used by Mandelas black racistspro-Eastern-Cape was used tto put a stamp on racial superiority of theXhosa-speaker or anybody born in the Eastern Cape, particularly from Mandelasown Thembu tribe wherever kinship to such royalty could be established.Some of Mr. Zumas most notorious sub-henchmen oftorture-pro-Mandelasque-Eastern-Cape-racism of the mid-1980s were (and Mr.Ngoepe is now joining the list) were Zumas Dakawa-Morogoro-Tanzanias Mr.Never Khalema (a pseudonym), Mr. Jackson Dira (a pseudonym).
Those Zumaguys had no scruples in burying a protesting man alive; Nor had they anyscruples in raping a comrades wife in broad daylight in Dakawas mid-1980while the raped woman toddler children watched! And this is the 2012South Africa that Mr. Bernard Ngoepe is allowing Mr. Jacob Zuma to drive it towith his yesmanship to the executive arm of Zumas government which is alitigant against whistle-blowing Phiri!

For moreinsight into where Mr. Zuma is taking South Africa, please check what the sameman was doing in exile, e.g. the Dakawa Camp, Morogoro, Tanzania (andthat is where all and not only Mandelas 2012-malfunctioning Eastern CapeProvince but all of South Africa is heading under Race-Henchman Zuma withhis blind and uneducated black racism pro-Mandelas Tribe Thembu Royal), pleaseread ONE POST.


IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTHAFRICA
[HELDAT BRAAMFONTEIN]
CASE NO : CASE REF: 437 / 2011
In the matter between :

GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI Appellant

And


THE MINISTER OF DEFENCE 1ST Respondent
DIRECTOR : MILITARY PROSECUTIONSDEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE 2ND Respondent

FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT


I, the undersigned

GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI
do hereby declare under oath as follows :
1.
1.1I am the Applicant in these proceedings.
1.2The facts deposed herein arewithin my personal knowledge save where as otherwise stated; and are to thebest of my knowledge both true and correct.
2.
Iconfirm that the attached NOTICE AND GROUNDS OF APPEAL AGAINST REFUSAL TO GRANTLEAVE TO APPEAL BY THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL IN TERMS OF RULE 19 OF THECONSTITUTIONAL COURT RULES was prepared on my behalf by my legalrepresentatives under my instruction and that I wish to incorporate it fullyherein as part of my evidence. I confirmthat this matter relates to the failure by the State to provide me with acrucial document in the trial in which I am prosecuted in the Military Court asper Annexure GMP4 the charge sheet.It is important for me to get information as to the investigations conducted,witnesses interviewed, the compilation of witnesses statements and the reportsfiled / submitted to those concerned interalia, the sought-after report (i.e. South African Inspector GeneralsReport involving Phiri et al at theSouth African Army College for the period February to March 2001. This, ofcourse, is for the purposes of preparing and conducting my defence as furtherexpounded by my legal representatives in the attached Notice and Grounds ofAppeal.
2.2 I was not invited to make a contribution tothe investigation despite the fact that firstly,
I was the first in offering to give information and, secondly, and according to the Charge Sheet now, I am supposed to have created such a furore at the College that I was deemed deserving of being the only one prosecuted from all those 100 or so other students and college staff who walked scot-free out of the investigations for racial disharmony. Indeed, I did reasonably request an opportunity to make my submissions to the investigations from day one February 6 2001 (resulting in a promise), as well as even prior to the arrival of the Inspector General where I was asking for opportunity to expose to college authorities a white instructor who was inciting racial confrontation on one hand, and a black instructor who was giving free marks to a student or two on the basis of sexual favours. Both General Mashoala (the Inspector General) and his subordinates declared me as having knocked too late on their door when I tried to remind them on 6 March 2001 about their promise to hear me a month before.

I found the aforegoing very strange as I was assured bythe Brigadier General (Mashoala) that I would receive an audience from theInspectors and my submissions would also be considered. Thus my letter ofredress of wrongs to the Chief of Army, dated the 6th March 2001against the Brigadier General M.E. Mashoala in his capacity as President/Chairmanof Chief Armys Board of Inquiry, Preliminary Investigation, CommandersInvestigation or whatever term they want to call the investigation conducted atthe SA Army College Feb March 2001.
Idenied that the Respondents furnished me with the document as reflected inAnnexure SBM1 to their AnsweringAffidavit before the Supreme Court of Appeal. What the Respondents did was topresent a doctored document, namely SBM1as a way of confusing issues and in order to falsely convince the court thatthey had furnished the correct document.
Thiswas a deliberate ploy to give an impression by using the language of ClaassenJs order,that they had complied with it. Other differences include the factthat SBM1 was signed by hand andthat it is also very obviously retyped since the contents do not correspondwith that of the original document. These subtle changes were meant to hoodwinkthe Full Bench of the North Gauteng High Court into believing that theRespondents had given me the requisite documents. Proof of this will befurnished at the appeal hearing should this Honourable Court grant me specialleave to appeal as per the Notice of Motion.
Quite shockingly, the Respondents gave a second versionthat a written and comprehensive Inspector Generals Report as per court order of Claassen J, South African Inspector Generals Reportinvolving Phiri et al the South African Army College; February to March 2001.[Dated: some time between February and March 2001] does not exist, and the fullbench, now supported by the Supreme Court of Appeal, it is submittederroneously agreed.

I am not in possession of any written andcomprehensive Inspector Generals Report as percourt order Claassen J; I submit it is simply because the Respondentssteadfastly refuse to provide me with same for malicious reasons to prejudiceme in the Military trial. I strongly believe that the said report does existand in that regard I rely on the respondents own version in a documententitled Decision Brief under the topic Modus Operandi (PH6, page 2) where they say that the report was produced and distributedto those concerned. I further respectfully submit that these restricteddocuments are in the custody of the Respondents.
I respectfully submit that the said deponents mutatingversion is blatantly contradictory, self-destructive and unrealistic as theRespondents relentlessly try to truncate the report therein sought, byexcluding its material contents i.e. that of witnesses statements orcomplainants statements or alternatively interview sheets compiled.
Based on theaforegoing, it is therefore not far-fetched nor inconceivable as I humblysubmit, that the said document does in fact exist and that I am entitled to thecontents thereof i.e. witnesses statements in order to have a fair trial, beable to fully prepare and properly defend myself in the proceedings before theMilitary Court. If the Respondents claim would be true (which I insist it isnot) that the report which I seek does not exist, what baffles me is that therehas never been any attempt on the Respondents part throughout this dispute tofurnish an affidavit from the Information Officer in compliance with thePromotion of Access to Information Act.
The Inspector Generals Report produced some time inFebruary and March 2001 (rather than the excuse dated 25 June 2001) remains crucialto my defence against the charges I am facing before the Military Court, uponwhich premise it will be argued interalia in the Military Court, that the said charges were provoked by myinsistence to make formal contributions relating to the initial investigationsinto racial disharmony at the SA Army College Feb March 2001 as well as being a whistle-blower in terms of which I held evidence to besubmitted to the said Inspectors relating toracial disharmony at the SA Army College Feb March 2001, as envisagedin terms of the Protected Disclosure Act No.26 of 2000.
WHEREFORE I pray for an Order in terms of the Notice ofMotion. THUS DONE AND SWORN TO AT PRETORIA THIS______DAYOF________2011

______________ DEPONENT

IHEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEPONENT HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THAT HE/SHE KNOWS ANDUNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THIS AFFIDAVIT, WHICH WAS SIGNED AND SWORN BEFOREME AT ___________________ ON THIS ____ DAY OF ________________, THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED INGOVERNMENT NOTICE NO. R1258 OF 21 JULY 1972, AS AMENDED, AND GOVERNMENT NOTICENO. R1648 OF 19 AUGUST 1977, AS AMENDED, HAVING BEEN COMPLIED WITH.
________________________________ COMMISSIONEROF OATHS


NAME:ADDRESS:CAPACITY:







INTHE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELDAT BLOEMFONTEIN CaseNo. Ref Case No.A474/08In the matter betweenGOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI Applicant AND
THE MINISTER OF DEFENCEFirst RespondentDIRECTOR, MILITARY PROSECUTIONS,DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCESecond Respondent______________________________________________________________________FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT______________________________________________________________________I,the undersigned, GOODMANMANYANYA PHIRI,do hereby make oath and state as follows: 1. Iam an adult lieutenant colonel in the South African National Defence Force withmy address of employment situated at Army Headquarters, Pretoria. My addressfor service in this matter is c/o my attorneys Messrs Muzah Attorneys of Suite212 Rentbel Towers, Bureau Lane, Pretoria Central, Pretoria, c/o correspondentsMessrs ____________of ______, Bloemfontein. 2.Iam the applicant in this matter and the facts contained herein are, unless thecontrary is expressly stated, within my personal knowledge and are to the bestof my knowledge and belief both true and correct.3.TheFirst Respondent is the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans Affairs,currently the Honourable Ms Lindiwe Nonceba Sisulu, in her official capacity asassigned powers and functions in terms of the Constitution Act. Her address forservice is c/o her attorneys of record The State Attorney, 4th Floor, Fedsure Forum , Cnr Van derWalt and Pretorius Streets, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa. LOOKING FORWARD TO ADDRESSCONFIRMATION4.TheSecond Respondent is The Director, Military Prosecutions, Department ofDefence, with his address for service in this matter also c/o The StateAttorney, 4th Floor, Fedsure Forum, Cnr Van der Walt and PretoriusStreets, Pretoria Gauteng. THE PURPOSEOF THIS APPLICATION
5.Thisis an application in terms of Rule 12(3) and Rule 6(3) of the Supreme Court ofAppeal Rules as amended, for condonation for the late application for leave toappeal to this Honourable Court and for leave to appeal to this HonourableCourt, respectively. Judgment was passed by the Full Bench of the Gauteng NorthHigh Court on 12 November 2010 against me. I should have applied for leave toappeal timeously to this Honourable Court, within the specified period of 20working days after the judgment. However, due to financial constraints and thehope that my grievances would be addressed out of court, as I will more fullyexplain below, I did not apply for leave to appeal within the stipulatedperiod. I now bring before this Honourable Court the circumstances which led tomy failure to apply for leave to appeal timeously, together with a frankassessment of the prospects of success of my case on the merits. I request thisHonourable Court to favourably consider my explanation for the delay and myprospects of success on the merits and to thus grant me condonation for thelate application for leave to appeal. I therefore request leave to apply forleave to appeal out of time.
6.Secondly,I am also simultaneously applying for leave to appeal to this Honourable Courton the basis that there are high prospects that a different court might reach adifferent decision to the one made by the Gauteng North High Court when itruled against me on 12 November 2010.7.Theultimate purpose of this matter is to successfully appeal against the whole ofthe judgment of the Gauteng North High Court of 12 November 2010 in which thecourt ruled in favour of the Respondents herein that they had complied with theprevious High Court judgment as per Judge Claasen, in which (Claasen order) itwas held that I am entitled to have accessto the reports wherein my name is mentioned, particularly the reportemanating from the South African Army College investigation (by the Armys Inspector General andTeam of two subordinates Mokalake and White) into racial disharmony inFebruary to March 2001. Access to this report is crucial to enable me toconduct my defence in the military court case pending against me in Case Number98007693PE.8.Iultimately seek further to obtain an order directing the Respondents to supplycopies of the documents or reports to me as per the Honourable Judge Claasensorder, for the purposes as aforesaid of the preparation and the conduct of mydefence at the Military Judges Court.
9.Ialso seek an order suspending the proceedings at the Court of Senior MilitaryJudge, pending that I be supplied with the relevant document(s) and/ or report(s).The Respondents (Applicants in the court aquo) have not complied with the order of the High Court as per theHonourable Judge Claasen in Case Number 7697/04.10.I therefore seek an order in the followingspecific terms on appeal:
i.The hearing in the Court of Senior Military Judge, Reference No.98007693PE against Applicant be stayed pending the orders prayed for underprayers 3 and 4a herein AND THAT IN THE EVENT THAT RESPONDENT DECLARES DOCUMENTS ARE LOST OR DONOT EXIST THE CHARGES BE DROPPED AS ALLEGING RACIAL CONFRONTATION BETWEENAPPLICANT AND COLONEL KLEYNHANS.
ii.Lieutenant Colonel GoodmanManyanya Phiri is entitled to have access to documents and / or informationheld by the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans Affairs/ and or any ofher/his delegated subordinates, in exercising or protecting his rights in thetrial pending in the military court;
iii.The Minister of Defence and MilitaryVeterans Affairs and/ or any of her delegated subordinates be ordered anddirected to furnish Applicant with the following document(s) namely, the SouthAfrican Army Inspector Generals Report involving Goodman Manyanya Phiri andothers at the South African Army College, dated anytime between February toMarch 2001
iv.Granting Lieutenant ColonelGoodman Manyanya Phiri such further or alternative relief as this court deemsfit
v.Ordering that theRespondents herein, jointly and severally, the one paying the other to beabsolved, pay the costs of this appeal including the costs of the applicationfor leave to appeal.
11.Insummary therefore, the purpose of this application is to request thecondonation of this Honourable Court for failure to apply for leave to appealto it timeously, secondly to request the leave of the Court to apply for leaveto appeal out of time and ultimately to apply for leave to appeal to thisHonourable Court on the grounds that there are good prospects that thisHonourable Court might find differently from the Court a quo.
BRIEF BACKGROUND FACTS TO THIS APPLICATION12.Iam a male member of the officer corps of the South African National DefenceForce ipso facto commissioned theretoby the President of the Republic of South Africa. I might as well add that, as isthe case with all other officers, I am definitely not a member of theother corps or men comprising of mere candidates to the officer corps or eventroops, like privates, corporals, sergeants, staff sergeants, and sergeantmajors etc. all of whom, rather than from the State President, do get theirranks by a mere warrant from the Minister of Defence. I therefore enjoy direct and lawful access toThe State President just as long as I have followed the channels of command ofall those above me: colonel, brigadier general, major general, lieutenantgeneral and General Chief of the SANDF (as of this writing, Acting Chief,Lieutenant General SollyShoke).Withoutassuming anything about my profession, I need to highlight that officers, beingapart from men or troops in movies caricatured by gun battles, expletives,chain-smoking, drunkenness, brawls and sexual activities, I as an officer, agentleman and the thinking machine for the troops, am (together with myfellow officers in our corps) not only expected to uphold the highest standard oftruthfulness, social decorum, sobriety and all that is best in humancivilization (or face dishonourable discharge and dismissal), but I am alsogoverned by a code of conduct spelling out loyalty to my commander in chief andhead of state (at this instance President Zuma) via his chain of command alluded toearlier: the General (Chief of the SANDF), Lieutenant Generals, Major Generals,Brigadier Generals, Colonels, Lieutenant Colonels, Majors, Captains,Lieutenants.
Inall, the most hated qualities in me as an officer, or any other officer forthat matter, are gluttony, drunkenness, failure to protect troops or even anappetite to exploit the troops juniority (for sex or any other undueadvantage). However, the two worstthings an officer like me can do is to be disloyal to his government (atraitor) and to be a coward. In the lastregard, albeit none of the SANDF officers I know are cowards, I need to informthis Court that because of the high level of intimidation exemplified currentlyby an armed raid of my house conducted by then Acting Chief of the SANDFLieutenant General Temba Templeton Matanzima who was attempting by clear orderof Jacob Zuma to to either take away evidence I have of the 2001 racialconflict and college corruption weighing heavily against the said MatanzimasEastern Cape tribe (or have me assassinated OR BOTH INTENTIONS), it has beenvery difficult to get statements under oath to support my plea to thiscourt, let alone having those fewdeponents I have to (per signature) attest, as per court rules, to have read thefounding affidavit of Goodman Manyanya Phiri.I hope the Honourable Court will understand the reality of the situationof utter fear for the likes of Lieutenant General Matanzima in unravelling thecurrent case dating as far back as 2001.
Inany event, here is the genesis of the now four court encounters between me andthe Respondent, outside her Department of Defence and Military VeteransAffairs. During the last few months ofthe Year 2000 I, already a lieutenant colonel by rank, was nominated to attenda course with some 90 (fifty) officer-corps students (majors by rank) at theSouth African Army College, a course that was immediately torn apart from thevery beginning, by black-officer drunkenness, sex favours for promotion and racialconflict (meaning some blacks were angry about other blacks who were not oftheir own tribe; some blacks were angry about whites; some whites were angryabout some blacks; and some whites were angry about all blacks).In that vein I must mention that theCollege was run by a Commandant whose tribe or ethnic group is from the EasternCape, just like the once-Acting Chief of the SANDF, the aforementioned TembaTempleton Matanzima. For those blackmajors who had ethnic links with the Eastern Cape (particularly, Student LeaderKgotso Edmund Matli and self-professed cousin of both former President Nelson Mandelaand Lieutenant General Matanzima: one female Major Bobelo-Zini), the similarly-Eastern-Capeblack racial hue of the Commandant did with impunity open an avenue for the breaking of practically all decorum ofofficership. So, and very much againstthe rules governing the officer corps as so well stated in my intro, there was theEastern-Cape-black-race-promoted rampant sex on the college and drunkennessthat even sucked in at least one of the male black instructors of the collegewho ended up unfairly passing at least one ex-Eastern-Cape female student whowas otherwise doomed to fail but dared not, just because she could apparentlygive the requisite sex to a corrupt instructor and she had powerful names torely on, like the aforementioned Mandela and Matanzima.
Everytime white seniors of the college and other whites who were students with ustried to stop the rot led by black Eastern Cape, they were wrongfully told by boththe Mandela/Matanzima female cousin Major Bobelo and Student Leader Major Matli thatthose whites were essentially beinganti-black-government or anti-black people. Us black students, particularlymyself, who joined the whites in condemning this ungentlemanly profligacy by members of this tribe of theEastern Cape on course with us, were also essentially labelled puppets ofwhite people and everything was done and said by both the powerful StudentLeader Matli and Mandela/Matanzima Cousin Bobelo-Zini (who was later joinedby her sex-for-promotion instructor Lieutenant Colonel Raymond Lentsoe, acourse leader or deputy principal of the course) to make us look bad or evento falsely accused us of being the fomentors of college black racism. For more information on what was happening atthat College back then in 2001, I wishto attach the affidavits of two fellow students, a white female Gertruida Bam,a white male Herman Claassen, who together or separately witnessed the collegedrunkenness, the fraternization between Mandela/Matanzima Cousin StudentBobelo-Zini and habitually-intoxicated Instructor Raymond Lentsoe, whosubsequently passed the major corruptly.As of this affidavit, Bobelo-Zini, unable to say boo to a goose for herrank, is ranked brigadier general crucially because of the corruption she andthe aforementioned Lentsoe got themselves involved with back in 2001.
13.DuringFebruary to March 2001 certain investigations into the allegations of racialdisharmony were ordered by Army Chief then Lieutenant General Gilbert LebekoRamano and subsequently conducted by Army Inspector General Enock Muiseng Mashoalaand his sub-inspectors Colonels Oupa Mokalake and Magdalena White at theinstitution. Being born also in theEastern Cape and also being subsequently insincere in his investigation in thatCollege, the said Mashoala compounded the problem of the racial disharmony,rather than solved it. However, I needto highlight the fact that by this time of the racial struggle as instigated bythe aforementioned black grouping with an Eastern-Cape link, too many whitemembers of the College, students and teachers alike, had as a reaction alsodeveloped a negative racial attitude towards blacks. Some of them whites who were apparently bosomfriends of Course Chief Instructor (CI) one Colonel Kleynhans, I even caughtred-handed planning ways and means of racially fighting back an anti-whiteMajor Matli, which I duly reported to all the college authorities only to makemore enemies for myself from the white racist grouping this time round, overand above my original enemies, the Eastern Cape black tribal grouping ofMandela-Matanzima Cousin Bobelo-Zini and Matli, the student leader.
Inany case, as a senior student by rank and by virtue of being informed of theracial troublemakers who came from both camps black and white, I, even in thepresence of Inspector General Mashoala, volunteered to give information to himand his investigators in relation to pinpointing individual troublemakers inthe racial conflict but he and his team patently went into a methodical andaggressive campaign to secretly call to attestation under oath viva voce and bymeans of written submissions practically every individual student and teacherwho mattered in the issue while avoiding me (even where I was as clearlynegatively implicated as attested by the joint statement of Colonels Lentsoe and Kleynhans the Chief Instructor or CI, which seeEnclosureas attached) for the entire month-long investigation by theInspector Generals team of the aforesaidthreesome (February 06-March 06, 2001). Shortly thereafter and to myutter surprise, I was on 09 March 2001 formally warned for military courtappearance, on charges which emanated from the said investigations. Thesecharges were brought in terms of the Military Disciplinary Code as read withthe Defence Act No. 44 of 1957 as amended, as well as the Military DisciplinarySupplementary Measures Act. A total of 11 charges, including 5 alternativecharges was pressed against me. These chargesare of a serious nature, including inter alia, Using Threatening,Insubordinate or Insulting Language; Conduct Prejudicial to MilitaryDiscipline; Riotous or Unseemly Behaviour and common law Crimen Injuria. Dueto the seriousness of these charges, they carry upon conviction, a mandatoryprison sentence of not more than 6 months. In addition, should I be convicted Istand to lose my employment and my employment benefits in terms of the DefenceAct and the Military Disciplinary Supplementary Measures Act. The copies of thecharge sheet as well as the averment of Colonels Kleynhans and Lentsoe willform part of the record that will be presented to this Honourable Court onappeal. 14.Itbecame clear at the commencement of my trial that the charges were based on thestatements of this certain witness (Colonel Johan Hendrik Beyers Kleynhansand his corroborator Colonel Raymond Atlholang Lentsoe) who made reference tothe Inspector Generals Investigation (c. 06 Feb-06Mar 2001) and the subsequentreport to which I have already alluded above. Of course, I am not certain ofthe exact date of this report but it was definitely finalized on or about 06 March2001 and very much three days, at least, to the day (09 March 2001) I wascharged (among other allegations as alluded to above) for calling a certainwhite senior a white racist. This report is of tremendous importance to mydefence because it immediately preceded my 09 March arraignment before theMilitary Court. I believe that this report contains certain crucial informationwhich will absolve me before theMilitary Court. My belief is further reinforced by the fact that since 2001 theRespondents have (inclusive of theiraction of essentially refusing to come before Judge Claasen for the purpose ofgiving account under Case Number 7697/04) fought tooth and nail against meaccessing or possessing this report. 15.Initially,and after several fruitless attempts to obtain the documents which I requiredin order to properly prepare for and conduct my defence in the Military Courtin 2001, I brought an application in the Military Court in early 2002 for thosedocuments to be furnished to me. The Military Court ruled that it had no powerto make such an order.
16. Iimmediately resorted to the procedure afforded by the Promotion of Access toInformation Act, No. 2 of 2000. However, this also failed because one Major H.S. Pretorius (the Information Officer for the Respondents), in spite of aclear-cut disabusal on my part, incorrectly dug his heels in alleging that thedocuments were required by myself for the purposes of civil litigation againstthe Department of Defence and thus were not, according to his reading of theAct, covered by the said Act. I was thusleft high and dry.
17.Inearly 2003, the Second Respondent sought to recommence the proceedings againstme before the Military Court. However, the case had to be adjourned again aftermy Senior Military Defence Counsel correctly indicated that I as yet had to befurnished with the all-important documents which I required in order toeffectively defend the matter.18. Despitethat clarion call of mine through my Senior Military Defence Counsel, theadjournment came and went and yet the documents continued to be denied me. Whenthe matter resumed it was before a new judge, namely Judge Piet Retief Venter,who initially refused to await the provision of these documents. However, hereluctantly postponed the trial again after I had applied for his recusal onthe basis of his bias against me, though he still dismissed the application forhis own recusal.19.Imust state that in the entirety of the period of all these postponements of thetrial, both my Senior Military Defence Counsel and I kept knocking on theRespondents various doors, requesting that the documents be furnished to me,to no avail. Suffice it to say, I have neversimply sought to delay the administration of justice as is frequently allegedby the Respondents, but I have actively sought the proper information whichwould enable me to conduct my defence and thus to bring the matter of thesecharges to finality and a definitive closure. There is a trail of various correspondencebetween my attorneys and the Respondents which bear testimony that I was andstill am actively seeking finality. Because of the limitation to only 30 pagesfor this application, limited to the barest essential facts for the Court togrant me both the condonation and the leave to note an appeal, I am unable tobring these papers into this application as it is.. However, these documents form part of thewhole record of appeal which will be brought before this Honourable Court inthe prosecution of the appeal itself. Thus, just to reiterate, I actively seekthe proper conclusion of the trial which remains pending before the MilitaryCourt but I cannot accede to such finality being brought at the expense of myaccess to and possession of information which I believe will absolve me fromthe preferred charges.
20. Imust also mention that despite general resistance towards complying with myrequests, at several stages during our exchanges the Respondents and/ or theirdelegated subordinates like General Sphiwe Nyanda then Chief of the SANDF didpop up a glimmer of hope that created in me a legitimate expectation of beingon course to be ultimately furnished with the requested documents because they kepton giving assurances to myself, to mySenior Military Defence Counsel and to my attorneys for the High Court that these would be furnished. However, theynever honoured those commitments and in fact ultimately somersaulted and allegedthat I had already been furnished with ALL the documents, as early as 2004(post-Claasen Judgment at the High Court), when I had in fact been giveneverything but the most crucial document which is the report issued by theoffice of Army Inspector General Mashoala and sub-inspectors Mokalake andWhite, dated on or about 06 March 2001 and very prior to my arraignment March09, 2001.
21.As for how I was left with no option butto appeal for remedies from the High Court through Judge Claasen, this is howthe matter panned out, just for some semblance of more detail. On or about 26 February 2004 the thenthree-year-old military trial against me resumed before Senior Military JudgeMichael Albertus Venter who outrightly and surprisingly blamed me for causingthe delay due to my insistence that I should receive the requisite documentsand reports before the trial could proceed in the honourable Court of SeniorMilitary Judge. In total disregard for the due administration of justice, the honourableCourt of Senior Military Judge ordered that the trial continues and I wasforced to plead. I pleaded not guilty to all the charges against me. TheProsecution called their first two witnesses (Colonel Edward Frans Drost and anindividual who (Colonel Raymond Atlholang Lentsoe) as admitted by the Respondents,had also three years before participated in the since-controversial ArmyCollege investigations and their subsequently hidden report at the behest ofArmy Inspector General Mashoala and his sub-inspectors White and Mokalake) andthey both testified against me, making inthe process yet again reference to the documents which I had all along beenrequesting, particularly the Army Inspector Generals Report that was finalizedon or about 06 March 2001. My defence Counsel could not proceed without accessto those documents so we reserved the right to cross-examine those twowitnesses. Thereafter the matter was postponed to 23 March 2004.

22. It is at that exact meantime ofpostponement that I approached the High Court (via Honourable Judge Claasen) onan urgent basis for an order inter alia, halting the Military Court trial untilsuch time as I would be furnished with the specified documents and any otherdocument relevant to the trial. The High Court as per the Honourable JudgeClaasen granted that order on 23 March 2004 in Case Number 7697/04.

23.On 19 April 2004 the Respondents wrote aletter to my attorneys, enclosing certain documents in purported complete compliancewith the order of Judge Claasen. These Enclosures and the accompanying letter(s)are also part of the record which will be before this Honourable Court onappeal, should this Honourable Court be with us in our application herein.

24.From the onset, I disputed that theRespondents had completely complied with the order because the documents thatthey provided were not only lacking the full complement ordered by JudgeClaasen, but they were too often individually truncated with the result thatthe most essential elements thereof (like minutes or statements of participantsetc) were clearly either cut out and simply replaced with ineffectual factscopy-and-paste style or whole swathes of supposedly-recorded documentarymaterial was patently and simply excluded for the obvious purposes of denyingme good defence when the trial recommences at the military court. This proteston my part was ventilated to Respondents by way of a letter addressed from my attorneysto the Respondents attorneys on 03 May 2004. This letter also forms part ofthe record. 25.On 25 July 2005, the Respondentsapproached the High Court (Via Honourable Acting Judge Sithole), under adifferent case number, effectively approaching a different judge (other thanthe Honourable Judge Claasen who was the custodian of the original High Courtorders), for an order that they had fully complied with the order of 23 March2004 (Claasens). I opposed the application and filed an answering affidavitwhich will also form part of the record on appeal. The High Court, as per HonourableSithole (Acting Judge), found against the Applicants (Respondents herein) thatthey had not in toto complied with the order of Judge Claasen of 23 March 2004.
26. The Respondents appealed against thedecision to the Full Bench of the Gauteng NorthHigh Court, leading to the latters judgment of 12 November 2010, whichI now seek to appeal against. I am convinced that the judgment was erroneousand a different court might find differently from the court a quo as stated in the attached Notice of Motion.


REASONSFOR THE DELAY27.I submit that I did not willfully failto apply for leave to appeal within the stipulated time frames. I had verycogent reasons which are as follows:
i.I am in a difficultfinancial position due to this prolonged dispute between the Respondents andmyself. As I have already stated above, this matter has spanned well over aperiod of 10 years now. The proceedings in the High Court have especiallysapped my financial resources as I have effectively had to fund three differentsets of proceedings in the High Court. In order to approach this HonourableCourt, I also needed to properly instruct my legal team, including the paymentof a deposit to cover their fees. It is now well known (and this HonourableCourt is invited to take judicial notice of the fact) that legal costs arerelatively high in South Africa. I am an employee of the Respondents, pittedagainst an employer whose resources far exceed my own and I am expected or atleast I need to meet them at their own level, in terms of legal representation.I am not just finding it very difficult to do so, I am standing already atfinancial ruination having sold every valuable of my household in order to stayafloat. In fact I am taking legal advice on whether or not the Respondentsshould be responsible for the payment of my legal fees since this is a disputerelating to my employment with the SANDF. However, in the meantime and sincethere is no guarantee that the opinion I will get will endorse that my legalexpenses be taken care of by the state or even that the Respondents will agreeto such an opinion, I must fund my own legal battles against them. I mustconfess to this Honourable Court that my delay in approaching the Court was dueto these very financial constraints.
ii.Secondly, and partly becauseof the financial hardships that I have already mentioned above, I have soughtto resolve this dispute outside the formal court proceedings. I have writtenletters to various institutions which I viewed as relevant and key to theresolution of this matter out of court. In this regard please find attached thefollowing documents which are proof of these engagements:a. Letterfrom the Office of the President of South Africa and Commander in Chief of theArmed Forces dated 13 October 2010 hard copy with electronic copy on https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=vpid=explorerchrome=truesrcid=0B2zhhdKEUk9ZMzhhYTM5NWMtNzQ1MS00NjIzLWJmMDAtNmU5NzQxMjAzZTFhhl=en(This was a presidential reply in response to my own letter to The Presidentand SANDF Commander In Chief dated 08 October 2010 https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B2zhhdKEUk9ZZDU5Njk0NGMtNTZhNS00YTViLWJiZjgtZTc1OGUxNjcxMjFjhl=enb. Letterof acknowledgment from the Interim National Defence Force Service Commissiondated 31 October 2010 (responding to their own copy of the letter written thePresidency)c. Letterof acknowledgment from the Public Protector dated 03 March 2010. (responding totheir own copy of the letter written the Presidency)d. Letterfrom Legal Aid Board South Africa dated 12 October 2010. This letter alsoconfirms the financial constraints that I am experiencing in funding this 10-yearold legal war because Legal Aid Board actually referred to my request for themto provide me with legal assistance in this matter. I have still not received asubstantive response on my request.
28.Iparticularly gave deference to the Presidential intervention which I was highlyanticipating in this matter. I was also expecting the Respondents to do thesame and to reciprocally pray for the President deign us his intervention sincewe are all under the authority of the National President and Our Commander-in-Chief.However, seeing that the Respondents have now resumed the Military Court trial asof an urgent fax (SANDF File Number LEGSATO TT/R/106/7) dated 11 March 2011, Iam now sure that the Respondents would like this matter to be finalized nowhereelse but within the four walls of the courtroom, except that they are convincedI have no legal recourse but to dance to their tune of being found guilty anddismissed from the Force without due legal process of sufficient ventilation ofthe charges on their part. Finding itimpossible to bow down to this clear act of injustice, I have, to the point ofstarving myself and my family, garnered what limited financial resources inorder to come before this Honourable Court.
MERITS OF THE APPEAL ITSELF29.I humbly submit that prospects standhigh for me to succeed in this appeal just on the merits of this case.. Theinitial judgments of the High Court before both the Honourable Judge Claasen andsubsequently Acting Judge Sithole were in my favour, though for slightlydifferent reasons than those which I am raising before this Honourable Court. Forthe purposes of such, please refer to the Notice of Motion for my detailedgrounds of Appeal. The fact that, out of a total of three High Court judgments,two did find in my favour is in itselfindicative of the great likelihood that this is a matter which a differentCourt might not only see differently, but may well find in my favour.30.I am especially confident that thisHonourable Court will be with me in my submission that the Respondents have notin toto complied with the order of the High Court as per the Honourable JudgeClaasen on 23 March 2004, in that they have not furnished me with all thedocuments that I require in order to conduct my defence. I am particularlyunhappy that the very report on which they decided to charge me (the InspectorGeneral Mashoala-and-sub-inspectors report that was finalized on or about 06March 2001) is still being withheld from me. This confirms my belief that thewhole case against me before the Military Court is fabricated and maliciouslybrought by the people who feared that I would expose their corruption, racism andtribalism when I in vain volunteered to participate in the Army InspectorGenerals investigation. The required report will help me to prove myinnocence. I am confident that this Honourable Court will vindicate my right tojustice.


CONCLUSION31.I humbly submit that this applicationmeets the criteria for the granting of condonation and leave to note an appealout of time and also for the granting of the special leave of this HonourableCourt to appeal to it as envisaged in Rule 12(3) and Rule 6(3) of the Rules ofthe Supreme Court of Appeal. The reasons for the delay in the late applicationfor leave to appeal are cogent and were not of my own making. They were due tomy unfortunate position of having to pay my last cent in order to obtainjustice in this matter, which as Ive already explained, is weighing heavily onme. Furthermore, I was very hopeful for an out-of-court resolution of the issues,at least for the provision of the relevant documents to the Military Courtproceedings without me having to resort to court again, but this was not to be,since the Respondents have not yielded. I am therefore left with no option butto approach this Honourable Court in this manner.
32.I also respectfully submit that it is inthe best interest of justice and the human rights protected in the Constitutionof The Republic of South Africa, 1996, that this Honourable Court hears my caseon appeal. I am on trial in the Court of Senior Military Judge, which carriesthe same (if not more serious) personal repercussions as a criminal trial. AllI am requesting is that I be given all and sufficient documents to enable me todefend myself, a defence which I otherwise only too eager to mount. TheRespondents, however, using the States resources which are abundantly available to them, seekto thwart the due fulfillment of a just process by denying me access to andpossession of that documentation. I urge this Honourable Court to overlook alland any procedural mishaps that the Court might in its discretion hold meaccountable for and to accordingly proceed to hear this matter nonetheless, alldue to the serious human rights consequences and the public-interest this casehas been commanding ever since 2001. The need for this Honourable Courtresolving the issues in the matter asreferred to above (and as will more fully appear in the full record ofproceedings) far outweighs any niggle to show disapproval for anyclumsiness on my part. I therefore humbly urge this Court to allowthis matter to proceed to this Honourable Court on appeal.
WHEREFOREI pray for an order in the terms set out in the Notice of Motion to which thisaffidavit is attached.
_____________________________ GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI

I certifythat the Deponent has sworn to and signed this affidavit before me at________ onthe________ day of______________2011, the Regulations contained in theGovernment notice No. R1258 of 21 July 1972, as amended, having been compliedwith in that the Deponent confirms that he knows and understands the contentsof this affidavit, that he has no objection to taking the prescribed oath andthat he considers the oath as binding on his conscience.

COMMISSIONEROF OATHS





PHIRI'S FAMILVENGEFULLY EXILED BY JACOB ZUMA"tyamzashe": Soldier who shot dead Mofokeng's
co-perpetrator of human rights
abuses against Phiri familythe late Benson Mandindi (pic and idenfification courtesy Mr Magogotye, a colleague of mine). Mandindi and co-perpetrators against my family, were given a breezy escape by Archbishoptutu'stRC:they were not even calledto respondto my cries withthe saidtruth and reconciliation commission which makes methink maybethe commission was just a cover-up of human-right abusers. they are now back in action withtheir Zuma headingthe state as ofthis 2012!!! And nobody's family is safe in South Africa while Zuma is stillin power! MARK MY WORDS!
my Zuma-exiled daughterthoko
and a Londoner who had paidthoko's school intanzania a visit
thoko, now 18
two sisters (thoko andtamara)
and a brother.thethorn betweenthe roses is my son, Maziri. Zuma refuses,
understandably so,to give audiencetothe suffering my
children andtheir mother are
undergoing intanzania and South Africa.
Zuma was inthe mid-80sthe one who
gavetribalistic Xhosa-speakerslike Robert Mance and
Stanley Mabizelacarte blancheto commitacts of human right
abuses againstnon-Mandela's fellow-
Xhosa-speakers. Carte Blanche
pretty much like Zuma as of 2011
gave Matanzimato hunt Phiri
down with 6 heavily armed
soldiers for no fault whatsoever
but blowingthe whistle onthe corruption
going on and andthewanton destruction of
state propertythe black racists andtribalists
from Mandela's Eastern Cape are with impunity
committing under Zuma's
watch of our defence force in South Africa.


Maziri
thoko, now 18
Maziri
thoko, a few years before 2012
Maziri
thoko, now 18

For Mandela, Mbeki and now Zuma (complete with theirArchbishop Tutu), on whose 5 doors I have been knocking for the pas 18 yearsnow to have justice as promised by both South African law and the reconciliationwe said as a nation we owe to one another, YOU HAVE TOA MEMBER OF SO-CALLEDMANDELA XHOSA TRIBE TO HAVE THE SOUTH AFRICAN STATE TREAT YOU AS A CITIZEN, ANDIF YOU CONTINUE TO POINT OUR THESE GENTLEMENS RACISM, THEY PILE UP FALSECHARGES AGAINST YOU BECAUSE PEOPLE OF MANDELAS EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE SHALLRULE SOUTH AFRICA BECAUSE MANDELA CAME FROM THEM. All photos here are of my three children whohave never known a happy growing up process.The first-born Thoko is 18 this year, and in the entire 18 years she hasonly seen me for only four weeks because Bishop Tutu Reconciliation Commissionchose to believe Mandelasque Xhosa racist perpetrators (like Mofokeng), andrejected my request to quiz them why they tore my Tanzanian wifes United Nationsdocumentation for repatriation to South Africa.The second born is the boy Maziri who has never seen me. The third-born is Tamara who lives in adilapidated and dusty shack with me in Mamelodi, South Africa (the other twoand their mother who is my first wife Leonilde born Makafu are still maroonedand suffering in Tanzania and whenever I go to Mr Jacob Zumas office as thePresident whose office handles compensation of human rights abuses during theanti-apartheid struggle, an official will tell me off from the door and report thatthey were instructed not to reveal to me the decision of Tutus Truth andreconciliation commission about my complaint To Them). In the meantime, one of Mofokengs co-perpertratorsagainst my family, Mr Benson Mandindi, was brutally shot dead in the streets ofPretoria in an unrelated matter. I prayMofokeng escapes that fate and before he meets his Maker or I do first, toplease explain to me (and stop helping Mandelasque Xhosa tribalists underZumas tutelage in the SANDF to drum up further false charges in order to makemy victimization by Mandelas fellow tribalists-pro-Eastern Cape disappear withme) why he, as Commander of APLA under Mandelasque Xhosa Tribesman President ofPAC Mlamli Clarence Makwetu, ordered Monezi Gcilitshe and Benson Mandindi tobanish my wife and children in 1994. Thewhite girl in The picture is a Londoner friend of my daughter who had visitedher school many years ago. And The manwith a cap is The former APLA soldier who executed in The streets of Pretoria Theracist-pro-Mandelasque-Xhosa-Tribe Benson Mandindi who worked hand-in-glovewith Mofokeng To banish my family and cause us so much of unending pain. The comrade who gave me This picture referredTo him as Tyamzashe. In fairness To Tyamzashewho went To jail for The murder of Mandindi, he never knew me nor I him; nordid he know he was killing somebody I will never miss. Furthermore, I hear during his Trial hepleaded loss of memory. In short, Thereis no relationship between Phiri and Tyamzashe save To say both of us served ThroughAPLA, The military wing of The Pan Africanist Congress of Azania; and as Iunderstand, he Too was a member of The South African National Defence Forcewhen The killing happened To The loss of life of a National Intelligence Agencygeneral (Benson Mandindi). I am also notsurprised This happened To Mandindi; probably he hurt a loT more people Thanme. Given The chance, I could also havekilled him in The same manner or worse Ten Times over for The racist andMandelasque-Xhosa xenophobic pain he has caused me, my first wife and ourchildren over These 18 years now counting!
Mr Daniel Mohato Mofokeng (a.k.a. "Romero": born Monday 20 February 1956) and former Azanian People's Liberation Army's Commander (albeit for about3 monthsafter a suspected hit on erstwhiledefacto and non-racist Xhosa-speaking APLA commander Sabelo Phama/Sabelo Gqwetha). Mofokeng (a spouse to a Xhosa-speaker) is notonly the man who worked for the Mandelaists like Jacob Zuma to retaliate against Phiri's anti-racism by banishing the latter's wife (Leonilde) to tanzania, but sources have it that Mofokeng is the one who has been consistently giving Phiri the bad name in the South African National Defence Force for the benefit of a Zuma indoctrinated as early as age 15intobelieving in racial superiority of Nelson Mandela's race of the Eastern Cape where Mofokeng found a wife named "Pearl".
Outside of Zuluman Jacob Zuma, it is extremely hard for me to imagine anybody in the past solid 24 to 27 years of my life and fight against black racism pro Mandelas Xhosa speaking Thembu and other Eastern-Cape races than Mofokeng. Truth and Reconciliation Commissions Case Number JB04241/01GTSOW (GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI AND HIS TANZANIAN WIFE AND CHILDREN) had to be launched because of the orders of Mofokeng to the late Benson Mandindi and Monezi Gcilitshe (UNHCR repatriation officer and PAC Chief Representative Acting, respectively) in Dar-es Salaam 1994 to tear down a United Nations High Commission for Refugees Repatriation order issued legally for my Tanzanian wife and first: Leonilde Makafu-Phiri. Mofokeng succeeded after my launching of the grievance with the TRC, to go and convince Xhosa-speaking Bishop Tutu who was heading the TRC Commission, that [Phiri is talking lies about atrocities of exile camps under Jacob Zumas intelligence control pro-Mandelas fellow-Xhosa-speakers of the Eastern Cape]. Another area of Mofokengs involvement in undermining my case: When I discovered years later about participation of some white racists within the South African National Defence Force (in cahoots with the Boeremag and hitherto wrote to the State President to reveal the criminal negligence or/and participation in the military coup plot of the extreme right, it is Mofokeng who joined my enemies to put a different spin to the whole matter and once again suggested not only falsely that I had put the letter to the President to the Mass Media but went further to impugn to the SANDF organization that [everything Phiri does is against Mofokengs brothers-in-law-the-Xhosas]. When on 9 March 2001 I got charged, naturally my legal defence counsel subsequently advised me to get affidavits from my potential witnesses to my innocence of those charges, but and when I in Lohatlha near Kimberly circa 2002 stood in front of the Army class/course I had been with during the previous year of Zuma-condoned-fornication-for-promotion in Pretoria-Thabatshwane, talking to them in that Lohatlha unit and pleading for any who could be witnesses on a case that had been fabricated to cover up for Mandelas relative who is the fornicating-for-promotion-Zini-Bobelo , it is self-same she who is Mofokengs former subordinate (Zini-Bobelo) who subsequently (and very immediately after my plea in front of the class) organized an all-Xhosa-speaker meeting aimed at warning any of her fellow race (of Xhosa-speakers) who would dare give me a statement because, as he maligned me, [Goodman Manyanya Phiri is hell-bent for the destruction of the Xhosa nation who are the owners of the African National Congress through Cousin Nelson Mandela]. Notably, Mr. THEMBELANI THANDEKILE XUNDU, one of the Xhosas who knew my innocence from the Drost trumped up charges of 2001, DEFIED Mofokengs former subordinate and gave a statement which is proof enough that it is not all Xhosa speakers who are evil enough to get their henchman Zuma signing off of people like Phiri or signing the burying alive of those two Coloureds (natives of the Western Cape and Northern per South African parlance) back in the mid-80, a an identification of their secret graves Mr. Zuma still owes not only South Africans and the families of those Coloured killed so grimly by Zuma signatures and commandership of Xhosaman Mr. Robert Mance, but HE OWES IT TO THE INTERANTIONA COMMUNTIY TOO. The other thing not to be forgotten about Mofokeng is the fact that he was the major domo of integration to the SANDF of us APLA forces, and oversaw as such all matters of former APLA members even after integration (these days that office is held by wife of query-slain APLA commander Sabelo Phama who is Dudu). But the days before Eddie Drost brought up his trumped up charges of 9 March 2001, I saw a dispatch from the office of Mofokeng who had come to confabulate with Eddie Drost. His name is Matolweni. Coming back to the issue of Lohatlha, I know it is Mofokeng who told Zini-Bobelo the lies about me being a Xhosa hater, because the reports of the gruesome killing and burying alive of comrades or burying them in secret greaves that was perpetrated by Mazimbu/Solomon Mahlangu administrator Mr. Robert Mance per orders of a Zuma who was sitting in Lusaka as head of Intelligence and Counter Intelligence, such reports which I gave very secretly to The Azanian Peoples Liberation Army back in 1987, could not have leaked to Zini-Bobelo (a former ex-MK member)) except per someone as high to the APLA as Mofokeng! One senior officer who had once attended Chief of the SANDF Commander Zuluman Nyandas meeting which his generals and heads of divisions was to come to me in grace shock and querying me what wrong did I ever commit against Mofokeng. And when I followed up that question, the officer in question sat in a session where General Nyanda had genuinely wanted low-down about Phiri and why his case was taking so long. Mofokeng, who had attended that meeting, is reported to have told General Nyanda that Phiri is a mere hater of Xhosa people and somebody never to have his case taken seriously. Mofokeng is a Major General in the SANDF.

Mofokeng (in uniform) andhis Xhosa-speaking brother-in-law-of-tribalism Temba Templeton Matanzima.Mofokeng did the dirty job of tribalism in exile for his brothers-in-lawsupported by Mr Jacob Zuma. Matanzima isfinishing the job of tribalism on Phiri in a democratic South Africa again withZumas sayso (Zuma is clearly showing gratitude for the spy tapes given him by SouthAfrica ruling tribe of Mandelas fellow-Xhosa-speakers by selling Phiri and hissuffering children in South Africa and Tanzania). So Matanzima and his fellow-Eastern-Cape-bornand Brother-in-law Mofokeng for Mr Jacob Zuma drummed up false charges in theSANDF based on, now they claim, non-existent February-March 2001 Board ofInquiry by their fellow-Eastern-Cape-born Inspector-General Mashoala all ofwhich led Phiri to be charged March 9, 2001.In the meantime Zuma denies civil-servant Phiri requisite state funds tohelp Phiri defend himself as is his constitutional right whether it be in SANDFcourts or any other higher court where Phiri must go seek redress of applicationin order to defend himself in those charges. As of this moment, much of it due tothe badmouthing that Mofokeng conducts in the SANDF when he is with likes of Matanzima. Mofokeng is the one who ordered my childrenand their mother to have their UN-proffered repatriation papers torn to piecesas holders were being left in Tanzania 1994.He was doing the bidding of then Xhosa-speaking president of the PAC,Mlamli Clarence Makwetu who, together with his fellow-Xhosa-speaking had beenangered by a report of atrocities committed their fellow-Xhosa-speakers per Zumasgreen light in the camps of Dakawa and Mazimbu Morogoro, Tanzania.My Profile
Goodman Manyanya Phiri, the South African military lieutenant colonel who's tried (2012 being the 11th consecutive year now...) to communicate to hard-of-hearing but over-marriageable-and-baby-making-focussed Mr Jacob Gedleyihlekisa Zuma to no avail except more and more persecution and violence against whistle-blowing Phiri to drum the point home that "Nguni-Mandela-Tembu-and-Zuma's-Zulu-tribalism-cum-black-racism together with prostitution-at-high-places of the Zuma-commanded South African National Defence Force, cannot be used as the main, if at all, criterion, for promotion at government or civil-servant level as conducted (with Zuma's apparent approval) by self-proclaimed Mandela Cousin SANDF Brigadier-General-so-called-by-Zuma (when she is still a mere major who only passed by prostitution with one Raymond Lentsoe) Winnie Ntombizodwa Zini-Bobelo cannot be standardized as the main criterion for creating generals out of junior officers in RSA's Department of Defence and Veterans' Affairs or any Zuma-commanded Department for that matter.Subscribe ToPosts Atom PostsAll Comments Atom All CommentsTHE SPEAR ZUMA SHARPEST POINT FOR PHIRI SALARY SHUTDOWN IS ONE MR MABALANE OR TWOFifty-nine-year-old Mr "Earl" Simon Mabalane, Blog Author's Bestman appearing on the marriage ceremony on this video has a 50-year old male child of his sister's,and a child who, despite having biological parents who married neither prior to his birth nor postnatally (hence the usage of his maternal surname to this day), has nonetheless succeeded to inveigle himself a place as some senior officer under Mr Jacob Zuma's watch of South Africa's Department of Defence and Veterans Affairs' has also been INDUBITABLY EXPOSED BY SANDF SOLDIERS AS THE SHARPEST POINT OF ZUMA'S NEWEST PERSECUTION OF GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI VIA SALARY SHUTDOWN. The fifty-year-old Mabalane bastard ('bastard' is still a recognized English word, Good Critical People) bears the name of 'Mr Eric Mabalane (more formally Mr Eric Magoma Mabalane).
As the stand-off over Phiri salary shutdown continues, Blog Author is shortly revealing more damning evidence of character's involvement in pro-Zuma party-political activities in an SANDF supposedly loyal to government of the day albeit apolitical in its day-to-day activities.
Blog Author's Friend, Bestman, and Comrade since days of exile togehter in Angola (Mr Simon Mabalane) will not escape the firing line as evidence with blog author points to Eric having consulted with Maternal Uncle Simon Mabalane prior to going for cheap-promotion gimmick to some hitherto u-nrevealed Snake In The Grass of SANDF HQ who, for Mr Zuma's pleasure, unconstitutionally ordered the aforesaid salary shutdown.Posts Atom PostsAll Comments Atom All CommentsTranslateSearch This BlogBlog ArchiveWHAT U AND OTHER FOLLOWERS MAY BE READING NOWHOW MR NELSON MANDELA STOLE THE LEGACY OF ANC FOUNDER DR PIXLEY KA ISAKA SEME AND ANTON LEMBEDE OF ANC YOUTH LEAGUE ANC Founder father to Helen Seme, the chief interviewee ...THE LIES OF NELSON MANDELA IN FAVOUR OF LIONEL MAJOMBOZI AND IN DISFAVOUR OF DR PIXLEY SEME AND YOUTH LEAGUE FOUNDER ANTON LEMBEDE MARIKANA MASSACRE AND GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI EXPERIENCE South Africa under the leadership of Mr Nelson Mandela protégé one Jac...HITMEN TO RULE SOUTH AFRICA POST-MANGAUNG CONFERENCE OF THE ANC WITH JACOB ZUMA STILL IN POWER?Hitmen at taxi rank - Times LIVE : via Blog this In chilling detail, Zimbabwean long-distance taxi driver Reason Moyo reca...Malema booted out, EFF walks - Times LIVE Malema booted out, EFF walks - Times LIVE : Graphic video shows police open fire on miners - YouTube : via Blog this ...HOW ZWELAKHE SISULU WAS BURIED WITH JACOB ZUMAS MANGAUNG DREAMS Horror of horrors! Jacob Zuma is trying for Mangaung to zombify dead Zwelakhe Sisulu in order to win the ANC-presidential race and we are...XHOSA-SPEAKING MR MNUKWA WANTS TO KNOW IN DETAIL ABOUT FELLOW-COUNTRYMAN ETHNIC-MALAWIAN GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI'S IDENTITY I, Goodman Manyanya Phiri like your ethnological theme on Facebook, Mr Sabelo Mnukwa! E Nkosi Kakhulu! Ndiyabulela kalokhu ukleleklele TH...LET SOUTH AFRICA KNIGHT MR JACOB ZUMA President Jacob Zuma Pcture with Courtesy If I look at all the clever moves of ANC President Mr Jacob Zuma, I read the tell-tale signs ...VERITABLE BUNGEE JUMP FOR A VOCAL SENSUALITY: NOMFUSI GOTYANA AND ANGLICIZED LYRICS FROM HER ISIXHOSA LANGUAGE! [FROM A WIKIPEDIA SOURCE] Nomfusi was born in the township of KwaZhakele in the Eastern Cape. Her single mother, Kwazibani (Who Kn...HAPPY BIRTHDAY,SIR: Aliaune Damala Bouga Time Puru Nacka Lu Lu Lu Badara Akon Thiam Been watching over the past 5 years what this wild musical talent has been up to. Largely I like him, if to say anything. HAPPY BIR...EARLY CHRISTMAS TODAY FOR PHIRI FROM SIBUSISIWE! 1. Three beautiful children is what God and His Son Jesus of this Christmas have blessed me with (over and above hordes of other rel...My Blog ListLOMLANDVOMNDZENIVEZANDLEBE DEFINITION - *SISWATI*1. Livezandlebe ngumntfwana lotfolwe ngunina (lowendzile) ngekuphinga. Sibonelo: Ngiteke uLaSibeko; ngamlobola; futsi sinebantfwana labab...7 years agoTHE SOMNAMBULISM OF THE PHARAOH AND THE INSANITY OF THE PHIRIThe Science of Sleepwalking - YouTube - The Science of Sleepwalking - YouTube: 'via Blog this'I know this phenomenon very intimately. I was a serious sleep-walker as a child; my younger broth...7 years agoSIMELANE SPEAKS AND SPITS IT OUTLION-HEARTED SIMELANE IN ACTION FOR UNDERDOG PHIRI - This post relates to an event that took place in Year 2004 where the redoubtable Simelane's legal mind was successfully sought for against the Devil who ha...7 years agoGOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI: GRIEVANCE LETTER TO PRESIDENT ZUMA - THEY SAID ITFollowersTotal PageviewsHERE IS WHAT U ARE DEFINITELY READING NOW FeedjitPAST 30 DAYS' MOST POPULAR READSTHE LIES OF NELSON MANDELA IN FAVOUR OF LIONEL MAJOMBOZI AND IN DISFAVOUR OF DR PIXLEY SEME AND YOUTH LEAGUE FOUNDER ANTON LEMBEDEBHEKUMUZI LUTHULI: LYRICS OF THE ILLEGITIMATE CHILDMalema booted out, EFF walks - Times LIVEHAPPY FATHERS' DAY PHIRI OF THE PYRAMIDS!Zahara - Bomi endibaziyo (the life I know) ft. Anele s having been effected (with Zuma's apparent personal albeit unlawful approval) by self-proclaimed Mandela Cousin one SANDF Brigadier-General-so-called-by-Zuma (when she is in lawful fact still a mere Major who only passed her main course by means of prostituting herself with one Raymond Lentsoe).MY PROFILE IN VIDEOXHOSA-SPEAKING NELSON MANDELA'S TRIBAL LIES AND THEFT (AT THE EXPENSE OF ZULUS AND SWAZIS) BOTH EXPOSED:FOUNDER OF THE ANC'S DAUGHTER EXPOSES IN BOTH THE ZULU LANGUAGE AND THE ENGLISH THE TRUE COLOURS OF UNDEREDUCATED JACOB ZUMA'S TRIBALISTIC MENTORS (NELSON MANDELA AND WALTER SISULU)'S DAYLIGHT THEFT FROM THE ZULUS AND THE SWAZIS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA TO MANDELA'S OWN XHOSA-SPEAKING THEMBU-TRIBE, YANKING FROM THE MANDELA-IMPOVERISHED ZULU-SPEAKING ANC-FORMATIVE-FOUNDER-DR-PIXLEY-KA-ISAKA SEME FAMILY AND EVEN FROM THE ROYAL HOUSES OF BOTH ZULU(THE KING DINIZULU BEHIND THE MUCH-CEBRATED YEAR-1906-BAMBATA REBELLION AGAINST THE EUROPEAN SETTLERS OF SOUTH AFRICA WHICH REBELLION NOT ONLY CREATED AN ARISTOTLEAN REASON FOR THE FOUNDING IN 1912 OF THE ANC BY ZULUMAN DR PIXLEY SEME AND SWAZIWOMAN HER MAJESTY QUEEN MOTHER LABOTSIBENI, BUT MAKES ZULU KING DINUZULU THE ARISTOTLEAN FINAL CAUSE FOR THE FOUNDING OF AN ANC SINCE THEMBU-XHOSAFIED BY NELSON MANDELA)AND SWAZI (ARISTOTLEAN ANC-MATERIAL-FOUNDER AND PHIR'S MATERNAL FIRST COUSIN SWAZI QUEEN MOTHER LABOTSIBENI GWAMILE LAMDLULI WITH HER UNPARALLELED AT LEAST 200 CATTLE SOLD FOR THE ANC NEWSPAPER ABANTU/BATHO) AND THE VERY PRIMACY OF ANTICOLONIAL FREEDOM STRUGGLE IN SOUTH AFRICA. AND THAT IS WHY TODAY THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL DEFENCE FORCE-SANDF IS OVERPOPULATED WITH MANDELA'S FELLOW-EASTERN-CAPE-BORN GENERALS ('SEBATA'/ SANDF MAJOR GENERAL ENOCH MUISENG MASHOALA,even , JACOB-ZUMA-APPOINTED DEPARTMENTAL OMBUDSMAN LIEUTENANANT GENERAL TEMBA TEMPLETON MATANZIMA, or even try BRIGADIER GENERAL MLANDELI ALFRED KULA, OR FOR-THE-SAKE-OF-EASRTERN-CAPE-MANGAUNG-VOTE-RECENTLY-PROMOTED-SANDF-MAJOR GENERAL NORMAN YENGENI WHO MAY HAVE PASSED HIS CRUCIAL MILITARY COURSE THROUGH THE SELF-SAME FRAUD THAT FELLOW-TRIBESMAN MANDELA TRIBALIZED THE ANC PRO-EASTERN-CAPE FOR THE GULLIBLE AND NAIVE JACOB ZUMAS OF 2012) AND COLONELS WHO FALSELEY CLAIM THAT THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ON TOP, TO FALSELY CHARGE NON-XHOSA-SPEAKERS LIKE PHIRI, AND TO DEMAND SEX FROM ANY MAN'S WIFE OR WOMAN IN THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE AND VERTERANS' AFFAIRS OF JACOB ZUMA'S RULE IF SHE BE SERIOUS ABOUT HER OWN PROMOTION 'BECAUSE ONLY XHOSA-SPEAKERS LIBERATED SOUTH AFRICA FROM APARTHEID'. I HAVE JUST SHOWN YOU, MY BLOG READER WHY, BECAUSE OF MANDELA AND HIS MIDGET OF A POLITICAL INTELLECT,, SOUTH AFRICA REMAINS A LAND IN TURMOIL WITH RACISM, TRIBALISM AND XENOPHOBIA LACED WITH JACOB-ZUMA-STATE-SPONSORED POLICE VIOLENCE OF SHOOT-TO-KILL-DISSENTERS-EVEN-IF-THEY-BE-MERE-MINE-WORKERS-DEMANDING-A-LIVING-WAGE. AND IF WE AS ANC SUPPORTERS, MEMBERS AND DELEGATES BOTCH THE ONCE-IN-A-CENTURY-CHANCE TO KICK ZUMA OUT AND ELECT THAT WOMAN/MAN WHO WILL BRING BACK THE TRUE HISTORY OF THE ANC, SOUTH AFRICA IS A LAND BOUND TO GET WORSE BECAUSE WE SHALL INSTEAD HAVE ELECTED IN MANGAUG ONE MORE POLITICAL IDIOT ('Mandela Father of The Nation'), THIEF (Fraudster Schabir Shaik benefactor), RAPIST OR SUSPECTED (Nomakhwezi), WOMANIZER ('more is better') AND HEATHEN ('[European Missionaries brought orphans and hunger to Africa]') COME DECEMBER 2012 IN MANGAUNG. YOU CAN WATCH A MORE DETAILED INTERVIEW WITH HER ROYAL HIGHNESS HELEN SEME-DAMBA OF ULUNDI, KWAZULU NATAL IF YOU VISIT THIS POST PER YOUR CLICK, OF COURSEMANDELAS LONG WALK TO FREEDOM AUTHORED XHOSA-SPEAKING-EASTERN-CAPEZUMA-KOWTOWED-TO BLACK RACISM
The Nelson Mandela autobiographical lies driving the 27-year-old concerted racism pro-Mandelas own Xhosa-speaking-Eastern Cape Province all against Swazi-speaking Goodman Manyanya Phiri, an anti-Phiri persecution slavishly pursued even by naïve, Robben-Island-brainwashed and under-educated Zulu-speaking Jacob Zuma DESPITE THE FACT THAT BRAINWAVES OF THE FOUNDING OF BOTH THE ANC (Dr Pixley Seme) AND THE ANC YOUTH LEAGUE (Anton Lembede per insistence of Seme) CAME FROM JACOB ZUMA'S OWN KWAZULU-NATAL PROVINCE::: VERY CONTRARY TO NELSON MANDELA'S AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL LIES THAT IT WAS [A Mr. Lionel Majombozi (medical doctor who clearly must have come from Mandelas Eastern Cape) who had the brainwave of starting the ANC Youth League] now under the spell of unjustly-expelled Julius Malema (Sello) whose only crime to Zuma is probably that Pedi-speaking Malema is not Xhosa-speaking which tribe per Zumas small mind should be the only one to produce leaders as, methinks, per Nelson Mandelas dissertation in Long Walk to Freedom full of the Majombozis who never had anything to do with the founding of no Youth League. PLEASE WATCH BOTH VIDEOS...and in advance, I am sorry for the noice created by the Mamelodi wind during this video shooting.Despite Phiris reporting of this racism of exile (where Jacob Zuma was heavily involved in signing off peoples deaths with a pen inspired by the myth of Xhosa-Mandela tribal superiority over other African ethnicities), and Phiri reporting such to the Mandela-ordered Truth and Reconciliation Commission which was led by yet another Mandela-fellow-Xhosa-speaker (Bishop Desmond Tutu), Phiris daughter and the rest of that initial family (now and as of Year 2012 and 18 years thence) REMAINS BANISHED TO THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA WHILE HER FATHER (GOODMAN) IS BY THE SELF-SAME ZUMA BEING FALSELY CHARGED OVER AND ABOVE BEING HOUNDED BY ARMED SOLDIERS. PHIRIS CRIME: EXPOSING SIMILAR MANDELA-RACE-TRIBE SUPERIORITY COMPLEX IN CURRENT-DAY SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL DEFENCE FORCE WHERE CORRUPTION OF THAT EASTERN-CAPE RACE RELATED TO NELSON MANDELA AND PER JACOB-ZUMA-SAYSO IS THE ORDER OF THE DAY (TO BE NONETHELESS COMPENSATED AND PAID FOR BY SOUTH AFRICA TAXPAYER)!PICTURESQUE!Jacob Zuma (Mr) and some unnamable character"Siziwe" a.k.a "Sighs", the self-professedNelsonMandelaCousinwho achieved generalcy and other rankingthroughadultery/prostitutionwith at least one Raymond Lentsoe in Year 2000.Goodman Manyanya Phiri, according to Mr Jacob Zuma,must for 11 years now therefore continue to sufferfor blowing the whistle against this relative to a Mandelathat Zuma calls "The Father of The Nation South Africa".Her official name isWinnie Ntombizodwa Zini-Bobelo... Here follows even her own friend's deposition on her apparently incurably desire, like "Cousin Nelson Mandela"to seek cheap fame while other races must work hardto achieve anything::::


ANNA CECILIA BAM'SDEPOSITION OVER THEZUMA-PROTECTEDCORRUPTION AT AN S.A. ARMY UNDER ZUMA'SOWNDIRECTRESPONSIBILITY
AS COMMANDER IN CHIEF CONSTITUTIONALLY30th April 20031. I, 82001991PE Major Anna Cecilia Gertruida Bam,working at Army Support Base Durban, Snell Parade, Durban and available on031********, wish to state under oath the following:
a. LieutenantColonel Goodman ManyanyaPhiriattendedthe same Junior Command and Staff Duties Course (JCSD) with me over the periodAugust 2000-March 2001 at the South African Army College, Thaba Tshwane,Pretoria [the Republic of South Africa].
b. It came to my attention thatPhiriis facing some chargesdetails of which were not divulged to me.

c. On the 30th April 2003Phirirequestedme to make under oath commenton the characters of certain members thatwere on course with us; comment also on the character(s) of certain member(s)of the course directing staff [lecturers].


2.Firstly, I was asked to solemnly reflect on my impressionsregarding the character of Major Kgotso Edmund Matli, the elected coursechairman or student representative. In that regard, I should like to saythe following, purely my own individual assessment of the said member'scharacter.

a. As from very early in the course, I personally gotthe impression that Major Kgotso Edmund Matli was elected as the chairman onlyas the result of a conspiracy by a group of students that wanted him in thechair so that he can be puppeted or directed around to their own [private]requirements[rather than to the requirements of the larger military student body].I never got the impression that Matli had the backbone [orcapability] to act on his own, towards making a stand or defusing a tensesituation all by himself. According to me, Kgotso Edmund Matli had noleadership [qualities or] abilities and he did not possess the abilityto effectively lead a group of students of such a diverse [cultural]nature as we or to create a harmonious atmosphere among the students.

b. According to my own perception, Major KgotsoEdmund Matli was also instrumental [in the causation of some of theeruptions of racial tension] that [occurredevery sooften particularly] towards the end of our course. There were twospecific incidents/occasions where Major Kgotso Edmund Matli made raciallyunacceptable remarks during [his] speeches[as studentrepresentative]. The first incident was during a visit by a foreigngroup (from Sweden, if I remember correctly). Some of the remarks made inhis speech[particularly with regard to the]politicalstruggle[of previous years]and the present politicalsituation, really offended some of the course members, mainly white, and theywere not only totally out of context , but were also uncalled for.

c. The second specific incident was during a coursefunction at the Wildebees Officers' Club[of the South African ArmyCollege in Thaba-Tshwane]where Major Kgotso Edmund Matli launched averbal attack on some of the white Directing Staff[lecturerers]andalleged that he had been victimized and discriminated against by the whiteinstructors. He claimed that his marks for one of his exam presentationsdid not reflect[his academic worth]and that"he'dgot bad marks due to the fact that his presentation was markedby[white]Lieutenant Colonel Rentia Deiner" and"that[Rentia Deiner]disliked" him.Other[unsavory]remarks regarding the integrityof the white Directing Staff were made. Again, these remarks offended alot of course members and were totally[beside the point].These remarks caused[deep]unhappinessand[revved up]tension amongst course members.It is my opinion that, if the major[Kgotso Edmund Matli]hadthis type of problems and impressions or perceptions[about anybody inrelation to his own personal wellbeing on College], that he had totake it up on the correct channels with the Directing Staff and thatthe[collective-student]coursefunctionatthe Wildebees Officers's Club was not the correct place or forum to addressshis[private]perceptions. It was quite notablethat Major Matli was never this outspoken against any of the black DirectingStaff or fellow black students, and I am convinced that they were not all ofthem above any criticism, neither were all of them innocent of acts ofmisbehaviour.

d. I,[once again], ..got theimpression that Matli was only representing[a]certainblack..[grouping]on the course and[thathe]did not have the interest of everybody at heart. It seemedthat he was tutored in what to say and how to handle the course by a certaingroup of black members on the course.
3. I was also asked[by LieutenantColonel Goodman ManyanyaPhiri]tocomment on the character of Major Winnie Ntombizodwa Bobelo-Zini that alsoattended the same course with us.

a. For at least six months of our course, Major WinnieNtombizodwa Bobelo-Zini and myself were quite good friends. We sometimeshad coffee together in my room before attending lectures in the moring.Thus I became aware of some of her intense friendships with some of theDirecting Staff[lecturers]and other seniormembers[our fellow-majors, colonels and generals]ofthe South African National Defence Force.
b. During the course it was quite apparent that therewas a very good relationship between Major Winnie Ntombizodwa Bobelo-Zini andLieutenant Colonel Atlholang Raymond Lentsoe, the Course Leader[orclass teacher]of our course. Lentsoe used to visit her quitefrequently in her room[and sleeping quarters]duringthe week and over weekends. Not all of these visits were course orwork-related. In other words, not visits to explain problem areas and orto assist with assignments that were given to the students. I saw themseveral times just chatting away and enjoying an occasional drink together.Zini also went out with Lentsoe as welll as with other seniorofficers[colonels and generals]during some weekends toattend parties. At first I thought nothing of this as I also havefriendships with other men and with other senior officers. Unfortunately,it then started to seem[as if]Zini was unfairlyfavoured by this friendship with Lentsoe. This matter had been indirectlyaddressed in the class and, in response, Lentsoe told us not to question hisintegrity as an officer and course leader[class teacher]ashe,[according to himself] "was not questioning" ourseither and at all. The friendship between[Lentsoe andBobelo-Zini]then became a bit more discreet. [Still,]therewere occasions when Lentsoe's car would be parked in front of our[femalesleeping quarters]for entire nights. This sparked a new set ofassumptions and impressions. I[personally]oncewitnessed Lentsoe's car parked underneath the big three opposite my bedroomwindow after midnight one night. Onecould not make out exactly who was in the car, but it was clear that therewere two persons in the car. This was quite an awkward place forLieutenant Colonel Atlholang Raymond Lentsoe the Course Leader [or ClassTeacher] to park his car, as this was a dark and very secluded area of themilitary base[of the South African Army College in Thaba-Tshwane].I stayed in VanRhyneveld 16, the last room next to the car park.[It would seem like] other members of the course also sawthis parked vehicle as this matter was to become the talk of the course thenext morning.
c. During our examination appreciation in end-Novemberand beginning-December Year 2000, Lieutenant Colonel Atlholang Raymond Lentsoewas not supposed to mark Major Winnie Ntombizodwa Bobelo-Zini's examination.Still, in the[sinister]end he apparentlyexchanged his marking duties to end up marking Zini's exam. As I was notpresent during her presentation, Icannotcomment on thecontents of her exam presentation. But I had visited her roomshortly before she started her presentation. I was shocked to see justhow little her preparations were for what was a major exam presentation.Her map preparations, overlays and other presentation aids were far fromwhat was required from us according to the guidelines and instructions thatwe'd received during the course. I asked[my friend]MajorWinnie Ntombizodwa Bobelo-Zini where her other aids etc. were and she respondedthat[what I was seeing]was all she had and allthat she needed for her presentation.[Perhaps sensing my sheerdisbelief], she[qualified] her previous statementby sayingthat some of her "other presentation aids were still withsomeone else who was at that moment busy presenting". This, too, didnot make sense to me as we had to[individually]hand inall our exam work at a specific closing/cut-off time, and could only collect itagain some 30 minutes before our[individual]exampresentation. This exam was also an[entirely]individualassignment and we were instructed not to work together[orcollaborate]at all, neither to discuss our[blue andred or own-and-enemy-forces]appreciations with each other at all.Therefore I found it strange that[my friend]Bobelo-Zinicouldtell me that some of her presentation aids were still with someone else who wasbusy using them in his or her own individual presentation. I went to yetanother friend's room and said to her that I am very much worried about Zini'spresentation because it seems that she had not prepared enough to pass thisexam. To our great surprise, Zini obtained very high marks for her exam, almostas good as the best student on the course, an Armour guy who had much more inhis presentation and on his maps and walls than anyone of us had. Weimmediately questioned this incident, but never received a clear-cut answer.That is when I too began to suspect that all was not what it should be onthis course and I also started questioning the integrity of some of theDirecting Staff. I personally was extremely unhappy because I felt that Ihad worked extremely hard for this exam but was marked by an external examiner.I felt that I was marked in a much stricter fashion than Zini. Ialso felt that she was unfairly favoured by being marked by Lentsoe, aneventuality that was not even according to the published Examiners'Program[which program had excluded Lentsoe from marking Bobelo-Zini'swork]. It was also unfair because Lentsoe was a personal andclose friend of hers. Lentsoe should have refrained from marking Zini'sexam due to the fact that their friendship was already viewed with suspicion bymany of the students. The friendship between me and Zini, as wellas my relations with Lentsoe, became strained after this and was not asspontaneous and easy-going as it had been before this exam.
d. During the course I also got the impression thatZini had a huge influence on the opinions that Lentsoe and the other DirectingStaff held about other students on course. They continuously discussedthe other members on course. I also got the impression that Zini wastwo-faced, what she said in front of you and what she said about you behindyour back, were two totally didffferent things. She would also tell youcertain things that were said about you by Lieutenant Colonel Atlholang RaymondLentsoe or other students which then turned out later to be void of any truth.When realizing this, I became very cautious as to what I said to Zini orwhat I'd say about other people in her presence. I realized that my wordswere being turned around and that things that were meant in a good way, weretoo frequently used against me as if I had meant them in a bad way. Therewere also certain times that I got the impression that Zini could be veryinvolved in stirring up some of the racial tensions that flared up from time totime because of the backbiting and gossiping that she frequently made herselfguilty of. This, again, is purely a reflection of my personal impressionsof the situation.
4. I want to emphasize yet again that the abovestatement is purely my own impressions, based on my own individual personalexperiences with the members mentioned in my statement.
5. This is all I wish to state.
6. I am aware of the contents of the abovedeclaration.
7. I do not have any objection to taking theprescribed oath.
8. I consider the prescribed oath as binding on myconscience.
9. Thus declared and signed by me after pronoucing theprescribed oath on the 30th (thirtieth) day of April 2003 at the Army SupportBase Durban[The Republic of South Africa].

SIGNATURE OF DEPONENT

I certify that the deponent[Major Anna CeciliaGertruida Bam]has acknowledged before me that she knows andunderstands the contents of this declaration. Thus acknowledged, sworn andsigned before me on the 30th (thirtieth) day of April 2003 at the Army SupportBase Durban [The Republic of South Africa] .
SIGNATURE OF COMMISSIONER OF OATHS
96662366 PFCaptain Nicholas Mzophethe SibisiArmy Support Base DurbanP.O. Box ******Bluff4036

College of December-2000-fornication-for-promotion pro-Mandela's Eastern Cape Xhosa-Speaking Race. Front Centre sits College Commander one Mr Mxolisi Edward Petane who is naturally one more Mandela's fellow-Xhosa-speaker whom Mr Jacob Zuma, regardless of ability outside of illicit sexual suspicions, seemsto be promoting and putting in positions of authority left and right inthe Republic of South Africa. (for clearly-indoctrinated Zuma, these folks are apparently the closest thing to his demigod, Nelson Mandela who taught an illiterate Zuma his first political lessons on Robben Island Prison when the latter was about only a tender 15 years old)


Mr AtlholangRaymond Lentsoe in 2001:thetutor/instructorwho fell forthe embedded seduction of self-professed Nelson Mandela Cousin Siziwe (Winnie Ntombizodwa Zini-Bobelo) all forthe purpose of propagating black racism pro-Eastern Cape as per Jacob Zuma's narrow pro-Nguni racism and pro-his Demigod-cum-Father-of-the-NationNelson Mandela's fellow Xhosa-speakers ofthe Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Zini-Bobelo is now (without any scintilla of military-science-know-howto go withthe prerequisite rank) "Brigadier General" for Mr Jacob Zuma despite 11 full years of Phiri's informing him ofthe bedroom antics and black racism pro-Eastern-Capeemployed in promotingthis woman by (among other powerful males) pictured "gentleman".






IN his 40'sthen: 2 pictures ofEddie Drost (officially Eduard Frans Drost, born Wednesday 27 January 1960) He isthe man who didthe dirty job for Mr Jacob Zuma, falsely charging Phiri for a 2001-racial-fracas cause by self-professed Mandela's cousin (Winnie Ntombizodwa Zini-Bobelo illicit fornication-for-promotion with Drost's immediate subordinate Raymond Lentsoein South Africa's most crucial security department: Defence)
Mr Daniel Mohato Mofokeng (a.k.a. "Romero": born Monday 20 February 1956) and former Azanian People's Liberation Army's Commander (albeit for about3 monthsafter a suspected hit on erstwhiledefacto and non-racist Xhosa-speaking APLA commander Sabelo Phama/Sabelo Gqwetha). Mofokeng (a spouse to a Xhosa-speaker) is notonly the man who worked for the Mandelaists like Jacob Zuma to retaliate against Phiri's anti-racism by banishing the latter's wife (Leonilde) to tanzania, but sources have it that Mofokeng is the one who has been consistently giving Phiri the bad name in the South African National Defence Force for the benefit of a Zuma indoctrinated as early as age 15intobelieving in racial superiority of Nelson Mandela's race of the Eastern Cape where Mofokeng found a wife named "Pearl".
Outside of Zuluman Jacob Zuma, it is extremely hard for me to imagine anybody in the past solid 24 to 27 years of my life and fight against black racism pro Mandelas Xhosa speaking Thembu and other Eastern-Cape races than Mofokeng. Truth and Reconciliation Commissions Case Number JB04241/01GTSOW (GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI AND HIS TANZANIAN WIFE AND CHILDREN) had to be launched because of the orders of Mofokeng to the late Benson Mandindi and Monezi Gcilitshe (UNHCR repatriation officer and PAC Chief Representative Acting, respectively) in Dar-es Salaam 1994 to tear down a United Nations High Commission for Refugees Repatriation order issued legally for my Tanzanian wife and first: Leonilde Makafu-Phiri. Mofokeng succeeded after my launching of the grievance with the TRC, to go and convince Xhosa-speaking Bishop Tutu who was heading the TRC Commission, that [Phiri is talking lies about atrocities of exile camps under Jacob Zumas intelligence control pro-Mandelas fellow-Xhosa-speakers of the Eastern Cape]. Another area of Mofokengs involvement in undermining my case: When I discovered years later about participation of some white racists within the South African National Defence Force (in cahoots with the Boeremag and hitherto wrote to the State President to reveal the criminal negligence or/and participation in the military coup plot of the extreme right, it is Mofokeng who joined my enemies to put a different spin to the whole matter and once again suggested not only falsely that I had put the letter to the President to the Mass Media but went further to impugn to the SANDF organization that [everything Phiri does is against Mofokengs brothers-in-law-the-Xhosas]. When on 9 March 2001 I got charged, naturally my legal defence counsel subsequently advised me to get affidavits from my potential witnesses to my innocence of those charges, but and when I in Lohatlha near Kimberly circa 2002 stood in front of the Army class/course I had been with during the previous year of Zuma-condoned-fornication-for-promotion in Pretoria-Thabatshwane, talking to them in that Lohatlha unit and pleading for any who could be witnesses on a case that had been fabricated to cover up for Mandelas relative who is the fornicating-for-promotion-Zini-Bobelo , it is self-same she who is Mofokengs former subordinate (Zini-Bobelo) who subsequently (and very immediately after my plea in front of the class) organized an all-Xhosa-speaker meeting aimed at warning any of her fellow race (of Xhosa-speakers) who would dare give me a statement because, as he maligned me, [Goodman Manyanya Phiri is hell-bent for the destruction of the Xhosa nation who are the owners of the African National Congress through Cousin Nelson Mandela]. Notably, Mr. THEMBELANI THANDEKILE XUNDU, one of the Xhosas who knew my innocence from the Drost trumped up charges of 2001, DEFIED Mofokengs former subordinate and gave a statement which is proof enough that it is not all Xhosa speakers who are evil enough to get their henchman Zuma signing off of people like Phiri or signing the burying alive of those two Coloureds (natives of the Western Cape and Northern per South African parlance) back in the mid-80, a an identification of their secret graves Mr. Zuma still owes not only South Africans and the families of those Coloured killed so grimly by Zuma signatures and commandership of Xhosaman Mr. Robert Mance, but HE OWES IT TO THE INTERANTIONA COMMUNTIY TOO. The other thing not to be forgotten about Mofokeng is the fact that he was the major domo of integration to the SANDF of us APLA forces, and oversaw as such all matters of former APLA members even after integration (these days that office is held by wife of query-slain APLA commander Sabelo Phama who is Dudu). But the days before Eddie Drost brought up his trumped up charges of 9 March 2001, I saw a dispatch from the office of Mofokeng who had come to confabulate with Eddie Drost. His name is Matolweni. Coming back to the issue of Lohatlha, I know it is Mofokeng who told Zini-Bobelo the lies about me being a Xhosa hater, because the reports of the gruesome killing and burying alive of comrades or burying them in secret greaves that was perpetrated by Mazimbu/Solomon Mahlangu administrator Mr. Robert Mance per orders of a Zuma who was sitting in Lusaka as head of Intelligence and Counter Intelligence, such reports which I gave very secretly to The Azanian Peoples Liberation Army back in 1987, could not have leaked to Zini-Bobelo (a former ex-MK member)) except per someone as high to the APLA as Mofokeng! One senior officer who had once attended Chief of the SANDF Commander Zuluman Nyandas meeting which his generals and heads of divisions was to come to me in grace shock and querying me what wrong did I ever commit against Mofokeng. And when I followed up that question, the officer in question sat in a session where General Nyanda had genuinely wanted low-down about Phiri and why his case was taking so long. Mofokeng, who had attended that meeting, is reported to have told General Nyanda that Phiri is a mere hater of Xhosa people and somebody never to have his case taken seriously. Mofokeng is a Major General in the SANDF.
A DAR ES-SALAAM CORNER CALLEDCEREBRAL MALARIA
This is thegruesome nickname by South African exiles given this mapped spot among spots ofone of Africas friendliest cities (the mosquitoes there are never friendlythough particularly for Rh- Blood Groups!)

The name (CerebralMalaria) for the spot derives fromexile-time black racists-pro-Mandelas-Eastern-Capes irreverent abuse made to the medically-termed cerebralmalaria.

CerebralMalaria ordinarily refers to a serious illness; but, for the racists of themid-80s, the term worked wonders whenever they were unfortunate enough to besurprised by Tanzanian nationals committingone of the Zuma atrocities of exile: capturing a man for gruesome execution by racists-pro-Eastern-Cape-Provinceof Nelson Mandela where Zuma the Zulu of KwaZulu-Natal excelled in giving thego-ahead! (Zuma was at about age 15 in the same prison with Nelson Mandela andMandela and ANC Leader Oliver Tambo had to prove by means of this illiterateZulu youngster that they were not, which in fact thery were, anti-Zulu pioneerspirit in the founding back in 1912 of the ANC with the material assistance ofBlogger and Writer Phiris first Cousin Swazi Queen Labotsibeni)

GeographicalCerebral Malaria stands right in the heart of Dar es-Salaam, a city in thelittoral United Republic of Tanzania where ancient civilization and the firststate of Azania/Zion put its capital named Rhapta.

Thiscorner, as alluded to earlier, is an ANC nickname for a spot inspired by Zumas devilishness in exile; but please note that SouthAfricans did not so gruesomely christen a corner of an otherwise mellifluous Dares-Salaam for nothing! You are bound to be shocked before you finish readingthese paragraphs and I am not even sure when I will finish the editing of thispain!

However, beforewe adumbrate on the history of the blood-curdlingnickname, please read this stuff coterminousto the PAC (Pan Africanist Congress of Azania) which is Blogger and Writer Goodman ManyanyaPhiris political party.I just hopethis added part will help explain the whereabouts of this place in Dares-Salaam and more importantly ipso factoshed some light on some of the lies andfibs told South Africas Archbishop Desmond Tutus Truth and Reconciliation Commissiona decade or so ago all in order to hide Jacob Zumas personal involvement inatrocities of exile where he in hisGrade-4-level-political-ignorance-cum-henchmanship-to-Nelson-Mandela-tribal-superiority-of-the-Eastern-Cape-Native,was from Lusaka (Zambia) signing even the torture to death of South Africanchildren still unaccounted for by the fully-knowledgeable and accountable racists-pro-Mandelas-Eastern-Capelike Minion Jacob Zuluman Jacob Zuma.

South ofwhere you see written Gapco Gas Station, or even right on top of the gasstation will be some three-to-seven-storey structure called MwananchiBuilding and a residence allocated me by my mother organization, the PanAfricanist Congress of Azania. Ofcourse, when the PAC fell into the hands of a racist-Eastern-Caper calledClarence Mlamli Makwetu I was ejected from the building (and by the Mofokengssent with my new wife-Leonilde andas-yet unborn daughter Mertho Matanje for slow torture by being denied allsupport from the PAC even though I was still-and-till-April-1994-when-the-radio-broadcasts-were-terminatedthe premier radio broadcast journalist for the organization) for havingrecorded with the PAC the atrocities committed in the ANC by Zumashenchmanship to Mandelasque Xhosa tribalism in the ANC.

Anyway, themap shows where I lived with Mr. Daniel Mohato Mofokeng (the saluting generalon one of these pics) and a man who fully knew about human-right abuses bypeople like Jacob Zuma pro-Zuma-demigod-Nelson-Mandela race and tribe to thedetriment of the rest of South Africans who are not from the Eastern Cape. But of course Mr. Mofokengs lies to the TRCare based on brother-in-lawship!

Mofokeng ismarried to one Xhosa-speaking Pearl who is by the same token one more member ofinvert Super Humans invert; she would d be one more Mandelas fellow race whoare per Zumas machinations currently misruling South Africa.

She comesfrom the people who, per Zumas indoctrinated mind, must to this day continueto savage non-Xhosa-speaking people through all manner of cruelty includingfalse charges where a man like Phiri must pay for himself to be prosecuted andget no assistance from Zumas government to pay legal fees in defence ofhimself notwithstanding the status of a civil servant...
notwithstandingthe fact of blowing the whistle on work-place corruption
notwithstandingthe fact that the victimization charges are wholly work-related and Phirisupposedly committed them in service and well-being of the Republic of SouthAfrica ridding it of the Zuma-Mandela kind of black racism currently eatingaway at the very soul of the this Nation.And ofcourse, Zuma's sub-henchman-Mofokeng is ingratiating himself with theXhosa-speaking Mandela people; hence he had not scruple in plainly lying to theTruth and Reconciliation Commission a decade or so ago.


...To be conTinued....ZUMA'S FOOTSOLDIERS IN HIS BLACK RACISM IN SOUTH AFRICAIt must bevery nice and snug to be a Nelson Mandela and also capable of indoctrinatinganother man like Jacob Zuma to do your racist job for you! As reader, (pictoriallyabove) you are looking at one more (Jacob-Zuma-created) loose cannon in SouthAfricas Army, the South African National Defence Force, post-1994: the racial superiority pro-Mandelas Xhosa-speakingThembu of the Eastern Cape.
The faceyou see on the picture, she is a junior officer by both age and rank and evenlacks experience be it academic or military (even her own father cant writeeven one good paragraph in English without glaring grammatical errorsbespeaking lack of education).
Nonetheless,wherever she goes she, just like her cousin Ntombizodwa Winnie Zini-Bobelo (whohad to pass at least one of her studies by sheer fornication only), thepictured young woman will strike terror among colonels and generals alike be they white or black ofnon-Mandela-Language-Xhosa-speaking because she Girl is the daughter of Zumass super-heroand Mandelas Cousin Mr. Temba Templeton Matanzima who clearly is one of themembers of ex-Eastern-Cape-Province-Mandela-Clan-or-Lingo-per-Xhosa that musthave given Zuma the infamous SPY TAPESthat saved a potential fellow-Schabir-Sheik-corruption-prisoner time injail and rather turnedprisoner-potential into Head of State ifonly for the purpose of doing the bidding of the Eastern Cape BlackRacists ravaging South Africas sustainability of course after the successful dressrehearsal of turning their own Xhosa-speaking Eastern Cape Province into its current basket-case-status allfrom the days of Mandelas cousin andBantustan Dictator KaiserDaliwonga Matanzima to the present time of Yesman, Henchman andSpytapesman Mr. Jacob Zuma!
That isthen how one of the greatest armies (SANDF) of Africa got its very espirit-de-corps, got its morale andf its fighting capability being destroyed by a Zuma indoctrinated to racial superioritypro-Mandelas race from the days the two were together in Robben Island in the60s (I suppose) to the days when Zuma was unleashed for exile henchmanship viaover-promotion (while his more-educated fellow-Zulus were apparently beingpoisoned to death in exile by Mandelas fellow-Xhosa-speaking Oliver Tambosregime on the longsuffering ANC) for his illiterate and thoroughly-indoctrinatedmind.To reiterate, this is exactly the same tribalerror that Zuma in the eighties of exile unleashed in camps like Morogoros Dakawaand Mazimbu in Tanzania. And comradeswho protested this were ordered by Zuma executed even by means of burial-alive-methodslike two Coloureds who were buried alive by one Xhosa speaking Mr. RobertMance (and administrator of Mazimbu and Solomon Mahlangu Freedom College) withthe say-so of utterly-indoctrinated Zuma.That was inthe 1980s and many MISTAKENLY thought the Truth and Reconciliation Commission(led by Mandelas fellow Xhosa-speaker Bishop Tutu closed and sealed theApartheid-era chapter (which it in fact did not close because the Afrikanerswere let lose who buried Stanza Bopapes bones in some place only known tothemselves known while on the other hand Apartheid-era human-right-abusers ofexile like Mr. Jacob Zuma were shielded by that self-same Commission to the extent that they have never even beenforced to go point out to the secret graves they made of SouthAfricas children who opposed both AfrikanerApartheid within the Country SouthAfrica and within Mandelasque Xhosa speakingTembu tribalism conducted by Zuma in exile!)
Today isYear 2012 and Zumas henchmanship pro-Mandela-race-superiority has sprung inaction once again! Except today Zumauses illegal Anton Piller orders. Zuma will as of this 2012 send to your housethis heavily armed military police contingent of six soldiers ostensibly justto take away from you the computer you blog withand what utterly nonsensicalexcuse for trying to assassinate a patriot when blogging does not need onecomputer and one can blog even from an internet café? Of course, the military men are there to execute you indefence of Mandelas black racism in South Africa and the seizure of computersis just a mere excuse! They will killyou per pretext you threatened them with a fire arm and thereupon put next toyour bleeding corpse a stolen firearm, the very one you used to threaten themwith hence they had to fatally shoot you


Mr. Temba Templeton Matanzima:Jacob Zumas 2012-Ombudsman for officers of theRepublic of South Africa. How so? Youask.
Well, Jacob Zuma has effectively thanked TembaTempleton Matanzima for the mess both of them have so far made of the SouthAfrican National Defence Force, hence Ombudsman of the Department of DefenceMatanzima.
And so, soldiers aggrieved must for angelic solutionsgo to the very devil that (over the years of Zumas racially-biased rule)caused them problems in the very first place!Talk of Hobsons choice!
I laughed the other day when an elderly white farmerfriend of mine asked:
Phiri, but why dont you take your problem to thenewly-appointed Ombudsman of South Africas Department of Defence and VeteransAffairs?
I could have replied: But Zumas 2012 Ombudsman is a mere throwback to Zumas mid- 1980sTanzania-Morogoro-Mazimbu/Solomon-Mahlangu Freedom Colleges ex-Eastern-Capeand Xhosa-speaking Mr. Robert Mance who (per Zumas orders) buried alive twoColoureds!
Mark you, it is ZumasOmbudsman Mr. Temba Templeton Matanzima who gleefully executed JacobZumas illegal order March 2011 whereby heavily-armed soldiers were sent toGoodman Manyanya Phiris residence in Lyttelton Pretoria for the apparentpurpose of of killing me on the pretext Phiri resisted an AntonPiller merely aimed at taking hiscomputer and stopping him from any further blogging
blogging on Zumas black racism and tribalism inSouth Africas Army in favour of Mandelas family members
blogging on Zumas black racism and tribalism inSouth Africas Army in favour of Mandelas Tembu/AbaThembu tribe, and
blogging on Zumas black racism and tribalism inSouth Africas Army in favour of Mandelas fellow-Xhosa-speakers of the EasternCape Province, and a province recently turned into a basket-case due to corruptionby Zumas appointees covered-up by self-same black racism pro-Mandelas peoplethat Zuma is now spreading for the rest of the Republic starting with the countrysbackbone which is the Department of Defence. With every single day greetingSouth Africa with a Zuma at the helm, the writing is Republic of South Africaheading for the gutters.
But to return to the Phiri victimization, the salt ofthe injury lies here: that Anton Piller application against longsuffering Phirihad been duly and lawfully requested (from Gauteng-North-Division of the HighCourt of South Africa) by Zuma and his favourite minister (a woman I dare notmention by name seeing that there is a Judge-Webster order that instructs Imust not talk about her any more).
The point here is :Zuma and his favourite female Ministerso unnameable were plainlyrefused an Anton Piller by Honourable Judge Webster; but maybe their friendin that court [a one Mr. Bernard Ngoepewho is not only President of the Division but seemingly confuses hisadministrative responsibility over his own judges with dependence of thosejudges decisions on Ngoepes administrative whims] secretly advised Zuma inthe following manner:
You Zuma arestill within your rights to do the Anton Piller via the SANDF ratherthan via the expected and normal South African Police Services (SAPS) in suchoperations which would have been the case if my otherwise stupid Judge Websterhad not denied you the go-ahead for the applied-for Anton Piller againstLieutenant Colonel Goodman Manyanya Phiri.And I, Bernard Ngoepe who knows the Army like the back of my hand sinceI review all their cases and will review Phiris tell you now: DO AN ANTONPILLER AGAINST PHIRI VIA THE SANDF AND FORGET ABOUT JUDGE GEORGE WEBSTERS STUPIDORDER TO THE CONTRARY.
Everything boils down to very one thing: Zuma and hisnew Department of Defence Ombudsman Matanzima come not as the greatestrespecters of the rule of law in SouthAfrica and with every single day thesecharacters are allowed to rule over us, South Africa is becoming a nightmarefor her own citizens.
I mean: the official version of the Gauteng NorthDivision of South Africas High Court (part and parcel of the countrys supremecourt junior only to the Constitutional court currently headed by Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng) was: NO ANTON PILLERAGAINST LIEUTENANT COLONEL GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI.
So (except for individuals like Zuma and Mandela whowant to over-night turn their family members into super-administrators,ombudsmen, brigadier-generals-via-the-bedroom and multi-millionaires where noneof those qualifications deserved) what true democrat.. what true child.. andwhat true member of an ANC and ruling party formed by our ancestors like Dr Pixleyka Isaka Seme and Swazi Queen Mother Labotsibeni 100 years ago for the purposeof combating these kinds of discriminatory activities by powerful people likeZuma can allow the contempt poured by this Zuma on Honourable Judge GeorgeWebster order that [there should be no Anton Piller against Phiri]?
I write here with the admission that cynics who readthis may ask the question:
Phiri, you are a soldier, and as such what did youexpect less than a raid of your residence for your computer if you dared blogabout South Africas military?
My answer may be lengthy, but still very simple. And it is this. Like anybody else, soldierslike Phiri are human beings too! Soldiers remain needful of constitutionalprotection and soldiers are in fact (to unschooled Zumas ignorance) duly protectedby South Africa Constitution. And heywake up, Cynical People: Soldiers are also fathers and they are also motherslike you!
Ultimately, if Jacob Zuma succeeds to kill Phiri by sillyruses like sending his six trigger-happy military policemen ostensibly justfor taking away the computer Phiri blogs with, who will take care of Phirisdaughter Tamara hardly two this August month of 2012?
If Zuma succeeds in his murderous path so gruesomelystarted in his mid-80s days of exile worship to Mandelas racismpro-Eastern-Capers, who will take care of my other children still banished byJacob Zuma to Tanzania for the sins of the father who (to both the PanAfricanist Congress of Azania political party of South Africa and ArchbishopEmeritus Desmond Tutus Truth and Reconciliation Commission) in vain reportedZumas henchmanship to Mandelas black racism pro-Eastern-Cape in the camps ofexile of Dakawa and Mazimbu for example?
If Zuma succeeds to murder me, who will take care ofthe mothers to these children?
O.K. maybe Zuma will want to marry these beautifulwomen for his umpteenth wive that taxpayers of South Africa will forever foottheir bill as First Ladies of South Africa ruled by a savage who has no idea ofwhat it is to be holy King Shaka Zulus idea of a true Zulu, but as a victim I (GoodmanManyanya Phiri) remain unimpressed!
So it is legally-speaking sheer nonsense that racistabusers of peoples human rights like Jacob Zuma have as commanders in-chiefof the military and other security organizations a carte blanche legal leewayto send robotic shoot-to-kill soldiers traipsing into the houses of army lieutenant colonelslike Phiri as the Zuma-like dictators so wish!
Ask yourself: If Zuma and his favourite Temba TempletonMatanzima can do that to an officer Phiri,
If Zuma and his favourite Temba Templeton Matanzima cando that to a gentleman Phiri,

If Zuma and his favourite Temba Templeton Matanzima cando that to Republic of South Africas Man of Honour Phiri by sending soldiersready to kick doors down just to for the purpose of taking Phiris PC withwhich Phiri reports Army corruption and racism, WHAT PROTECTION DO DOWN-TO-EARTHCIVILIANS HAVE AGAINST ZUMA WHEREVER THEY DARE WHISTLE AGAINST BLACK-RACIST-ZUMA-PRO-MANDELA-TRIBEIN THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA?
Maybe I should give my reply this way: If it was constitutionally kosher for JacobZuma to send those military men to my residence in Lyttelton-Centurion-Pretorialike he did by means of the Armys Matanzima Commander-since-turned-OmbudsmanMatanzima, WHY DID ZUMA IN THE FIRST PLACE BOTHER TO GO VIA HIS UNNAMABLEFEMALE DEFENCE AND VETERANS AFFAIRS MINISTER TO PLEAD WITH JUDGE GEORGEWEBSTER?
























AM I WINNING OR LOSING MY WAR VERSUS MR ZUMA?OUT TO DESTROY PHIRI FOR ZUMA ARE THESE!Lieutenant Colonel Goodman Manyanya Phiri presentingspeech during a cultural function in honour of the Dlaminis who are Phiris SwaziRoyal grandmotherly people. The Swazi-speaking Dlaminis are the founders of SouthAfricas ruling African National Congress in terms of material sustainabilitywhat with the Swazi Queen Mother Labotsibeni-Dlamini having parted with thegreatest founding contribution ever made in 1912 to the ANC (200 head of cattle)over and above financing the great ANCs mouthpiece/newspaper (Abantu/Batho) from asearly as possible in the ANCs lifetime till as late as the 1940s when blackracists-pro-Eastern-Cape like Mr Nelson Mandela infiltrated the ANC to kill anewspaper that sought to destroy European colonial borders between South Africaand the following countries (among others): Lesotho, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Botswana,Zambia and, of course, Queenmother Labotsibenis own Kingdom of Swazilandcurrently ruled by lonesome King Mswati III. If you understand Nguni/Swazi/Siswati,you can among other presentations in the Dlamini Cultural Function Phiri was addressing, watch video One or Second of Phiri talking, also of ANC stalwart Father Smangaliso Mkhatshwa who shareswith Phiri one common ancestor: Swazi Prince Khenkhana Dlamini, a founder of SouthAfricas Royal Residence of Emjindini/Barberton, Mpumalanga Province. Now, if a WOMAN (the Swazi Labotsibeni-Inkhosikati-Gwamile-LaMdluli)is ruling ANCs greatest material founder (we know intellectual founder wasZuluman Dr Pixley ka-Isaka Seme [by affinity Second Maternal Cousin Removed toBlogger and Writer Goodman Manyanya Phiri]), WHY IS SOUTH AFRICA ALLOWING MALECHAUVINIST JACOB ZUMA TO REDUCE CIVIL-SERVANT AFRICAN WOMEN TO MERE EXTENSIONSOF THEIR OWN VAGINAS? Please, wake up to the scourge Ye South African women andSisters to Phiri and other right-thinking men!...this indeed an August-1-2012 update in favour of Women's Month in South Africa.
Jacob Zuma (Mr) and some unnamable character"Siziwe" a.k.a "Sighs", the self-professedNelsonMandelaCousinwho achieved generalcy and other rankingthroughadultery/prostitutionwith at least one Raymond Lentsoe in Year 2000.Goodman Manyanya Phiri, according to Mr Jacob Zuma,must for 11 years now therefore continue to sufferfor blowing the whistle against this relative to a Mandelathat Zuma calls "The Father of The Nation South Africa".Her official name isWinnie Ntombizodwa Zini-Bobelo
College of December-2000-fornication-for-promotion pro-Mandela's Eastern Cape Xhosa-Speaking Race. Front Centre sits College Commander one Mr Mxolisi Edward Petane who is naturally one more Mandela's fellow-Xhosa-speaker whom Mr Jacob Zuma, regardless of ability outside of illicit sexual suspicions, seemsto be promoting and putting in positions of authority left and right inthe Republic of South Africa. (for clearly-indoctrinated Zuma, these folks are apparently the closest thing to his demigod, Nelson Mandela who taught an illiterate Zuma his first political lessons on Robben Island Prison when the latter was about only a tender 15 years old)



Mr AtlholangRaymond Lentsoe in 2001:thetutor/instructorwho fell forthe embedded seduction of self-professed Nelson Mandela Cousin Siziwe (Winnie Ntombizodwa Zini-Bobelo) all forthe purpose of propagating black racism pro-Eastern Cape as per Jacob Zuma's narrow pro-Nguni racism and pro-his Demigod-cum-Father-of-the-NationNelson Mandela's fellow Xhosa-speakers ofthe Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Zini-Bobelo is now (without any scintilla of military-science-know-howto go withthe prerequisite rank) "Brigadier General" for Mr Jacob Zuma despite 11 full years of Phiri's informing him ofthe bedroom antics and black racism pro-Eastern-Capeemployed in promotingthis woman by (among other powerful males) pictured "gentleman".









IN his 40'sthen: 2 pictures ofEddie Drost (officially Eduard Frans Drost, born Wednesday 27 January 1960) He isthe man who didthe dirty job for Mr Jacob Zuma, falsely charging Phiri for a 2001-racial-fracas cause by self-professed Mandela's cousin (Winnie Ntombizodwa Zini-Bobelo illicit fornication-for-promotion with Drost's immediate subordinate Raymond Lentsoein South Africa's most crucial security department: Defence)
Mr Daniel Mohato Mofokeng (a.k.a. "Romero": born Monday 20 February 1956) and former Azanian People's Liberation Army's Commander (albeit for about3 monthsafter a suspected hit on erstwhiledefacto and non-racist Xhosa-speaking APLA commander Sabelo Phama/Sabelo Gqwetha). Mofokeng (a spouse to a Xhosa-speaker) is notonly the man who worked for the Mandelaists like Jacob Zuma to retaliate against Phiri's anti-racism by banishing the latter's wife (Leonilde) to tanzania, but sources have it that Mofokeng is the one who has been consistently giving Phiri the bad name in the South African National Defence Force for the benefit of a Zuma indoctrinated as early as age 15intobelieving in racial superiority of Nelson Mandela's race of the Eastern Cape where Mofokeng found a wife named "Pearl".
Outside of Zuluman Jacob Zuma, it is extremely hard for me to imagine anybody in the past solid 24 to 27 years of my life and fight against black racism pro Mandelas Xhosa speaking Thembu and other Eastern-Cape races than Mofokeng. Truth and Reconciliation Commissions Case Number JB04241/01GTSOW (GOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI AND HIS TANZANIAN WIFE AND CHILDREN) had to be launched because of the orders of Mofokeng to the late Benson Mandindi and Monezi Gcilitshe (UNHCR repatriation officer and PAC Chief Representative Acting, respectively) in Dar-es Salaam 1994 to tear down a United Nations High Commission for Refugees Repatriation order issued legally for my Tanzanian wife and first: Leonilde Makafu-Phiri. Mofokeng succeeded after my launching of the grievance with the TRC, to go and convince Xhosa-speaking Bishop Tutu who was heading the TRC Commission, that [Phiri is talking lies about atrocities of exile camps under Jacob Zumas intelligence control pro-Mandelas fellow-Xhosa-speakers of the Eastern Cape]. Another area of Mofokengs involvement in undermining my case: When I discovered years later about participation of some white racists within the South African National Defence Force (in cahoots with the Boeremag and hitherto wrote to the State President to reveal the criminal negligence or/and participation in the military coup plot of the extreme right, it is Mofokeng who joined my enemies to put a different spin to the whole matter and once again suggested not only falsely that I had put the letter to the President to the Mass Media but went further to impugn to the SANDF organization that [everything Phiri does is against Mofokengs brothers-in-law-the-Xhosas]. When on 9 March 2001 I got charged, naturally my legal defence counsel subsequently advised me to get affidavits from my potential witnesses to my innocence of those charges, but and when I in Lohatlha near Kimberly circa 2002 stood in front of the Army class/course I had been with during the previous year of Zuma-condoned-fornication-for-promotion in Pretoria-Thabatshwane, talking to them in that Lohatlha unit and pleading for any who could be witnesses on a case that had been fabricated to cover up for Mandelas relative who is the fornicating-for-promotion-Zini-Bobelo , it is self-same she who is Mofokengs former subordinate (Zini-Bobelo) who subsequently (and very immediately after my plea in front of the class) organized an all-Xhosa-speaker meeting aimed at warning any of her fellow race (of Xhosa-speakers) who would dare give me a statement because, as he maligned me, [Goodman Manyanya Phiri is hell-bent for the destruction of the Xhosa nation who are the owners of the African National Congress through Cousin Nelson Mandela]. Notably, Mr. THEMBELANI THANDEKILE XUNDU, one of the Xhosas who knew my innocence from the Drost trumped up charges of 2001, DEFIED Mofokengs former subordinate and gave a statement which is proof enough that it is not all Xhosa speakers who are evil enough to get their henchman Zuma signing off of people like Phiri or signing the burying alive of those two Coloureds (natives of the Western Cape and Northern per South African parlance) back in the mid-80, a an identification of their secret graves Mr. Zuma still owes not only South Africans and the families of those Coloured killed so grimly by Zuma signatures and commandership of Xhosaman Mr. Robert Mance, but HE OWES IT TO THE INTERANTIONA COMMUNTIY TOO. The other thing not to be forgotten about Mofokeng is the fact that he was the major domo of integration to the SANDF of us APLA forces, and oversaw as such all matters of former APLA members even after integration (these days that office is held by wife of query-slain APLA commander Sabelo Phama who is Dudu). But the days before Eddie Drost brought up his trumped up charges of 9 March 2001, I saw a dispatch from the office of Mofokeng who had come to confabulate with Eddie Drost. His name is Matolweni. Coming back to the issue of Lohatlha, I know it is Mofokeng who told Zini-Bobelo the lies about me being a Xhosa hater, because the reports of the gruesome killing and burying alive of comrades or burying them in secret greaves that was perpetrated by Mazimbu/Solomon Mahlangu administrator Mr. Robert Mance per orders of a Zuma who was sitting in Lusaka as head of Intelligence and Counter Intelligence, such reports which I gave very secretly to The Azanian Peoples Liberation Army back in 1987, could not have leaked to Zini-Bobelo (a former ex-MK member)) except per someone as high to the APLA as Mofokeng! One senior officer who had once attended Chief of the SANDF Commander Zuluman Nyandas meeting which his generals and heads of divisions was to come to me in grace shock and querying me what wrong did I ever commit against Mofokeng. And when I followed up that question, the officer in question sat in a session where General Nyanda had genuinely wanted low-down about Phiri and why his case was taking so long. Mofokeng, who had attended that meeting, is reported to have told General Nyanda that Phiri is a mere hater of Xhosa people and somebody never to have his case taken seriously. Mofokeng is a Major General in the SANDF.
My Blog ListHapa KwetuMdau Kajipatia Kitabu - Huyu dada, Tanya, alihudhuria mazungumzo yangu na wana Rotary Club of Brooklyn Park tarehe 6 Oktoba. Mada yangu ilikuwa "Cultural Differences in the Glob...16 hours agoMbeleA Talk on Culture and Business Between Africa and Latin America - October 5, 2021 was a special day for me. I made a Zoom presentation to a conference organized from universities in Colombia titled International Summit:...5 days agoMAISHA NA MAFANIKIOVYAKULA VYA ASILI NI MUHIMU SANA - Tusisahau vyakula vyetu vya asili. Maana hapo utakuwa umesahau ulikotoka.1 week agoNGONI PEOPLEThe Essence of The Pilgrimage of Incwala - by Rodney Tingo-Kanyama - THE ESSENCE OF THE PILGRIMAGE OF INCWALAA perspective from a Nguni of Gomani Ngcamane MasekoBy Rodney Sigidi Tingo-Kanyama Nzunga, Blantyre, Malawi....6 months agoSwahili na WaswahiliKikombe Cha Asubuhi; Mathayo 11.... - * Shalom,Habari za Asubuhi,Hamjambo,Mmeamkaje?Tumshukuru Mungu wetu katika yote...Asante Mungu wetu kwa wema na fadhili zako kwetuAsante kw...1 year agoMtakatifu SIMON KITURURU - MAWAZONINimerudi. Tuko Pamoja! - 1 year agoMAMBOBADORais Magufuli Azungumzia Tukio la Maalim Seif kukataa mkono wa Rais Shein ..Asononeshwa sana.. - *Rais John Magufuli amemshangaa Rais wa Zanzibar, Dk Ali Mohamed Shein kwa kuidhinisha fedha za matibabu ya mpinzani wake wa kisiasa, Maalim Seif Sharif H...5 years agoUpepo MwananaJust Remembered My Blog!!!!!! - 7 years agoVukaniKUMBE WAMAKONDE WANAOGOPA KUFA...! - Inaelezwa kwamba Maziko Wamakonde huwa na maombi tofauti na yale yanayofuatwa na madhehebu mengine. Badala ya Sheikh au Kasisi kusoma dua, Wamakonde wana...8 years ago"Maisha Ni Mikikimikiki"MAISHA NI MIKIKIMIKIKI - *Maisha na mikikimikiki na kila mawio na machweo ni utafutaji wa riziki kwa kila kiumbe.Wahenga walisema riziki ya mbwa wa kienyeji ipo miguuni mwake na as...10 years agoGOODMAN MANYANYA PHIRI: GRIEVANCE LETTER TO PRESIDENT ZUMA - Show AllPowered by Blogger.

TAGS:LENGIBATSANDZAKO 

<<< Thank you for your visit >>>

Websites to related :
Nintendo Guías | N64

　　keywords:
description:

Tatuajes de Chicas

　　keywords:
description:
main | sidebarTatuajes de ChicasHomeEntries (RSS)Comments (RSS)LoginBlog Archive 2010(25) mayo(

The Malaysian Journal of Patholo

　　keywords:
description:This is the Malaysian Journal of Pathology Volume 43 No.2 August 2021 and it is the official journal of the College of pathologi

FightTrends.com - MMA/UFC clothi

　　keywords:
description:
Skip to navigation Skip to content FightTrends.com HomeBlog Menu Trending:Cain Vel

Word monorhyme meaning. Word mon

　　keywords:
description:What is a monorhyme, definition of monorhyme, meaning of monorhyme, monorhyme anagrams, word starting with monorhyme.
Tweet

embalmingnet

　　keywords:
description:

sturdyblog | Just another WordPr

　　keywords:
description:Just another WordPress.com site
Skip to content sturdyblog Just another WordPress.com site Home Abou

Esco Engineering

　　keywords:
description:

Apteka internetowa Wapteka

　　keywords:apteka, apteka internetowa, leki bez recepty, kosmetyki, suplementy diety
description:Wapteka to apteka internetowa oferująca szeroki wyb&oa

www-5.unipv.it

　　keywords:
description:

ads

Hot Websites

WHY YOU SHOULD Be listed

Matt Cutts, a software engineer and former head of the web spam team at Google, stated back in 2012 that "spammy directories" are disregarded while those who "excercise editorial discretion" worth it. Even though countless business directories litter the internet, they won't all offer a positive change. Don't take unneeded risks and suggest your website to one that Google loves!

Email: liunxqq$$$126.com ($$$=@) ie websites |