Church Court Chambers | Home

Time 2020-09-20 09:03:43

Web Name: Church Court Chambers | Home

WebSite: http://churchcourtchambers.co.uk

ID:53158

Keywords:

Court,Church,Home,

Description:

Senior clerk Daniel Bartlett ‘always listens to instructing solicitors and seeks to ensure the set maintains a high standard of work’ Legal 500 2019Dan has been Senior Clerk at Church Court Chambers since its creation in June 2013.He has been clerking since 1989 with apart from for an 18 month period starting in 1999 when he worked as a paralegal in Singapore at Beaumont & Son solicitors, an international law firm where he worked in Aviation Insurance law. He also took a year out some time later having picked up the travel bug to tick off some boxes from the bucket list.Dans enjoys running his clerks room on efficiency, approachability and above all honesty.Rod joined Church Court Chambers in 2016 from 7 Bedford Row chambers, having begun his clerking career 29 years ago, in 1989.He is adept at building and maintaining client relationships both domestically and internationally. He has a thoroughly professional and compellingly friendly manner.He was awarded a professional qualification by the Chartered Institute of Marketing (CIM) and is a member of the International Bar Association.Rod was also invited to join the Legal Forum at the University of Greenwich. Dave Selsdon aka Big Dave runs chambers daily dairies. Dave has been clerking since 1999 and brings an incredible level of efficiency and calmness to what could be a very stressful role.In his younger days he was an avid footballer using his extraordinary height to protect the goal, he now spends many an hour on the side-lines supporting his eldest boy who is following in his footsteps and his beloved West Ham. Tom joined Church Court Chambers in September 2018 as our Second Junior. He will be assisting David Selsdon with the daily running of chambers, which will range from managing the diaries to assisting barristers.Having worked with David in the past he shares with him that same high level of efficiency and drive in all aspects of his work.Tom is an avid film and series watcher, particularly Game of Thrones. He also enjoys playing cricket on the weekends for his team in Kent. Mark brings a wealth of experience having started his clerking career in 2001. He is responsible for the billing and collection of counsel’s fees. He is quoted in Legal 500 as “extremely helpful and goes that extra mile to ensure the clients requirements are fulfilled.’ Mark is a keen golfer and Member of the Eldon Golf Society (a society for Barristers Clerks that dates back to 1928.) Mark is also a Tottenham Hotspur Season Ticket Holder and a volunteer for Guide Dogs UK.He helps with all aspects within chambers from introducing and maintaining IT processes, to dealing with larger projects,.He aided in preparing chambers for GDPR and innovating new technological process.He has had previous experience at Penningtons Manches LLP where he assisted in the development of Knowledge Management within the firm.Jonathan graduated from Loughborough University in 2016 after studying Business and Information Management,He enjoys learning all forms of technology to better assist others in their problems.He has a passion for power-lifting and skiing making regular trips to Val d’Isère and Tignes. “Thorough and meticulous in preparation, a charming advocate and a joy to work with…” Peter Woodley, Partner, St James solicitors. “Kerim delivered, in defence of his client, one of the most powerful and eloquent closing arguments I have ever seen” Public Defender, USA “Kerim Fuad QC’s supreme mastery of the evidence is only surpassed by his ability to charm jurors and judges alike. He combines being the father of the house at the central criminal court with an extremely approachable and down to earth character who leaves clients with an unvarnished understanding of their predicament and a sense of relief that they are represented by the man to get them out of it.” Sean Longley of GT Stewart Solicitors. Kerim Fuad QC is Head of Church Court Chambers and the former Leader of the South Eastern Circuit. He is the first choice highly experienced defence silk for instructing solicitors’ high-profile, sensitive and most difficult cases. Kerim is a QC who is prepared to roll up his sleeves and fight...Read more Kerim Fuad QC is Head of Church Court Chambers and the former Leader of the South Eastern Circuit. He is the first choice highly experienced defence silk for instructing solicitors’ high-profile, sensitive and most difficult cases.Kerim is a QC who is prepared to roll up his sleeves and fight fearlessly for his clients. His win rate is breathtaking and is second to none. He has been described as an “ingenious” barrister with a unique ability to relate effortlessly with juries. The court trusts him.Kerim Fuad QC was the elected Leader of the South Eastern Circuit for 2017 and 2018, a reflection of the esteem with which his peers and the senior judiciary view him.Kerim is regularly instructed in high-profile, complex and sensitive cases, for example the murder of Damilola Taylor, “the Exeter Bomber”, “the Three Cooks Bakery” murder “the Clockwork Orange” murder, the Uber Driver wife murderer, to name but a few. Kerim’s extraordinary energy, humanity and compulsive attention to detail means that he enjoys great success in defending his trials.Accordingly he has regular success in huge fraud trials, including by way of example the largest fraud against the NHS to date. He recently represented the main defendant in a 3 month fraud alleged against deaf charities, a complex allegation of cheating the revenue matter at the Old Bailey. He was also counsel in of the largest European human trafficking cases ever.He is also an Environmental law specialist, working for Thames Water.Since taking silk Kerim has developed a practice of back to back murder, terrorism, serious sexual abuse and fraud trials, nearly exclusively at the Old Bailey, where he has been described by a resident judge as “the father in the house.”Kerim has a wealth of past experience prosecuting crime (in particular sexual abuse) at all levels. This gives him a huge insight into the need to protect and understand the needs of vulnerable witnesses. The combination of his empathy, determined and sensitive approach led to great success which later formed the template for his highly astute trial tactics.He was chosen to work on both National and Local “Better Case Management” Committees in a bid to improve the quality of the experience facing all court users. In particular those who are the most disadvantaged and who naturally can find the crown court an oppressive, daunting and scary place to appear. He hopes to help break down those boundaries.Kerim is specialist vulnerable witness trained. He has a vast deal of experience in dealing with and obtaining the immediate trust of young and challenging clients and prosecution witnesses. His experience of mental health cases, especially unfitness to plead, defences of insanity and diminished responsibility is second to none.Kerim has built a first class reputation for winning. He thrives on difficult cases and securing acquittals against the odds, in the face of seemingly the strongest of evidence.This is why he is one of a small group of QCs who are regularly instructed to defend the most serious cases in the country at the Old Bailey.He is renowned for his ability to cross-examine experts on complex forensic evidence, and is often instructed in murder cases which demand his understanding of forensic pathology and cell site analysis. He is an outstanding jury advocate who has an innate ability to bring warmth and humour to even the most sensitive of cases. He is renowned for his passionate and persuasive opening and closing speeches.Kerim is highly regarded for his meticulous attention to detail and he values the importance of having Queen’s Counsel on board from the earliest opportunity and regularly insists on seeing clients in conference to reassure them even before a representation order for Silk is granted.Kerim accepts instructions in all criminal and international matters and has been instructed by leading magic circle firms, to provide his criminal and regulatory expertise.Kerim has long had an interest in international law and the benefit to be gained in learning from other legal jurisdictions and forging close cultural ties. Kerim was born in Kampala, Uganda and has lived in Hong Kong; he is of Cypriot heritage. Kerim proudly Co- founded and Co- Chairs “the Cypriot Lawyers’ Society.”In March 2018 he was specifically chosen by the British High Commissioner to teach advocates in Cyprus and harmonise relations between the two communities. He made strong associations with both Chief Justices there and met their respective judiciaries.Having fled Uganda as a refugee in the 1970s, he understands better than most the difficulties displacement and isolation can bring.He has provided a detailed paper to assist the Law Commission on its consultation on the law of Insanity and Automatism. Furthermore he has helped in the response to the Law Commission’s consultation on “Misconduct in Public Office.”In November 2016 he was the only QC in the country to be selected to visit the Scottish High Court and attend the Scottish CBA Conference.There he was privileged to give a detailed talk on “Registered Intermediaries- The Theory in Practice in England and Wales.” He has developed strong ties with the Dean and Vice-Dean of the Faculty of Advocates.From 2012 to 2016 Kerim Fuad QC was an active member of the Executive of the Criminal Bar Association.He was the appointed Chair of the Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Bar Mess from 2013 to 2016.In July 2019 Kerim Fuad QC was appointed by Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou (of Easyjet) as a specialist adviser for his Philanthropic Foundation, focusing on matters relating to the island of Cyprus.Kerim is a qualified Advocacy trainer for the Middle Temple.He has also been a pupil supervisor for 21 years.Kerim Fuad QC believes that with the right positive mindset anything can be achieved.“Do the right thing, not the easy thing.” R v BM and another – Old Bailey – July to August 2020 On 10th October 2019 at 3.19 pm, a boy boarded the 241 bus on the way to Stratford wearing a balaclava and armed with a very large hunting knife. He proceeded to knife two 15-year-old schoolboys a total of 4 times, in front of terrified passengers, before running off the bus after B. A. who later died of his stab injuries.Mr Fuad QC’s client was also a 15-year-old schoolboy and was carrying an identical hunting knife in his rucksack which he was seen on CCTV to take out on the same bus to inspect. The defendants’ knives had been bought together. He was alleged to have been the look out and the one who “tipped off” his best friend from the top deck via a lengthy phone call, and other phone calls, to know which bus the deceased and his friends were on and pinpointing where the bus was.There was previous Snapchat talk involving all the boys in which knives were talked about and threats were made, including who was going to “be the first to be on someone’s blade.”Mr Fuad’s client was acquitted of all 4 counts. This acquittal adds to Mr Fuad QC’s quite extraordinary record of Murder acquittals, in particular over the last 10 years.The other defendant was unanimously convicted of the Murder of B. A. He will be sentenced in due course following probationary reports.This case has been widely reported in the national press, although reporting restrictions apply in respect of child defendants and witnesses.On a separate note:Both Mr Fuad QC and Miss Karaiskos are Cypriots who come from each of the island’s communities. The trial was a classic example of the two working as a successful, cohesive and powerful team. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-50427925https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/london-stabbings-baptista-adjei-death-knife-crime-stratford-latest-a9153776.html Kerim was instructed by Mr Joel Lamptey of Hanson Woods solicitors. R v CM and another – Old Bailey – January to February 2020 Murder and Conspiracy to rob. His client used a dumbbell to kill a drug user in Acton and steal cash and Rolex watches from him.Very powerful evidence connected CM to the murder scene, including; ANPR, CCTV, Cell site, three I messages sent to him by the co- defendant at the time of the killing referring to the need to “Hurry up and get the P,” a contemporaneous phone call that was recorded of the killing and Crimewatch searches done on his phone.He was convicted and received a life sentence with a minimum term of 32 years’ imprisonment. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-53310091https://www.mylondon.news/news/west-london-news/convicted-killing-dumbbell-17787100https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/ealing-paul-tong-murder-manslaughter-rolex-watch-a4367651.html Kerim was instructed by Shahid Khan of AdviceWise solicitors R v AM and others – Old Bailey - December 2019 Kerim Fuad QC today secured the unanimous acquittal of a young man alleged to have been involved in a “brutal and savage” murder. The trial before HHJ Leonard QC at the Central Criminal Court began on the 2nd December 2019 and lasted four weeks. It was alleged that the victim was stabbed repeatedly to death with a large kitchen knife in front of horrified eye-witnesses in retaliation for being on the “territory” of the three defendants having threatened two of them with a knife. He was instructed on behalf of the first defendant. It was the defence case that the defendant together with a friend were being robbed by the victim, in an unprovoked incident, when another male emerged from nearby bushes and murdered the victim. It was advanced that there were, in effect, two separate incidents and thus the absence of a joint enterprise. Eye witnesses were skilfully cross-examined to establish a punctuation in time between the initial start of the incident, namely an altercation between the victim and the defendant said to be a robbery, and the end of the incident, when the stabber emerged from a hiding position and brutally attacked the victim.This was a highly emotive case involving four young males and brought under the spotlight the issue of joint enterprise post Jogee, and the sheer brutality and prevalence of knife crime. The stabber was duly convicted of Murder. The defendant and his friend were acquitted, however in such sad cases there are never any winners. This case was another acquittal for Mr Fuad QC marking number eleven of the most recent and sensitive murder cases in which Mr Fuad QC has successfully defended. It is the third consecutive acquittal for Mr Fuad QC and Mr Witcher when defending together in such cases.https://courtnewsuk.co.uk/accused-killers-were-in-wrong-place-at-wrong-time/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7858197/Man-21-guilty-brutal-horrific-murder-18-year-old.html Kerim was instructed by Mahomed Ismail, Director of MFI Law, London. R v CS – Lewes Crown Court – November 2019 In a murder case dubbed “The Midsomer Murder,” Kerim Fuad QC represented a man who broke into a Waterside house in Bosham, West Sussex late at night in December 2013 with a claw hammer. He used the hammer to attack and kill a grandmother who was house sitting. The horrific injuries, in particular to her head were described as “extreme and akin to those seen in a road traffic accident.”He then fled to Dej, Romania from where he was extradited under a European Arrest Warrant 6 years later. The case led to the most extensive police investigation in Sussex history. 9,000 people were interviewed and over 3,000 DNA samples were taken in a police hunt for her killer.The damning evidence was that he confessed to his ex partner and his dna was found on the bloodied hammer discarded at the scene.https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7236667/Hammer-killer-suspect-28-Midsomer-murder-case-Sussex-appears-Romanian-court.htmlhttps://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/07/23/romanian-man-accused-midsomer-murders-killing-remanded-custody/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/suspect-in-bosham-hammer-death-of-valerie-graves-is-arrested-in-romania-px5szmbtl Kerim was instructed by Sef Mani of Bark and Co Solicitors. R v TP – Old Bailey- January to February 2019 Mr Fuad QC represented Mr T.P who accused of the Murder of his wife and Arson with intent to endanger his family and an alternate count of reckless Arson.After a 13 day trial before the Common Serjeant of London, the jury found him guilty of murder, not guilty of Arson with intent, but guilty of reckless arson.The jury had been 2 days in deliberation.He was sentenced to a life sentence with a minimum term of 25 years’ imprisonment. He received a 7 year concurrent sentence for the reckless arson.His client was alleged to have strangled his wife and forced a flannel deep down the back of her throat whilst she was alive. The prosecution (and pathology evidence) strongly suggested he then dragged her across the floor, removing clumps of her hair (which were found in the hall way and bedroom), locked her in a bedroom and set her body (her head and private parts) and two rooms in the house on fire. Fire experts gave evidence as to it “having to be a deliberate setting of different fires in rooms.”His three children were prosecution witnesses against him saying he had dragged their mother across the floor from one room to another in which her body was found.T.P maintained that he was in fact dragging a suitcase, not his wife, and the killing and lighting of the three separate fires was an accident. He could not explain why he lit fire so close to her private parts, but said “it was spiritual like a séance.”When a neighbour, the deceased’s 80 year old parents and the refuse men came to the burning house to assist, he claimed many times over (and was captured on body worn footage) that his wife was not in the house but had “gone for a walk.” He verbally and physically pushed people out of the house refusing to let them into the bedrooms.He told the police that he had lit candles to “lighten the mood” and that the bite injuries which matched her teeth on his hand (a piece of his skin was later found), putting the flannel deep in her mouth, were caused by their pet dog. Other injuries to his face were caused; “when shaving.”Three weeks before the killing he had set up life insurance for the maximum payable to him upon his wife’s death of £310,000 and was also to benefit from her pension. The jury also heard of two earlier separate but unproven reports of him assaulting her, once by attempting to strangle her.He said in evidence that it was “a shame” she was dead.In evidence he said he was in shock and was attacked by his wife first who had kicked him to his knee, having initially given a “no comment” interview.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-47201007https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/controlling-bully-thomas-peter-who-15812151 Kerim was instructed by Chanelle Wray of Dexter Henry Solicitors R v DB and others – Old Bailey – September – November 2018 Kerim Fuad QC’s extraordinary run of Murder Acquittals continues On 31st October 2018, after a 7 week trial at his home court, the Old Bailey, Kerim Fuad QC’s client, D.B was unanimously acquitted of Murder. D was a 17 year old who was clearly captured on cctv running with a large knife in Logan Place W8 in a chasing pack of 20 young men who were chasing down a man, LB who was then, as the crown put it, “butchered” defenceless on the pavement. His client was also remarkably acquitted of manslaughter and violent disorder. It was the 9th acquittal Mr Fuad QC has secured in his last 10 trials. Kerim was leading James Hasslacher and instructed by Deborah Spence of Banks and Partners Solicitors R v F-D I and others – Old Bailey – November 2018 – January 2019 Kerim Fuad QC maintained his unique and extraordinary run of 10 acquittals in his last 11 homicide trials, at the Old Bailey. He led Edward Boateng-Addo, also of Church Court Chambers, successfully representing Mr I who had allegedly played a key role in planning Mr S’s brutal killing with axe handles. He had followed and passed the deceased’s red car 13 times in a space of a few minutes whilst constantly on the phone for just under half an hour and reporting the movements of the deceased’s car to the driver of another car. The multi handed trial ran from early November culminating with their client’s acquittal today. The first 2 defendants were unanimously convicted of murder, another of manslaughter. Another defendant was also acquitted. Kerim was instructed by Ebenezer Madeinlo of Hanson Woods Solicitors. R v FK – Murder – Old Bailey – July 2018 Kerim Fuad QC secures another Murder acquittal. After a fascinating and extraordinary trial at Old Bailey that ran some 6 weeks, the jury unanimously acquitted FK of Murder but convicted her of manslaughter. The case widely reported by the media. The defence case not helped by the client who had taken a video and photo of deceased dying on pavement which she posted with the words “that’s what you get for fxcking with me.” She also fabricated documents in the middle of giving her evidence. Telegraph BBC Kerim Fuad QC led Kevin Molloy of Church Court Chambers. They were instructed by Attiq Malik of Liberty Law. R v AS and others – Murder – Old Bailey – May 2018 Kerim Fuad QC wins again Mr Fuad QC’s winning streak continued. The jury at the Old Bailey unanimously acquitted AS on counts of murder and also manslaughter as a lesser alternative. The incident arose over a £20 drug debt in Plashet Park in East Ham on 15th October 2017. AS’s case was that he threw one punch at a man who he thought was an aggressor and then withdrew from the incident. Another stabbed the deceased who died at the scene from a single wound to the heart. Telegraph Kerim Fuad QC was leading Robert Newcombe. They were instructed by Mahomed Ismail of MFI Law, Solicitors. R v D. L and others – Old Bailey – Murder. February 2018 After a hard fought six week trial at the Old Bailey, Kerim Fuad QC and Fiona McAddy’s client, DL was the only one of the 5 defendants to be acquitted of Murder & Manslaughter. DL was unanimously acquitted. In what was one of his toughest cutthroat defences to date, Mr Fuad QC exposed the first 3 defendants’ lies, that their client DL was in the culprit car that went to the murder and whom was alleged by all to have played a lead part in the brutal and fatal knife attack on young Jermaine Goupall. This was in spite of DL getting a text shortly before the murder saying; “Get your nank we going 7.” 7 was a reference to “CR7” another part of Croydon with whom the gang who lived in “CRO” postcode had historical issues of taunting and violence. Complex issues relating to a co-defendant’s bad character dominated the case, and Mr Fuad QC’s powerful and incisive cross examination based in part around the fruits of the application decimated the accounts of the co-defendants, and critically, augmented the Crown’s case against them. Mr Fuad QC was the only silk to make a defence opening speech which firmly laid the foundation for their defence and took the sting out of the case against his client. He was instructed by Tim Edwards of Edwards Vaziraney. R v S.H and others – Luton Crown Court -Rape and Misconduct in Public Office. December 2017. Mr Fuad QC represented the main defendant a Serco detention officer, Mr H, who was accused of very serious counts of rape and sexual assault of a female detainee at Yarlswood detention centre in Clapham, Bedfordshire. In addition his client faced an allegation of misconduct in a public office. In this high profile and complex trial Mr Fuad QC managed to thoroughly discredit the complainant’s account over two days by his incisive, sensitive but powerful cross examination. The allegations had hung over his client who was of impeccable character for over 5 years. His attention to detail and painstaking research into thousands of pages of material, comprising years of Serco and Home Office reports lead to a hugely focused and ultimately compelling cross examination of the complainant. His trademark opening speech set the tone from which the crown’s case never truly recovered. Kerim Fuad QC was leading Matthew Kirk instructed by Cartwright King Solicitors. R v S.E – Coventry Crown Court – Rape. October 2017 Kerim Fuad QC succeeded yet again in university rape case. Mr Fuad QC represented a young man accused of the rape of a fellow University student. After a trademark opening speech by Mr Fuad QC, straight after the crown’s opening, and his meticulous cross examination (which was praised by the Judge for its sensitivity) Mr Fuad QC exposed the complainant’s account. Mr Fuad QC’s client who was a young man of impeccable good character, had given a complete and consistent account from the moment of his arrest that all sexual contact was consensual. He could not have assisted the investigation more. Unusually and a first for the very experienced trial Judge, the trial did not even get to half time as the crown in the exceptional circumstances of this case, simply had no choice but to offer no evidence after the cross examination had concluded. The Judge directed the jury who happily found him not guilty. Mr Fuad QC complimented his opponent in open court for the sensible decision he initiated, making plain how important it is that the independent Bar prosecute these sensitive and complex matters. Mr Fuad QC was instructed by Steve Halloran of Lawtons Solicitors. R v K.M and another – Old Bailey – Murder. July 2017. Another successful acquittal in a complex Murder trial, this time before HHJ Bevan QC at the Central Criminal Court. The victim had been stabbed at least 12 times in a senseless act of gratuitous violence; the motive inferred as revenge for the victim having dared “mess with the wrong people”. The defendant, K.M, an accepted road related (gang related) young man, was the owner of the car that carried the killers to the scene; the number plate having been noted down by an off duty police officer. The defendant was later positively identified on an ID procedure by an independent eye witness as being one of the two killers. When arrested the defendant’s face was half burnt – the car carrying the killers had been set on fire. Further, the defendant’s phone had ceased all contact with the co-defendant after the time of the murder. The jury acquitted K.M after the evidence, although seemingly compelling on its face, had been carefully dissected by the defence.The co-defendant was convicted of Murder and was sentenced to a life imprisonment with a minimum term of 26 years. Mr Fuad QC was instructed by Tim Edwards of Edwards Vaziraney and Co. R v L – Kingston Crown Court – Attempted Murder. March 2017 An unusual case where the victim was stabbed repeatedly following a heated exchange over a trivial parking matter. The allegation was that the defendant, having had a fight with the victim on his doorstep, retreated to his house and retrieved a kitchen knife. After a few moments he was then captured on CCTV running through the cul-de-sac where both parties lived. Whilst the victim was sat in his car, unarmed, trapped by his seatbelt and sitting next to his partner, the defendant stabbed repeatedly through the open window, causing “devastating and life changing injuries.” The case was unusual in that the defendant’s evidence was that he simply could not remember what had happened – one moment he was at his front door with the victim, the next he was standing with a knife with people screaming at him that he had stabbed someone. The Crown argued that there was a clear intent to kill in that the defendant had said, as he went to get the kitchen knife; “Just watch what is going to happen next.” He then plunged the knife repeatedly into the victim and had told officers soon afterwards that he “had seen red mist”. He also made other unhelpful remarks noted by police officers. By good fortune and the commendable work of paramedics the victim survived, albeit being in a coma and sustaining life changing injuries. He spent many months in hospital. The added complexity to the case was that the defendant’s previous firm of solicitors withdrew having unusually breached legal privilege. As such the entire former legal team withdrew only a few days before the trial was scheduled to commence. The Learned Judge, HHJ Dodgson recognised that this unusual case deserved the attention of Queen’s Counsel – Kerim Fuad QC and Colin Witcher were instructed. The trial had in the first instance to be adjourned in October 2016 and the jury discharged, Counsel rightly not being satisfied that the case had been fully prepared by the original legal team and that critical matters of disclosure remained outstanding. The trial then took place this week and after a five day trial the jury took only an hour and a half to unanimously find the defendant “not guilty” of Attempted Murder. Kerim Fuad QC took the decision to make a robust and persuasive opening speech which helped quell much of the fire of prosecution counsel’s speech. The defendant had earlier pleaded guilty to section 18. Press: ITV: http://www.itv.com/news/london/2017-03-15/knifeman-jailed-for-frenzied-attack-on-his-neighbour-in-trivial-parking-space-row/ Standard: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/jailed-for-five-years-thug-whose-frenzied-knife-attack-left-neighbour-in-coma-a3489841.html Counsel were instructed by Karmenah Vaziraney, Partner at Edwards Vaziraney R v E.S and others – Bristol Crown Court – May 2016 Kerim Fuad QC’s client was acquitted of Murder in triple stabbing incident. After a two month Murder trial before the Honourable Mr Justice Openshaw, the jury unanimously acquitted Mr Fuad QC’s client, E.S of both Murder and S.18. E.S was one of the main defendants and was caught on a covert prison van recording, confessing to not only ‘not knowing whether he had licked the victim’ but also shouting ‘Get the Ting,’ at the time they were alleged by eye witnesses to have gone to the boot of the car to obtain the murder weapons. Two of the co-defendants were convicted JB of both Murder and S.18, and ND convicted of S.18. The rest were acquitted. Kerim Fuad QC led Ray Tully of Guildhall Chambers. He was instructed by Damon Whitlow and Emily Evans of Allen Hoole Solicitors, Bristol Patrick is a highly experienced practitioner who specialises in defending cases involving murder and manslaughter. After years prosecuting high-profile cases involving terrorism and serious fraud, Patrick specialises in defending homicides – where he combines a meticulous approach with an ability to put defendants at their ease. He devotes time and...Read more Patrick is a highly experienced practitioner who specialises in defending cases involving murder and manslaughter.After years prosecuting high-profile cases involving terrorism and serious fraud, Patrick specialises in defending homicides – where he combines a meticulous approach with an ability to put defendants at their ease.He devotes time and attention to evidential detail – on the long-held principle that time spent in reconnaissance is seldom wasted. He has a good network of expert witnesses and a strong knowledge of firearms and ammunition.Patrick prides himself on his ability to communicate with defendants, giving them the time they need – and helping them remain calm despite the serious charges they may face.He believes in taking time to support the family of a defendant – helping them stay aware of what is happening during a period of difficulty and stress.Patrick is also a recorder with both criminal and civil jurisdiction, and a tribunal judge with the mental health review tribunal.InterestsPatrick teaches advocacy at the University of Hertfordshire R v S, 2017 Attempted murder/Section 18, in which the defendant eviscerated his victim with a machete. Not guilty both counts. R v F, 2016 A Royal Marine charged with fraud and theft and possession of 500 rounds of rifle ammunition. Not guilty on all counts Truro Crown Court. R v B, 2016 Wood Green Crown Court. Attempted murder/Section 18. A North London street gang stabbing. Not guilty on all counts. R v Baker, 2016 Attempted murder, in which the victim was stabbed 46 times. Snaresbrook Crown Court. R v M, 2016 Gross negligence and manslaughter, whereby the victim was killed by mechanical digger – guilty, sentence suspended. Wolverhampton Crown Court. R v K, 2016 Murder, the victim shot in care home by husband who was found not guilty of murder and sentenced to a hospital order. Chelmsford Crown Court. R v B, 2016 Murder, in which the victim was beaten to death. Client found not guilty of murder, guilty of manslaughter and sentenced to a hospital order. Winchester Crown Court. R v F, 2016 Murder, in which the victim was stabbed 8 times by neighbour. Found guilty of manslaughter – 13 years imprisonment. Inner London Crown Court. R v C, 2016 The victim, a suspected paedophile, was stabbed. Chelmsford Crown Court. R v L, 2015 Historical child sex offences. Guilty and sentenced to 23 years’ imprisonment. Southwark Crown Court. R v R, 2015 Victim was driven over 6 times with a large Mercedes. Defendant sentenced to life imprisonment. Chelmsford Crown Court. R. v. C, 2014 Murder of one identical twin by the other. Winchester Crown Court. R. v. S and others, 2013 Substantial fraud involving stolen scrap metal. Acquitted of all charges. Oxford Crown Court. R. v. N, 2013 Attempted contract killing. Victim survived. Acquitted on all charges. R. v. H and another, 2012 Billion dollar negotiable instrument fraud. Southwark Crown Court. R. v. G and others, 2012 Drugs conspiracy involving transport of heroin through British Army bases in Germany. Manchester Crown Court. R. v. A and others, 2012 Unprovoked attack on a man at night. Acquitted of manslaughter. Central Criminal Court. R. v. K and another, 2012 Money laundering Columbian drug funds. Southwark Crown Court. R. v. A, 2011 Rape, s.18 and child cruelty. Acquitted of all charges. Blackfriars Crown Court. R. v. R and others, 2011 Conspiracy to import drugs by the ton from Columbia. Acquitted of all charges. Central Criminal Court. R. v. A and others, 2009 – 2012 Known as the Airline Bombers’ Case. The defendant was acquitted of the main charge of conspiracy to destroy aircraft. Woolwich Crown Court. R. v. Brown and others, 2008 Known as the Lakeland Terrorist Training camp case. B was acquitted. Woolwich Crown Court. R. v. H and others, 2014 Corporate manslaughter and health and safety offences. Acquitted of manslaughter. Richard Carey-Hughes QC is a highly experienced silk with a heavy criminal practice primarily centred at the Old Bailey. He specialises in all aspects of criminal law including murder, organised crime and serious fraud. He has a particular expertise in joint enterprise murder cases and successfully represented all four appellants...Read more Richard Carey-Hughes QC is a highly experienced silk with a heavy criminal practice primarily centred at the Old Bailey. He specialises in all aspects of criminal law including murder, organised crime and serious fraud.He has a particular expertise in joint enterprise murder cases and successfully represented all four appellants in the then leading case of A,B,C D in the Court of Appeal where Hughes LJ reviewed all the authorities prior to his more recent review (now as Lord Hughes of course) in the recent case of Jogee where a fundamental re-statement of the law was handed down. Since Jogee Richard has successfully contested a joint enterprise murder case at the Old Bailey where the interpretation and application of Jogee to the unusual facts was extensively canvassed. Richard has considerable experience in appellate matters and appeared in the House of Lords in the appeals which restricted the automatic inclusion of police officers and prosecutors on juries. He was involved in the Court of Appeal in the current leading authority on legal professional privilege which effectively overturned a long line of authority on this complex topic.His practice in financial crime is extensive and includes appearances in cases which involve solicitors and accountants as defendants and also SFO prosecutions.He is an LSM accredited Mediator. With forty years experience in adversarial advocacy and twenty years experience as a part time judge – together with a lightness of touch – Richard is admirably suited to assist in the resolution of contested cases and conflicts generally.Chambers UK 2015 and Chambers 2016 entries.InterestsCommercial Pilot’s Licence and extensive aviation expertise with BOAC and British Airways flying VC10s worldwide.The arts, music, cinema, collecting, cricket and cycling and other sports, fly fishing, Bridge Ryan & Others VAT fraud – issue as to legality of government VAT charges on gaming machines. Abdroikof And Others: House of Lords Whether fair to have serving police officers and CPS prosecutors on juries. Olu & others 2010 Murder – character direction – guidance given by CA on disclosure R v M 2018 Allegation of murder in Wormwood Scrubs prison. Defendant acquitted of all charges after 6 week trial at the Old Bailey. W & others Main defendant in large importation conspiracy relating to hundreds of Kgs of Class A drugs – undercover officer and possible participating informant. Case abandoned by prosecution mid-trial after disclosure arguments. O & others Gang murder – later appealed with extensive argument re character directions. S & others Revenge murder – successful appeal (ABC&D) followed by hung jury and subsequent acquittal. S & others Main defendant in large scale mortgage fraud involving a number of solicitors among defendants R & Others VAT fraud – issue as to legality of government VAT charges on gaming machines. Ben is a highly sought-after, stand-out Silk whose career reflects his strengths as an advocate, his analytical ability and meticulous attention to detail. Ben works with each client to achieve the best result obtainable, however challenging the circumstances. Ben was appointed Queen’s Counsel in March 2009, and to the Serious...Read more Ben is a highly sought-after, stand-out Silk whose career reflects his strengths as an advocate, his analytical ability and meticulous attention to detail. Ben works with each client to achieve the best result obtainable, however challenging the circumstances.Ben was appointed Queen’s Counsel in March 2009, and to the Serious Fraud Office QC list in 2009 and 2013. Prior to taking Silk, Ben developed a varied practice initially obtaining an LLM in company law, intellectual property law, company law and administrative law. Ben served as standing counsel to Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, an area where he continues to accept instructions in suitable cases.Ben prosecutes and defends in equal measure and with equal commitment. Before taking silk he was a Grade 4 Prosecutor on the South Eastern and Midland Circuits and a long-standing advocate on the Specialist Prosecution Rape Panel.Ben continues to accept a wide range of work, including murder, commercial fraud, personal injury, actions against the police, contract and commercial disputes and Judicial Review. He is an experienced hand in the Court of Appeal and has assisted in the development in his list of decided cases.Ben has served by invitation as special counsel to the Governor of the Cayman Islands to advise on constitutional matters relating to the judiciary and law officers. Ben’s broad knowledge of the law and his in-depth experience as an advocate informs each case he undertakes.Ben is known for his commitment to the criminal justice system. He is a senior advocacy and ethics tutor for Lincoln’s Inn. He assesses advocates for the CPS Higher Advocates panel a role that includes assessing Queen’s Counsel employed by the CPS. He has been involved in providing training for those who will be involved in the development of the vulnerable witness programme. R v. C Prosecuting Queens Counsel Man kills wife due to lesbian affair. Loss of control defence. Defendant convicted. R v. PC Prosecuting Queens Counsel Man pushes former Eurotunnel boss onto train tracks. Attempted murder. Defendant convicted. R v. L & M: Prosecuting Queens Counsel Gangs steal free evening standard newspapers for profit. Instructed to give detailed advice on the law of theft. Both defendants convicted following trial. R v AJ Defence Queen’s Counsel Seven-handed murder. Obtaining successful acquittal on charge of murder. Manslaughter alternative verdict. R v. HA Defence Queens Counsel Four handed gang related murder at the Old Bailey. Successful acquittal. R v BP Defence Queen’s Counsel Two-handed murder. Obtaining successful acquittal on charge of murder of a 15-year-old. Manslaughter alternative verdict. R v Cr Defence Queen’ Counsel Acquittal of husband and wife (separately represented) on allegation of shooting and using a knife against family members inside and outside their home on Easter Sunday. Both accused successfully raising pleas of self defence. R v Cu Defence Queen’s Counsel Defending in four-handed murder. Victim attacked with various weapons and having been killed attempts had been made to dismember his body with an angle grinder. Accused acquitted of murder convicted of manslaughter but all other defendants convicted of murder. R v A Defence Queen’s Counsel Four-handed murder charge in context of drug-related offences. Allegations of torture. 16-year-old vulnerable defendant. R v N Defence Queen’s Counsel 27 day three-handed murder and attempted murder, defending vulnerable 16-year-old defendant; victims also 16. Case involved the aftermath of an acid attack. Defences considered were diminished responsibility, legal loss of control, lack of intent and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), alternatively an adjustment disorder. D acquitted of murder but manslaughter by diminished responsibility. R v D Prosecuting Queen’s Counsel Death caused by driving when under influence of alcohol/drugs. Obtained successful conviction following 7-day trial for manslaughter. R v B Prosecution Queen’s Counsel with junior and disclosure counsel Five-handed murder, attempted murder possession of firearms and section 18 assaults. All parties both accused and victims were members of gangs in the Birmingham area. R v F K Prosecution Queen’s Counsel Five-handed attempted murder/conspiracy to cause grievous bodily harm involving serious allegations that police evidence had been planted and raising issues of when a judge should recuse himself in an ongoing case. R v. AJ [2018]: Defence Queen’s Counsel AG Ref. on sentence in Murder/manslaughter case. Sentence was not increased. R v PW [2016] 2 Cr.App R 27, Prosecuting Queen’s Counsel The applicable mens rea in indecent images, abuse of process principles; the Tryell principle, preferring indictments on electronic system; jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal in Terminating appeals. R v JM [2015] EWCA Crim 1928 Prosecuting Queen’s Counsel Issues arising relating to abuse of process; missing documents; terminating rules in the context of historic allegations of sexual abuse. R v Sliogeris [2015] EWCA Crim 22 Prosecuting Queen’s Counsel The correct approach to circumstantial evidence in murder cases. R v. Stanton [2014] EWCA Crim 1695 Prosecuting Queen’s Counsel The correct approach to bad character hearsay evidence where cut-throat defences are being run in murder cases. Ulcay [2008] 1CR.App.R.27 Ambit and scope of cab rank principle in complex fraud cases. Wallace [2007] 2 Cr App R 30 a Application of bad character provisions in circumstantial evidence cases. Malcolm v DPP [2007] 2 Cr App R Prosecuting Counsel Admissibility of new evidence after justices have retired. Abiodum [2005] EWCA Crim 09 Criteria to be applied before lawful intercepts can take place in prison. Ex parte Salubi (2002) 2 Cr.App.R.40 Abuse of process in section 51 transfer cases. Ofori & Tackie (No 2) (1994) 99 Cr.App.R. 223 Admissibility of foreign evidence in English Courts. “ The ‘calm and composed’ Amjad Malik QC is noted for his ability to provide ‘a clear case strategy from the off, and maintain it through the turbulent waters of a trial’.” Ranked in Chambers & Partners: Crime “Well–regarded advocate Amjad Malik QC is regularly instructed to prosecute and defend murder and organised crime cases.” Leading Silk in Crime in Legal 500 “Regularly instructed to prosecute and defend murder and organised crime cases” Leading Silk in Crime in Legal 500 “Experienced in prosecuting and defending murder cases” Leading Silk in Crime in Legal 500 “Well regarded for a broad criminal practice focused on complex homicides and drugs conspiracies. He is particularly experienced in the area of white–collar crime.” Leading Silk in Crime in Legal 500 “He is articulate and surgical in his advocacy, and the way he digests information and gives advice is amazing.” “He prepares his cases fantastically thoroughly.” A leading Silk in the field of Crime and in Fraud demonstrating a multi disciplinary skill set encompassing civil, commercial and criminal expertise. Amjad Malik QC is continuously instructed in the most complex and important of cases. He is sought after by solicitors because of his stylish, persuasive advocacy and...Read more A leading Silk in the field of Crime and in Fraud demonstrating a multi disciplinary skill set encompassing civil, commercial and criminal expertise.Amjad Malik QC is continuously instructed in the most complex and important of cases. He is sought after by solicitors because of his stylish, persuasive advocacy and is known as being at the forefront in the field of fraud, corruption and commercial crime such including confiscation and restraint.Recently he has been asked to advise clients in a matter with regard to facilitation payments under the Bribery Act. He represented JM in the landmark proceeds of crime case, A, M and others (Operations R and A), the money laundering of £40 million through London Currency Exchange Bureaus tried in 2013.He has also recently represented KM in R v SB and others (Operation V) a MTIC fraud, causing a loss of approximately £95 million to the taxpayer.  R v M and others 2015  defending in a Money laundering enterprise through a Midlands currency exchange.He also executes a regulatory and civil expertise when appearing before specialist regulatory tribunals: the General Medical Council; the Nursing and Midwifery Council and the Healthcare Professionals Council. He presently represents a Consultant Professor in  GMC v B, charged with publishing plagiaristic research articles in a number of international medical journals.He has wide experience of many aspects of mental health law including mental capacity, healthcare law and human rights. His practice encompasses many areas in which this specialism is important, for example, the Court of Protection, prison law, community care, torts actions, inquests and inquiries.He possesses an in–depth knowledge of terrorism offences and has long experience of “Honour Killing” crime; defending JD in the Southall murder of Geeta Aulukh at the Central Criminal Court.Work Undertaken Commercial crime (including fraud and money laundering) Serious Crimes (including terrorism offences, murder, manslaughter and drugs) Professional regulatory and disciplinary Mental health and healthcare law Human rights Memberships Elected President of the Association of United Kingdom Muslim Lawyers (2011-2016) http://www.aml.org.uk/cms/ The membership consists of some seven hundred solicitors and barristers. He has helped in the development and advancement of understanding in areas of Sharia law with regard to English civil, commercial and family law. See seminars. Sharia finance Seminar at Bar Council Rooms March 2014Sharia “Dispelling Myths” with Professor Tariq Ramadan of St Annes Oxford at the Arab British Chamber of Commerce 2013.He is regularly invited as a keynote speaker in Terrorism legislation, Honour Crime and Hate Speech crime seminars (“Speech Crimes” Published in The Barrister issue 48).A keynote Speaker on “Wilful Neglect” and protecting vulnerable adults at Safeguarding Conference Islington and Lincolns Inn BIA conference in April 2014. R v SB and others Representing KM in R v SB and others (Operation Vex) Kingston Crown Court. Defendant involved in a massive MTIC fraud, causing a loss of approximately £90 million to the taxpayer. Anwoir, Meghrabi and others Representing JM in the second trial arising from the landmark proceeds of crime case, Anwoir, Meghrabi and others. Money laundering of £40 million through London Currency Exchange Bureau. Kingston Crown Court. R v Miah and others Defending in a money laundering enterprise through a Midlands currency exchange. R v Singh and others Central Criminal Court Defending the so called “honour killing” of Geeta Aulukh in a residential street in Southall by defendant and 3 others using machetes. R v Aiden Jackson CPS Lincoln/East Midlands Prosecuting leading Counsel Homophobic murder of an elderly disabled man by a 17 year old teenager who had lured the victim to a remote area in order to kill him. R v Malik Blackburn and another St Albans CC Thames Valley Complex Crime Unit (TV CCU) Conspiracy to Murder. Leading Prosecuting Counsel in a targeted shooting of a Organised Crime gang rival – The victim survived the attempt on his life and refused to provide evidence to the Crown of who shot him. R v Malik Blackburn St Albans CC TV CCU Corruption – Leading Prosecution Counsel in a case involving payment to a civilian employee in order to obtain access to Police Computer database and obtaining information on rival organised crime gang members. Computer and telephone evidence issues. v Masciopinto and 4 others Luton CC TV CCU Heroin and Cocaine supply conspiracies– Leading Prosecution Counsel involving surveillance visual and probe material. Sensitive unused material issues. R v Craig Leighton Reading CC CPS Reading Murder of a visually impaired and disabled man by the defendant. R v Wall and 2 others Reading CC TV CCU Leading Prosecution counsel. Murder of an Asian gang member by a rival Black gang in Slough. Gang member issues and anonymous witnesses. R v Newell and 4 others Luton CC TV CCU Conspiracy to Murder and attempted murder. Leading Prosecution Counsel Contract killing paid for by an organised crime gang on 2 rival gang members in Luton. R v Wali Khan & Others Birmingham Crown Court Mr Justice Globe The torture and murder of a businessman in a targeted robbery at residential premises in Leicester. The murder was carried out by the defendant and two others, forcibly wrapping the head of the deceased with layers of cloth in order to kill by asphyxiation. Cut–throat defences. R v Muhammed Shafi Reading Crown Court HHJ Z Smith A pre–planned murder of the defendant’s female partner, who was taken to a remote area late at night, the defendant using a knife and heavy metal cutters to kill. Loss of control was raised as the defence to murder. R v Frankie Parker and Gary Smith Cambridge Crown Court Mr Justice Singh The beating and brutal murder of a 76 year old man during a robbery, carried out in his own home by the defendant and another. Cut–throat defences involving witnesses who were all from the travelling community. R v Sandhu Penuts Harrow Crown Court An Albanian drug cartel the subject of surveillance operations conducted by the Serious Crime Agency. Defendant found with 4 kilograms of Heroin (street value 1 million pounds) and acquitted. R v Mark Lewis Northampton Crown Court 19 year old defendant who robbed and killed a stranger in the town centre in the early hours of the morning. R v Sajjad Hussain & others Luton CC Defendant with three others attacked rival gang members with meat cleavers in Bedford Town centre, murder of one man and the attempted murder of another. R v Quaye and 2 others Norwich CC Leading Prosecution Counsel. Two defendant’s, age 15 and 17, charged with murder of a young man at a party by joint enterprise stabbing. Third adult defendant involved in assisting an offender after the murder. R v Hnida and others and R v Stawski Oxford Crown Court - Polish gang related murder. R v Clements Hull Crown Court - defending murder involving a killing by the cutting of the throat in a residential street. R v Thomas White Luton Crown Court - murder of a man involving GHB/GBL and Mephedrone overdose. R v Paul Cooke Wolverhampton Crown Court - Prosecution of Murder of elderly homeowner during robbery. R v Michael Dannaher Oxford Crown Court defending the Excel Sheet/Wind in the Willows 1st Edition Murderer who was targeting celebrities. R v Ben Richardson Nottingham Crown Court - Prosecution of Murder by 19 year old with fitness to plead, diminished responsibility and loss of control issues. Operation Diesel Prosecuting Operation Diesel Birmingham CC. A 13 defendant Conspiracy to supply Cocaine and Money laundering. R v SE Cardiff Crown Court, December Recently advised and obtained leave to appeal the conviction of a mother for the murder of her 7 year old son by beating because of a failure of the boy to recite the Koran properly. Issues raised on appeal as to failure of trial Judge to allow expert evidence on Honour based violence sustained by the defendant at the hands of her husband. R v H Nottingham Crown Court Representing a Solicitor, who faced witness intimidation charges arising out of a criminal trial that he himself conducted. Appeal against original conviction successful but Court of Appeal ordered a re–trial. Appeared for the defendant in the retrial and Defendant was acquitted after submissions made of no case to answer. "Ruthlessly intellectual in preparing his cases with precision." Legal 500 2020, Ranked as a Leading Silk Lewis Power QC is a leading Queen’s Counsel both domestically and internationally. He is a formidable advocate who has established a reputation as a leading practitioner in complex jury trials and has been described recently in the media as “being in the Top Ten List of barristers in the UK”....Read more Lewis Power QC is a leading Queen’s Counsel both domestically and internationally. He is a formidable advocate who has established a reputation as a leading practitioner in complex jury trials and has been described recently in the media as “being in the Top Ten List of barristers in the UK”.He specialises in complex and heavyweight criminal cases, including cases concerning murder, criminal fraud, money laundering, bribery and corruption, offshore and international, serious sex crimes, terrorism and war crimes. Notably he successfully defended in the London Bombing trials at the Old Bailey in London and was lead Counsel in the private prosecution of the current UK Prime Minister, Boris Johnson.He has successfully recently appeared for the defence in a number of high profile murder cases achieving a string of acquittals. Lewis has recently acted as leading Counsel in the internationally renowned “Cyprus Teenager Rape case” where he was permitted to act by the Attorney-General of Cyprus. Clients consistently comment on Lewis’ strategic and tactical acumen developed through nearly 30 years of trial advocacy, latterly in international or trans-national cases including Cyprus, India, USA, the Balkans, the United Arab Emirates and in Ireland. Lewis also regularly acts as a guest lecturer and speaker all over the world and regularly appears on National TV and in a variety of documentaries giving his insight into topical legal issues. He is recognised as a leading Queens Counsel by both Chambers UK and the Legal 500 which comment in particular on his renowned strength in cross-examination: “The epitome of a modern silk. He is approachable, naturally charming and engaging, with a work ethic that is second to none. His cross-examination is effortless and even in the most hopeless of cases, he fights tenaciously for the client and leaves no avenue unconsidered.” He is referred to as “an unrivalled cross-examiner” where his style is said to be “nothing short of brilliant”.Legal 500 2018 : Ranked QCLewis Power QC – Church Court Chambers ‘A strong trial tactician, he is devilishly effective in front of a jury.Chambers Commentary (UK Bar) 2017Lewis Power QC of Church Court Chambers Prominent criminal barrister known for his handling of complex international cases relating to regulation, fraud, rape and murder. Sources commend his ability to manage and reassure clients in highly sensitive proceedings. Strengths: “The epitome of a modern silk. He is approachable, naturally charming and engaging, with a work ethic that is second to none. His client care skills leave the most apprehensive clients firmly reassured. His cross-examination is effortless and even in the most hopeless of cases, he fights tenaciously for the client and leaves no avenue unconsidered.” Recent work: Appeared in R v Miles Headley, a high-profile attempted murder case linked to gang violence in south London.Lewis Power QC is part of our experienced and highly acclaimed team advising and representing clients at all stages and at every level of the regulatory process, including advice on compliance with regulation and at all stages of investigation and prosecution of regulatory offences, and advice on enforcement and improvement notices in all areas of regulation.Corporate Manslaughter has been at the forefront of regulatory lawyers’ minds for several years. Lewis Power QC has regularly been involved in the provision of seminars to both professional and lay clients, providing opinion about the law as it was predicted to be enacted, and subsequently into the effect of the Corporate Manslaughter and Homicide Act once it came into force.Lewis has regularly defended the full range of Health Safety offences and has appeared and advised in a number of high profile cases at the Central Criminal Court :R v Yousoff and in Lewes Crown Courts : R v Barnett and R v H ).He has particular experience and expertise relating to construction cases, R v H becoming involved in cases at an early stage and has often provided advice in relation to compliance issues.Lewis has advised and represent those involved in all types of construction accidents including: Construction, Design and Management issues. Falls from height on construction sites. Structural collapse during construction or demolition Asbestos contamination Environmental waste and Landfill sites. In terms of Health and Safety at work Lewis has successfully defended prosecutions brought by HSE and local authorities relating to all aspects of workplace safety, both as it affects the employer’s own workforce and as it impacts upon the members of the public served or affected by the employer’s undertaking, and whether the accused is the business as a whole or an individual employee said to be at fault.Types of accident covered include: Falls through and from fragile roofs and elsewhere from a height in the workplace ( Corporate manslaughter defending company Mead Contractors Ltd re death of Stephen Bonner ). Slips, trips and falls. Workplace transport ( notably an employee fatality Corporate Manslaughter with Eastbourne Buses ). Mechanical failure, especially in manufacturing and factory Retail, with safety representation and advice offered for and against national retailers ( Next fatality – Bicester Outlet Village ).Lewis’ work includes complex cases concerning companies, public authorities and individuals in cases involving fatalities in the workplace. He also does a large amount of inquest work and enforcement notice appeals. He is currently advising in a case concerning environmental issues in respect of the large-scale disposal of controlled waste and land-fill tax schemes.He has considerable experience in representing clients in a range of tribunals especially medical and sports matters ( Osteopathic General Council and UKAD – famous Cyclists; boxers ) where he combines his expertise of robust courtroom advocacy and thorough case preparation to secure favourable results.Public LawLewis is regularly instructed to advise and represent companies, organisations and individuals at inquest His expertise has also recently been sought in one of the largest public enquiries in the UK to date.Offshore InternationalA former lecturer in International law at Birbeck College University of London, Lewis was appointed Officer to War Crimes Committee of International Bar Association from Jan 2015. Lewis is on the International Bar Association’s War Crimes Committee as the Conference Coordinator. He is moderating at the Peace Palace at the Hague in January 2016 at the Conference on Legal Challenges to Modern Warfare chairing the session on “Peacekeepers Responsibilities and Liabilities in Conflict Zones”.He is regularly instructed in heavyweight criminal proceedings involving fraud and regulatory cases with an international dimension, and for those which are particularly complex requiring prompt judgement. His specialisms also include murder, conspiracy to murder, attempted murder and rape cases. Recent instructions have also included the two major cases witnessing the new slavery crime being charged, the first of their kind in 200 years. Admitted as Defence lead Counsel to the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) Counsel List. The STL is said to constitute in effect the World’s First International Terrorism Court.Sports LawLewis acts on a regular basis for high profile sports personalities, specifically in the fields of football, rugby, horse racing and boxing and recently acted for the World Heavyweight Champion, Tyson Fury. Last year due to his high profile International legal work he was honoured with being made an Ambassador to Belfast in Northern Ireland.He acted in the first ever football fixing trial ( R-v Grobbelaar others ) ; has advised professional jockeys before the Jockey Club and has acted recently in respect of extant Anti-Doping matters before the National Anti-Doping Panel Tribunal. Publications “The Changing Face of International Law” – Counsel magazine – England & Wales – February 2015.“Slavery & Trafficking – An International Criminal Epidemic” – IBA – December 2013 ; “21st Century Slavery: Hidden in Plain Sight” – Lead Article in Counsel Magazine – England & Wales – February 2014.“Call to Arms”: A Paper on behalf of the North American Forum dealing with issues of International Criminal Justice: 2013 International Bar Association. Appointments Full member of Association of Defence Counsel before ICTY (International Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia) Northern Irish BarCriminal Bar Association Sussex Bar Mess International Bar Association Approved Football Association Lawyer Member of North American Forum and War Crimes Forums R –v- Petraglia (2017) Southwark Crown Court – Defendant acquitted on all charges in 3 month money laundering trial involving Multi-Million Pound alleged Italian Mafia linked Bureau de Change Fraud and linked tax avoidance case. R –v- C (2017) Inner London Crown Court – Defendant acquitted on Marital Rape case after submissions on disclosure forced Crown to offer to offer no evidence – ground-breaking case as to disclosure in sex cases. R –v- Mitchell (2017) Lewes Crown Court – Acquitted of Murder in Multi-handed murder trial – after successful submission of no case to answer at close of Prosecution case. R –v Cash (2017) Guildford Crown Court – Defendant acquitted on all charges in Modern Day Slavery Case. R—v- Sadler (2017) Cardiff Crown Court – Defendant acquitted on Murder Charges – daughter had killed father in house fire and found not guilty by reason of insanity. R v D (2016) Chichester Crown Court : Historical Sex abuse case by carer on children and separate Adult Rape Allegations – acquitted on all charges. R v Meade ( 2015) Lewes Crown Court – Paedophile ring familial sex abuse trial- representing vulnerable Defendant. R v – X (2015) Belfast Crown Court – Paramilitary case – Attempted Murder/Perverting the Course of Justice. R v Miles Headley Instructed on high profile case focused on the rivalry between prolific south london gangs. National newspapers ran features on the prevalence of such gangs which are responsible for some of the worst crimes committed in recent years by organised gangs in the capital. Defendant cleared of two attempted murders. R v Steven Miles Instructed on the dexter copy-cat murder case where a teenager fascinated with the hit tv show “dexter” murdered his 17 year old girlfriend in a sadistic fashion. Overview as to applicability of defence of diminished responsibility and brain disorders. R v Sandland Instructed in “Assassins Creed Baby Murder” case. Huge media coverage across national headlines in extraordinary baby shaking case with medical complications for both baby and Defendant, who required 29 medical experts for assessment. R v RH [2014] Multi-handed murder of homeless man; defendant acquitted of murder. R v Nichols [2014] Complex murder trial at the Old Bailey; new defence of “loss of control”; acquitted of murder. R v Haskell [2013] Trial of one of oldest historic rape cases in UK dating back half a century; Defendant acquitted. R v Vijashinghe [2013] Multi-handed, 6 defendant, Sri-Lankan Gang related murder trial at Old Bailey; representing only defendant to be acquitted. R v JC & others [2013] EWCA Crim 368 First judgment of Court of Appeal by Lord Chief Justice on new slavery offences; Lewis Power QC leading 4 Junior counsel. R v Tommy Connors [2013] The first ever prosecution of the new offences of “Slavery” under the Coroners & Justice Act 2009; acquitted all charges at re-trial. R v Brida Connors [2012-2013] Representing only female defendant in Irish Traveller slavery case. R v Denford [2013] Church of England Vicar with historic sexual abuse allegations within Church. R v El-Kurd [2013] Largest money laundering case involving Bureau de Change in UK to date; involving laundering of approximately £200 Million. R v W & W [2013] Representing defendant in million pound bank factoring fraud & building construction fraud. R v Topping [2012] “The Missing Body Murder Case”; representing only defendant to be acquitted. R v Biliniewicz [2012] Murder of wife case where defendant advanced “morbid delusional jealousy” as partial defence re diminished responsibility. R v Shephard & Steele [2011] Serious Fraud Office (SFO) international prosecution where some 22 Million Euros were dishonestly appropriated by the Defendant. R v Wasim Sheikh [2011] A complex conspiracy to defraud the O2 Telecommunications Network by way of an International Revenue Share Fraud (IRSF). R v Mike Zur [2011] Murder – one of the first murder cases under the new legislation re partial defence for murder in diminished responsibility cases;defendant was putting forward “Alcohol Dependency Syndrome “as diminished responsibility defence. R v Simon Gold [2011] Murder; manslaughter contrary to the common law and one count of administering a poison or noxious substance so as to endanger life, contrary to section 23 of the OAPA 1867; defendant giving a lethal heroin injection. R v Abdelgadir & Others [2008] London terrorist bombings case where only 1 out of 2 defendants acquitted. R v M [2007] Leading Counsel in the “Adams Family” gangland case “Operation Trinity”; joint Police and MI5 case quoted as the biggest corruption case to come before the UK Courts; acted as leading counsel and secured acquittal for family Accountant. R v Cheddi Acted for the first Defendant in this International Fraud case which involved the infamous Indian Corporate Giant Company Sahara India Pariwar. Secured the acquittal of the Defendant. Highly complex and novel case involving International Corporate Fraud on a huge scale and where the Crown acknowledged that this case involved concepts of “International Capacity Building” on money laundering and cash smuggling with recent foreign deployments and also and most crucially “Alternative Remittance Systems and Informal Value Transfer Systems” such as Hawala. "A confident and strong advocate who has great presence in the court room." Legal 500 2020, Ranked as a Leading Silk "A brilliant advocate" Legal 500, 2018 Tier 1 Silk "A strong presence in court and has a good rapport with his clients." Legal 500, 2019 "Regularly handles murder and manslaughter cases on behalf of both the prosecution and defence as part of a busy general crime practice. Recent work: Successfully defended a professional man charged with causing death by dangerous driving. The case involved complex scientific evidence and detailed cross-examination of expert witnesses." Chambers UK, 2017 "He has expertise in public interest immunity, complex fraud and medico-legal cases." Legal 500, 2016 Ranked in Legal 500 2016 as a leading Silk on the Wales & Chester Circuit "Known for his expertise in medico legal cases." Legal 500, 2015 "A ‘Leading Silk’ on the Wales and Chester Circuit: ‘Noted for his ability to evaluate complex evidence, particularly in medico-legal cases." Legal 500, 2014 "Primarily prosecutes complex criminal law cases. He is recommended in matters where there is significant medical evidence, such as murder and violent crimes." (Chambers UK Guide 2015) Chambers UK Guide, 2015 "Michael Mather-Lees QC is recommended for medico-legal cases, as well as fraud and confiscation work." Legal 500, 2013 "Michael Mather-Lees QC receives praise for his ‘exceptional intellect.’ He runs a broad practice but is particularly renowned for his work on fraud cases." Chambers UK 2013 "Michael Mather-Lees is recommended for VAT, fraud and medico-legal cases." Legal 500, 2012 "Michael Mather-Lees really shines as a barrister who specialises in medico-legal cases and serious and complex fraud matters." Chambers UK 2011 Michael Mather-Lees is "intellectually exceptional but also down to earth." Chambers UK 2009 The Legal 500 2019 describes him as “A confident and strong advocate, who has great presence in the court room”; the 2018 edition describes him as a leading silk and “a brilliant advocate” and in both 2017 and 2016 he was ranked him as a leading silk, stating that “he...Read more The Legal 500 2019 describes him as “A confident and strong advocate, who has great presence in the court room”; the 2018 edition describes him as a leading silk and “a brilliant advocate” and in both 2017 and 2016 he was ranked him as a leading silk, stating that “he is noted for his ability to evaluate complex evidence, particularly in medico-legal cases”Chambers Legal Directory states: “He primarily undertakes complex criminal law cases. He is recommended in matters where there is significant medical evidence, such as murder and violent crimes.”His practice covers the most serious criminal cases, having prosecuted and defended many homicide cases, complex sexual cases, including internet-based offences and serious fraud (including internet fraud) together with cases involving vast volume and very intricate issues of disclosure, up to and including the most sensitive levels. The majority of these cases now involve the ability to both understand and be conversant with detailed computerised technology and the use of web-based information.He is noted for his extensive experience in medico-legal litigation, both criminal and civil, and has recently successfully defended a Police Detention Officer charged with unlawful act manslaughter and gross negligence manslaughter. That case involved very detailed and specialised medical evidence and the cross-examination of eminent medical specialists, and has extensive experience in cases of “baby shaking” murders, both prosecuting and defending.In addition, he also undertakes a substantial amount of regulatory work, including Health and Safety, Police Discipline, Motor Vehicle Licencing and Regulatory, Medical Defence, Inquests, Public Enquiries and Environmental Law, Disciplinary Tribunal work and Courts Martial.Having practiced for many years as a junior in complex cases of Clinical Negligence and personal injury, he has, since being in Silk, re-engaged in this area. He has a particular and specialised interest in forensic medicine. R v Heath (2000) Crim LR 109 Duress -involvement in drugs operation following threats of physical violence arising out of debt. R v Anthony Court of Appeal (1998) Inadmissibility of medical evidence – infant death x 2 (Munchausen/apnoea), substitution of verdict by virtue of additional evidence. Broome v Perkins (1987) Crim LR 271 Driving without due care and attention – diabetic in hypoglycaemic state – defence of automatism. R v K, M& T (2017) Successful defence of police detention officer charged with manslaughter (death in custody). R v T, K, T & C (2017) Successful prosecution of international conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. R v S (2017) Successful resolution of case involving multi-handed defendants charged with murder, public disorder, and firearms. R v Tancos and Others (2016) This was a multi handed, evidentially complex, modern slavery prosecution, tried over a period of three months, all defendants convicted. It involved the use of Czech Nationals, many of whom were either under a disability of vulnerable, and required a very high level of witness care. Most of the witnesses spoke little or no English. Much of the evidence was presented as a result of multi-agency international co-operation, together with live link evidence for extra territorial locations. R v Richardson (2016 Successful defence to murder, involving complex medical evidence and issues of causation. R v J (2016) Baby shaking case which involved complex issues of causation and cross examination of expert medical witnesses. The case was partially successful, as acquittals, were secured in respect of historic injuries. R v O’ Connell (2016) Defending in murder involving the victim being burned to death, detailed submissions in respect of aggravating issues. R v Ahmed and Deacon (2016) Successful prosecution of drugs related murder with complex evidential issues. R v H (2015) Successfully defended a professional man, charged with causing death by dangerous driving. The case involved complex scientific evidence and detailed cross-examination of expert witnesses. R v P (2014) Successful prosecution of defendant denying homicide of baby, involving very complex medical evidence. R v S (2014) Defence of person under very serious intellectual disability, charged with serious sexual offences. R v KN (2015) Successful defence of Company Director, avoiding director’s disqualification. Alun is a criminal practitioner for 39 years, undertaking prosecution and defence work in the Crown, Magistrates and Youth Courts and in the Court of Appeal. Experience:  Alun’s caseload has been wide-ranging and has included: being led for the defence in murders at the Central Criminal Court prosecuting complex frauds such as...Read more Alun is a criminal practitioner for 39 years, undertaking prosecution and defence work in the Crown, Magistrates and Youth Courts and in the Court of Appeal.Experience:  Alun’s caseload has been wide-ranging and has included:being led for the defence in murders at the Central Criminal Courtprosecuting complex frauds such as a large scale production of credit and bank cards;defending one of the first cases of transmitting pornographic images on the internet;prosecuting supply of high value drugs and confiscation of property and assets;defending in an early alcohol diversion scheme, with multiple defendants mounting cut-throat defences;prosecuting multi-handed trials for arson, serious violence, burglary, fraud etc.representing defendants at army court martials in UK and Germany.Of late he has predominantly prosecuted for the CPS and other agencies such as the Probation Service and the Department of Work and Pensions.Skills and Personal QualitiesAs a seasoned advocate, Alun feels confident in his ability to take the daily twists and turns of the court process in his stride. But there are always surprises, which keep him sharp and interested.Blessed with a good memory for detail, he can assimilate complex casework quickly.  His many years at the Bar help him identify and focus on the issues that require attention and which go the heart of a case.He aims to promote confidence in the prosecution service in others, particularly those who are giving evidence in court, seeking their continued participation in the event of delays and adjournments.  Whether civilian witnesses, defendants, experts or police, He listens to what they say, explains what will happen, and provides reassurance to secure their trust and co-operation.He has built a sound, flexible working relationships with prosecution professionals, caseworkers, and police officers, placing emphasis on effective communication.He is tenacious when pursuing important issues, taking the initiative to problem solve.  Equally, he is realistic when there is little prospect of success, and will speak his mind.Calm, self-assured, and with an articulate, distinctive speaking voice, he is a persuasive advocate with a good track record of success for whosoever instructs him. Education B.Sc (Econ) International Relations, London School of Economics, 1975(a) Criminal Law : chambers of Attorney-General Geoffrey Thomas Q.C(b) Civil Law : chambers of Solicitor General Sir Ian Percival Q.C.Internationally experienced litigator, legislative and commercial policy advisorOf Counsel to US Attorneys Sidley & Austen advising on US antitrust and EEC competition law 1981-2Professional private practice as a Barrister based in London England 1982-2013 Counsel to Thelen Marrin Johnson & Bridges of San Francisco Insurance coverage litigation and arbitration Counsel to Sidley & Austen of New York and Chicago Antitrust/competition issues. Counsel in attendance at Senate Confirmation Hearings on Appointment of Special Attorney General for Antitrust. Re Asbestos Coverage Cases Presenting US Insurance industry in litigation against Lloyds of London –”LMX Spiral.” R v Ludford & Ors Alleged multi-million pound excess fare frauds successfully defended. R v Goff Alleged perverting course of justice in civil proceedings-successfully defended. Prosecution Counsel for Scotland Yard, Civil Aviation Authority, Port of London Authority, Serco Justin’s main area of Practice is in all areas of Family Law. He is particularly experienced in Ancillary Relief particularly cases involving substantial assets, pensions and private companies. He has considerable experience in Co-habitee disputes and applications under S15 and Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989. He handles all...Read more Justin’s main area of Practice is in all areas of Family Law. He is particularly experienced in Ancillary Relief particularly cases involving substantial assets, pensions and private companies. He has considerable experience in Co-habitee disputes and applications under S15 and Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989. He handles all areas of private and public law cases. He has handled a number of cases involving International Child Abduction.He is experienced in all forms of Civil Litigation. In particular personal injury. He has vast experience handling the following types of cases: Accidents at Work, Occupiers Liability, Product Liability, Highway Accidents, RTA, Repetitive Strain, and Fatal Accidents. He is prepared to undertake Conditional Fee work in appropriate cases.He is regularly instructed in Clinical Negligence, professional negligence, actions against the police, Landlord and Tenant both private and public sector and business tenancies. Construction disputes, Property claims, (including sale of land, trusts, mortgages, trespass, nuisance, boundaries and easements and dilapidation claims as well as employment cases.He has substantial Criminal experience involving Serious Fraud, murder, rape, child abuse, death by dangerous driving and serious drug offences.Licensing Act 2003 applications, reviews, variations and enforcement.Direct AccessJustin regularly takes instructions from professional bodies and persons other than solicitors as well in appropriate cases direct from the public. Area of Practice Justin’s area of practice is in and around London and the South Coast. He is a Founder member of Kings Bench Chambers Bournemouth. Reported Cases Scott v R 1989 AC 1242 Privy Council Jones v Trollope Colls Cementation Overseas Times 26/1/90 Re Capita Expansion and Development Corporation v Brackland Times 30/11/92 Fozal v Gofur Times 9/7/93 Re R (a minor) 1994 2 FCR 629 CA DPP v G 1997 (whether a head teacher investigating an alleged assault by a teacher is subject to PACE Lesley Manley is a highly experienced barrister. She has well deserved reputation for dealing with challenging cases and clients. She has defended in a number of serious fraud matters. The case of R V G concerned an alleged cheat on the Revenue of £1.2 million by a two defendants. Having...Read more Lesley Manley is a highly experienced barrister. She has well deserved reputation for dealing with challenging cases and clients.She has defended in a number of serious fraud matters.The case of R V G concerned an alleged cheat on the Revenue of £1.2 million by a two defendants. Having inspected original files held by the Revenue the court ruled Lesley and co-defending counsel, a commercial specialist and using a multi disciplinary approached successfully argued that the prosecution was an abuse of process. Both defendants were acquitted. Thereafter Lesley was instructed in a complex conspiracy to defraud in Gibraltar.She became known internationally for her role as defence counsel in R v Marrache. The trial lasted for 9 months and was the longest running fraud trial in the history of Gibraltar and concerned the loss of £40 million pounds. This case was tried at The Supreme Court of Gibraltar. This was a complex case that necessitated reviewing of the bankruptcy files from various civil actions brought by those who had suffered financial loss, reviewing volumes of other unused material including trust agreements.In addition to factual issues in the trial the case gave rise to numerous legal complications and arguments which included recusal of Judge, abuse of process, applications to exclude evidence and a possible appeal to the Privy Council in relation to Judge only trial.This case was complex not only in terms of the financial and Tusts aspects of the case but in terms of its international aspects. Evidence was received by live link by agreement with the government of the Czech Republic. There was evidence relating to a number of EU countries in particular Spain, Portugal, Belgium, and the Republic of Ireland and also to Israel, Canada and the United States.This case was the subject of international media attention and reports can be found on www.chronicle.gi and www.gbc.gi/ . This matter is the subject of an appeal to the Privy Council.In addition to acting as junior in respect of the criminal matter Lesley researched legal issues in respect of constitutional matters and appeared in court to assist Charles Gomez, Gibraltar Counsel, who brought a Constitutional Motion against the Attorney General’s Office and The Governor of Gibraltar on behalf of Behalf of Benjamin Marrache. The trial concluded in 2014.On her return to the UK and upon joining Churchcourt Chambers Lesley was instructed as leading counsel in OPERATION AGULLIAR R v N in £1 million pound fraud at Southwark Crown Court. The defendant was deaf and accused of conspiracy to defraud the DWP of ATW payments and also charity funds. Conferences and the giving of evidence were facilitated by the services of a sign language interpreterSexual OffendingLesley Manley is very experienced in defending in cases alleging sexual offending including cases where other offences such as violence, cruelty or robbery are connected. She has acted as leading and junior counsel.Lesley is often instructed to represented defendants accused of serious sexual offending including multi-handed cases involving human trafficking and grooming. Recent examples are set out.2019 OPERATION ALMOND Shrewsbury Crown Court R v Q and others. Trafficking and sexual assault.This case was successfully concluded with the acquittal of her lay client and was the subject of intense media scrutiny – BBC, Shropshire Star2019 Woolwich Crown Court R v W. Sexual assault on child under the age of 132018 Lincoln Crown Court R v E. Historic sexual offending against multiple complainants. This case involved two vulnerable complainants one of whom required the assistance of an intermediary. The defendant had mental impairment and also required the services of an intermediary in order to be able to give evidence.2018 Bradford Crown Court R v W Historic sexual offending and child cruelty against multiple complainants2017 Reading Crown Court R v A. Leading counsel in lengthy multi handed trial defendants alleging grooming and rape and gang rape of vulnerable child.2016 Lincoln Crown Court R v H. Counsel in multi-handed case alleging trafficking and sexual abuse of vulnerable complainant who had been in care.In this case which resulted in acquittal the jury were discharged at the first trial upon the application of Miss Manley who managed to ascertain disclosure had not been properly completed.2015 Central Criminal Court OPERATION ARTICULATE R v AH. Counsel in lengthy multi-handed trial concerning 11 defendants accused of sexual abuse against vulnerable complainantIn particular she has special expertise in representing defendants with mental illness, mental impairment and autism. She has written published articles on this point. She is also experienced in representing deaf defendantsShe has been asked to provide written advises for convicted persons in connection with references to the Criminal Appeals Review Commission.Lesley is a trained vulnerable witness facilitator and has provided training on several occasions to other members of the bar.She is also a pupil supervisor and trained advocacy trainer at Middle Temple where she has taught for over 15 years.This year she attended the Advocacy Trainers Symposium at the ICCA. She also was selected to attend the Florida Advocacy Course in Gainesville in 2018. She has experience of the most up to date teaching methods used nationally and internationally.The diverse nature of her practice has led to her being instructed in a wide range of offences. Examples are armed robbery, kidnap, attempted murder, murder, child cruelty, cases where rape has been accompanied by section 18 and robbery, aggravated burglary and copyright theft. Publications and Seminars “Are you fit for fitness to plead” published in Crimeline Mental Impairment Identifying The Signs”I’ll prove I’m innocent. I’ll take a lie detector test” . The admissibility of Polygraph Evidence by Colin Witcher and Lesley ManleyPodcasts:False Allegations of RapeFitness to PleadMercy killing-An act of Compassion or Self Interest.Murder-Sexual Infidelity as a defenceLectures:She has provided lectures in the fields of the development in the law of sexual offences, vulnerable and intimidated witnesses, fraud and the development of the law in relation to firearms.She is also an approved pupil supervisor and an advocacy trainer at Middle Temple Inquests Lesley Manley is appreciated for her sensitive approach at the Coroner’s Court.She has acted in numerous fatal road traffic collisions.2015 Acted on behalf of parents who tragically lost 3 year old child in fatal traffic accident.2013 Acted on behalf of family whose relative had died as a result of fall from Beachy Head. Verdict. misadventure.She has also acted in a variety of difficult cases. They includeAn inquest into the death of a baby when suffocated by a family memberRepresented a Custody Sergeant ( Newcastle Coroner’s Court) following the death of a man who had swallowed a drug package.An inquest into the death of a wife whose husband had been originally charged with her murder. Verdict. Suicide. R v X Instructed as leading counsel in multi-handed million pound fraud trial at Southwark Crown Court to commence in 2016. R V Gorecia 2010 The defendants were accused of cheating the Revenue of £1.2 million pounds. An abuse of process argument advanced by previous counsel had been dismissed. The defendants continued to maintain they had immunity from prosecution. Isaac Jacob of 9 Stone Buildings co-defended in the matter using a multi-disciplinary approach with their respective knowledge of tax law and criminal law. In due course the Revenue found a file which lead to the re-opening of the abuse argument and the case against the defendants was stayed. R v W and others In R v W (and others) at Maidstone Crown Court the defendant was charged with a conspiracy to defraud the NHS by way of dishonesty in respect of procurement of contracts. The trial was estimated to last 6 weeks but collapsed after 4 days as a consequence of the defence raising issues in connection with disclosure and failure of the Crown to properly investigate matters which may have pointed to the defendants’ innocence. R v X Croydon Crown Court. Defendant charged with substantial benefit fraud but no evidence offered after DWP accepted the level of domestic violence she had suffered was so severe that she was psychiatrically incapacitated by post traumatic stress syndrome. R v X Case involving serious Harassment of Officials with issues of Fitness to Plead to be determined at Aylesbury Crown Court. R v M and others Case involving the arranging of Sham marriages. Newcastle Crown Court. R v X Central Criminal Court Undercover police operation in respect on online attempts to be provided with 3 year old child. 2019 R V M Woolwich Crown Court Supply of class A drugs. Defence of duress advanced. 2018 R v M Birmingham Crown Court Acting for the lead defendant in multi-handed trial accused of blackmail, threats to kill and witness intimidation. 2018 R v S Birmingham Crown Court Drug importation. Multi-handed case concerning the importation of £1 million pounds of heroin. R v Bernard Wright [Serial rape case with defendant attacking victims at knifepoint] R v Peter Ramsay [Internet date rape case followed by serious physical assault on victim] R v X Woolwich Crown Court [Rape of 13 year old girl by mentally impaired defendant] R v X Inner London Crown Court [Multi-handed rape by school boys upon fellow pupils] R v X Croydon Crown Court [Historic sexual abuse by stepfather upon stepdaughters from different families. Abuse spanning 1960’s -1980’s] R v X Croydon Crown Court [Historical case. Rape by father of his biological daughter when she was 11-14. Complaint made when accused aged 76] R v X Reading Crown Court [Historic sexual touching of granddaughter. Successful application to exclude lie detector evidence the Crown wished to place before the jury] R v X Child Cruelty. Croydon Crown Court. Mother aged 17. Accused of fracturing bones of new born baby. R v X Aggravated Burglary Luton Crown Court. Brain injured defendant accused of breaking into his sister’s house and attempting to kill her. Called in 1983 Chris has been in continuous practice at the Bar since 1983 and has a broad breadth of knowledge and experience with skills honed from thousands of cases. He is known to work extremely hard on case preparation and ensures he’s fully briefed before setting foot in court....Read more Called in 1983 Chris has been in continuous practice at the Bar since 1983 and has a broad breadth of knowledge and experience with skills honed from thousands of cases. He is known to work extremely hard on case preparation and ensures he’s fully briefed before setting foot in court. Chris provides excellent client care and ensures all concerned are kept abreast of case issues. He is a specialist criminal barrister who predominantly defends but also prosecutes. He is a Level 4 CPS advocate for the South Eastern [London/Non London] and Midland circuits. Chris has frequently been instructed in a number of leading criminal cases including; murder manslaughter, kidnap with torture blackmail, allegations of violent assaults, sexual offences rape, , large scale organised drugs conspiracies, firearms offences and serious fraud. He has acted as leading defence counsel in a large number of cases including murder. Chris’s abilities and successes have secured the backing of a large body of solicitors who regularly instruct him. He has worked extensively in sexual assault cases, involving historic allegations of familial sex, which have involved detailed forensic examination of social services files, educational and psychiatric reports. He has also undertaken the role of leading counsel in large-scale car-ringing cases, local authority internal frauds, sophisticated retail frauds and armed bank robberies. He’s regularly instructed in criminal appeals from referrals and appears for appellants in the Court of Appeal. Chris has enjoyed a thriving practice in the Military Courts and is often abroad conducting court martial trials. In 2010, he was instructed by one of the “Magic Circle” firms to advise a multi-national company on an internal employee fraud. Chris has been a pupil supervisor since 1996. Reported Cases R v Pommel (1995) 2 Cr. App. R R v. Jason Graham [2007] EWCA Crim 1499 R v B 2018 Snaresbrook CC. Successfully defended a warehouseman in £8m value drugs importation from Holland investigated by The Serious and Organised Crime Command. Operations Ultra, Bush R v M 2018 Successfully defended a man at The Central Criminal Court accused of wounding his brother with intent to cause GBH when he drove his truck onto the pavement at the victim. R v K 2018 Operation Cave, Wood Green CC, defended in a £1m tobacco and alcohol duty evasion organised crime case. R v O 2017 Operation Pileated, Cambridge CC Represented a defendant in a courier fraud conspiracy involving multiple elderly victims. R v S 2017 Operation Limit, Leicester CC. defended in an allegation of the supply of “Skorpion” machine gun and ammunition as part of organised crime group. R v K 2017 Nottingham CC, Operation Feast & Zephyr. Lead defence counsel in industrial scale cocaine supply from London to Northampton. R v S 2017 Leicester CC. Represented a man accused of serial rape and sexual offences on young boys in 1980s. R v S 2017 Leicester CC. Represented a male accused of serious sexual assault by penetration of a resident in a special needs care home. R v A Snaresbrook CC. Prosecuted a teenage male for rape of 10 year-old sister. R v B 2015 Represented the alleged leader of gang of five men responsible for the kidnap, false imprisonment and torture of two separate victims and subsequent blackmail of the families. R v S 2015 Defended one of five men accused of largest haul of ram -raid burglaries of rural banks in East Anglia. R v H 2015 Prosecuted a case of familial sexual allegations dating back to 1965. R v G 2015 Represented the man known as the “night stalker” in his appeal against conviction for several rapes of elderly people in their homes. R v R 2014 Represented man accused revenge slashing of former police officer investigating licensed taxi offences. R v T 2015 Successfully prosecuted a leader of a gang of men who had embarked upon a campaign of rape and sexual offences towards a 12-16 year old girl in Bucks in 2004-13. R v W 2012/13 Leading defence counsel in the largest ever Flying Squad Bank Robbery Operation involving over 12 armed bank robberies spanning 10 years. R v H 2013 Successfully defended one of the three acquitted defendants out of ten Charlton FC fans accused of racist violence. R v K 2013 Defended man in multi handed trial in which he was accused of firearm possession in large Trident case. R v T 2013 Defence counsel in successful defence of man accused of domestic violence featuring all the accused’s children supporting his “battered wife”. R v M 2013 Successfully represented woman accused of stabbing her former boyfriend in the street. R v C 2012 Defence counsel in multi handed car ringing/burglary case in Maidstone CC. R V A 2012 Central CC. Successfully defended when led by QC man accused of murdering drugs rival with shotgun. R v M 2010 Conducted an appeal against conviction before full Court of Appeal in the case of an appellant who had been convicted of throwing acid over barristers appearing against him in a High Court action he was bringing. High Court barrister burned in courtroom acid attack. R v M 2010 Defended an alleged gang member accused of having a sawn off shotgun which was alleged to have been used to threaten others. R v G and others 2008 Represented a defendant who was acquitted of his part in a murder and further stabbing of another victim in an alleged racist gang attack in the Isle of Sheppey. R v W 2007 Leading defence counsel for one member of a cash-in-transit robbery gang. K.B., the leader of said gang, was a notorious criminal. The trial lasted three months and was conducted under the tightest security ever witnessed in an English court. R v A 2007 Representing as leading counsel one female member of a gang said to have committed the largest alleged fraud of its time on a health authority: NHS fraudsters jailed (From News Shopper). R v S and others 2010 An internal fraud of a national bread manufacturer by managers worth £300k. 2016 Instructed for the Finance Officer of a business who along with others is accused of a £1.5m fraud on State/ local authority agencies in a trial listed for 2016. “Excellent barrister my clients recommend him to their friends” HSR London (2017) “A man that instils confidence in clients” MN LAW (2017) Elroy is a highly experienced defence specialist and is an established criminal practitioner. He specialises in defending in serious criminal cases and also undertakes police tribunal work. Elroy is regularly instructed in cases of fraud, murder, rape, drug offences, serious violence, proceeds of crime, kidnapping, firearm offences, armed robbery fraud...Read more Elroy is a highly experienced defence specialist and is an established criminal practitioner.He specialises in defending in serious criminal cases and also undertakes police tribunal work.Elroy is regularly instructed in cases of fraud, murder, rape, drug offences, serious violence, proceeds of crime, kidnapping, firearm offences, armed robbery fraud and serious historical sex cases, financial crime and regulatory matters.Throughout his career, Elroy has built a reputation on his analytical and thorough approach to the preparation of his cases.  During his career he is consistently recognised for his communication with lay clients.His court craft and advocacy are built upon a clear working knowledge of the issues and tactics to be deployed in a particular case.As a Leading Junior he is able to marshal complex paper heavy cases and liaise effectively with both Junior council and Solicitors to ensure that the case is prepared thoroughly and efficiently. Having conducted many ‘two counsel’ cases,’ he is well respected and trusted by solicitors to deliver the best for their clients.Elroy is always calm under pressure, which enables him to develop positive relationships with lay and professional clients as part of a legal team.Elroy is sensitive to issues and matters that arise. These qualities has allowed him to establish trustworthy relationships between himself and clients.Elroy has been a Recorder since 1998.Regularly instructed to defend on a direct access basis. R v O People trafficking, young women from Nigeria to Prague and then on to Heathrow, case required an understanding of the Nigerian culture and traditions of Nigerian village traditions. R v R Defendant charged with rape allegation that the victim was drugged. Defendant acquitted. International sex trafficking gang, trial at the Central Criminal Court. R v DN (akaL-F) Representing serving prisoner in sexual activity with a child. Defendant had substantial links with the Manchester underworld. R v B Representing man charged with historical rape offences whilst serving a long sentence for rape. R v A Leading counsel in £1 million fraud. Five men charged with setting up fraudulent firm with the aim of providing fraudulent HGV licence. Representing only defendant to be acquitted. “Andrew Taylor wins praise due to the zeal and determination that he exhibits.” Chambers 2008 “Andrew Taylor has a broad criminal practice with a specialism is gaining compensation for wrongful convictions. He provides advice to the BBC and is well known in the legal community for this role. He worked on R v Mattan, the last man in Wales to hang.” Chambers 2010 “Andrew Taylor is recommended for his extensive criminal practice and his efforts in seeking compensation for wrongful conviction/execution.” Chambers 2011 “The experienced Andrew Taylor’s recent work has included fraud and murder cases. He is noted for the strength of his appellate practice.” Chambers UK 2012 Andrew is a highly respected criminal advocate who for over 25 years has specialised in criminal defence. Having been a Grade 4 CPS Counsel, for the last 4 years has only undertaken defence briefs. Andrew has been in continuous practice since being called to the Bar. He has appeared with...Read more Andrew is a highly respected criminal advocate who for over 25 years has specialised in criminal defence. Having been a Grade 4 CPS Counsel, for the last 4 years has only undertaken defence briefs. Andrew has been in continuous practice since being called to the Bar. He has appeared with and been led by some of the leading advocates in England Wales over the last 30 years. He is known for his thorough preparation and meticulous attention to detail. He is considered to be a formidable cross examiner and is a consummate jury advocate. He is also very approachable and is very good with clients.Andrew has led many juniors over the years, and in the last year has conducted two murder cases without a Leading Counsel. He has experience of multiple murder cases, conspiracy to murder, large scale drug importation cases, sex cases involving allegations at multiple  children’s homes, MTIC or Missing trader frauds, HMRC frauds, mortgage frauds involving numerous professional clients,  international drug conspiracies, international money laundering, contempt proceedings, perverting or attempting to pervert the course of justice in criminal, civil and family jurisdictions, conspiracy to defraud insurance companies, people trafficking, DWP fraud.Andrew has been instructed in numerous VHCC cases as a Junior and Leading Junior. He is also regularly instructed in private defence cases. Due to his extensive experience, reputation and fascinating commentary, he has been an advisor to the BBC for over 20 years and takes part in numerous legal discussions and debates. He regularly appears on television programmes, Radio 4, Radio 5, Radio 2 and regional BBC stations providing advice, commentary and opinion. He additionally advises the BBC and independent production companies on legal affairs/current affairs programmes. Memberships Andrew is the Wales & Chester Circuit Representative on the Gray’s Inn Barrister’s Committee. He is also a representative on the Bar Council Committee that is looking into GFS reform. He believes passionately in the provision of legal aid and has played leading roles in opposition to Legal Aid cuts. R v R Leading Counsel in R v R where the Crown and co-defendant, (a practicing solicitor) were represented by Silk and Juniors. Secured an acquittal following a successful dismissal argument in an international money laundering case that had taken 6 years to come to trial. R v P Led a junior in a large scale conspiracy in Plymouth Crown Court where it was alleged that huge quantities of Class A drugs were being brought into ports from Holland. R v W Led a junior in a heroin conspiracy where a huge network of defendants were charged and the trial process in total took almost 6 months. R v R Represented a client charged with conspiracy to pervert justice in civil proceedings where her two co accused were practicing solicitors. It was alleged by the Crown that his client had falsified documents and altered civil pleadings. The client was eventually acquitted after a trial lasting 6 weeks. 2019 Andrew is currently appearing in a long running case in Inner London Crown Court where his client is facing two allegations of MTIC fraud along with money laundering 2019 Later this year Andrew is instructed on behalf of a defendant who is facing an allegation of murder where it is suggested that he used a sawn off shotgun to kill a man over a dispute they were having. The case is listed to last 6 weeks. October 2019 Andrew is representing a Defendant who along with two others is accused of conspiracy to defraud a local authority out of hundreds of thousands of pounds. September 2019 In September Andrew is due to represent a client facing multiple Human Trafficking allegations. December 2015 Andrew achieved the first acquittal in “Operation Dino” which involved 89 Defendants who were charged in a well-publicised case known as “Cash for Crash” and involved conspiracies to defraud. The Crown ultimately convicted 87 of the Defendants. November 2016 Andrew’s client in a double handed murder ran cut throat. He was acquitted of murder but convicted of Manslaughter. The co accused was convicted of murder. May 2016 Andrew’s client in a long case at Southwark Crown Court was acquitted of conspiracy to defraud the DWP of almost £1 million. Pamela Brain is one of the most respected barristers practicing at the criminal bar and has nearly 30 years’ experience in defending in complex and difficult cases. She has defended virtually every kind of criminal offence and is renowned as a brilliant jury advocate. She has successfully defended in murder...Read more Pamela Brain is one of the most respected barristers practicing at the criminal bar and has nearly 30 years’ experience in defending in complex and difficult cases. She has defended virtually every kind of criminal offence and is renowned as a brilliant jury advocate. She has successfully defended in murder and attempted murder cases, in particular in those involving ‘battered woman syndrome’. She has been instructed in cases involving allegations of Armed Robbery, Kidnapping, Blackmail, Riot, Conspiracy to Import and Supply large quantities of Class A drugs, large scale Fraud and Money Laundering cases and Child Cruelty.Pamela has a particular expertise in defending these very difficult types of cases. She has represented defendants who have been charged with every type of sexual allegation including those accused of Serial Rapes , Gang Rapes, Rapes involving the Administering of Date Rape Drugs, Male Rape, Paedophile Offences , Indecent Images and Historical Allegations with some dating back 30 or 40 years. Naturally she has gained considerable experience in cross examining vulnerable complainant’s. Some have been as young as 4 years of age and others have needed the assistance of intermediaries because of their severe learning difficulties or mental health problems. She is particularly skilled in cross examining the complainant’s in a way that does not alienate the jury from the defence case. This ability sets her apart from many others at the criminal bar. She also has very good client skills, which is especially appreciated by those who instruct her in these uniquely difficult cases. She often represents young defendant’s as well as those who are vulnerable because of learning difficulties or mental health issues and she has a reputation as being someone who can engage with some of the most challenging of clients.Pamela has extensive experience in the Court of Appeal. In 3 separate cases of Rape she has managed to successfully persuade the Court to overturn the convictions and allow the appeals. They were cases involving allegations of Gang Rape, a Rape by a Youth and an Historic allegation dating back over 30 years.Pamela is direct access qualified. Publications and Lectures The Practical Challenges of Representing Defendant’s Accused of Sexual Offences R V S This was a case where it was alleged that the defendant was a serial rapist who had raped 3 women who were unknown to each other. Following a day of legal argument, the Crown offered no evidence. R V D This was a case which was widely reported in the National Press ( http://www.dailymail.co.uk/ news/article-2063439) It was an historic allegation of Rape involving 2 young complainants. R V F This was a case involving allegations of Sexual Activity with multiple complainants who were suffering from dementia by an employee of a Care Home. R V F This was a case involving an allegation of Rape where both the complainant and defendant suffered from very severe learning difficulties and mental health problems. Both required intermediaries. The defendant was acquitted of the charge. R V Y This was a case concerning an allegation of Rape where it was alleged that a date rape drug had been administered. The defendant was acquitted. R V J This was an allegation of Rape where the complainant had learning difficulties. A defence application for disclosure was made and this resulted in the CPS obtaining third party material. In light of this material the Crown offered no evidence. R V E This case involved an allegation that the defendant was part of a long running international advanced fee fraud which involved the defrauding of millions of pounds from vulnerable victims. R V L In this case it was alleged that the defendant had fired a shot gun at a 12 year old girl, causing injury. R V K This was a case involving a conspiracy to supply large quantities of Cocaine that originated from Colombia. R V W This was a case involving 2 separate conspiracies to supply large quantities of Cocaine. R V C This case involved an employee of the DWP who was alleged to have made a fraudulent claim re invalidity benefit. There was extensive surveillance evidence and expert medical evidence. The proceedings were stayed as a result of a successful abuse of process application being made. Michelle is a criminal barrister with over 30 years’ experience, she has recently spent 5 years as an in house barrister at cartwright king which has added to her understanding of both sides of the profession. Due to her breadth and depth of experience she is highly regarded for her...Read more Michelle is a criminal barrister with over 30 years’ experience, she has recently spent 5 years as an in house barrister at cartwright king which has added to her understanding of both sides of the profession. Due to her breadth and depth of experience she is highly regarded for her advocacy and skills in all types of trials dealing with a wide range of offences including serious sexual offences; fraud; murder; manslaughter; child cruelty; drug trafficking and has been instructed in such cases as both a junior and lead counsel.She has a reputation for first class advocacy and instilling confidence in her clients. She has particular expertise in cases involving vulnerable people, either as defendants or complainants. R v AH Defending as junior counsel the main 18-year-old defendant in a revenge murder. R v I Defending Yarlswood detention officer charged with sexually molesting a detainee. Historic allegation of molesting boys in the woods (high profile case). Attempted murder with a knife in a revenge attack between drug dealers. Sham marriages conspiracy with brides being flown in and out of the UK. Paula Bignall is a London based barrister specialising in serious crime and complex cases of family law. She is recognised as a skilled, highly experienced and resourceful advocate with well honed and sympathetic client care skills. Criminal Law Paula is regularly instructed to defend in cases involving serious violence, rape,...Read more Paula Bignall is a London based barrister specialising in serious crime and complex cases of family law. She is recognised as a skilled, highly experienced and resourceful advocate with well honed and sympathetic client care skills.Criminal LawPaula is regularly instructed to defend in cases involving serious violence, rape, and all types of sexual offences, large-scale fraud and dishonesty and drugs case including trafficking and production.Cases more recently defended include large-scale importation of class A drugs, conspiracy to commit fraud and robbery involving 19 defendants and hundreds of pages of cell site analysis, historic rape cases,rape cases involving victims and defendants under the age of 13, kidnapping and false imprisonment involving torture, Child neglect and also attempted murder.Family LawPaula undertakes all forms of private and public law work involving children. She has practised at all levels including the high court. Called in 1990, Colin McCarraher was the founding Head of Chambers at Church Court and has been in independent practice for 25 years. During that time he has established a reputation for determined, fluent advocacy with a proven track record for winning cases both large and small all over the...Read more Called in 1990, Colin McCarraher was the founding Head of Chambers at Church Court and has been in independent practice for 25 years. During that time he has established a reputation for determined, fluent advocacy with a proven track record for winning cases both large and small all over the country.He is qualified as an International Commercial Arbitrator and is fluent in Russian.He is registered as a Direct Access Barrister.Colin McCarraher has advised government departments on Human Rights with regards to the Iraq war and the Republic of Yugoslavia conflict.He is regularly instructed as leading junior counsel and in that role, recently defended in a 9 million pound drug supply case, murder, major drugs supply and contract killing case.He represented the Balcombe anti-fracking protesters and frequently advises those engaged in civil disobedience campaigns.He has been instructed in all aspects of criminal law, prosecuting and defending, particularly serious crime involving banking fraud, organised crime, corruption, money laundering and proceeds of crime. He also appears in human trafficking, child abduction and serious sexual offences.He served for 25 years in the Royal Naval Reserve and Intelligence Corps (V) so he has a sound knowledge of maritime matters and the Armed forces in general. R -v- Ian Hersey [1998] Crim.L.R.281 CA. This is the leading authority on voice identification and the first case in England and Wales to rely solely on voice identification using sophisticated auditory techniques without any further supporting evidence. It broke new ground at the time and resulted in a new area of forensic expertise. R -v- Lynsey (Jonathan Simon) [1995] 3 All ER 654 This case resulted in the CA deciding that for the purposes of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 Common Assault was to be construed as including Battery. It involved tracing the entire history of the law relating to violence and is used today for statutory construction. Michael Fullerton was admitted to the Victorian Supreme Court as a Barrister and Solicitor in 1981. He practised as a solicitor until 1986 when he signed the Bar Roll of Victoria and was admitted to the Inner Temple as a Barrister in 1990. Able and versatile Australian barrister with 35...Read more Michael Fullerton was admitted to the Victorian Supreme Court as a Barrister and Solicitor in 1981. He practised as a solicitor until 1986 when he signed the Bar Roll of Victoria and was admitted to the Inner Temple as a Barrister in 1990.Able and versatile Australian barrister with 35 years’ experience as defence jury advocate and civil practitioner covering an extensive range of both criminal and civil law including a variety of appellate cases in crime, civil and judicial review.His civil practice includes advising and litigating on behalf of an array of international clients. His case authorities cover personal injury, common law procedure, commercial law and criminal law.He is registered and conducted many cases on Direct Access and is also a Qualified Mediator. Education 1982: Admitted as a Barrister and Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Victoria.1990: Called to the Bar of England and Wales.PRACTICE; Established practitioner of both crime defence and civil law.Direct Access: Registered and accepted both criminal and civil cases.Mediator: Qualified August 2008. R v A – Reading Crown Court Attempted murder – Complex case involving multiple experts on injuries, weapon, glass, CCTV identifying vehicle, cell site and mobile phone evidence. R v B – Bristol Crown Court Leading Ms. Chiara Maddocks. 8-week carbon credit fraud. Six hander, conspiracy to defraud and conspiracy to convert criminal property. Voluminous commercial, financial and digital evidence, expert evidence and over 50 lay witnesses. Acquitted on both charges. R v C – Hove Crown Court Conspiracy to produce cannabis – Cut-throat three-hander. DNA, fingerprint and satellite navigation evidence. R v E – Oxford Crown Court s18 GBH. Suspended sentence and compensation order. R v S – Luton Crown Court Aggravated burglary, false imprisonment and robbery. Firearms, knives. Acquitted on all charges. R v M – Harrow Crown Court Theft of BMW removed beyond EU. Trial 1 – hung jury. Trial 2 – Acquitted. R v A – Aylesbury Crown Court Affray, Offensive Weapon, Damaging Property. Absent witness, Hearsay evidence successfully excluded. Three hander. Acquitted. R v W – Croydon Crown Court Acting in breach of Restraining Order – Acquitted. R v A – Southwark Crown Court PWIT – 5 counts of class A and having article with blade – Secured agreement for reduced indictment and sentence. R v H – Harrow Crown Court s.18 and s.20 GBH. Secured agreement for ABH & suspended sentence. R v P – Lewes Crown Court Arson – Fitness to plead enquiry – capacity to form intent. R v D – St. Albans Crown Court Burglary & Theft – secured agreement to Theft only – penalty of fine. R v R – Guildford Crown Court Burglary, Damaging Ppty and Theft – Secured agreement to amended indictment re damaging ppty only. Community Order and Restraining Order. R v M – Wood Green Crown Court PWIT –Various Class A & B – Community Order and suspension of curfew. R v M – Central Criminal Court Making indecent photos of child – Cats A, B & C. Possessing extreme photographs. Expert report obtained and at trial prosecution offer no evidence. R v H – Birmingham Crown Court S.18 GBH and ABH. Secured agreement for Affray. R v T – Leicester Crown Court Two separate counts of Dangerous Driving – hung jury on one count. R v L – Kingston Crown Court ABH and having offensive weapon – Acquitted on both counts. R v T – Leicester Crown Court Putting person in fear of violence by harassment, breach of Non-Molestation Order, ABH, Dangerous Driving. Secure agreement to harassment count only. R v K – Guildford Crown Court PWIT – Class A. Secure agreement to possession only. R v V – Central Criminal Court ABH – Exclusion of hearsay evidence and BWV – Acquitted. Williams v Fisher (1998) Kemp & Kemp, The Quantum of Damages Vol. 3 F2-001 (Leading case on whiplash injury); Systemcare (UK) ltd. v Service Design Technology Ltd. & Sharif [2011] EWCA Civ 546 (Costs of company awarded against Director) R v Manh Toan Dang [2014] EWCA Crim 348 (Industrial scale production of cannabis) R (on Appn of RSCPA) v Colchester Mags Ct & D. Fuller & P Shelldrake [2015] EWHC 1418 (Admin) (unlawful use of warrant) OF – Rolls Court Companies Court. Part 7 and Part 8 claims. International Share purchase agreement & cross-application. Application to re-open previous High Court judgment and various costs orders successfully defended against Leading Counsel.FPM – Central London County Court – Appeal under s.214 Housing Act 2004 for failing to protect deposit. Secured massive reduction of claimed costs. S – Brighton County Court Upper limb work related claim – settled for Claimant. S – Central London County Court Resulting and Constructive property claim against family member. Claim succeeds. FPM – Central London County Court Appeal under s.214 Housing Act 2004 for failing to protect deposit. Secured massive reduction of claimed costs. DOO – Central London County Court Infant settlement including substantial award for gratuitous care by friend of family. AH – Royal Court of Justice Family Division – Opposing Local Authority Application for Contempt of Court. Application dismissed with costs. EN – RCJ – Court of Appeal Opposing Appeal against Order dismissing claim for defamation. Appeal dismissed. Fraud involving summary judgment against fraudulent accountant, Freezing Orders and Injunction involving firms of solicitors, fraud and restitution concerning national company, Insolvency and bankruptcy. Litigation regarding contractual disputes, building and construction, shareholding and directorships, international drilling contracts. At a recent murder trial, a senior Old Bailey Judge, specifically commended Stephen Bailey, for the “Excellent representation of his client during the trial” See the case of A (2010.) The Director of Liberty Law, Attiq Malik, describes Stephen as “a true master of advocacy” and Church Court Chambers should...Read more At a recent murder trial, a senior Old Bailey Judge, specifically commended StephenBailey, for the “Excellent representation of his client during the trial” See the case of A (2010.)The Director of Liberty Law, Attiq Malik, describes Stephen as “a true master of advocacy” and Church Court Chambers should be “proud” to have him.• Instructed on a regular basis in two counsel cases, as leading counsel.• Instructed in serious, complex and difficult cases but always available to represent clients at all levels of criminal cases to ensure that the client has the best available representation.• A first – class and very successful trial barrister. A go-to lawyer.• A hard working and dedicated defence brief, who always presents to the court, fearlessly and without regard to his personal interests, the defence of his client.• Excellent client care skills.• A likeable and very approachable lawyer.Extensive experience in cases involving:• Serious fraud, murder and sex cases, as leading and junior counsel.• Organised criminal gangs• Defendants’ turning “Queen’s Evidence” See the cases of R -V- B Maidstone C.C., and R -V- H Nottingham C.C.• Mental health, fitness to plead and fitness to stand trial issues.• The representation of young or vulnerable clients.• The difficult and sensitive area of the cross examination of child witnesses.• The cross examination of expert witnesses, in relation to such diverse matters as pathology, bloodspatter evidence, D.N.A, ballistics, fire arms residue, cell site analysis and forensic accountants.• The vital area in case preparation, of disclosure, P.I.I. and third party disclosure R -v- M, Snaresbrook C.C.(2007) A 3 handed conspiracy to defraud / commit forgery (production of counterfeit / forged immigration documents). The issues included a cut throat defence by a partially sighted co-defendant, alleged by the Crown to have held himself out as an immigration lawyer and therefore able to assist his clients in obtaining false do. R -v- B, C.C.C. (2013) Murder (led junior). A 12 handed gangland shooting case. Cut throat defences abound. Cell site analysis played a key part in this case. 8 week trial. Reported in the media. R -v- A, Woolwich C.C. (2013) Rape. Complainant had psychological difficulties. R -v- C, Croydon C.C. (2013) Kidnap and false imprisonment in the context of an attempted rape. R -v- D, C.C.C. (2012) Murder (leading counsel). Drug gang execution. Cut throat defence. Cell site analysis and CCTV analysis played significant roles in the trial. R -v- R, C.C.C. (2012) Murder (leading counsel). The multiple and frenzied stabbing of the defendant’s drug dealer who attempted to rob and attack the defendant with a baseball bat and knife. Unlawful burial of the corpse. Detailed cross examination of the pathologist and blood spatter expert. Bad character played a significant role in the trial. Reported in the media. R -v- L, Ipswich C.C. (2012) Murder (led junior). The execution (shooting) of two hit men who had attended the defendant’s small holding with a view to committing arson and to attack the defendant. Mobile phone evidence, D.N.A, ballistics and bad character played significant roles in this trial. Reported in the media. R -v- P, Lincoln C.C. (2012) Sexual assaults in relation to 3 of the defendant’s step children and computer downloading of voluminous quantities of child pornography. A forensic computer expert was instructed to analyse this case and to give evidence as to the likely user of the computer at the relevant times of the downloads, based upon the actual internet activity on the computer over a 6 month period. R -v-M, Isleworth C.C. (2011) A two handed, historic sexual abuse case. Stephen defended the first defendant, who had been accused of sexually assaulting an 11 year old pupil, when he was a senior lay teacher at St Benedict’s Roman Catholic School. It is noteworthy, that the defence adduced at trial the defendant’s previous convictions (guilty pleas) to similar allegations against former pupils, in three previous prosecutions, as part of the defence case.This case, and several other cases in relation to this school, have been reported in The Times newspaper. Lord Carlile of Berriew, recently lead an inquiry into sexual abuse at St Benedict’s in the 1970’s and also into the efficacy of the past and current child protection provisions at the school. R -v- A, Oxford C.C. (2011) A nightclub doorman was accused of raping a customer jn the toilets of the club. Reported in the media. R -v- K, Croydon C.C. (2011) An historic case, of systemic rape and sexual assaults by the defendant of 3 of his grand children and two of their young friends over a period of 4 years. R -v- K, Maidstone C.C. (2011) Murder (junior alone). The successful defence of a Polish man, accused of murdering a fellow compatriot. As a result of defence submissions, the Crown were persuaded to offer ” no evidence” prior to the P.C.M.H. R -v- W, Reading C.C. (2011) A 4 handed witness intimidation case with threats to kill a key witness if he gave evidence the following day in a murder trial. Reported in the media. R -v- X, Y C.C. (2011) A case of the utmost sensitivity involving P.I.I. and informant information. A very successful result. R -v- F, Oxford C.C. (2011) Murder (led junior counsel). The issue in this case was whether the strangulation / death of the defendant’s partner, occurred during a consensual sex game and was manslaughter, or did not and was murder. Reported in the media. R -v- C, Harrow C.C. (2010) A major 5 handed conspiracy to steal railway equipment. R -v- A, C.C.C. (2010) Murder (leading counsel). The preliminary issue here, was whether the defendant was fit to plead and or stand trial. The issue at trial, was whether the defendant “did the act”. The case had a heavy forensic scientific content, notably pathology, blood spatter and psychiatric evidence. The representation of Ali, was described by the trial judge, as “excellent” (See above). The case included a relatively novel aspect, as the defendant who was “unfit” to travel south, watched and participated in the proceedings, via video link from Sheffield Crown Court. R -v-W, C.C.C. (2010) Manslaughter (junior alone). The Issue was self defence. A one punch manslaughter case. Reported in the media. R -v- P, Newcastle C.C. (2010/2009) Representing the first defendant, in a multi million pound,12 handed cannabis cultivation case, using dozens of house in the wider Newcastle area. R -v- B, Newport C.C. (2010/ 2009) Representing one of the main defendants’ in a 16 handedconspiracy to supply Class “A “drugs between Birmingham and South Wales. The case included a significant amounts of probe and surveillance evidence. R -v- J, C.C.C. (2009) The stabbing of the defendant’s drug dealer. The defence raised diminished responsibility and intoxication. R -v- T, Cardiff C.C. (2009) – (V.H.C.C.) (Led junior counsel) Stephen conducted the majority of the cross examination of the co-defendants’ in a 6 handed cut throat murder case. The case flowed from a nationwide cannabis cultivation conspiracy. The deceased was punished / attacked for stealing a crop from one of the factories. R -v- C, Southwark C.C. (2007) A 16 handed, conspiracy to supply Class “A” drugs. The caseinvolved 150 hours of undercover surveillance evidence and test purchasing audio / video tapes. The defendant relied upon the defence of duress. R -v- O, Wood Green C.C. (2006) A 5 handed conspiracy to supply Class “A” drugs. The issueswere duress and entrapment. R -v- M, Harrrow C.C. (2006) A 4 handed conspiracy to import / supply Class “A” drugs with an actual supply to two undercover officers. The issues included entrapment and duress and the admissibility and relevance of an intelligence gathering interview ( the officers were in the witness box for 3 ½ days). The defendant was in the witness box, giving evidence in chief for 3 days. The defendant admitted to being a retired drugs dealer / police informant in Nairobi, Kenya. R -v- K, Birmingham C.C. (2009) A 7 handed attempted murder and violent disorder, at theVaisakhi festival, emanating from political differences between worshipers at a Sikh Temple in Birmingham. Reported in the media. R -v- A, C.C.C. (2008) A 3 handed murder case. The Crown successfully applied for multiple anonymity of witness orders. R -v- J, C.C.C. (2007) Representing a 12 year old boy charged along with 5 other boys under the age of 15, with the manslaughter of a 65 year old man. The issues were joint enterprise, causation, and the legal requirements of unlawful act manslaughter. The conviction was overturned on appeal. Reported in the media. R -v- H, Birmingham C.C. (2007) Murder. The Issue was the identity of the killer. R -v- S, Middlesex C.C. (2005) Murder. The issues included the conflict of expert evidence as to whether the stab wound was consistent with the claim of self defence, whether the client was fit to plead and stand trial and whether “he did the act.” Mental Health Act disposal. R -v- H, Nottingham C.C. (2003) A 7 handed Murder case. The case involved a 16 year old contract killer who turned Queen’s Evidence. R -v- R, Kingston C.C. (2006) An 8 handed conspiracy to import Class “A” drugs from several islands in the West Indies and South America, with a further conspiracy to supply the drugs within the U.K. – Birmingham. The issues included a cut throat defence, cell site analysis, mobile phone evidence and significant disclosure matters. As a result of a section 8 C.P.I.A. 1996, disclosure request, on behalf of this defendant, the Crown offered no evidence against her. R -v- N, Croydon C.C. (2002) – (V.H.C.C.) A 16 handed conspiracy to import and supply Class “A” drugs within the UK – London to Birmingham, and Yorkshire. The issues included probe evidence, mobile phone and observation evidence. R -v- G, Sheffield C.C. (2005) The possession with intent to supply “Class A” drugs betweenLeeds and London . The issues included entrapment and or fit up. R -v- S, Birmingham C.C. (2002) A 6 handed conspiracy to supply Class “A” drugs. The issuesincluded a detailed cross examination of 16 surveillance officers and disclosure. R -v- B, Maidstone C.C. (2000) A 7 handed conspiracy to import Class “B” drugs. The issuesincluded one defendant turning Queen’s Evidence. The client’s co-defendant brother, was a servingNational Crime Squad officer. The case was stayed for an abuse of process, three months after the trialstarted. R -v- Y, Birmingham (2009) a 14 handed rape case. The one co-defendant at trial, had committed the offence whilst on the run for the murder of W.P.C. Beshenivsky. R -v- A, Birmingham C.C. (2006) An historic 4 handed gang rape and false imprisonment of two 13 year old girls, over a 3 day period, in 1995. The client was arrested in 2004, on the basis of advances in D.N.A. technology. Stephen led the submissions re: abuse of process (investigative failings). The conviction was overturned in the Court of Appeal, on the basis of the claim of an abuse of process. R -v- A, Harrow C.C. (2004) A 6 handed conspiracy to commit kidnap, false imprisonment, blackmail, rape, indecent assault and possession of firearms with intent re: 3 complainants. The issues included similar fact evidence and the admissibility of the statement of an unavailable complainant. The defendants were described by the Crown as “dangerous members of a mafia style, Eastern European protection racket”. R -v-T, Blackfriars C.C. (2006) A 6 handed conspiracy to commit armed robbery / burglary ofcirca 75 supermarkets and warehouses in the South East, over a 12 month period. The issues included acut throat defence, the extent of the clients involvement and cell site analysis. R -v- M, Southwark C.C. (2013) Wine investment / boiler room conspiracy to defraud investors of over £4 million (leading counsel.) 10 week trial. Reported in the media. R -v- H, Southwark C.C. (2010 / 2009) Representing (leading counsel) the first defendant, in a 5 handed conspiracy to steal over £1 million, from a bank account. The funds were laundered by a practising solicitor – one of the co-defendants’ at trial. The client had a cut throat defence with 3 of the 5 defendants. Reported in the media. R -v- K, Birmingham C.C. (2008) – (V.H.C.C.) Represented the first defendant on the Indictment, in a 5 handed conspiracy to defraud / steal 30 high value cars from national dealerships, by making fraudulent applications for loans / hire purchase. R -v- T, Ipswich C.C. (2007) Represented the director of a company, in a 3 handed conspiracy to defraud people who had paid for time share accommodation and cheap flights. Reported in the media. R -v-A, Birmingham C.C. (2006) A 5 handed conspiracy re a large scale and complex car cloning case. The issues included the admissibility of bad character evidence, a cut throat defence and fit up. R -v- K, Blackfriars C.C. (2004) A V.A.T. fraud over 8 years by a West London chain ofrestaurants Alex Specialises in Criminal Law and has a particular interest in Human Rights Law and regulatory Law. His Practice has included high profile and/or complex cases for which he has represented the Defence or Prosecution. Alex is regularly instructed to represent the Defence or Prosecution in DWP, VOSA, Serco, Trading...Read more Alex Specialises in Criminal Law and has a particular interest in Human Rights Law and regulatory Law.His Practice has included high profile and/or complex cases for which he has represented the Defence or Prosecution.Alex is regularly instructed to represent the Defence or Prosecution in DWP, VOSA, Serco, Trading standards and HM Custom’s fraud cases.Alex is an approved prosecutor on the CPS panel of advocates and has been regularly instructed by the CPS since called. In addition Alex has acted on behalf of insurance companies and Local Authorities.For 18 years Alex was the Deputy Managing Director of a group of French companies with branches across Europe which Alex assisted to set up and develop. He was the Director of Sales and marketing for the companies’ overseas operations.Alex was also the Marketing Executive for EW Facts Plc’s (now Nord Anglia Plc) School of Finance and Management Division. He was responsible for the marketing and development of the company’s overseas operations in the Far East, Africa, Indian Ocean and Caribbean.Worked as a freelance lecturer in Business Law to undergraduates undertaking the University of Hull BA degree at the School of Finance and Management in London. Alex was also a part time lecturer to undergraduates undertaking the University of London LLB degrees and to post graduates taking the Inns of Courts, Bar Final Examinations at the London School of Law. Alex was involved in the training of trading standard officers on enforcement laws in Northern Ireland. Speaks fluent French and ItalianPractice DetailCrime: Serious Fraud, Murder, attempted murder, manslaughter, rape, kidnapping, torture, armed robbery, blackmail, child abduction, false imprisonment, serious drug offences, organised crime and serious motor prosecutionsHealth Safety: Represented individuals and companies prosecuted under the Health Safety Act, Food Trading standards and other regulatory legislation including fatal accidents. Represented families, local authorities, individuals and companies at Inquests.Immigration: Asylum applications, entry clearance appeals on behalf of visitors, students and businesses following refusals of their applications and judicial reviews. Alex is especially interested in the link between immigration issues and Human Rights Law. Publications and Lectures Alex works as a freelance lecturer in Business Law to undergraduates undertaking the University of Hull BA degree at the School of Finance and Management in London. Alex was also a part time lecturer to undergraduates undertaking the University of London LLB degrees and to post graduates taking the Inns of Courts, Bar Final Examinations at the London School of Law. Alex was involved in the training of trading standard officers on enforcement laws in Northern Ireland. R v Patel & Others £38 million, confiscation hearing. Resulted in one of the highest confiscation orders in the UK. R v Darren Mansfield Causing Death by Dangerous Driving, allegedly hit a cyclist like a golf ball at 99mph. Found not guilty. Organised crime involving black on black killings in North London and Indian/Pakistani gang war crime. False imprisonment involving the torture of a vulnerable witness with disabilities found gagged with his arms and legs tied up by the police. Found not guilty. Successfully represented a major European airline against customs and Excise. Glenn is a specialist criminal defence advocate. He has a significant practice as both leading and junior counsel in very serious cases such as murder, robbery, serious sexual offences, drugs and fraud. In addition Glenn advices on criminal and regulatory matters evolving from maritime offences. His reputation as a fearless...Read more Glenn is a specialist criminal defence advocate. He has a significant practice as both leading and junior counsel in very serious cases such as murder, robbery, serious sexual offences, drugs and fraud. In addition Glenn advices on criminal and regulatory matters evolving from maritime offences.His reputation as a fearless advocate, coupled with excellent client care has meant that he has been instructed in some of the most high-profile and serious cases in recent times.Glenn Harris has lectured on various aspects of criminal investigations into potential maritime offences and regulatory breaches. He regularly advises one of the most respected city firm of solicitors who specialise in maritime law.He has previously been instructed as counsel to advise following a ‘fatality at sea’ and as a result of his assistance and representation this has had the effect of preventing a significant criminal prosecution against the ship owners and controllers.Glenn was recently instructed under the direct access provisions to represent a skipper of a vessel charged with various regulatory offences arising out of an incident in Poole Harbour. He was able to successfully negotiate a much-reduced liability and considerably mitigate the sentence at court.Historically, he has been instructed in the largest legal-aid fraud of its time (R. v. Pritchard and others) and in R v Twomey and others which was a large scale armed robbery at Heathrow Airport using an inside man. This case took several years to go through the courts, having several aborted trials at significant public expense and which later made legal history and gained notoriety by becoming the first trial without a jury for over 300 years.Glenn was also instructed as junior counsel to represent one of those accused of the axe murder of Daniel Morgan in 1987, an investigation dogged by police corruption and which yet again resulted in no convictions after lengthy and successful legal arguments on abuse of process. This case is still in the public eye with the Home Secretary announcing an independent review of the case.Glenn continues with his criminal practice but has broadened his practice to include International Crime, Regulatory work such as Health and Safety and Trading Standards Prosecutions.As well as his demanding case load, Glenn is currently in the process of embarking on a series of lectures on International Criminal Law to Judges from foreign states and on the Bribery Act.Recent YearsIn 2014 one of Glenn many successes, was his defence of a young man charged with murder and firearms offences following a lengthy retrial at the Old Bailey.Success continued in 2015 when again he secured the acquittal of a young man accused of murder. In fact, Glenn’s client was the only defendant in the case to be acquitted of all charges he faced. Glenn also successfully defended a father accused of murdering his own daughter and he successfully argued that there was no case to answer for a mother accused of being involved in a large-scale sex trafficking conspiracy.When not in court Glenn has spent considerable time advising clients and solicitors in connection with alleged war crimes involving a variety of legal and human rights issues arising out of the Syrian crisis. This included complex jurisdictional issues and the procedure and jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.Glenn’s practice goes from strength to strength and 2016 looks to be a very busy year for him. Having already secured an acquittal of a man accused of a serious assault with a sword, he has been instructed to defend in two murder trials, a terrorist trial, three lengthy fraud trials and a trading standards trial.Glenn can also be instructed directly having completed the Public Access Course. Shaun Esprit is known for having an extremely meticulous approach and an engaging and highly persuasive court presence. He specialises in general crime, corporate crime and regulatory work. He also undertakes work in selected specialised areas of civil law. Shaun both defends and prosecutes, including as a Leading Junior. He...Read more Shaun Esprit is known for having an extremely meticulous approach and an engaging and highly persuasive court presence. He specialises in general crime, corporate crime and regulatory work. He also undertakes work in selected specialised areas of civil law. Shaun both defends and prosecutes, including as a Leading Junior. He is a well-respected barrister, who has an ability to engage with people from all walks of life.Shaun has appeared a number of times on TV as an expert criminal barrister, including offering detailed commentary and analysis on the Oscar Pistorius’ Trial. All media enquiries for interviews, case comments or analysis on legal news, should be addressed to Chambers’ senior clerk Daniel Bartlett.Areas of expertiseCrime: including serious violent offences (including murder/manslaughter); sexual offences (rape, child abuse); drugs; regulatory work; fraudCivil: personal injury; clinical negligence; Court of ProtectionShaun also has a specialist expertise in relation to Proceeds of Crime and the interplay between confiscation proceedings and ancillary relief/financial remedies. Publications and Lectures “For Richer, For Poorer”: article on the interplay between confiscation and matrimonial proceedings: The Proceeds of Crime Review (No.2 2008)“A Fair Share”: article on property rights of cohabitees in context of confiscation/restraint proceedings: The Proceeds of Crime Review (No.4 2009)“Abuse of Process in Confiscation Proceedings”: The Proceeds of Crime Review (2011)“Criminal or Casualty: Marine A”: article in Counsel Magazine (2017) 2019 Defending in large scale conspiracy to supply over 50kg of ketamine (£1.25 million street value). 2019 R-v-SR & Ors Successful appeal to the Court of Appeal for interested third party (wife) in multi-million pound confiscation proceedings. 2018 R-v-CW defending historical sexual offences case: defendant acquitted of all 33 offences arsing from alleged incident in 1970s [Stafford Crown Court]. 2017 Successful appeal against conviction representing senior consultant physician re possession of indecent images of children (Court of Appeal). 2017 Successful appeal against conviction and subsequent acquittal representing defendant charged with causing death by careless driving. 2017 R-v-RE Defending attempted murder with gangland background (Inner London). 2016 R-v-HA Cardiff: prison riot; attempted murder/section 18 Cardiff Crown Court. 2015 R-v-SC & Ors Lewes Crown Court: representing lead defendant in trial arising from large scale drug importation of Class A drugs in excess of £10,000,000 2014 Defending in prison violent disorder/attempted murder trial (Worcester Crown Court) 2013 Represented Defendant in high-profile multi-handed racially aggravated public disorder case. 2012 R-v-S Represented Defendant at trial for importation of over 10kg of high purity cocaine. 2010 R-v-C, H & A Prosecution on behalf of RCPO re the importation of 90kg of heroin into UK. 2010 R-v-G, M & Ors Defended in relation to a conspiracy to commit burglaries and steal high performance motor vehicles for onward sale; value £450,000. 2007 Represented Father in care proceedings arising from his alleged involvement in an extensive paedophile ring 2006 Represented the Sandwell Borough Council in care proceedings arising from alleged anal rape of infant. 2006 R-v-S & H Inner London Crown Court: defended firearms case (as led junior) arising from Operation Trident investigation into gun crime. 2010 Represented Appellant before the Employment Appeal Tribunal; setting aside of finding of dishonesty made against senior health care official in his claim for unfair dismissal. 2005 Represented Claimant in successful clinical negligence proceedings arising from obstetrician’s negligence; award of over £500,000 achieved 2017 R-v-FN Defending owner of money exchange business in trial of multi million pound money laundering conspiracy Reading Crown Court. 2011 Prosecuted as led junior a large scale money laundering conspiracy arising from the proceeds of an MTIC fraud. 2009 R-v-M & Ors Prosecuted re-trial of Barclays Bank manager alleged to have stolen from employers as part of a conspiracy with participants in organised crime. 2010 R-v-D Prosecution on behalf of RCPO re importation of 40kg of herbal cannabis. 2008 R-v-K Prosecuted on behalf of RCPO case involving just under £1,000,000 evaded duty on imported cigarettes. 2004 R-v-G & Ors EWCA Crim 1368: led junior defending banker allegedly engaged in largest “arrangement fee” fraud ($80,000,000) ever prosecuted by the Serious Fraud Office. Leading authority on issue of accidentally disclosed PII material and its effect on fairness of criminal trial. 2003 Advised Messrs McClean McNally, International Attorneys, Turks & Caicos in relation to the first copyright case brought in that jurisdiction (re application and extension of the Copyright Acts 1911 and 1956 and the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1989 to the Turks and Caicos Islands). Barrister Robert Newcombe has secured numerous acquittals for clients. For example: Mortgage Fraud Murder Mortgage Fraud Appeal Against Conviction (Reporting Restrictions apply) Rape 1. Fraud Act: Mortgage Fraud – Title Fraud: 2 month trial (and two week re-trial) at the Crown Court at Preston. Mr Newcombe’s FCA approved mortgage broker...Read more Barrister Robert Newcombe has secured numerous acquittals for clients. For example:Mortgage FraudMurderMortgage FraudAppeal Against Conviction (Reporting Restrictions apply)Rape1. Fraud Act: Mortgage Fraud – Title Fraud: 2 month trial (and two week re-trial) at the Crown Court at Preston. Mr Newcombe’s FCA approved mortgage broker client (of good character) was charged with making false representations on behalf of clients in order to induce mortgage lenders to believe that a number of residential conveyancing transactions were genuine, when they were not. Properties were “sold” without the real owners knowing.The defence case that the broker was not a knowing participant was accepted by the jury. Detailed cross-examination of the Crown expert on a large number of conveyancing files assisted the defendant’s case.2. Murder: Central Criminal Court: 2 month trial at the Central Criminal Court. Mr Newcombe was led by Mr Kerim Fuad QC, head of Church Court Chambers. A man was stabbed to death outside Stockwell Underground Station during a public order incident. Two young men were tried for murder and several others were charged with conspiracy to commit violent disorder and GBH with intent.The evidence against Mr Newcombe’s client was: (a) he was seen on CCTV running into the fracas; (b) the deceased’s blood was found on his hoody and (c) he was seen on CCTV re-enacting what appeared to be the fatal blow, afterwards.The jury accepted his case that he was neither a principal or secondary party to murder, and he was acquitted of all charges. He had assisted the police with their inquiries at all stages. The forensic evidence of the blood staining was in fact consistent with that which any bystander at the scene may have been expected to have received, according to the prosecution forensic expert, in cross-examination.3. Conspiracy to Defraud: Mortgage Fraud, tried at the Central Criminal Court. The prosecution case against the defendant (bank employee of good character) collapsed after 4 weeks of financial expert evidence against this defendant and several others. The allegations included use of false documents to obtain many millions of pounds of mortgage advances.Dogged pursuit of disclosure requests, combined with a written submission of “No Case” at the end of the prosecution evidence lead to no evidence being offered at that late stage, against Mr Newcombe’s client.4. Offence not Disclosable: Appeal against Conviction: Court of Appeal (Criminal Division): Mr Newcombe acted for an Appellant before the Full Court, with leave to appeal, and bail for the Appellant. The nature of the Appeal concerned “Fresh Evidence”. The conviction was quashed. A reporting restriction is in place relating to the Judgment of the Court.5. Rape: Crown Court at Bradford. The defendant was acquitted of raping his own son, several years earlier. The jury heard about the defendant’s previous conviction for unlawful sexual intercourse with his step-daughter (aged 15 ½ at the time). This conviction’s use by the jury was limited to background only and not propensity, after submissions before the learned judge.In 2015 Mr Newcombe represented a Bishop (of previous good character) who was convicted of rapes which occurred many years ago (two week trial, at Inner London Crown Court before HHJ Madge). Four other females also made allegations of indecent and sexual assault, of which he was also convicted. The defendant received a sentence of 25 years imprisonment. In sentencing, the learned judge agreed that a determinate sentence was appropriate notwithstanding that he had made a finding that the defendant was a “Dangerous Offender”.This was due to the defendant’s age (66) and the length of the determinate sentence to be passed. The learned judge referred the case to the Hon. Lowell Goddard’s Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, for consideration, given his concerns regarding the previous investigation by the Local Authority where some of the females lived and concerns relating to regulation of Churches.Cyber Fraud and Financial CrimeRobert Newcombe has wide experience in financial crime cases, as well as in multi-million pound cyber frauds – conspiracy to defraud and money laundering. He acts as leading junior counsel or as junior alone in these fraud trials. He has lectured on cyber fraud to solicitors and barristers for CPD: for example with a former Head of Operations of the British Army’s Cyber Warfare branch, as part of the Church Court Chambers lecture series: “Cyber Fraud and Cyber Security: Trojan Botnets, Web-Injects and Mules – Law and Practical Case Management”.Wide Ranging ExperienceRobert Newcombe has a breadth and depth of criminal law experience and is often engaged by clients (often of good character and high standing in the community) specifically because of his ability to master technically complex facts and legal areas.A recent case involved a CHIS (Covert Human Intelligence Source). The abuse of process hearing relating to prosecution disclosure lasted for four weeks. RIPA Authorizations; Search Warrants; Open Justice; potential Waiver of Privilege by the Crown and the Burden and Standard of Proof were issues on which Robert submitted written documents, and made submissions.Robert has acted as trial counsel in over a dozen homicide cases at the Central Criminal Court and elsewhere. In a Newton Hearing in 2016 at the Central Criminal Court involving 2 days of evidence, acting as junior alone, Robert succeeded in persuading the learned judge that the killing had not been done for financial gain as the Crown alleged – which reduced the Life sentence by 20 years. In other murder cases Robert has been instructed as junior counsel to QCs, and has conducted attempted murder trials as junior counsel alone.He acted as leading junior counsel in a nine handed conspiracy to defraud for two months at Southwark Crown Court, where the client was first on the indictment. Issues involved the scope of the conspiracy and guilty pleas of two co-defendants, and whether their bases of plea were admissible.Robert Newcombe also led another barrister in chambers, Oliver Grimwood, in a successful two month money laundering trial where video-links to witnesses in Jamaica were set up.FirearmsMr Newcombe has acted as junior alone, representing clients for attempted murder and is very familiar with firearms and their legitimate and illegal uses. Antique hammer guns or concealed key-ring guns or fully automatic machine pistols – Robert has a wide array of experience with their deployment. He has lectured to barristers and solicitors on this technical area.Environment and Planning LawRobert Newcombe is also a specialist in cases prosecuted by the Environment Agency, including all waste and pollution matters and the Environmental regulatory offences. He often acts for businesses and landowners. After a nine week trial in 2013 his landowning client was acquitted of s.33 Environmental Protection Act matters. A strong challenge was made to the use of covert surveillance by the Environment Agency, the use of which is not authorised under the Police Act 1997.In addition to his Environmental Law expertise, Robert Newcombe also is instructed to defend and prosecute in Planning Enforcement cases under the provisions of section 179 et sec of the Town and Country Planning Acts. These have included Appeals to the Inspector and Statutory Appeals to the High Court and injunctions, as well as jury trials.His Regulatory work also includes cases prosecuted by the Health Safety Executive. In 2014 he represented a business owner at Southwark Crown Court who was tried for breaches of the Work at Height Regulations, which resulted in the fatality of an employee.Expert EvidenceRobert Newcombe has a real flair for dealing with contentious expert evidence, whether it be financial, FCA related evidence; or medical evidence including brain injuries; or blood spatter, glass shards, ballistics and DNA evidence; or surveyors’ reports regarding baselines on land levels; or cell site and telecoms evidence; or engineering or waste management industry expert evidence.Reported CasesR v Mitchell [2004] EWCA Crim 3206 – Rape conviction, appeal dismissed. (S.41 YJCEA 1999 – temporal provisions).R v Kuosmanen [2005] 1 Cr. App. R. (S.) 354 – ID documents sentencing.R v C [2015] CA(CD) – Reporting Restrictions Apply. Seminars Cyber fraud and Cyber Security: Trojan Botnets, Web Injects and Mules (at the University of Northumbria’s Centre for Evidence and Criminal Justice Studies) and as part of the Church Court Chambers’ CPD Lecture series.Firearms: Law and Case Management (CPD for practitioners)Defending Environmental Prosecutions (CPD for practitioners) R v S Southwark Crown Court (2014) Leading Dejan Mladenovic of chambers. Defendant denied conspiracy to manufacture and distribute identity documents on an industrial scale. He was convicted and sentenced to 4 years imprisonment after a two month trial. R v B Teesside Crown Court (2013) Leading counsel in two day Proceeds of Crime and sentencing hearing involving multi-million pound drugs conspiracy. Negative equity in residential property portfolio. R v C Croydon Crown Court (2011) Leading Oliver Grimwood of chambers. Defendant was acquitted of laundering cash to Jamaica using money transfer companies after a two month trial. R v S Inner London Crown Court (2008) Leading counsel, where defendant was convicted of being in possession of a Skorpion sub-machine pistol, key-ring gun and handgun, and more than a kilo of heroin, with intent to supply. Defendant granted bail between conviction and sentence. R v H Central Criminal Court (2017) Multi-handed fatal stabbing and perverting the course of justice. To be tried in 2017. Led by Kerim Fuad QC. R v A Central Criminal Court (2015) Defendant acquitted of Murder after being present at the scene of a fatal stabbing, led by Kerim Fuad QC. R v N Central Criminal Court (2007) Defendant acquitted of Murder after a man was bludgeoned to death on the back seat of the car he was driving, led by Tim Barnes QC. R v M Central Criminal Court (2005) Defendant acquitted of Murder after three-way cut-throat defences, led by Nigel Baker QC. R v H Newcastle Crown Court (2009) Defendant stabbed father and pleaded guilty to Manslaughter on day of trial (provocation); not guilty of Murder, lead by Paul Sloan QC. R v S Central Criminal Court and Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) (2004/5) Defendant convicted of Murder in the course of robbery on elderly victim. Identity and causation in issue, with numerous similar fact robberies. Medical evidence challenged from neuropathologist; pathologist; neurosurgeon; A&E registrar; ambulance crew and GP, led by Tim Barnes QC. R v H Central Criminal Court (2003) Defendant pleaded guilty to Manslaughter after injecting friend with heroin, led by Nigel Rumfitt QC. R v C Central Criminal Court (2016) Murder. Newton Hearing against QC. 2 days of evidence to determine whether Crown could prove whether killing was for financial gain. Finding in favour of defendant which meant Life sentence was some 20 years lower than might otherwise have been the case. Aggravating factors were concealment of body. R v P Central Criminal Court (2009) Defendant acquitted of Attempted Murder after injured party was shot in the head with a .22 shot cartridge fired from a pre-1880 hammer pistol. Both defendants were successful with their defence of accident. R v O Central Criminal Court (2011) Defendant acquitted of joint enterprise Attempted Murder, but convicted of aggravated burglary and possessing (and discharging) a firearm during a Schedule 1 offence. Co-accused was convicted of attempted murder. R v F Central Criminal Court (2009) Defendant acquitted of Attempted Murder after stabbing his brother 9 times. The jury accepted the defence of self-defence. The assailant brother was unarmed. R v A Canterbury Crown Court (2010) Defendant was acquitted of Conspiracy to Supply Class A drugs. 25kg of drugs in the boot of his car as he entered the UK from a ferry. The two co-accused in the vehicle when it was stopped by Customs were convicted. R v N Central Criminal Court Defendant acquitted of Murder after man bludgeoned to death on back seat of the car he was driving. R v M Central Criminal Court Defendant acquitted of Murder after three-way cut-throat defences. R v H Newcastle Crown Court Defendant stabbed father and pleaded guilty to manslaughter on day of trial (provocation); not guilty of Murder. R v S Central Criminal Court and Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Defendant convicted of murder in the course of robbery on elderly victim. Identity and causation in issue, with similar fact robberies. Medical evidence challenged from neuropathologist; pathologist; neurosurgeon; A&E registrar; ambulance crew and GP. R v H Central Criminal Court Defendant pleaded guilty to Manslaughter after injecting friend with heroin. R v P Central Criminal Court Defendant acquitted of Attempted Murder after injured party was shot in the head with a .22 shot cartridge fired from a pre-1880 hammer pistol. Both defendants were successful with their defence of accident. R v O Central Criminal Court Defendant acquitted of Attempted Murder, but convicted of aggravated burglary and possessing (and discharging) a firearm during a Schedule 1 offence. R v A Canterbury Crown Court Defendant acquitted of Conspiracy to Supply Class A drugs. 25kg of drugs in the boot of his car as he entered the UK from a ferry. R v C Preston Crown Court Mortgage fraud and money laundering involving fraud on the title of residential properties (re-trial 2015). R v N Central Criminal Court Mortgage fraud relating to over 170 residential properties. Conspiracy to Defraud and Obtaining money transfers by deception (for trial 2015). R v S Southwark Crown Court Leading Dejan Mladenovic of chambers. Defendant denied conspiracy to manufacture and distribute identity documents on an industrial scale. He was convicted and sentenced to 4 years imprisonment after a two month trial. R v C Croydon Crown Court Leading Oliver Grimwood of chambers. Defendant was acquitted of laundering cash to Jamaica using money transfer companies after a two month trial. R v K Teesside Crown Court Defendant deputy manager of nursing home convicted of similar fact ill-treatment of multiple residents under s. 44 Mental Capacity Act. R v X Central Criminal Court Defendant found unfit to stand trial due to progressive brain tumour – fraud in breach of trust alleged to be £½ million. R v C Croydon Crown Court Operation Lath: investigation commenced by FBI in USA and involved a conspiracy to defraud UK banks of tens of millions of pounds. The Zeus Trojan virus had been utilised by a sophisticated criminal syndicate to assist in withdrawing funds from internet accessible bank accounts.This case involved the use of Trojan botnets (to acquire compromised sensitive data), web-injects (to phish) and money laundering mules (to cash-out from drop accounts). R v Y Southwark Crown Court Operation Mandrill: investigation into conspiracy to defraud the Student Loans Company of millions of pounds together with a further conspiracy to defraud UK banks.This case involved the use of Trojan botnets (to acquire compromised sensitive data), web-injects (to phish) and money laundering mules (to cash-out from drop accounts). R v C Preston Crown Court Mortgage fraud and money laundering involving fraud on the title of residential properties: Acquittal. R v N Central Criminal Court Mortgage fraud relating to over 170 residential properties. Conspiracy to Defraud and Obtaining money transfers by deception: Acquittal. R v K Teesside Crown Court Defendant deputy manager of nursing home convicted of similar fact ill-treatment of multiple residents under s. 44 Mental Capacity Act. Expert opinion taken from one of the country’s leading professor’s of psychology to establish whether a base-line existed beyond which the nominal complainants lacked capacity. R v X Central Criminal Court Defendant found unfit to stand trial due to progressive brain tumour – fraud in breach of trust alleged to be £½ million. Crown Offered No Evidence. R v Y Newcastle Crown Court Defendant convicted of sexual activity with a person with a mental disorder impeding choice, where 27 year old complainant had a mental age of 4-5. R v A Newcastle Crown Court (2016) Abuse of Process involving CHIS, lasting 4 weeks. Reporting Restrictions apply. Environment Agency v J: Newcastle Crown Court (2013) Defendant acquitted after 9 week trial of Permitting the Deposit of Controlled Waste, offence under s. 33 Environmental Protection Act. Defence consisted of suitability of deposited material and the de minimis principle and statutory defence. Challenge to the policy of permitting trespass by EA officers even though no Police Act 1997 authorisation is possible. Environment Agency v A: Redbridge Magistrates’ Court (2015) Defendant pleaded guilty very early in proceedings to numerous charges contrary to the Transfrontier Shipment of Waste Regulations and was sentenced to a non-custodial sentence. Environment Agency v V: Guildford Crown Court (2007) Defendant sentenced to a non-custodial sentence after permitting the deposit of hundreds of tons of controlled waste at a swan sanctuary. Health & Safety Executive v H: Southwark Crown Court (2015) Defendant convicted of breaches of the Work at Height Regulations, resulting in a fatal fall from scaffolding, after failing to attend for his trial (whilst serving a life sentence for murder). Robert Newcombe has been involved with many cases where lack of mental capacity has been in issue and is interested to explore further cases in this area. High Court (Chancery Division) fraud Lancashire Mortgage Corporation v Ikoku and Onabrakpeya – the signatory to a false mortgage application was advised to submit to questions on his affidavit of means. He was then not charged with any offence. B v BBC Article 2 Right to Life Application for emergency injunction (on behalf of alleged murderer while awaiting trial) to prevent footage of murder victim being broadcast. BBC submitted that the Human Rights Act did not apply to its broadcast function, but this was rejected by Collins J: it was arguable that it did for the purposes of the application. Statutory appeals to High Court and injunctions specifically in relation to the Town & Country Planning Act. Alkan acts in a broad range of commercial litigation, arbitration and transaction matters. His focus includes high value commercial disputes, cross-border banking and finance, banking regulation, commodities trade disputes,  art and antiquity law. Prior to the Bar, Alkan worked for Clifford Chance and has developed hands-on experience in financial services...Read more Alkan acts in a broad range of commercial litigation, arbitration and transaction matters. His focus includes high value commercial disputes, cross-border banking and finance, banking regulation, commodities trade disputes,  art and antiquity law.Prior to the Bar, Alkan worked for Clifford Chance and has developed hands-on experience in financial services regulation and banking and finance products such as derivatives and offshore investment funds. At Clifford Chance, he advised a number of pension funds, hedge funds, private equity funds, insurance companies and institutional investors.Alkan has also advised major banks including The Royal Bank of Scotland, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America Merrill Lynch on a range of complex disputes involving both institutional and private investors.At the height of the banking crisis in 2009, Alkan counseled banks on disputes relating to International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) contracts, structured investment transactions, off-shore investment trusts, bank insolvency, FSA/FCA regulatory breaches and anti-money laundering.Alkan’s expertise also includes proceedings before international courts, tribunals, offshore jurisdictions and enforcement of foreign judgments in England.Alkan is also a regular commentator on a range of international legal issues and geo-political risks in emerging markets having provided commentary for publications such as Africa Asset Management and MENA Insurance Review.More recently, Alkan has also advised on legal issues affecting fine arts and antiquities. He has also written extensively on the Elgin Marbles, the Hague Convention and the looting of antiquities in Iraq and Syria. Recent Work Acting for a major US bank in a dispute with a Luxembourg hedge fund.Defending a UK bank in a claim by a private high net worth client involving financial promotions rules.Mediating a dispute between East European high net worth clients involving the sale/purchase of oil.Acting for a Middle East sovereign fund investor in a claim against US and Swiss banks.Advising a private client in respect of financial mis-selling by a UK bank.Advising on cross-border civil fraud/breach of trust proceedings in the Caribbean.Advising shareholders on breach of director’s duties and asset tracing. Kevin is one London’s top criminal defence barristers and his practice caters mainly for private clients and those who are publicly funded. Kevin was called to the Bar in 1999 and has been in continual practice in London ever since. He is highly regarded by both the solicitors who instruct...Read more Kevin is one London’s top criminal defence barristers and his practice caters mainly for private clients and those who are publicly funded.Kevin was called to the Bar in 1999 and has been in continual practice in London ever since.He is highly regarded by both the solicitors who instruct him and the barristers who appear with or against him in court. Judges who know him have described him as an “assured and highly skilled advocate”. He is regularly instructed in the most serious and complex cases both in the Crown Court and in the Court of Appeal. He recently secured an appeal against conviction for a victim of trafficking who was wrongly prosecuted and convicted in the Crown Court.Kevin is a hugely experienced barrister who is regularly leading other counsel in complex trials. Queens Counsel who have led him in complex trials value his tactical awareness, tenacity and attention to detail.As a cross-examiner of experts, professional witness such as police officers and co-defendants he is known as a barrister who can undermine the most confident of witnesses and expose weaknesses in evidence others have missed. Due to the reputation he has gained over the years other counsel regularly seek his advice. Kevin is known to have excellent judgement which, combined with a sharp legal brain make him a hugely popular choice with both lay and professional clients.His vast experience and well-earned reputation has meant he has been instructed in high profile cases in courts both inside and outside London.He has successfully defended in the most serious cases including those alleging murder, kidnapping, large scale drugs conspiracies, fraud conspiracies, gun crime, bomb making and sex offences. He was also instructed in the first case of its kind brought to court in relation to coercive and controlling behaviour under s.76 Serious Crime Act 2015.Kevin successfully defended in the first “slave case” to be tried in England in nearly 200 years. The trial lasted three months and despite the Crown insisting they had a “very strong case” his client was the only defendant to be acquitted. The case was described by the trial judge as one of the “most complex any jury would ever have to deal with”.Despite a very heavy work load Kevin plays an active part in the management of his chambers and is an active member of various legal, professional bodies. He sits on the South Eastern Circuit committee and is Chair of his local Bar Mess. Publications and Lectures Contributed to SEC committee response to government paper entitled “Breaking the Cycle of Offending”. Contributed to Circuiteer quarterly magazine. R v S (2019) Attempted murder trial at the Old Bailey. Defendant accused with attempting to kill the victim in order to enforce a drugs debt. The victim had been put in a bath and doused from head to toe with petrol before being set alight, suffering 40% burns to his body. The defendant accepted presence but denied being responsible. R v HHD (2019) Court of Appeal, Kevin won an appeal against conviction in relation to a victim of human trafficking, debt bondage and slavery under s.45 Modern Slavery Act 2015. The case has caused CPS guidance and their 4 stage test to be revisited, with the case being referred to the Senior Presiding Judge due to the issues it raised. R v W (2019) People smuggling trial in Portsmouth. Kevin represented a female defendant who had been charged with two others with conspiring to smuggle into the UK vulnerable migrants. The defendant was stopped in Portsmouth and in her van the authorities found 8 migrants. The co-defendants who were in a car behind tried desperately to blame the female driver of the van. Following a lengthy trial, the jury acquitted the female van driver and convicted both the male co-defendants. R v W (2018) Three month fraud conspiracy at Southwark Crown Court. The case involved benefit assessors who agreed to falsify numerous false benefit applications. These benefits paid out over a period of years and were in excess of a million pounds. Kevin led counsel from chambers in this long and complex case. R v K (2018) Three month murder trial at the Old Bailey successfully defending the “Snapchat Queen” against an allegation of murder. The defendant was prosecuted as a secondary party who was alleged to have wanted to have a man, who wanted to be her boyfriend murdered. She recorded footage of the victim dying on the street and uploaded it onto Snapchat. R v M (2018) Prosecution alleged defendant had smuggled firearms into a property in Luton. Following two days of legal argument Kevin secured the dismissal of the case. R v G (2017) Unusual and novel gross negligence manslaughter trial which involved experts giving evidence from the USA with regard to a drug called Ibogaine. Following lengthy legal argument at close of the Crowns case the defendant was found not guilty. R v V (2017) The only trial to be conducted with the defendant appearing in court via video-link and not in person in the dock. The trial Judge described the defendant as the most dangerous man currently in prison in the UK. R v U (2015) Secured the acquittal of defendant accused of Murder and familial homicide under s. 5 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004 relating to the murder by family members of his sister. The trial lasted 10 weeks and involved the defendants wife trying to blame the defendant. The wife was convicted of the murder. R v V The only trial to be conducted with the defendant appearing in court via video-link and not in person in the dock. The trial Judge described him as the most dangerous man currently in prison in the UK. R v F Represented a client accused of making a bomb and leaving it outside the address of a love-rival. R v M Represented a client who was accused of murdering his own mother in the first case of matricide to be heard in Exeter crown court. R v B Represented a client who was accused of making and leaving a bomb in a hotel. R v B (2015) Represented a defendant at the Old Bailey accused of the double-murder of members of a rival drug gang. The trial lasted 4 months. R v M Secured the acquittal of a retired professional who was accused of serious sexual assaults which dated back 40 years. R v K Successfully defended at the Old Bailey in a case involving a Lithuanian national who was accused of being a member of an organised criminal gang who had allegedly kidnapped a Latvian national in an attempt to extort money from his family. R v U Secured the acquittal of defendant accused of familial homicide relating to the murder by family members of a sister. The trial lasted 10 weeks and involved the defendants wife trying to blame the defendant. The wife was convicted of the murder. R v B (2015) Contract killing trial which lasted 4 weeks and involved six defendant’s. One co-defendant tried to say Kevin’s defendant was heavily involved. Following lengthy cross-examination of this co-defendant by Kevin, the jury convicted the co-defendant and acquitted Kevin’s client. R v G Unusual and novel gross negligence manslaughter trial which involved experts giving evidence from the USA and resulted in an acquittal. R v F Serious s.18 GBH trial involving a victim who was a trainee lawyer. Following a detailed attack on the accuracy of the identification evidence by Kevin, the prosecution conceded their case was no longer one they could put before a jury and a not guilty verdict was entered. R v B “Blue Lagoon Murder” where the tortured and dismembered body of the victim surfaced in the lagoon a full year after the murder. R v B Largest ever fraud committed against the NHS at the time, with the use of ghost workers over a long period. R v B Defended in multi-handed double-murder at the Old Bailey. The trial ran for nearly three months and attracted much attention in the national press. R v E Secured acquittal in alleged hate crime, the complainant was a transvestite and the allegation was in relation to a s.18 GBH assault. R v C (2013) Notorious “slave” case, the first of its kind in the UK in 200 years. Mr Molloy led counsel from chambers and secured the only acquittal in the trial. It was described by the trial Judge as “one of the most complex cases any jury would ever have to deal with.” R v D (2014) Kevin led counsel in first “slave” case of its kind in Wales and led counsel from chambers. Another acquittal was secured whilst the co-defendant was convicted. R v C Notorious “slave” case, the first of its kind in 200 years and resulted in sole acquittal. R v S Defended the main defendant whilst leading another barrister in a very large, historic drugs and money laundering conspiracy. The evidence involved the presentation of phone usage spread over a 10 year period and covering several continents. The complexity of the case included the use and understanding of the international money exchange markets. R v F Operation panther involved the prosecution of a large drugs conspiracy based in Essex. The late service of phone evidence required a lengthy and skilled cross-examination of the Crown phone expert which resulted in the case being stopped and adjourned. At the second trial the phone evidence was discredited due to its many flaws, which resulted in the acquittal of both defendants and the awarding of full costs for the first trial against the crown prosecution service. R v N Leading counsel in a conspiracy to murder where Kevin led a member of his chambers in a two month long trial, which included a difficult cut-throat defence. Kevin was one of the few to secure an acquittal. R v D Led a member of chambers in large multi-handed “slave” case, which lasted three months. Secured the only acquittal out of seven defendants despite representing one of the “main” defendants. R v D Represented the first named defendant on the indictment whilst leading a member of his own chambers in a “forced labour/slave” case. Trial lasted 3 weeks and resulted in the only acquittal. R v M Led a member of his own chambers in a complex and difficult historic drugs case. “A force of nature. George has a very quick mind and an electric personality, and is great fun to work with” Giles Bark-Jones, Principal, Bark & Co, a 'Top Tier' Legal 500 Firm George is a well-established barrister with an excellent reputation for his specialist knowledge of extradition law and human rights, advocacy and drafting. His background is in serious crime; in this context George has acted in cases of terrorism, murder, drug conspiracies, serious sexual offences and other serious crime. As can...Read more George is a well-established barrister with an excellent reputation for his specialist knowledge of extradition law and human rights, advocacy and drafting. His background is in serious crime; in this context George has acted in cases of terrorism, murder, drug conspiracies, serious sexual offences and other serious crime. As can be seen below,  George has a particular expertise in extradition appeals and securing bail in extradition proceedings.George is highly experienced at conducting extradition proceedings under Part 1 and Part 2 of the Extradition Act 2003. He has represented numerous individuals before the Westminster Magistrates’ Court and the High Court. George can provide informed advice and effective advocacy at each stage of proceedings.George relishes advocacy in all its forms, whether addressing a jury, the Court of Appeal, High Court or a District Judge and believes that practising across a number of different fields and forums is a positive advantage in keeping advocacy skills sharp and legal thinking flexible.George also has considerable experience in civil litigation and employment law.George has published and lectured extensively on extradition.George is accredited as a Barrister Pupil Supervisor.George is Public Access qualified.Recent extradition cases:7 January 2020 – Greece v RK (Ref GR85001) – Westminster Magistrates’ Court, CPS strongly objected to bail. Bail granted by District Judge Baraitser.10 December 2019 – RK v Poland  CO/3050/2019 – High Court Application to stay case pending Polish Court Judgment granted by Mr Justice Jeremy Baker.28 November 2019 – Poland v CZ CO/1783/2019 – High Court Appeal against Order for Extradition successful.  Order for Extradition quashed by Mrs Justice Farbey.21 November 2019 – RM v Romania CO/4982/2019 – High Court Application for Permission to Appeal an Order for Extradition. Granted on grounds of Art 3 and Art 8 by Mr Justice Jeremy Baker.20 November 2019 – Italy v SH CO/4546/2019 High Court Application for Bail. CPS strongly objected to bail. Bail Granted by Mrs Justice Whipple.11 November 2019 – Poland v SJ (Ref 86SX260) – Westminster Magistrates’ Court, CPS strongly objected to bail. Bail granted by District Judge Goldspring.5 November 2019 – Belgium v CP CO/4161/2019 High Court Application for Bail. CPS strongly objected to bail. Bail Granted by Mr Justice Jay.8 October 2019 Poland v MM – Westminster Magistrates’ Court – Application for Bail, CPS strongly objected to bail. Bail granted by District Judge Grant.25 September 2019 – RH v Hungary v CO/3737/2019 – High Court Application for Bail. CPS strongly objected to bail. Bail Granted by Sir Ross Cranston sitting as a High Court Judge.16 May 2019 – RM v Poland CO/5181/2018 – Application for Permission to Appeal an Order for Extradition – Granted on Art 8 ground by Mrs Justice McGowan.8 May 2019 – MN v Poland CO/214/2018 – Appeal Against and Order for Extradition. Granted by Mr Justice Ouseley. Extradition Order quashed. FeesThe majority of George’s work is publicly funded however he does also work on some cases on a private fee basis. When working on a private fee basis, the fees are agreed upfront with the client. This can take the form of either (a) a fixed fee arrangement whereby we consider how much work he will have to do for you in total and how much this will cost. We will then give the client an overall amount that they will need to pay for the work he is doing, or (b) An hourly rate arrangement: This is when the client will have a set rate s/he is charged for each hour of work done (or increment thereof). George will then keep track of how many hours of work he has done, and this will be the final cost. We may be able to give an estimate of the number of hours it will take at the outset. R v B-R & NB [2011] EWCA Crim 1136, [2012] 1 WLR 2364 Appeal Against Crown Court Conviction bailii R v AG [2016] EWCA Crim 140 Successful appeal against a Crown Court sentence where the sentence of 16 months’ immediate custody was quashed and replaced with a Suspended Sentence securing the defendants’ immediate release. R v JC [2016] EWCA Crim 67 Appeal against Crown Court Sentence where the structure of the Extended Sentence was reduced on appeal. R v RS [2015] EWCA 1102 Appeal against Crown Court Conviction and Sentence. George was described by Leveson LJ as ‘a powerful advocate’. Bailii R v RT [2014] EWCA Crim 1715, [2015] 1Cr. App. R. (S) 3 Successful appeal against Crown Court Sentence. R v B [2012] EWCA Crim 1174 Successful appeal against Crown Court Conviction and Sentence. R v BR and NB [2011] EWCA Crim 1136; [2012] 1W.L.R. 2364; [2012] 1 Cr. App. R. 4 Times April 22, 2011 – Successful appeal against Crown Court Conviction. This case involved serious sexual offences and the defendant’s convictions and sentence were all quashed and the defendant was unanimously acquitted by the jury at his retrial. R v R [2011] EWCA Crim 3183 Successful appeal against Crown Court Sentence. This case involved over 70 TIC’s for Burglary. Attorney General’s Reference (No.34 of 2010) [2010] EWCA Crim 2055 Successful prosecution appeal against Crown Court Sentence. R v C (Robert Norton) [2010] EWCA Crim 933 Appeal against Crown Court Sentence. P v Court of First Instance of Brussels [2005] EWCH 915 (Admin); [2005] Extradition L.R. 62 This was one of the first major cases involving the Extradition Act 2003. This case served to limit the scope of ‘no-evidence’ extraditions involving category 1 territories. R v W (Terence Edward) [2004] EWCA Crim 3417; [2005] 2 Cr.App.R.(S.) 51 George acted for the Crown in this case which is now the leading authority on stranger kidnapping sentences. R v Z [2008] EWCA Crim 2169 This case involved the concept of the mercy where a terminally ill man was given a sentence that would involve his inevitable death in custody. The appeal was successful. R v H [2009] EWCA Crim 605 This case involved the successful appeal of a sentence of 9 years for conspiracy to supply cocaine. Following extensive courtroom exchanges with Mr Justice Calvert-Smith (former DPP) the sentence was reduced from 9 to 7 years. R v JM The Halloween Nunchaku murder involved the murder of a 15 year old boy at a Halloween party. George was led by David Fisher QC in this notorious murder trial. BBC R v MK Murder case involving a dealer murdering his best-friend in a frenzied knife attack. George was led by Sascha Wass QC in this trial. BBC R v DR ‘Caterham Bus Bomber’: this was an allegation of a ‘home-grown’ terrorist who was found to have a cache of chemical weapons at his home. George successfully defended this man and he was acquitted of all charges. BBC R v JW (& 5 others) Successful prosecution of multi-defendant football hooligan case involving widespread public disorder. BBC R v TW Successful prosecution of a serious stranger kidnapping case involving an armed stranger kidnap of young children. George was subsequently instructed by the Crown to appear in the Court of Appeal and this case is now a leading authority of Sentences for Kidnapping. BBC R v VF This case involved an Albanian/Chechen criminal gang selling highly sophisticated cash-point scamming kits to other criminal gangs in Wales. It attracted nationwide publicity including the front page of the Times. BBC R v GT George was initially instructed in this extradition of this notorious Holocaust denier. The extradition was successfully opposed. BBC R v DS George was instructed in this case involving the ‘Gatwick shooter’ who was apprehended and Tasered by police as he wandered around Gatwick Airport brandishing a firearm. BBC R v JR George was instructed to defend a member of this notorious tie-up robbery gang that committed more than 12 robberies involving serious violence. BBC R v JB Serious historical sexual assaults in children’s home. Defendant received 20 years’ custody. BBC M v Circuit Court of Katowice (Poland) [2017] EWHC 2812 (Admin) Successful Extradition Appeal (A8) bailii MH v Court of Milan (Italy) [2017] EW Misc 20 Very High Profile First Instance Extradition Decision bailii C v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWHC 238 (Admin); [2007] Extradition L.R. 51 Extradition case involving Judicial Review of the Home Secretary bailii GP v Court of First Instance Brussels [2005] EWHC 915 (Admin) [2005] All ER 185 (Apr) Successful Extradition Appeal (s.2) bailii B v Belgium CO/197/2018 High Court appeal involving multi-million fraud allegation. Albania v HM 2018 Part 2 case involving Murder conviction and Articles 2, 3, & 6. C v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWHC 238 (Admin); [2007] Extradition L.R. 51 Extradition case involving Judicial Review of the Home Secretary. “An excellent advocate who cuts to the heart of the issue. He has a presence in court and superb client care skills.” Edward’s practice in the UK is predominately Criminal defence. He is regularly instructed to defend clients charged with serious offences including, armed robbery, murder, rape, large scale importation of drugs, fraud and serious violent offences. Edward is an accomplished advocate with a wealth of experience representing clients involved in complicated...Read more Edward’s practice in the UK is predominately Criminal defence. He is regularly instructed to defend clients charged with serious offences including, armed robbery, murder, rape, large scale importation of drugs, fraud and serious violent offences. Edward is an accomplished advocate with a wealth of experience representing clients involved in complicated and serious cases.He adopts a practical approach to case analyses and problem solving which makes him a “go to lawyer” and a formidable opponent in the court room. R v Kluxen Researched and drafted legal argument in a case that involved EU law and is cited as the leading authority on EU nationals and recommendations for deportation. R v Islam Researched and drafted successful grounds of appeal against conviction. Case involved identification evidence and the applicability of the Codes of PACE to civilians. R v NT Researched and drafted grounds of appeal which resulted in the Court of Appeal giving guidance on sentences for offences where knives used to cause serious and fatal injuries. R v Osundina Represented a defendant charged with the fraudulent evasion of VAT payable on importation of pharmaceutical goods. The fraud spanned the UK and Nigeria. R v Ekejah Represented a defendant charged with defrauding HMRC and the DWP. The value of the fraud was estimated to be in excess of one million pounds. Instructed as junior counsel. R v Cooper High profile multi-handed conspiracy to evade import duty on tobacco. The value of the evasion was estimated to be approximately two million pounds. R v Taiwo Large scale conspiracy involving forged passports and Home Office travel documents. At the time considered to be the largest find of counterfeit passports in the UK. Reported Cases (Ghana Bar) Representing an international digital media company, in an action against the Government of Ghana in connection with a dispute over termination for convenience clauses in a contract.Representing a major processor and exporter of tuna products, in a dispute over a distributorship agreement.Represented a major oil and gas exploration company, in a dispute concerning unlawful interference with contracts and inducing third parties to breach a contract.Representing a multi-national automotive corporation, in a dispute regarding product liability.Regularly advising a major soft drinks manufacturer, on issues of employment law. Maria is a highly regarded barrister who is well known for her meticulous preparation, fearless approach to each case and persuasive style in Court. She has strong legal skills, intelligent case planning and full commitment to each case she undertakes. She is an excellent communicator who holds the confidence of...Read more Maria is a highly regarded barrister who is well known for her meticulous preparation, fearless approach to each case and persuasive style in Court. She has strong legal skills, intelligent case planning and full commitment to each case she undertakes. She is an excellent communicator who holds the confidence of each client and the Court.Maria prosecutes and defends all cases of serious crime. She is an accredited grade 4 serious crime and sexual offences prosecutor for the CPS. Maria’s practice includes cases of homicide, manslaughter in the workplace, substantial violence, rape and other serious sexual offences (including historic sexual abuse), multi-handed drug conspiracies, international human trafficking rings, money laundering and multi-million-pound frauds. Maria also has experience prosecuting and defending regulatory crime, health and safety breaches by corporations, noise abatement notices by the local authority, breaches of High Court injunctions and a wide range of environmental offences. R v AH [2019] EWCA Crim 185 (Court of Appeal) Sentencing youths; appropriate discount to be applied on sentencing guidelines; manslaughter in Finsbury Park, London. R v CS [2018] Lewes Crown Court (Led junior) successful prosecution of a murder trial, where the defendant shot his wife and mother in law multiple times with a stolen rifle, before Mrs Justice McGowan; widely reported in the press. R v PB [2018] Stafford Crown Court (Led junior) successful prosecution of a murder trial, where the defendant stabbed his partner multiple times following a drug overdose. Successful advice to Treasury Counsel as unduly lenient sentence: [2018] 11 WLUK 19. R v SS [2018] Snaresbrook Crown Court (Leading a junior) defending a 17 handed large-scale drugs conspiracy. R v MM [2018] Inner London Crown Court Successful defence of historic rapes and sexual offences against a child; specialist cross examination of a vulnerable witness. R v PW [2016] EWCA Crim 745 (Court of Appeal) Sexual images on social media where the distributor was the maker and appeared in the indecent image; mens rea and strict liability. R v JM [2015] EWCA Crim 1928 (Court of Appeal) Abuse of process in sexual allegations from the 1950s; use of preparatory hearing; severance. R v JM [2015-2016] Barnstaple Crown Court (Led junior) ground-breaking prosecution of the (then) oldest man in the country for prolific sexual offences; unique use of special measures to accommodate the physical needs of the defendant. R v EP [2015] Newcastle County Court Defending a high-profile personal injury claim brought by a rape victim against a defendant outside the statutory limitation period and triggered by the defendant winning substantial sums in the National Lottery. R v RP [2015] Birmingham Crown Court (Led junior) Prosecuting gross negligence manslaughter and substantial breaches of the Health and Safety at Work Act before Mr Justice Popplewell. R v Waste4Fuel et al [2014] EWHC 2484 (QBD) Successful defence of contempt of court trial, breaches of environmental regulations and injunctions before Mr Justice Eady, widely reported in the press. “I would just like to say thank you for your help and assistance with regard the hearing on Monday. It has been an incredible strain for me over the past months being a LIP and your understanding of my position has helped me tremendously; the outcome of which I could not have asked any more.” 2017 Sumita was called to the Bar in 2001. She practices in the areas of crime and family law. Her practice in the area of family law encompasses the following:  Child arrangements (contact and residence); specific issue orders (name change, religion and schooling); adoption and special guardianship applications; domestic violence injunctions; financial...Read more Sumita was called to the Bar in 2001. She practices in the areas of crime and family law. Her practice in the area of family law encompasses the following:  Child arrangements (contact and residence); specific issue orders (name change, religion and schooling); adoption and special guardianship applications; domestic violence injunctions; financial matters and disputes and leave to remove from the jurisdiction.She is able to use her own experiences in understanding that clients in this arena are at their most vulnerable and therefore require counsel who is empathetic to their situation and can provide reassurance; her client care is exceptional and she has an ability to communicate the technical legal process to vulnerable clients. Sumita recognises that at whichever court or stage of the proceedings, the outcome for the client is significant. In addition to this her aim is to achieve the best outcome for the client in the most timeliest manner. She represents parties in all children proceedings, both care and private children law and also undertakes cases in financial remedy proceedings. She also has experience of acting on behalf of parents in care proceedings and recently represented the child in care proceedings, who had separate representation.As a result of Sumita’s criminal practice, she has particular experience in inter disciplinary cases, where there is a cross over between family law and crime, which provides for tough and effective advocacy.She has also provided a webinar lecture for the Lexis Nexis website on an update in family law 2017- a yearly roundup.Sumita s criminal practice encompasses all areas of serious crime, including murder (arguments on new law of joint enterprise) serious violent and sexual crimes and rape.The case of R v RH 2017, was an appeal from Oxford Crown Court where LJ Treacy gave sentencing guidance on cases of child abduction. In the reported case of R v Darlow, the Court of Appeal gave guidance on sentencing for cases of indecent exposure, where the Court commented upon ‘Miss Mahtab’s earnest and excellent submissions’. In her serious sexual offences practice, she has represented a serial rapist who was operating in East London, rapes and sexual assaults against minors, grooming cases, historical rapes and relationship rapes. She also has experience in proceedings involving young and vulnerable witnesses and has been involved in many s.28 hearings, and so has the necessary and vital  experience in cross examining vulnerable witness. She has had involvement in Operation Bullfinch (Oxford sexual grooming case).Sumita has been instructed on many multi hander drugs and fraud trials and has experience of dealing with the forensic analysis of scientific evidence and cell site analysis data which is always present in that arena. Due to her exceptional client care skills and ability to put clients at ease, whilst at the same time instilling confidence, she is particularly effective in dealing with vulnerable clients and has conducted finding of fact hearings upon a finding of unfitness to plead and has also represented defendants requiring an intermediary. She takes great care to ensure that each case is fully prepared and all legal arguments made in a timely manner, in fact in a recent rape case, following a  section 8 disclosure application being aggressively pursued, the Crown subsequently offered no evidence.She has also appeared at the Court of Appeal, including cases which have been reported in the law reports. Sumita undertakes all forms of private and public law children work and also accepts instructions in ancillary relief matters, having practised at all levels including the High Court. R v Noble Led junior on Murder at Oxford Crown Court. Issues as to the new law on joint enterprise, including lengthy and detailed arguments on hearsay and bad character. R v Avdullraj Section 18 GBH attack with hammer on the street. Not guilty to section 18 GBH. R v Shamout Threats to kill made by wife against husband during a prolonged incident with a knife. Not guilty. R v Paul Darlow Court of Appeal reported case law on sentencing for offences of exposure, where the Court commented upon ‘Miss Mahtab’s earnest and excellent submissions’. R v. Georgiev Led junior at Snaresbrook Crown Court where the defendant faced trial for a series of stranger rapes in the East End of London. R v Awan Rape and sexual activity with a child. Alleged grooming over a considerable period of time. Not guilty. R v Hussain Marital rape, involving issues of immigration, complainant’s capacity to consent and intermediaries. R v Singh Marital rape of 4 counts, involving issues of immigration. Upon section 8 disclosure applications being vigorously pursued, Crown reviewed the case and offered no evidence. R v Razak Led junior at Reading Crown Court in a multi-hander case involving conspiracy to supply large consignments of cannabis. R v Koxha Multi hander conspiracy to supply class A drugs and money laundering. R v Khan Multi hander conspiracy to import class A drugs, involved PII legal arguments. R v Ambrose Possession of firearm. Expert evidence on the issue of antique firearm. R v Hamzaalnatsha Child abduction by a parent. Legal argument regarding interpretation of defence available. R v Gouveia This was the reported case at Oxford Crown Court of the bogus MI5 agent who was jailed for conning his ex-girlfriend! R v Riasat Led junior at Birmingham Crown Court, involving a family alleged to have conspired together to launder the proceeds of the two brothers’ drug dealing. Sumita also practices in the areas of housing and landlord and tenant (both residential and commercial). She has extensive experience in possession hearings and also has experience in defending actions brought by social landlords.Her practice also comprises conducting county court trials from the small claims track to the multi track in areas ranging from RTA’ s to contractual disputes. Rajesh Pabary is an experienced practitioner who is regularly instructed to advise on and appear in a broad range of civil, criminal, white-collar criminal and immigration cases. Recognised as a resourceful negotiator and advocate. He has significant experience and success in the presentation of cases to juries and tribunals. He...Read more Rajesh Pabary is an experienced practitioner who is regularly instructed to advise on and appear in a broad range of civil, criminal, white-collar criminal and immigration cases. Recognised as a resourceful negotiator and advocate. He has significant experience and success in the presentation of cases to juries and tribunals.He regularly appears on behalf of the major prosecuting authorities and on behalf of leading defence solicitors in the crown court and appellate courts. He advises and prosecutes on behalf of Trading Standards departments, the Vehicle and Service Operator Agency, SERCO and the DWP throughout the United Kingdom. In regulatory work he has a wide range of experience in the civil courts and tribunals, and in judicial review.Former Co-ordinator of the Lecture Programme at Church Court Chambers [CPD accredited] (2002 to date). Providing lectures on specialist topics including the Enforcement of LGV PSC license infringements, Human Rights, 
Criminal Sentencing. Prosecuted on behalf of the Crown Prosecution ServiceSecured convictions against defendants committing fraud, serious violence and drugs 
offences.Noted as a leading Counsel in prosecutions of Trading Standards offences for Breach of 
Copyright, Counterfeit goods and Trademark infringements.Prosecuted on behalf of the National Probation Service and Prison Security Services for 
breaches of Community and Curfew Orders imposed by the Criminal Courts.Prosecuted benefit fraud cases on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions.Conducted complicated confiscation proceeding for Kent County Council.Prosecuted tachograph fraud cases on behalf of the Vehicle and Service Operator Agency. Defence Developed a substantial practice representing clients in all Courts in the United Kingdom.Trial experience includes Attempted Murder, Kidnap, Prison Riots, large scale Violent Disorder, serious 
Sexual Offences, Fraud, Robbery and Conspiracy to supply class A drugsImpressive record of appeals against conviction and sentence in the Criminal Court of AppealRecent achievements include the successful defence of a client who was accused of a £400 million VAT fraud. An armed robbery trial that involved several defendants tracking cash in transit vans, approaching the vans with weapons and making off with cash. I also represented a defendant charged with 5 others on an indictment containing two counts of violent disorder and s.18 wounding. He was successfully acquitted after a 2 month trial. Represented parent and grandparents in public law matters which have involved fact finding hearing relating to significant harm caused to children.Represented husbands and wives in financial relief cases.Represented parents in private law contact cases and cases involving applying for non-molestation orders and occupation orders. Resolved applications for political asylum, spouse and family visas and permanent settlement.Significant experience in cases involving Civil Rights and Human Rights abuses.Represented clients from an expansive list of countries in Immigration Appeals hearings. Regularly instructed on behalf of Trading Standards departments throughout the United Kingdom.Advised on civil complaints, breaches of consumer protection legislation and breach of contract.Successfully obtained enforcement orders against traders for infringements of domestic and European Community legislation.Advised and appeared on behalf of HMRC in forfeiture proceedings involving substantial sums.Advised and appeared on behalf of VOSA at public inquiries and on appeal from those inquiries with great success.Outstanding record of favourable verdicts and settlements. "Extremely effective – he maintains a concise, measured approach." Legal 500 2020, Ranked as a Leading Junior Yasin conducts all aspects of Criminal defence, White collar and fraud, International Appellate work, Regulatory and Sports Law both nationally and International, Commercial Law and many other areas. In fraud and financial regulation, there is an abundance of expertise in national and International complex fraud, money laundering, commercial fraud and business crime....Read more Yasin conducts all aspects of Criminal defence, White collar and fraud, International Appellate work, Regulatory and Sports Law both nationally and International, Commercial Law and many other areas.In fraud and financial regulation, there is an abundance of expertise in national and International complex fraud, money laundering, commercial fraud and business crime.In addition, the criminal defence work encompasses a CV full of work that includes murder and grave offences, sexual offences, human trafficking and human rights cases.Experienced in all aspects of Sports Law with a wide range of clients. This ranges from Sports Professionals, governing bodies (national and international), professional teams and clubs, agents, journalists and broadcasters. Appeared regularly before national and international courts and tribunals.Advisor and counsel to clients abroad in International Cases of MTIC, Carbon, Ponzi and other fraud cases including clients in Dubai and the Middle East, the US (‘million-dollar man’) and in Europe (‘Deutsche Bank’ fraud and other cases).Has been advising and dealing with regulatory work including representation of Dentists, Pharmacists and other Medical Professionals.Highly experienced in Inquests, Public Enquiries and Judicial Reviews as well as Civil Actions against the Police, highlight a practice that is multi-disciplinary and covering many aspects of Civil Work. Appears regularly before the Parole Board representing terrorists and those convicted of grave crimes.Reported Cases include, R v Salman Butt (the former Pakistan Test Cricket Team Captain in the spot-fixing case), R v Yasir Ali (human trafficking, rape and grooming), R v Patel (multi-million pound Bosch fraud), R v Hassan (double-murder), R v Uddin (honour-killing case) and R v Yousaf (Metropolitan Police Officer involved in human trafficking).For further information on Yasins Sport Law work please visit www.slam.global.Interests Pro Bono work for Newham Monitoring Project Trustee and Volunteer at Frenford Clubs for Young People Adviser to Gujarati Metropolitan Cricket League (GMCL) and Essex Association of Boys Clubs Publications Unexplained Wealth Orders: The ‘What, Where, When and How’ of the new Legislative Provisions“Image Rights” Exploitation, Investment or Protection for ‘Good Looks’?“Shamima Begum: UK Citizen, Terrorist, Isis Wife, ‘Groomed Schoolgirl’ Or None Of The Above?”“Tax Avoidance and Evasion? Legal or Illegal?”“Drones – The Good, The Bad And The Ugly”“The Crime (Overseas Production Order) Bill (‘The Bill’)”“Drugs, Slavery, Trafficking, Exploitation and Links to County Lines. What Can and Is Being Done By The Law?” R v BB and Others Operation Patos – Led Junior in a murder committed in Enfield linked with the DA and the GMG. A ‘cut-throat’ between all of the defendants. R v C and Others Operation Nunton – Led Junior in trial at Central Criminal Court following a murder in Romford linked with drugs and ‘County lines’. In the cut-throat proceedings, Mr Charles was acquitted of the grave charges. R v D and Others Operation Dynasty – Leading Junior in a tragic death in Leicester that was broadcast nationally where the defendant was charged with conspiracy to murder but found guilty of lesser offences resulting in a sentence of just over 8 years. R v OH and Others A brutal double-murder gang-killing in Leytonstone that was tried at the Central Criminal Court and involved a ‘cut-throat’ between two factions of defendants from the one gang. R v TU and Others Junior counsel in a nationally broadcast and publicised honour killing case at St. Albans Crown Court where the defendants were charged with murder and the new Section 5 DVCDA. R v YA and Others Junior counsel in a nationally broadcast trial of numerous counts of rape, human trafficking and grooming in Peterborough and surrounding areas. R v PK and Others Murder of a young medical graduate battered to death with a cricket bat in an alleged gang related fight in South London. R v SA Representation of the defendant tried and convicted in the Rachel Manning murder. R v KY and Others Representation of a Metropolitan Police officer charged with multiple rapes, human trafficking, sexual assaults and perverting the course of justice. R v IN Young defendant charged and tried of grooming and rape of a teenage girl in the north of England: a hung jury resulted in this politically sensitive case. R v HJ An 86-year old charged with a number of historical sexual offences of rape and sexual assault of children. R v U Cleric charged with multiple counts of rape and indecent assault upon young students. R v L Man accused of raping a prostitute and causing serious injuries to her body. R v P Man with serious mental health deficiencies accused of raping young children. R v W and Others Junior counsel in multi-million pound drugs conspiracy trial and confiscation proceedings at Kingston Crown Court. R v P and Others Junior counsel in a conspiracy involving theft of machinery involving BOSCH UK at Reading Crown Court. R v JW Charged with several other defendants with a conspiracy to steal spanning 18 months and across the South East of England involving 100’s of offences. R v GJ Representation before the Recorder of Southwark where an old lady was killed via the act of death by careless driving. R v SVD Representation of a man charged in conspiracies involving kidnapping, blackmail, Section 18 offences and drugs supply at the Central Criminal Court. R v TH Air-rage case, where the accused was arrested and charged following efforts to force open the plane doors and storm the flight deck. R v SX A drugs conspiracy to supply Class A drugs in the Watford and surrounding areas from a gang alleged to have made millions of pounds from their actions. R v SM Tried for conspiracy to supply Class A at the Central Criminal Court, the defendants were alleged to be part of a gang who had conspired to Supply Class A across London. R v E Successful representation of a man charged with section 18 offences and on a life licence. R v B Armed Robbery conspiracy on an armoured vehicle by a prominent gang in the Midlands. R v VP Representation of a man charged with armed robbery and featured on the BBC’s ‘Crimewatch’ programme. R v NP and others Operation Osmoregulation – Led Junior in terrorism trial as the Old Bailey where the defendant was acquitted of all terrorism charges. The trial involving young children, schools and prayer classes was publicised nationally R v NC Arrested on Terrorism matters and subsequently tried on possession of explosive substances and improvised explosive devices, the Attorney General ordered for the matter to be dropped following lengthy legal arguments and submissions by the defence. R V LA Representation of leading client charged with terrorism and drug related offences in the United Kingdom and the United States. R v AM Parole Board Hearing, representing client convicted of terrorism offences. R v OB Representation of prisoner before Parole Board hearing convicted of terrorism offences and recalled to prison. R v G and Others Operation Ensete and Operation Amaryllis – Leading Counsel in an International multi-million pound fraud and money-laundering case where Mr. Gidde was deemed to be the leading criminal but received a lesser sentence then all other defendants. R v IK and Others Operation Tarlac – Leading counsel for the main defendant in this multi-million pound International fraud to be tried in October 2016 in a conspiracy that resulted in world-wide money-laundering R v A and Others Representation of the ‘second in command’ in the £130 million fraud reported throughout the Press. R v AH and Others Operation Cave II – A fraud involving the smuggling and importation of tobacco, cigarettes and alcohol worth millions of pounds. Hamdi walked free from the court of the conspiracy charges. R v SP Operation Fardel – An International Fraud where the accusation was was that the defendant defrauded many victims and laundered the proceeds worldwide. R v A and Others Operation Susomo – Junior Counsel in a fraud conspiracy involving Forex Exchanges in and around London with International organistaions in the Middle East, Asia and Far East. R v SPP and Others Operation Perhaps – Representing one of the lead defendants in a mortgage conspiracy and money laundering case at Birmingham Crown Court involving millions of pounds. R v LN and Others Operation Jibe – Tried at the Central Criminal Court and accused of assisting the main defendant in a mortgage fraud involving numerous financial institutions and banks amounting to millions of pounds R v MY and Others Operation Enderby – Junior counsel in a multi-million pound fraud and money-laundering case at the Central Criminal Court where the SFO offered No Evidence after 19 days of a trial. R v SB and Others In this ‘spot-fixing case’ which was broadcast all over the world, was representing the Pakistan Cricket Team Captain in charges of conspiring to cheat and obtain financial advantage at Southwark Crown Court R v SM and Others ‘Bollywood Film Fraud’: a conspiracy to cheat HMRC by claiming rebates and VAT on Bollywood films that were never produced; one of the first film frauds to be tried in the UK, where HMRC lost millions of pounds. R v ZI Charged with conspiracies regarding Money-laundering, VAT and phone frauds following multi-national investigations and charged with a number of International defendants. R V MP Held at Southwark Crown Court, the first trial under the Bribery Act 2010, in conspiracies linked to bribes taken by an employee of HMCTS. R v NP Representation of defendant charged with a multi-million pound mortgage fraud. R v MR Client charged with various fraud and copyright offences and linked to £63 million HMRC Fraud. R v JS Conspiracies linked to Immigration fraud offences, false passports and documentation, tax evasion and benefit fraud on an International scale R v SD Heard at Southwark Crown Court, a conspiracy where the banking fraud involved employees of the bank being accused of withdrawing savings of clients who were deceased and transferring the money to international accounts abroad. R v SJ Benefit fraud involving hundreds of thousands of pounds and multiple fraud identities around Maternity Benefits, Child Tax Credits, Child benefits and other benefits by the defendant on behalf of persons residing abroad. R v MM Charged with several other defendants on a variety of fraud conspiracies associated with letting businesses and the letting of properties and money laundering offences. R v AM A fraud committed against TFL totalling hundreds of thousands of pounds by using the refund scheme on Oyster cards and electronic refunds. R v RC Representation of one of the UK’s leading Aston-Martin dealers accused of defrauding Williams (F1) and causing them huge financial losses. R v S Fraud case involving laundering of money and proceeds through the ‘Havalla’ method. R v AAS Multi-handed social security fraud involving 6 defendants and housing, council, social security and mortgage fraud. R v A A Judicial Review of the Parole Board and Prison Service regarding the recall and lack of education and training to a recalled prisoner. R v A A Judicial Review of detention of a foreign national held in custody despite the expiry of his custodial term. R v W Judicial Review of a prisoner incarcerated beyond his minimum time tariff due to the lack of courses in the Prison Establishment. R v S Various Human Rights arguments for a defendant prosecuted under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2003, for protesting outside Parliament and other protesting activities. R v OB Judicial Review of the rights to privacy and family life of a defendant whose personal and family details were being broadcasted and reported daily through the national press. R v M Representation of Sri Lankan Tamils, protesting about the selling of arms to the Sri Lankan government and the subsequent killing of Tamils. R v M and Others Defendants charged with violent disorder offences and riot in Burnley and Oldham in 2001 and whose defence was defence of the community from Far Right racists. R v AM Parole Board hearing, representing client convicted of terrorism offences. R v OB Representing a prisoner before the Parole Board, convicted of terrorism offences and who was recalled for breaching licence conditions. R v A Representation of foreign nationals in parole proceedings who were sentenced to extended sentences. Adrian Longley Reported Inquest of a prisoner whose suicide was partially blamed on the Prison authorities who removed his suicide watch to facilitate his transfer from one prison to another. Andrew Pountley Death of a prisoner and Rule 39 order in relation to the availability of defibrillator’s in prison establishment. Andrew Palmer Inquest that ordered the updating and minimal requirements of first aid equipment in prison establishment. Prosecution v KSK Tried in Frankfurt, advised and represented the client charged as one of the leaders of a conspiracy involving a number of defendants and forming a multi-million Euros MTIC and VAT Fraud. Prosecution v SB Carbon Credit Fraud and Phone Fraud charges and allegation against a defendant in Munich involving tax evasion of over 12 million Euros. Prosecution v SA Dubbed the ‘Million dollar man’, representation included the fighting of his extradition from the USA to Europe and then the defence in various charges of VAT Fraud, Carbon Credit Fraud, Money Laundering and other offences totalling over 100 million Euros and many companies. Prosecution V IAP Charges varying from MTIC and Carbon Credit Fraud and also tax evasion and linked to one of the biggest Carbon Credit Frauds in Frankfurt. Prosecution v AV MTIC Fraud matters covering a whole European Network and specifically linked with emissions fraud in Poland Worked for Reprieve 2003/2004 to today in representing inmates on Death Row and facing the Death penalty in Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi and Florida. R v SB Extradition Proceedings sought by GDR: defence of Extradition on Article 8 Human Rights Grounds and also Legal Submissions on Article 2 Grounds. R v KSK Involving a warrant issued by the GDR and arguments against extradition of client accused of being the ‘mastermind’ behind a multi-million-pound VAT Fraud. Defence based upon Article 8 of the ECHR and the validity of the arrest warrant. R v RK Extradition proceedings relating to various Category 2 states demanding extradition of a defendant charged with grave crimes. R v IP Extradition was requested by the GDR following the issuing of an EAW in relation to fraud allegations. Human Rights defences were submitted and argued all the way to the High Court. R v B Application by Turkish state to have Kurdish refugees extradited: Human Rights based opposition led to the application being refused. ICC v SB Representation of the Former Pakistan Cricket Captain at the International Cricket Council Tribunal Hearing in Doha, Qatar, and at the Appeal at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), in Lausanne. BCB v MA Representation in proceedings before CAS and in hearings before an Independent Tribunal in Bangladesh on offences of match-fixing in the BCB with evidence of fixing in test matches and One-Day Internationals. WPBSA Tribunal Part of Tribunal Team that heard the cases and Hearings of Cao Yupeng and Yu Delu before the WPBSA Board. England Cricketers Representation of International cricketers in defamation matters arising out of match-fixing allegations and Al-Jazeera Documentary. ITF v JM Representation of International Tennis Star in Appeal Proceedings before CAS. BCB v DS English cricketer represented in proceedings of numerous individuals of various fixing offences in the Bangladesh Premier League. ECB v Mervyn Westfield Successful Appeal of a young English cricketer before the EWCB Independent Tribunal Appeal and representation in other hearings and cases. ECB v MW Successful Appeal of a young English cricketer before the EWCB Independent Tribunal Appeal. CSA v GB Advising of International Cricketer charged with match-fixing offences. ICC v RB Representation of an International cricketer investigated by the ICC for Breaching the Code on corruption. ICC v OS Representation of an International cricketer investigated by the ICC for match-fixing. WWA v OA Successful representation of wrestler charged with offences linked to steroids and enhancement drugs. LTA v S Dispute between the Lawn Tennis Association and a young black tennis player: instructed by the CAS to represent Mr Stoute. MCC Disciplinary Hearings Tribunal Member for various offences committed by members of the MCC. Essex FA v Bari FC Representation of Football Club and individual players charged by the FA. International Cricketers Contractual negotiations on behalf of International cricketers. Dhaka Gladiators Advising the Franchise Team, its owners and management body in relation to a ban imposed by the BPL and the ICC. Advising Players and Franchise sides on player contracts, Image Rights and terms and conditions of League and Franchise. ESPN Contractual Negotiations and Agreements on behalf of International Sportsmen with Worldwide Sporting Broadcaster. Playing Contracts Contractual Negotiations with National Sporting Teams for player contracts, Image Rights, Endorsements, bonuses and more. Image Rights Advising International Sportsmen and Women on Image Rights companies, contracts, clauses, structures and benefits in a variety of sports Committee Member and Advisor to Membership and General Purposes Committee Premier League Speaking at Premier League clubs to players and officials on contracts, terms, conditions, wages and various legal duties and rights within contractsAs well as representation, advice has been provided to Sports Leagues Committees, teams and individuals in relation to a plethora of subjects including drugs and misconduct issuesSpeaker at International Sports law conferences involving topics such as corruption, drugs use, betting and corporate governanceAdviser and trainer at Professional sports clubs and bodies including rugby, cricket, football and martial arts.Yasin Patel has also been involved in various aspects of Sports Law in advising, negotiating and drafting contracts for professional sportsmen with media companies for commentary, commercials and advertising and media workHe has been instructed to represent International Sportsmen in their contractual negotiations as well as drafting of their professional playing contractsHe is advising International Sports franchises on a variety of legal matters including good governance, contracts, image rights and media contractsFurthermore he is advising and representing International Sports personnel in governing body disciplinary issues and allegations GDC v R Representation of a dentist alleged to have caused permanent damage to a patient in relation to treatment of sporting injuries. ICSL v X Representation of professional students excluded from the institution and excluded from legal societies due to cheating. GPhC v P A pharmacist accused of breaching GPC rules in relation to ethics, standards and professional code for prescriptions. Guy has a commanding presence in the courtroom which he uses to good effect.  His imposing figure stems from former careers as a senior police officer and super heavyweight amateur boxing champion. Guy has significant experience in the successful defence of trials for robbery, offences against the person and public...Read more Guy has a commanding presence in the courtroom which he uses to good effect.  His imposing figure stems from former careers as a senior police officer and super heavyweight amateur boxing champion.Guy has significant experience in the successful defence of trials for robbery, offences against the person and public order, sexual offences, drug trafficking and POCA applications, fraud, and immigration related cases. In addition he has undertaken police disciplinary hearings and courts martial. Guy appears in courts and tribunals at every level.He has a keen interest in sports law, the regulation and governance of sport, and the interaction between sport and the criminal law.AchievementsGuy was decorated with the Queen’s Police Medal for distinguished service in 2004.During his 28 years of police service, he was the holder of a Chief Constable’s Commendation.Boxing:He was formerly European Amateur Super Heavyweight Champion, Chief Coach to the British  Amateur Boxing Federation Team at the Police Amateur Boxing World Championships in Calgary.1997 World Championship Gold Medal winner for the Super Heavyweight division at San Jose1985 and a Gold Medal Winner in the same category at the Arizona, 1984 and Sydney, 1988 P.E.S. Olympiads. “Simply the best; a barrister with depth of knowledge, sharp intellect, and able to think outside the box. Fearless and presents every argument with confidence, reassuring, and clients could not ask for more.” Cosmas Dikeocha, Solicitor Mohammed has mixed criminal and personal injury practice. He regularly appears as a specialist defence advocate in the Crown Court and Magistrates Court, and on personal injury matters in the County Court and High Court. Mohammed is hard-working, analytical, thorough and fearless in court. On a practical level, Mohammed has an approach which is empathetic...Read more Mohammed has mixed criminal and personal injury practice. He regularly appears as a specialist defence advocate in the Crown Court and Magistrates Court, and on personal injury matters in the County Court and High Court.Mohammed is hard-working, analytical, thorough and fearless in court. On a practical level, Mohammed has an approach which is empathetic to the clients needs, and he is conscious that often it is the defendant s family who suffer along with the defendant. Mohammed prepares thoroughly for cases, whether they are Magistrates trials or lengthy Crown Court trials.Mohammed has a broad defence practice, encompassing the breadth of criminal and regulatory offences. He is known for his representation of clients organised accused of crimes involving drugs and organised crime networks facilitating the importation and onward distribution of drugs and firearms.Mohammed understands that defendants needs can be wider than just representation in court whilst trials are in progress; he is able to give advice relevant to these issues.Mohammed also specialises in representing defendants involved in satellite crimes associated with drug supply, such as burglary, thefts, credit card fraud and money laundering.Outside of court, clients may find Mohammed relaxed and approachable, willing to travel to conferences across the country. He is good-humoured and patient when dealing with clients, both professional and lay outside of court.In the BBC documentary Hell in a Bottle , Mohammed provided some insight as to the rise, cause and judicial approach to acid attacks across the United Kingdom. R v T - 2019 Central Criminal Court Junior Counsel representing a Defendant allegedly involved in Perverting the Course of Justice after an alleged 'gangland' murder. R v H - 2018, 2019 Snaresbrook Crown Court Operation Deghvard. Junior Counsel during a trial involving 11 Defendants charged with a Conspiracy to Commit Grievous Bodily Harm. The case centred around historical and ongoing gang rivalries and involved the analysis of complex GPS vehicle data and phone data. R v B and Otrs - 2019 Southwark Crown Court Operation Hipsometer, Leading Counsel in a complex multi layered trial involving the specialised theft and dismantling of over 200 vehicles valued in total at over £1 million. The Defendant was alleged to have been a significant and central element to the ringing and concealment of vehicle identities and parts along with their onward sale and concealment as well as arranging for the vehicles to be moved to and from across the United Kingdom. R v I and Otrs - 2017 Southwark Crown Court Leading Andrew Kerr in a lengthy multi-handed trial involved in the organised theft of vehicles valued in the region of £1.2 million. Defendants used cloned car keys, false number plates, forged vehicle documentation, surveillance of targets and hi-tech computer technology to steal luxury vehicles. The case was reported in the Daily Mail. R v A A and Otrs - 2017, Reading Crown Court Multi-handed violent fight between gangs of boys resulting in a stabbing. Client was acquitted after a successful submission of no case to answer surrounding issues of identification and participation. R v F - April 2016 Successful reduction in sentence involving submissions on the correct approach to written bases of pleas, offender mitigation and credit by crown court judges. R v P - April 2016 Successful appeal against the sentence of Truro Crown Court's incorrect imposition of an indeterminate life sentence when the correct sentence should have been a determinate sentence. As reported on ITV. DWP v A D Selling of fake Viagra and associated confiscation proceedings, reported in The Sun. R v D T and Otrs Murder of Olu Olagbaju in Shadans nightclub December 2006, reported in the Evening Standard.
 R v A & A Student loan fraud valued at £175,000 and ongoing confiscation proceedings. R v S Dealing of drugs to undercover officers and test purchase officers in Lewes over a two-year period. DWP v L Benefit fraud by a young mother over a two-year period totaling £3,000 DWP v B L Council tax and housing benefit fraud by an elderly lady over a 20-year period. R v D and Otrs 2012 (Junior Counsel) Largest ever conspiracy to produce cannabis. R v M - 17th May 2013, Luton Crown Court High-profile acquittal in a wilful neglect case involving an Alzheimer’s patient left overnight in a Council bus, reported in The Mirror. R v P - 2014 Harrow Crown Court Acquittal of delivery driver allegedly involved in the importation of heroin in rice sacks from India. R v A - 2014 Bristol Crown Court Acquittal after a seven-week trial of a clearing agent alleged to have been the central figure in a network of importations of drugs into the West and South East of England. Akhtar v Linford Christie - 2014 Personal injury claim arising out a road traffic accident valued at £1 million approx, as reported in The Guardian. Homes for Haringey v Barbara and Piper Fari [2013] EWHC 3477 (QB) and [2013] EWHC 3623 (QB) in the High Court (QBD) Contempt of court case, where the court imposed a custodial sentence on both a wife and husband for outrageously exaggerating the wife's personal injury claims. The case attracted wide media attention, including in the Evening Standard, and it remains one of the few cases of its kind. “He is a seriously good jury advocate who is always in demand and his friendly but no nonsense approach makes him extremely popular with clients. His attention to detail and meticulous preparation serve him extremely well in complex cases.” Paul is a London based barrister specialising in serious crime with a particular interest in cases involving firearms, ballistic evidence and scientific analysis and also fraud cases involving ‘real’ property.  He is also frequently requested in complex cases of family law, especially in cases with a mental health dimension.  His...Read more Paul is a London based barrister specialising in serious crime with a particular interest in cases involving firearms, ballistic evidence and scientific analysis and also fraud cases involving ‘real’ property.  He is also frequently requested in complex cases of family law, especially in cases with a mental health dimension.  His knowledge of mobile phone data and cell site analysis has proved invaluable in a number of cases.Areas of WorkMurder attempted murder; rape sexual offences; drugs; firearms; serious violence; vulnerable witness cases psychiatric issues; fraud; complex family law.  Accredited by the Bar Council to undertake ‘Direct Access’ work. R v J F 14 year old – possession of ‘Mach 10’ machine gun and a large quantity of ammunition. R v F N Southwark Crown Court – Fraud – Large scale Internet & credit card fraud. Snaresbrook Crown Court – in excess of one hundred dwelling burglaries. Mizan enjoys a broad practice at the Bar which includes Family, Sharia (Islamic Law), Crime and Commercial litigation. He is a CEDR Accredited Mediator. Mizan has expertise in all areas of family law including Islamic Law (Sharia Law); matrimonial finance and related proceedings; public law children work; private law, contested...Read more Mizan enjoys a broad practice at the Bar which includes Family, Sharia (Islamic Law), Crime and Commercial litigation. He is a CEDR Accredited Mediator.Mizan has expertise in all areas of family law including Islamic Law (Sharia Law); matrimonial finance and related proceedings; public law children work; private law, contested contact and residence disputes; and non-molestation injunction proceedings involving domestic violence. Mizan has experience of obtaining mirror orders in the Middle East, and has knowledge of family rights within Islamic law, as well as rights conferred via Islamic Nikkah (marriage) contracts.Between 2011 and 2014, Mizan was Legal Assistant to [then] commercial barrister Robin Knowles CBE QC, as of October 2014 the Hon Mr Justice Knowles CBE. This role has allowed Mizan to gain a wealth of experience within the environment of contract law, bankruptcy and corporate insolvency and reconstruction, mediation, arbitration, commercial litigation and company law.Mizan assisted with legal research on various aspects of counsel’s practice and with the encouragement and development of Pro Bono work nationally and internationally.Mizan gained commercial trial experience, equivalent to that of a second junior in major cases. Examples include: (a) He assisted counsel in the case of New Cap RE v AE Grant, which went to the Supreme Court of England and Wales. A landmark case of 2012, the question for the Supreme Court was when enforcement of a foreign judgment may be effected at common law, or under the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1933 or through the Insolvency Act 1986, s 426. (b) Mizan also assisted on a contract and partnership trial in the Chancery Division of the High Court; and (c) He assisted with a Commercial Court trial (with experts) concerning the validity of a multinational restructuring.Mizan also assisted with two Civil Justice Council initiatives: A Response on behalf of the Civil Justice Council to the “Draft Defamation Bill” Consultation; and the Civil Justice Council Report (and following work) on “Access to Justice for Litigants in Person”.A recent client quoted:“Mizan was an invaluable asset to my case. He discussed with me very difficult matters in a friendly and approachable way with great explanation to ensure I fully understood the situation. Above all else his manner is natural and  likeable and he has integrity, so whilst it is never a great day in court he carries you through it smoothly and keeps your spirits high. On the day Mizan delivered a better result than I could have expected”Pro BonoMizan has a strong commitment to pro bono and has been involved in the development of projects at local and international level.Jan 2006- date: Pro Bono in the LMC (PBLMC). (Founder and Director)London Muslim Centre (LMC), Whitechapel Road, London E1 1JXAt PBLMC, Mizan had led the arrangement of a number of seminal speeches and seminars:– Organised the trip to London and keynote speech of the Chief Justice of Rwanda entitled “Rwanda, Past Present and Future” (2013)– A conference co-organised with Oxfam on the “United World” (2012)– “Evolving World: international law” speech by ICJ President H.E Hisashi Owada (2012)– “Forced Marriage, Law, Religion and Practice” with Sir Mark Potter, then President of the Family Division of the High Court ) and Sir James Munby, current President of the Family Division (2010)– Lord Chief Justice (Lord Phillips) unique keynote speech on “Equality in Justice” (2008)– 2013 to date, Advisor to the Pro Bono Project in the British Virgin IslandsInternationalQatar International Court and Dispute Resolution Centre, (DOHA)Mizan has a detailed understanding of the QICDRC and is able to both represent clients in the QICDRC and advise on the procedure applicable. Publications and Lectures Qatar Law Forum, Junior Lawyers session, (Joint Chair) 2012Australian Biennial Access to Justice Conference 2009Risk Advisory Council 2009Bar Conference (England & Wales) 2008The Pro Bono Conference 20082007 Called to the Bar of England & Wales by the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple.2007 Bar Vocational Course, The College of Law, London.2006 LLB (Hons) Law, The School of Oriental & African Studies, University of London.In addition to the ‘black letter subjects’ Mizan studied Islamic Law. He also undertook an independent study project on the Recognition of Muslim Family Law within the Scope of the English Divorce Law.The project required an interview with Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss GBE the former President of the Family Division.1994 Financial Services and their Regulations parts 1/2/ and 3. SFA Securities Representative.COURSES2013 Advanced International Advocacy Course at Keble College (August 2013), 1994 Government Debt Krystelle enjoys a mixed practice in all aspects of crime and immigration. She prides herself on being approachable and providing a sensitive touch to difficult matters often involving vulnerable individuals. Her work in the field of criminal law covers a wide spectrum of matters including fraud, knife crime, drug and...Read more Krystelle enjoys a mixed practice in all aspects of crime and immigration. She prides herself on being approachable and providing a sensitive touch to difficult matters often involving vulnerable individuals.Her work in the field of criminal law covers a wide spectrum of matters including fraud, knife crime, drug and serious assault matters. Krystelle has been led in a high-profile murder trial involving youth defendants, but is experienced in these matters in her own right. She is regularly instructed in respect of confiscation and POCA matters, both in the drafting and preparation of documents and representation at contested hearings. Krystelle also undertakes Parole Board and prison disciplinary hearings.Krystelle regularly appears before the First Tier and Upper Tier Immigration Tribunals in respect of all immigration matters such as asylum, EEA, PBS, deportation and Human Rights cases. She is experienced in dealing with individuals who have experienced torture or who are the victims of human trafficking. She prides herself on her thorough preparation of a case and is happy to deal with appeals arising from any country of origin. Krystelle has particular experience in dealing with Sri Lankan asylum claims and Albanian “blood feud” matters. In the High Court, Krystelle has experience of judicial review matters and had previously successfully obtained the removal of individuals from the Detained Fast Track, including injunctions to prevent immigration decisions being issued.Krystelle lectures to other professionals on current topics in immigration and crime. As a member of the pupillage committee she strives to achieve excellence in advocacy and sits as an assessor for Chamber’s pupils. Publications and Lectures Where have all the appeal rights gone? – Overview of new changes to immigration rules R v S and others (Central Criminal Court) Defence junior in a multi-handed high profile murder trial involving youth defendants and anonymous witnesses. R v C & P (Plymouth Crown Court) Prosecution counsel for the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission. Successful prosecution of two CMEC employees involving fraudulent misrepresentations made to reduce financial liability. Drafted initial charging decisions and indictment prior to conducting all hearings. R v E (Woolwich Crown Court) Prosecution counsel acting on behalf of the NHS. Successful prosecution of a foreign doctor who had failed to declare previous convictions when obtaining a visa and work in the UK. R v A & A (Blackfriars Crown Court) Successfully defended two-handed case where defendants were charged with possession of cannabis with intent to supply. In the matter of M v SSHD Successful in securing the removal of the applicant from the Detained Fast Track. K v SSHD Successful in obtaining asylum on the basis of involvement in an Albanian blood feud. T v SSHD Successful in obtaining asylum on the basis of risk of arrest if returned to Sri Lanka. Patrick hails from Gibraltar. He was called to the bar in England and Wales and in Gibraltar 2007 and is a member of the Honourable Society of the Inner Temple. His workload is predominately criminal defence. Patrick accepts instructions in all areas of criminal law and has also acted on...Read more Patrick hails from Gibraltar. He was called to the bar in England and Wales and in Gibraltar 2007 and is a member of the Honourable Society of the Inner Temple. His workload is predominately criminal defence. Patrick accepts instructions in all areas of criminal law and has also acted on behalf of construction companies in health and safety matters. Patrick is the Honorary Consul for Italy in Gibraltar, a member of the Royal Gibraltar Yacht Club and Honourable Artillery Company. R v Celecia [Supreme Court of Gibraltar] Attempted Murder. It took a 7 to 2 majority to convict. R v L [Gibraltar Supreme Court] Rape, two counts. One count withdrawn following half-time submission. Second count unanimous not guilty verdict. Regina v A and another [Gibraltar Supreme Court] Defendant was 14 at the time of the offence. Secured not guilty verdict in an allegation of robbery involving an imitation gun. X v Regina [Gibraltar Court of Appeal] Sexual assault of a child under the age of 13. The defendant was 17 years old at the time of the offence the defendant suffers from a complex disorder involving autism spectrum condition and ADHD. Sentence of 2 years’ imprisonment quashed and substituted with a 3 year Community Order. R v Smith and others [Gibraltar Supreme Court] Fraud. Ponzi scheme. Not guilty verdicts following half time submissions. Simon is a criminal law specialist with a busy practice in London and the South East. Simon prosecutes and defends in the Crown Court. He is currently a Level 2 CPS Advocate. Simon also undertakes regulatory and other work. He maintains a strong commitment to being friendly, down-to-earth and realistic...Read more Simon is a criminal law specialist with a busy practice in London and the South East. Simon prosecutes and defends in the Crown Court. He is currently a Level 2 CPS Advocate. Simon also undertakes regulatory and other work. He maintains a strong commitment to being friendly, down-to-earth and realistic in his advice. Prior to coming to the Bar, Simon taught law for two years at a private university in Hamburg, as well as working for a firm of solicitors in a regulatory capacity, on instructions from the SRA.Criminal LawRecent cases have involved conspiracy to blackmail, armed robbery, breaches of ancillary orders, affray, possession of Class A and B drugs with intent to supply, fraud with a value in excess of £120k, witness intimidation, threats to kill, burglary and GBH.Simon has extensive experience of conducting confiscation proceedings.Simon often acts for vulnerable people with behavioral problems, learning difficulties and mental health issues. He prides himself on being able to make proceedings intelligible, straightforward and as painless as possible for his lay clients.Simon has defended clients in serious Youth Court matters and has experience of large-scale joint enterprise violence, sexual assaults, robberies and Operation Withern cases involving burglaries committed during the London Riots. Simon has defended young people in cases across the full spectrum of Youth Court work, although now primarily focuses on Certificate for Counsel cases.Simon regularly undertakes appellate work, including appeals against conviction and sentence. Simon has successfully appealed to the Court of Appeal.Business CrimeSimon has extensive fraud experience, both prosecuting and defending. He has dealt with offences well in excess of £100k.Simon has been extensively instructed by the Serious Fraud Office and the DWP to deal with the prosecution of large-scale fraud, some of which has been valued in excess of £100 Million.RegulatorySimon undertakes cases involving the full range of road traffic, dangerous dog and health regulations matters.CivilSimon has accepted instructions from the Department of Health for civil drafting. Mazharul specialises in the fields of immigration, nationality and asylum law. His practice encompasses the full spectrum of appeal and judicial review work. He has a particular interest in right of abode, citizenship, family and private life cases. Prior to joining chambers in 2019, Mazharul was as a solicitor-advocate specialising...Read more Mazharul specialises in the fields of immigration, nationality and asylum law. His practice encompasses the full spectrum of appeal and judicial review work. He has a particular interest in right of abode, citizenship, family and private life cases.Prior to joining chambers in 2019, Mazharul was as a solicitor-advocate specialising in immigration, nationality and asylum law with an extensive advocacy and drafting practice. YM v SSHD C7/2016/3644 Secured permission on the papers to appeal to the Court of Appeal. The case concerned the interpretation of paragraph 245ZX(ha) of the Immigration Rules. Appeal allowed by consent. R (on the application of NB & Ors) v The Upper Tribunal (IAC) CO/4056/2015 Secured permission on the papers in a ‘Cart’ judicial review. The case concerned paragraph A280(f) and paragraph 301 of the Immigration Rules. “...He has great courtroom style & is aware of the scrupulous attention he gives to preparation, in addition to the effort he commits to the actual hearing.” The SSHD commented “The commendation received was also highly complementary about his advocacy style. I have personally observed him on a number of occasions & would describe his advocacy as calm, professional, proportionate & measured. He is very well aware of ethical standards & he demonstrated his awareness of disclosure by challenging me on that very issue.” The Secretary of State for Home Department on Asylum and Immigration Judge “It is the first time I have worked with Islam Khan, he was very helpful, thorough, and professional given the last minute instructions. He was able to get the result we wanted, and for that I am hugely appreciative. I look forward to working with him again.” Ainsley Harris Solicitors - Solicitors and Commissioners for Oaths & Higher Court Advocates Islam Khan started working from a very young age in various respective fields to hold and support his family together; he came to the Bar with life experience with a varied career background from becoming a chef to owning my own catering businesses and working as a host at the...Read more Islam Khan started working from a very young age in various respective fields to hold and support his family together; he came to the Bar with life experience with a varied career background from becoming a chef to owning my own catering businesses and working as a host at the Millennium Dome.Islam Studied law as a mature student whilst working full time as a civil servant in various departments of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. This included the Human Rights Policy Department, UK-visas, Consular and heading the Benefits, Pay and Policy section of HR. He also served overseas as an Entry Clearance Officer in Lagos, Nigeria.Islams main practice is defending in serious crime. In particular, Conspiracy related crime, all Proceeds of Crime, Fraud, Drugs and Immigration related criminal fraud. He is also often instructed on serious violence including murder and manslaughter and gang violence. Islam is instructed on appeals against sentence and conviction regularly.Islam is also instructed by individuals who often find themselves in disputes with the GMC, NMC, SRA, BSB and the UK Charities commission. He is instructed by a number or organisations across the country in relation to HR policy and regulatory matters including charity commission and constitutional disputes in charitable institutions.Islam is an expert in appeals on Asylum, Trafficking, Deportation and Urgent removal hearings (including out of hours injunction) and bail hearings with many years of experience. He was involved in the Court of Appeal case of Quila researching on points of law for Bibi and others challenging the UK government’s age bar policy on overseas marriages that lead to striking down legislation.Whilst sitting on a number of panels in Tower Hamlets he advises a number of charitable organisations across the country and has developed an array of knowledge in the area of charitable organisations and the legal implications. Notably, he was involved in engaging various stakeholders to diffuse the Shajalal mosque fiasco in Tower Hamlets that was widely reported. He has been legal advisor to the Council of Mosques, the Stifford Centre in Tower Hamlets and has worked at Bail for Immigration Detainees, Fair Trials International, Hackney Law Centre and was an active mediator for Tower Hamlets Mediation Services.Islam has a keen developing interest in probate/administrative of estates law. He obtained above and beyond a first class in this topic during his Academic studies leading my personal tutor commenting “I am professionally pleased and delighted to give these marks for this topic”. He often draft Islamic Wills for members of the community free of charge, subject to a donation to a charitable cause and have been advising and instructed on probate matters. Published Articles The Notary of England and Wales, American Bar Association’s Section of International Law, Europe Committee - Europe Update (Newsletter), Issue 3, February 2013Comparative Judicial Supremacy, issue 6, October 2012 – www.dictumlawmagazine.comInternational Law and The legality of the Flotilla raid by Israel, Islamic Digest;Indirect discrimination by raising the marriage age rule to 21, New Law Journal;Religious implications for Hindu pyres in the UK (Ghai and Others);FGM: “an Islamic practice or modern fashion;Mediation in practice; Court of Appeal v Quila and Ors Challenging the UK age bar to overseas marriage. Court of Appeal v BH (Ghana) Challenging that it is contrary to fair trial rights to allow the SSHD to adduce evidence on its own volition without challenge. Court of Appeal v ST (Gambia) Challenging the SSHD that the rule on intention to live together and subsisting marriage should apply at the same time and not separately. High Court (Admin) v SH (Mubin) Challenging the MOJ’s inefficient and incompetent new interpreting services that denies access to justice and develop a case law guidance given the severe civil war in Bangladesh. Liam has a mixed common law practice, with an emphasis on criminal defence and immigration. Liam is instructed across a broad range of practice areas and is willing to undertake instructions in other areas. Liam has a reputation for strong advocacy skills coupled with a sharp and analytical mind applied...Read more Liam has a mixed common law practice, with an emphasis on criminal defence and immigration. Liam is instructed across a broad range of practice areas and is willing to undertake instructions in other areas. Liam has a reputation for strong advocacy skills coupled with a sharp and analytical mind applied to each case. Liam prides himself on not only having the skills required for inside of the court room but the compassion and consideration required outside of it, to ensure that those instructing and the lay client feel fully informed and involved in the process.CrimeLiam enjoys a broad criminal practice representing clients across the full range of criminal and quasi-criminal matters. Liam is as comfortable dealing with vulnerable legally aided defendants as commercial clients and prides himself on providing the highest level of client care. Liam is regularly instructed in serious criminal matters across a broad range of work in the Crown Court and has appeared in the Court of Appeal for appeal against sentence and conviction.FraudLiam continues to be instructed in all manner of fraud cases building upon his previous employment history working for a busy city brokerage assessing due diligence, compliance and legal liabilities. Liam also draws upon his experience of having worked as a fraud investigator on multi-million pound domestic and international fraud cases.ImmigrationLiam has a busy immigration practice across the broad range of immigration work across all levels, including in the Upper Tribunal and in relation to Judicial Review.International LawHaving previously worked as an intern for on the Charles Taylor Defence Team in the Hague Liam maintains a strong interest in this developing field of law. Liam spent seven months in 2012 working as the Country Project Director for a mitigation and Capital case project in Uganda on behalf of the Centre for Capital Punishment Studies. Liam established a project dealing with those awaiting re-sentencing whilst on death row (the “Kigula beneficiaries” – see related posts) as well as assisting in training lawyers and students more generally in the principles of mitigation and key areas of human rights.Liam remains committed to the abolition of the death penalty and was proud to have been nominated for the Bar Pro Bono Lawyer of the Year Award 2013 for this work. Liam continues to act and advise in a number of capital cases, including a number of cases due to be listed before the Supreme Court in Uganda later this year, on both appeal against conviction and sentence.Liam has also acted in an advisory capacity in a number of cases including advising members of the Syrian Government-in-exile in relation to domestic and international criminal liability against President Assad.Liam also consulted with members of the Kosovan Government relating to allegations stemming from the Balkans conflict and alleged war crimes.Prison LawLiam has built on his experience as a prison law paralegal prior to commencing pupillage and continues to be instructed in adjudications and advising on Judicial Review.Liam has handled numerous Parole Board hearings, including those involving complex psychological and psychiatric evidence as well as license recalls, IPP cases and lifers.Judicial ReviewLiam has a strong practise in judicial review and advises across a broad range of such proceedings (please see Publications Articles for details of Liam’s recent contribution to the practitioner’s handbook on Judicial Review).Liam advises in relation to all aspects of judicial review and prides himself on a forensic analysis of the issues and an understanding of the complete judicial review process. Liam has acted and advised in relation to challenges of the decisions of prison Governors, the Secretary of State for the Home Department and the London Borough of Islington Council.Liam is prepared to challenge any decision with merits and to comprehensively advise in relation to those challengesLicensing, Regulatory and PlanningLiam accepts instructions across the gamut of licensing work, including alcohol and taxi licenses and temporary event licenses. Liam advises and represents those involved with issues in relation to the Food Standards Agency as well as Health and Safety. Liam is instructed in planning matters as well as the possible criminal liability often stemming from alleged breaches. Liam has also successfully acted in proceedings before the Nursing and Midwifery Council.Landlord Tenant / Construction LawLiam has been instructed in numerous cases in relation to this area. Instructions include, enforcement and challenge of section 21 eviction notices, failure to license tenanted dwellings and planning matters. Liam has also been instructed in relation to a number of construction disputes in relation to breach of contract and the enforcement of standard form contracts. Liam has also advised in relation to arbitration and mediation in relation to such disputes. Liam has also acted in civil actions in relation to claims for breach of contract Most recently, Liam was instructed in relation to unjust enrichment and restitution arising from an initial complex contractual agreement in relation to the purchase of land and its development. Publications and Articles “Judicial Review in the Crown Court”, co-author and contributor to the practitioner handbook “Criminal Judicial Review”(Hart Publishing, 2014)CCPS Guides to Ugandan Law on “Hearsay“, “Disclosure” and “Identification” evidence (2012), published online and free to access to all Ugandan Lawyers through the Ugandan Law Society and UNAFRI websites“Plea Bargaining in the UK” (2011), report presented to a delegation from the Bar of Singapore“Reforming the Law Concerning Physician Assisted Suicide” (2009) – Law Reform Committee Essay Competition Prize Winner of the Year R v MS Junior alone at the Old Bailey in 6 week case involving allegations or murder and conspiracy to commit grievous bodily harm related to gang violence in North London. R v SK Junior alone in a large-scale conspiracy to supply Class A drugs relation to a least 25 kilos of heroin R v CM Lead junior at the Old Bailey in a case involving allegations of murder and conspiracy to grievous bodily harm. R v AE Violent disorder relating to gang violence in South East London involving various weapons, including a firearm. R v GL Large scale conspiracy to commit grievous bodily harm and violent disorder involving alleged ongoing gang turf war involving samurai swords and other assorted weapons resulting a stabbing. R v DT Allegation of Possession of a Firearm with intent to endanger life in relation to serious gang violence resulting in a police shooting. R v DG Series of aggravated burglaries in the Hackney area where the defendants were alleged to have carried out home invasions & held householders at knife point. R v RB Instructed in relation to an aggravated burglary involving the use of a firearm. R v M A large multi-handed conspiracy to burgle, including aggravated burglary. R v MA Violent Robbery resulting in the death of the victim. Complexities included assessment of mentally-ill client, including issues of fitness to plead and consideration of whether Hospital Order or imprisonment was the most appropriate sentence (a Hospital Order was imposed). R v MS Currently instructed to be lead by Queen’s Counsel at the Old Bailey in 6 week case involving allegations or murder and conspiracy to commit Grievous Bodily Harm related to gang violence in North London. R v AI Instructed in a case involving an allegation of attempted murder, the defendant was acquitted. R v MS Instructed in a murder and conspiracy to cause section 18 GBH currently listed for six weeks at the Old Bailey. R v CM Instructed in case involving allegations of murder and conspiracy to cause s.18 GBH. Defendant acquitted of the most serious charges. R v AE Alleged violent disorder relating to gang violence in South East London involving various weapons, including a firearm. R v MA Violent Robbery resulting in the death of the victim. Complexities included assessment of mentally-ill client, including issues of fitness to plead and consideration of whether Hospital Order or imprisonment was the most appropriate sentence (a Hospital Order was imposed). R v DG Series of aggravated burglaries in the Hackney area where the defendants were alleged to have carried out home invasions & held householders at knife point. R v RB Instructed in relation to an aggravated burglary involving the use of a firearm. R v M A large multi-handed conspiracy to burgle, including aggravated burglary. R v AG Large, multi-handed Possession with Intent to Supply Class A drugs case involving the alleged supply of drugs in the Surrey area by gangs from South East London. R v A A complex case involving analysis of the conflicting areas of the law of the Philippines and English law, including areas of family, chancery and criminal law. Liam succeeded on legal argument on the application of Philippine law and the case was dismissed after a judgment in favour of the defendant. R v G Currently instructed in a case involving three allegations of Sexual Assault. R v W Case involving the making of indecent images of children and the possession of extreme pornography. R v PD Instructed in a case of indecent assault on a minor and possession of over 100,000 indecent images, at all levels. Instructed in Parole Board hearing in relation to prisoner serving life sentence for the murder of a 62 year-old neighbour. Successfully obtained release on license in the case of X, convicted of fratricide. R v T Case involving threats by a foreign national to blow up a bus in South East London. R v E Trial on the actus reus alone of a defendant found unfit to plead, accused of sending a number of packages to the Israeli Embassy and the White House, resulting in the US Secret Service placing the White House on a heightened state of security alert. R v PN Currently instructed in a complex fraud case at Southwark Crown Court listed for three months. R v MO Instructed in relation to a number of complex frauds perpetrated against elderly and vulnerable victims. R v X Retained as LPP Counsel in relation to an international multi-million pound fraud. Further details restricted due to confidentiality agreement. Albanian blood feud asylum case involving a successful appeal heard at the Upper Tribunal. Successful application for permission for Judicial Review of the Home Office. Trafficking case, involving the trafficking of women from the Balkans for use in the sex industry. Represented client in relation to EEC national case and Ghanaian Customary marriage. Richard appears on behalf of the Defence in a wide range of criminal matters in all courts. He receives regular private and public instruction in cases of violence, sexual offences, drugs, theft, identity documents, public order, fraud, confiscation and driving offences. Richard is known for and prides himself on his...Read more Richard appears on behalf of the Defence in a wide range of criminal matters in all courts.He receives regular private and public instruction in cases of violence, sexual offences, drugs, theft, identity documents, public order, fraud, confiscation and driving offences.Richard is known for and prides himself on his client care, ensuring they are fully informed and advised at all times. His court manner lends itself to being well received by Judges and juries alike. He is skilled at dealing with vulnerable witnesses and experienced in dealing with issues relating to mental health and proceeds of crime.He accepts instructions on various private civil matters.Before practice Richard worked in the criminal department of a busy High Street Solicitors firm. He garnered expansive experience of criminal litigation having conduct of cases from the Youth Court to Court of Appeal.Richard is currently instructed on a multi-handed GBH and possession with intent to supply class A case. R v Layne (2015) Inner London Crown Court – successful unanimous acquittal of three rape counts after a 5 day trial. Included threats to kill with knives and prolonged detention. R v Francis (2015) Croydon Crown Court – Two counts of sexual assault (acquittal) and two counts of sexual activity of a child under 16. Involved the cross-examination of a child witness. R v Jethwa and Ors (2015) Southwark Crown Court – ABH and common assault (acquittals) of security guards in KFC, Leicester Square. Successful submission of no case to answer and not guilty pleas entered. R v Jinjika (2014) Oxford Crown Court – Six benefit fraud (totalling over £100,000) and two identity document counts. Involved a mentally ill Defendant. R v Osman (2014) Kingston Crown Court (privately funded) – Threats to kill (acquittal) wife with a knife in the presence of their children. R v Alaka and Other (2013) Basildon Crown Court – Mortgage fraud of over £200,000. Persuaded the Prosecution to offer no evidence. R v Pennycook (2013) Woolwich Crown Court – Possession of an offensive weapon (acquittal) to scare children aged between 10 – 15. Involved the cross-examination of an 11 and 13 year old. R v Brooks (2013) Central Criminal Court – Possession with intent to supply cannabis. Involved a strong application of the R v Twist rules relating to mobile telephone evidence. Gabriel Withers and Ors v Nachelle Crowther (2013) Croydon County Court – Infant settlement hearing in relation to payment for injuries in a road traffic accident. Police v Al-Mousawi (2014) Westminster Magistrates Court – Cash forfeiture of over £50,000. The Judicial Authority of Poland v Marcin Pulik (2014) Westminster Magistrates Court – Article 8 right to a family life argument. Nazmeen has a unique background having a gained a number of years’ experience practising in an oversea common law jurisdiction. Her practice was predominately in criminal law and she appeared for both the prosecution and defence in both litigation and advisory work. At the English Bar, her practice is in...Read more Nazmeen has a unique background having a gained a number of years’ experience practising in an oversea common law jurisdiction. Her practice was predominately in criminal law and she appeared for both the prosecution and defence in both litigation and advisory work. At the English Bar, her practice is in criminal and regulatory workNazmeen uses her extensive experience to represent clients at the Magistrates and Crown Court as well as before parole boards. She is well known for being able to build rapport with clients and solicitors whilst always being thoroughly prepared. Solicitors therefore regularly instruct her in a range of cases such as driving matters, domestic offences and theft offences. The diversity of her practice does not solely extend to defence work. She also appears frequently on behalf of prosecutorial bodies. Being a CPS Panel Advocate, she appears for the CPS in the Magistrates and Crown Court. Her Crown Court work also comprises of breach proceedings where she has appeared on behalf of Probation Services.Having carried out a secondment with the Nursing and Midwifery Council, Nazmeen has appeared as a case presenter in many substantive hearings including those brought against managers of care home and high-profile midwifery cases involving a death of a baby. She therefore has an interest in developing her practice in regulatory law, another area of Chamber’s expertise. Qualifications Dual qualified barrister: England and Wales (Call 2009) and Mauritius (Call 2011) "Juries warm to him; he approaches the cross-examination of vulnerable witnesses with care and skill." Legal 500 2020, Ranked as a Leading Junior “A very fine Advocate”, “an impressive knowledge of law and procedure” Legal 500 2019, Ranked as a Leading Junior “Incredibly bright. Superb in cross-examining difficult witnesses” Bellamy Forde, Partner, McMillan Williams, London “Corporate clients appreciate his focused practical advice on insider trading and his ability to always hit time sensitive deadlines” Shamina Chowdury, Solicitor, 3HR Corporate Team, Paris Colin Witcher has cemented his position as a  Junior of Choice for instructing solicitors and Queen s Counsel, having being Led by five different Silks at trials during 2019. Described as dependable , extremely bright and engaging Colin is a highly regarded Jury advocate, ranked by the Legal 500 where commentators note...Read moreColin Witcher has cemented his position as a  Junior of Choice for instructing solicitors and Queen s Counsel, having being Led by five different Silks at trials during 2019. Described as dependable , extremely bright and engaging Colin is a highly regarded Jury advocate, ranked by the Legal 500 where commentators note his advocacy ability and his legal knowledge. He has acted as a Led Junior, Leading Junior and Junior Alone.Colin both prosecutes and defends, often  entrusted with cases of the highest sensitivity acting in high-profile and high-value matters. He is sought after to defend in financial crime cases and is highly experienced in confiscation and assest restraint, routinely acting on behalf of third parties. In 2019. Colin acted as Junior Counsel in the high profile FA Bribery and Corruption Trial at Southwark Crown Court.Colin has extensive experience in Private Prosecutions, both on behalf of the prosecution and defence. Colin acted at first instance in the most high profile Private Prosecution of recent times, successfully securing a summons against Boris Johnson MP.  Colin did not acted in the subsequent Hight Court appeal but was thereafter instructed to act in respect to leave to the Supreme Court. Colin has lectured on this topic and was a recent invited speaker at the PPNL Association conferencce advising on Private Prosecutions.Colin has a diverse and varied advisory practice, and is often instructed to act as part of a larger team working on corporate investigations.  The same means that Colin is well placed to advise companies facing an investigation from relevant regulators. Recent examples include advising a FTSE100 company on compliance with Environmental Regulation and a Japanese Finance House on insider trading.Current Instructions for 2020R v L (Led by QC, unusual Murder Trial prosecuted with the consent of the AG)R v D (Leading Counsel, appeal concerning Identification Evidence Court of Appeal)R v B (2 month fraud trial, Peterborough CC)R v E (3 month Conspiracy to Supply trial, Nottingham CC)HMRC v D (£12m account freezing matter)Recent Example Instructions from 2019 R v E (Led by QC: Bribery, Southwark CCR v D (Led by QC: Baby Shaking, Luton CC)R v E (Led by QC: Murder, Central Criminal CourtR v D (Led by QC: Costs Leave to the Supreme Court, QBD)R v D (Junior Alone: Perverting the Course of Justice, Central Criminal Court)R v P (Junior Alone: Trading Standards, Croydon CCRecent Advisory Matters:Re: BB (Food Hygiene)Re: ED (Ofgem)Re: DB (Bribery)Re: DE (Environmental)Re: AA (International Fraud)Recent International Matters Include:Re: DR: Kosovo (war crimes)Re MW: Nigeria (freezing injunctions arising in cross-border fraud)Re BW: Japan (insider trading arising from employee conduct)Re DN: Hong Kong (injunction arising from share mismanagement)Re: DB: Dubai (extradition and HMRC settlement)Profile OverviewColin routinely acts on behalf of companies and directors in the full spectrum of regulation and criminal offending including health and safety, food hygiene and licensing. He has extensive experience of asset forfeiture, restraint and confiscation matters, including acting in one of the largest confiscation cases since the 2002 Act came into force (£154m benefit).He has developed a reputation for offering excellent client care and for being an engaging and passionate advocate who can adapt to any tribunal, be they lay, professional, corporate or military. He is well versed in dealing with a variety of expert witnesses and has cross examined medical experts, including pathologists, breaking down complex facts and technical matters to get to the heart of the issue for jurors. Colin received high praise in a recent murder case where he cross-examined a pathologist, forcing concessions highly advantageous to the defence. He, unusually for his level of call, has experience in baby-shaking cases.In general crime, Colin has developed a specialism in defending in paper heavy, complex, criminal matters including murder, drugs and fraud which require thorough and effective case preparation. Colin has been led in a number of high-profile and complex criminal matters but is also a confident Jury advocate in his own right. He has appellate advocacy experience in both the High Court and the Court of Appeal, in addition to advising in CCRC matters.In addition to his domestic practice, international law and military law has long been a passion for Colin both professionally and academically. As a former intern at the Special Court for Sierra Leone during the War Crime trial of Charles Taylor, the ex-president of Liberia, and as a Pegasus Scholar in Washington, Colin often brings an international perspective and approach to his cases. Colin has also discussed cross-boarder legal perspectives with experts, both legal and military, at the Pentagon, Qunatico and the Military Appeal Court, Washington DC.Colin regularly publishes commentary on current legal issues and has lectured both domestically and internationally. In February 2017, Colin was invited to present a key note speech in Seattle, USA, on cross board perspectives on tackling racial bias within the jury system. In November 2017, Colin was invited to join the delegation in Qatar at an international bribery and corruption and in December 2018 Colin assisted in arranging a conference for The Rule of Law Anti-Corruption Centre in London.In 2015, Colin was elected to the Executive Committee of the Criminal Bar Association and in 2016 was elected to the Executive Committee of the South Eastern Circuit. He is the current treasurer of the Herts and Bed Bar Mess. Colin is now in his fourth successive term on Chambers’ Management Committee Publications Extradition: Old Dogs, New Tricks (published by IFO) Colin co-wrote this article on extradition law with Kerim Fuad QC offering commentary on the separation of powers in the light of recent high-profile cases.Disabled Children, a legal handbook (published by LAG) Colin was a researcher for this leading textbook on child disability law, focusing on researching and drafting content in respect of Statements of Special Educational Needs.An Innocent Man’s Parole (Published by Converse) Article co-written with Charles Archer of J4E ltd offering advice for prisoners seeking parole whilst maintaining their innocence R v D Appeal against conviction; cross territorial jurisdictional of document fraud offences. R v G Appeal against sentence in respect of manifestly excessive sentence; drugs. R v N Appeal against sentence in respect of error of law and manifestly excessive sentence. R v G CCRC Appeal in respect of cold case review; bank robbery, fresh evidence. R v M [Maidstone Crown Court] Led Junior in five day final hearing; confiscation sought for £152million; awarded £500,000. R v P [Warwick Crown Court] Privately retained on behalf of company directors in patent/trade mark offences. R v G [Harrow Crown Court] Privately retained on behalf of multimillionaire property developer; confiscation sought for £1million; awarded £190,000. R v E [Snaresbrook Crown Court] Privately retained; successfully opposed an application by the Crown under section 22 to increase available amount. R v O [Leicester Crown Court] Leading Estelle Thornber of Chambers in paper heavy case (150,000 pages) where 11 defendants faced an indictment alleging violent disorder in the context of an attempted murder. R v R [Leicester Crown Court] Led Junior in multi-million pound conspiracy to supply Class A and B Drug, value in excess of £5million. R v S [Maidstone Crown Court] Led Junior in two month conspiracy to supply / import class A Drugs trial, value in excess of £7million. R v N [Luton Crown Court] Led Junior in a five week conspiracy to murder trial. R v D [Southwark Crown Court] Led Junior in £1m fraud against the Government (deaf defendants). R v S [Maidstone Crown Court] Led Junior in a seven week multi-million pound money laundering trial. R v D [Reading Crown Court] Multi-Count familiar rape (24 alleged occasions of rape); cross-examination of young complainant. R v P [Northampton Crown Court] Violent rape in the context of domestic violence. R v C [Inner London Crown Court] Assault allegation jointly charged with codefendant facing attempted murder; cross examination on premises of fabrication and “stitch up”. R v X [Woolwich Crown Court] Successfully defended in Section 18 and Threats to Kill matter. R v O [Woolwich Crown Court] Successfully acted at trial on behalf of a defendant (a victim of domestic violence) who stabbed her husband four times in self-defence. R v D [Central Criminal Court] Secured not guilty verdict for lifer charged with aggravated burglary. R v E [Isleworth Crown Court] Defence of company accountant; three separate trials resulting in acquittal. R v X [Kingston Crown Court] Six week 17 handed conspiracy to rob trial (69 separate high value robberies). Secured one of two only acquittals. R v E [Southwark Crown Court] Led by QC in high-profile and unusual fraudulent trading case. X v X [Advisory] Together with QC advising on an international injunction case for LA based clients. MYE [Advisory] Retained privately by the European subsidary of an international finance company (with $2.5billion holdings) to advise on insider trading (both FSMA and CJA). SFO [Advisory] Retained as LPP Counsel by SFO in respect of international bribery case. HMRC [Advisory] Retained as LPP Counsel by HMRC in respect of £400m tax fraud. R v S [Canterbury Crown Court] Defence Counsel on behalf of an accountant charged with fraudulent trading. R v P [Nottingham Crown Court] Instructed defence Counsel in 12 handed trading standards trial, prosecuted by Queen’s Counsel. R v M [Kingston Crown Court] Privately retained in a five day fraud trial concerning misrepresentation to induce and retain building contracts. R v G [Warwick Crown Court] Privately retained on the behalf of a company director of a large-scale importers and distributors in respect of trade description offence arising from EU patent breaches. X v D [High Court, QBD] Junior Alone in a £3million Freezing Injunction arising out of a breach of fiduciary duty. HSE v F [Bromley Magistrates Court] Successfully secured not guilty verdicts in a health safety prosecution in respect of contractors working at height. U v S [High Court, QBD] Led by Damien Brown QC in a high-value Employment/Commercial Dispute involving high profile clients and media coverage. X v X [Bournemouth County Court] Successfully acted at trial in respect of defending liability for valuable cargo which was damaged during transportation. P v P [Advisory] Led by Kerim Fuad QC in advising a leading commercial firm in respect of private prosecutions and injunctions due to conduct by former employee. Called in 2010, Tomas’s practice covers all aspects of Crime, Family and Prison Law. He also provides advice in relation to sports law and regulatory matters. Tomas is now Chambers Criminal Bar Association representativeRead more Called in 2010, Tomas’s practice covers all aspects of Crime, Family and Prison Law. He also provides advice in relation to sports law and regulatory matters.Tomas is now Chambers Criminal Bar Association representative Publications and Lectures Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 – An in-depth guide for practitioners dealing with cases brought under the Dangerous Dogs Act.Lawinsport: Tomas is a contributor to lawinsport.com concentrating on rugby related issues. Chiara appears in the Crown Court, as a led junior and junior alone, on a range of serious and complex criminal matters, and has experience in the Appellate Courts. She has extensive experience in cases involving mental health, fitness to plead and fitness to stand trial issues, and excels in...Read more Chiara appears in the Crown Court, as a led junior and junior alone, on a range of serious and complex criminal matters, and has experience in the Appellate Courts. She has extensive experience in cases involving mental health, fitness to plead and fitness to stand trial issues, and excels in representing young and vulnerable clients. Her easy manner with clients and excellent advocacy skills have led to instruction in several high profile cases.Chiara has advised on an international level including assisting with the drafting of statutory instruments. She has appeared before the High Court in Extradition proceedings.Chiara welcomes instructions in disciplinary and regulatory work, and has appeared on behalf of interested parties and companies before various professional bodies such as the British Cycling Federation and the Traffic Commissioners Office. Publications and Lectures Bar Standards Board accredited ‘Continuing Professional Development’ lectures given to barristers, firms of solicitors and in-house practitioners on a range of topics including youth sentencing and proceeds of crime legislation.Chiara has also given media interviews in respect of complex legal issues, such as “Omissions as Criminal Acts” and Joint Enterprise. Professional Memberships Representative of the Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Bar MessMember of Chamber’s Management CommitteeCriminal Bar AssociationSouth Eastern CircuitYoung Fraud Lawyers AssociationPreviously served as Secretary for the Care Lavers Parliamentary Group chaired by John Hemming MP R v A (2019) Exeter Crown Court. Currently instructed in a multi-defendant county lines drug conspiracy, where the defendant is also prosecuted under the Modern Slavery Act. R v H (2019) Court of Appeal. Successfully argued against a finding of dangerousness in a case involving an historic series of raped against a child. R v A (2019) Portsmouth Crown Court: Multi-handed conspiracy to traffic individuals in to the United Kingdom. R v G: (2018) Norwich Crown Court. Secured acquittals in familial historic sexual assaults. Considered issues of hearsay, bad character of the complainant and s41 applications arising out of disclosure of school and medical records. R v B & Others (2018) Bristol Crown Court. Led Junior. Client acquitted in a complex multi-million pound fraud relating to the sale of Carbon Credits. R v H (2017) Central Criminal Court. An Uber driver accused of digital penetration of a sleeping passenger. Legal argument resulting in late disclosure of medical records which resulted in an acquittal for the client. R v T & Others (2017) Birmingham Crown Court. Multi-handed nationwide fraud against John Lewis Partnership. Involved complex legal arguments as to abuse of process and admissibility. R v B & Others Canterbury Crown Court. Sole defendant acquitted on multiple counts of Aggravated Burglary and s18, extensive cross-examination relating to identification. R v M (2017) St Albans Crown Court. Conspiracy to supply 10 kilograms of cocaine. Extensive phone downloads and multi-jurisdictional issues. R v P & Others Snaresbrook Crown Court. Successfully defended possession of a firearm with intent to endanger life at initial trial, following legal argument Crown offered no evidence on lesser charge of simple possession ahead of retrial. Youth defendant. R v G & Other Wolverhampton Crown Court: Acquitted of violent robbery of a Cannabis factory. Extensive legal argument and cross-examination involving bad character. R v B & Others Harrow Crown Court. Led junior in multi-handed bank fraud. Involved detailed cross-examination of financial experts. R v M & others (2014 and 2016) Snaresbrook Crown Court & Kingston CC. Led junior on a 3-month human trafficking trial involving complex argument on legal definitions. A further retrial and additional rape and false imprisonment offences. R v G & others Central Criminal Court: Instructed in own name in a murder, later granted a certificate for QC. Conviction for lesser offence of manslaughter. Operation Amazon Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs: Instructed junior disclosure counsel on Operation Amazon, a multi-million-pound international fraud. The Supreme Court of Rwanda Consultant to the Chief Justice on sentencing principles. Assisted in the drafting the current proposed sentencing guidelines. Led a 4-day working group with the judiciary, including members of the Supreme Court and the Ministry of Justice. Serious Fraud Office Instructed LPP counsel on a multi-million-pound international fraud involving prolonged periods of false accounting. Fiona accepts instructions in all areas of Chambers’ practice and has a particular interest in criminal law. Fiona has defended in a broad spectrum of offences before the Crown Court and maintains an interest in cases involving offences of serious violence or fraud. She has a particular interest in the...Read more Fiona accepts instructions in all areas of Chambers’ practice and has a particular interest in criminal law.Fiona has defended in a broad spectrum of offences before the Crown Court and maintains an interest in cases involving offences of serious violence or fraud. She has a particular interest in the potential legal complexities involved in indictments alleging conspiracy and has been instructed to advise on conspiracy matters both in this jurisdiction and abroad.As a result of her interest in the law relating to conspiracies, Fiona has been instructed as led Junior in a number of factually complex and paper heavy fraud matters involving multiple agreements, transactions and defendants. She takes pride in her reputation for competence and efficiency in such cases.Consequentially, Fiona has a steadily increasing practice involving contested applications under the Proceeds of Crime Act, and remains a firm believer in the benefits of providing early advice in such cases.Fiona continues to accept instructions to appear before the Youth Court for defendants charged with serious offences. As a consequence, she is regularly instructed on behalf of young and vulnerable defendants who consequently appear before the Crown Court for trial, charged with matters ranging from murder to rape and arson.Fiona has appeared before the Court of Appeal in relation to appeals against conviction in relation to the framing of conspiracy indictments, and appeals against sentence in relation to a variety of matters, including dangerousness, and Article 8 considerations.Fiona is a Grade 2 CPS prosecutor, and has prosecuted matters ranging from s.18 GBH, offences involving serious public disorder, sexual assault, large scale drug importation and fraud. She is also instructed by the Serious Fraud Office as disclosure counsel in SFO v Rolls Royce, and has been instructed by the Financial Conduct Authority as LPP counsel on a number of operations.Because of her expertise in serious criminal offences, Fiona is also instructed to appear for parents at fact finding hearings before the Family Court. To that end, she has represented parents accused of serious criminal conduct including campaigns of rape and attempted murder.Fiona also accepts instructions to appear before the Coroners Court on inquest matters.She continues to write and lecture on a variety of topical criminal issues, and enjoys the theoretical aspects of criminal law.Fiona plays an active role in the profession outside of the courtroom; she is a member of Chambers’ Management Committee and she is the Herts and Beds Bar Mess Representative to the South Eastern Circuit Executive Committee. Publications (2016) “The Modern Conspiracy – The Problem with Persons Unknown” – co-authored with Colin Witcher(2016) “Shaken Baby Syndrome – The Development of Expert Evidence” – co-authored with Jo Morris(2016) “Courts Martial and the Human Rights Act” – co-authored with Jo Morris(2016) “Shaken Baby Syndrome – Practical Considerations” co-authored with Jo Morris and published by Crimeline(2016) “Coercive Control” – co-authored with Jo Morris and published by Crimeline Seminars (2016) “The Military Court Martial – An Outline of Military Jurisdiction” – Chambers Lecture Series.(2016) “Shaken Baby Syndrome” – Chambers Lecture Series R v DL (Central Criminal Court) [2018] Led Junior – Defendant unanimously acquitted of a gangland murder. DL was one of five defendants who faced trial for the slaying of a 15 year old boy in Croydon. DL was the only defendant to be unanimously acquitted of murder and manslaughter. R v CM (St Albans Crown Court) [2018] CM was unanimously acquitted of arson with intent to endanger life. CM accepted in evidence that he had sent his ex partner a threat to burn her house down, that he had attended her house with a can of petrol and that he had then set the property on fire whilst the occupants were asleep upstairs. R v HM & NA (Isleworth Crown Court) [2018] Successful prosecution of two defendants for the large scale importation of Class C drugs. FH v R (Court of Appeal, Criminal Division) [2018] Successful appeal against conviction in relation to the sentence imposed for dangerous driving. R v RM (Blackfriars Crown Court) [2017] Defendant unanimously acquitted of 3 counts relating to cruelty to two children. The defendant was said to have tortured the two children by burning them. R v MS (Isleworth Crown Court) [2016] Defendant unanimously acquitted of attempted s.18 GBH. The Crown alleged that he had deliberately driven his car at his ex partner’s new boyfriend on an empty road. R v OV & Ors (Huntingdon Crown Court) [2016] Led junior in case involving conspiracy to acquire criminal property. Case was noteworthy for its factual complexity. EW v R (Court of Appeal, Criminal Division) [2015] Successful appeal against 12 year custodial term for rape. Reduced to 8 years and 6 months. R v KM (Chelmsford Youth Court) (2015) Successful prosecution of a youth under s.16A Firearms Act 1968 arising out of an incident where a 15 year old with severe learning difficulties had been threatened with a firearm in a car park. W v W (Central Family Court) [2015] Proceedings involving residence, contact, a previous abduction of one of the children, and a potential future abduction. RA v SS [2015] Fact finding hearing involving 11 allegations of rape, allegations of assault and suffocation of a child. Instructed by the Treasury Solicitor’s Department on large scale, ongoing litigation as part of the BB scheme. Treasury Solicitor’s Department Anthony specialises in corporate and financial crime, general crime and civil litigation with a wealth of experience in private prosecutions. Anthony is highly sought after due to his ability to act as both a tactician and a strategist. He is praised for his lateral thinking ability and creativity. Background Prior...Read more Anthony specialises in corporate and financial crime, general crime and civil litigation with a wealth of experience in private prosecutions. Anthony is highly sought after due to his ability to act as both a tactician and a strategist. He is praised for his lateral thinking ability and creativity.BackgroundPrior to joining Chambers, Anthony was an analyst at Goldman Sachs. His responsibilities included advising the trading teams on matters including international fraud, bribery, money laundering and counter terrorism financing laws and ensuring the investment bank’s compliance with domestic and international financial regulations, including the anti-money laundering regulations, MiFID, EMIR and Dodd-Frank.Anthony joined Chambers in 2013 and quickly developed a reputation in business crime. In 2015 he was seconded to the SFO to assist in an international multi-million-pound bribery confiscation case. Anthony was also seconded to Peters Peters LLP on two occasions, where he advised on matters of general crime including murder and sexual offences, and on corporate crime including fraud, bribery and corruption, INTERPOL red notices, extradition, UN sanctions, export controls, and private prosecutions. Anthony advised on domestic cases, pre and post-charge, various EU cases, and on an complex international arbitration.In 2018 Anthony spent a year in the financial crime team in KPMG, where he advised numerous high profile clients and successfully negotiated with various prosecution authorities to avoid clients being charged with criminal offences. Whilst at the firm, Anthony spearheaded KPMG’s legal offering in the cryptocurrency and blockchain space.Anthony enjoys writing legal articles. He has been published in the New Statesmen and the New Law Journal, and has been quoted in The Guardian, CNN and the British Medical Journal.Corporate and Financial CrimeAnthony specialises in advising employees and directors of organisations on criminal liability and defending those charged in criminal proceedings. His practice encompasses the spectrum of business crime, including heavy fraud work, complex white-collar crime, tax evasion and bribery. Anthony has been involved in various landmark cases including the Rolls-Royce prosecution. He has also been instructed in arbitrations, where the parties wish to deal with issues concerning potential criminality outside of the public forum.General CrimeAnthony is an experienced prosecution and defence criminal practitioner. His recent cases include importation of drugs, kidnap, blackmail, bribery, attempted murder and serious sexual offences. He is forensically astute, dealing with the complex evidence and intricate legal issues. He has experience being led and sole junior for both the prosecution and defence.Private ProsecutionAnthony has developed a particular specialism in bringing and defending private prosecutions. He frequently advises on the merits of bringing a private prosecution and on issues arising in the course of proceedings, such as those relating to disclosure, LPP, confidentiality and investigatory powers. Anthony has acted in private prosecutions involving employee fraud, historic sexual offences and on the prosecution of the Prime Minister for misconduct in public office. Scholarships and Prizes University of Durham, Law LLB, Upper Second Class HonoursDuke of Edinburgh Scholarship, Inner Temple, 2011Exhibition Award, Inner Temple, 2011Sweet & Maxwell Scholarship, Pupil Barrister Award, Inner Temple, 2013 Publications ‘Could Vote Leave be Prosecuted for its EU Referendum Propaganda?’ – New Statesman, 19 July 2016 – http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/staggers/2016/07/could-vote-leave-be-prosecuted-its-eu-referendum-campaign-propaganda‘Covered Up?’ N.L.J. 2014, 164(7603), 15-16 – New Law Journal –http://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/nlj/content/coveredAssisted in 2016 and 2017 editions of ‘Asset Recovery – Getting the Deal Through’, Law Business Research – https://gettingthedealthrough.com/area/53/asset-recovery/Quoted by Legal Affairs Correspondent of the Guardian in article ‘First legal attempt to prevent Brexit set for preliminary hearing’, 8 July 2016 – https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/08/legal-attempt-prevent-brexit-preliminary-hearing-article-50 Advised a US entity on whether it had breached the UK Bribery Act 2010. Advised a multinational company on the implications of the EU and US sanctions against Iran, Sudan, Syria, Cuba and Russia and Crimea. Assisted in drafting the internal anti-bribery and corruption policies for corporate clients. Acting in a Crown Court trial, where the client is charged with defrauding a multinational corporation. Submitted representations to the United Nations and European Union Commission on the withdrawal of a travel ban and asset freeze on a politically-exposed person. Instructed by the SFO as legal professional privilege (LPP) Counsel an international bribery and corruption investigation. SFO Instructed by the Treasury Solicitor’s Department on the Kenya Emergency Group Litigation. Treasury Solicitor’s Department Advised on grounds of appeal on a multi-million-pound Serious Fraud Office prosecution. Represented a youth charged with affray after allegedly brandishing a machete in a London shopping centre. Successfully represented a father in the High Court in wardship of child proceedings. Michael Polak is a very popular choice for high profile cases involving international law, serious crime, human rights, and strategic litigation. Michael is currently acting in some of the most newsworthy cases including the Cyprus Rape trial and appeal, a challenge to the Government’s Huawei 5G plans, the defence of...Read more Michael Polak is a very popular choice for high profile cases involving international law, serious crime, human rights, and strategic litigation.Michael is currently acting in some of the most newsworthy cases including the Cyprus Rape trial and appeal, a challenge to the Government’s Huawei 5G plans, the defence of an artist’s freedom of expression, and a number of large scale private prosecutions in areas such as fraud and torture. Alongside this cutting edge work, Michael is also instructed to defend in a number of lengthy complex fraud and drug conspiracies.In regards to strategic litigation, Michael’s strong understanding of the full range of legal options in both the domestic and international legal spheres means that he is able to advise on the best way to solve a client’s particular legal problems, whether they are individuals or an organisation, and whether that solutions lies in the civil, public law, private prosecution, or international law arenas.InternationalInternationally, Michael has experience managing client’s cases in places as diverse as Belarus, Myanmar, Cyprus, Australia, Spain, Mexico, the USA, China, Greece, the Middle East, and India. Michael’s international work has included:• Co-ordinating the defence of the British teenager who has been put on trial in Cyprus after reporting a gang rape;• Submitting communications to the United Nations’ Special Procedures, the Working Group on Enforced and Involuntary Disappearances and the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention and appearing before these groups on behalf of clients in China and Bangladesh;• Assisting the Uyghur community with a number of different legal areas and speaking at the World Uyghur Congress’ Conference in Washington in 2019;• Drafting successful representations to the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files to remove Red Notices. Michael is also the author of leading legal publisher Westlaw’s Insight article on INTERPOL Notices explaining the notices and the possibilities as to how they can be removed;• Assisting clients as a member of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office’s Pro Bono Panel set up to promote and protect the human rights of British nationals detained overseas;• Assisting on research for an appeal at the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia;• Working on the Mau Mau litigation in regards to the situation in Colonial Kenya;• On secondments with the Public Defender in Jamaica, the Black Sash in South Africa, and at the Khmer Rouge Tribunal in Cambodia; and• Working on a Hague Convention case involving the alleged abduction of a child from Italy to the United Kingdom.Serious CrimeMichael is regularly instructed to defend in serious criminal matters. He applies a forensic approach but is able to relate well to juries as well. Michael’s secondment at the Financial Conduct Authority where he worked on a matter concerning alleged breaches of the listing rules by a major financial institution expanded his fraud knowledge and experience.Michael has acted in trials involving the full range of criminal offences including:8 Handed 75 Tonne Tobacco FraudMichael represented the first defendant of eight, alleged to be the mastermind of a conspiracy to evade excise duty payable on the manufacture of hand rolling tobacco from raw tobacco in regards to consignments imported by air with a gross weight of 75 tonnes.It is alleged that the defendants created an “immensely complex” set of records and numerous shell companies to hide their real purpose – to import raw tobacco and then treat it so it could be sold for use by smoking. All other defendants were found guilty and a retrial for Michael’s client will being in January 2021.Lengthy Courier Fraud TrialMichael Polak successfully represented a Defendant in a lengthy trial St Albans Crown Court who was alleged to be involved in a 8 handed courier fraud conspiracy involving the defrauding of a number of individuals of over £350 000 by the participants.The trial included a large amount of telephone cell-site evidence and the cross-examination of an expert in this area. The defendant Michael Polak was representing was one of only two Defendants out of eight who were found not guilty after trial.Leading in Multi-Handed Lengthy Robbery TrialMichael acted as leading Counsel representing a defendant in this 9 handed lengthy youth robbery at St Albans Crown Court. The case involved three knife point robberies committed by a gang of 9 young men against other youths in the local area. This case involved a large volume of telephone and CCTV evidence and careful management of young a vulnerable defendants and witnesses.Michael led a junior barrister in this trial and held his own amongst significantly more senior barristers.Kidnapping TrialMichael Polak successfully defended a client alleged to have been involved in the assault and the kidnapping of a youth. After a 5-day trial at Northampton Crown Court the jury returned unanimous not guilty verdicts.Private ProsecutionsMichael has conducted two successful private prosecutions from inception for assault occasioning actual bodily harm and unlawful eviction.He is also currently advising on three high profile private prosecutions concerning allegations of torture, coercive and controlling behaviour, and fraud.Appellate WorkMichael is regularly instructed to advise on appeals of both convictions and sentences to the Court of Appeal and is currently instructed to pursue an appeal to the European Court of Human Rights.International CrimeMichael has the experience needed to advise on international criminal cases given his Master’s Degree in Public International Law which included international criminal law, his research for an appeal before the Mechanism UN Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunal, his attendance at a training course at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, and his work as an intern with the Defence Support Section of the Khmer Rouge Tribunal.Michael can advise individuals who may find themselves subject to the jurisdiction of an international court or tribunal as well as organisations who may be considering submitting a communication to the Prosecutor of the ICC for her to consider prosecution in regards to certain situations.Current Domestic Criminal InstructionsMichael is currently instructed in a large scale drug importation case, an armed robbery, and a s18 Assault Occasioning Grievous Bodily Harm trial.Human RightsAs well as the international matters listed above which involve human rights arguments Michael is often instructed in domestic human rights public law and civil cases. This has included judicial reviews involving the provision of Kosher food to Jewish Prisoners, actions for assault on prisoners by prison guards or other inmates, and public law challenges to unfair prison adjudications.Another human rights area in which Michael practices is extradition law and cross-border criminal investigations. In extradition, Michael has appeared in multiple applications for the Respondent raising arguments based on the Human Rights Act, procedural bars, and conviction in absence grounds. Michael has also successfully acted for a Pakistani national who was apprehended in Eastern Europe on a Red Notice issued on the request of a Middle-Eastern state to have it removed. Further to this Michael is also the author of leading legal publisher Westlaw’s Insight article on INTERPOL Notices explaining the notices and the possibilities as to how they can be removed.Michael also has experience of inquiries have worked as a paralegal for the Secretariat to the Alexander Litvinenko Inquest before commencing pupillage and having also spent time on the West Kingston Commission of Enquiry (Tivoli Enquiry) in Jamaica which examined the circumstances surrounding an incursion by the Jamaican security forces into an inner city community which resulted in the death of over 70 people. Appointments and Scholarships Michael is the elected President of Middle Temple Young Barrister’s Association, is on the Executive Committee of the Human Rights Lawyers Association (HRLA) where he was previously the Chair of the HRLA’s Young Lawyers Committee and where he started the annual judicial review competition and journal, the Young Human Rights Lawyer.Michael is also an elected member of the South-Eastern Circuit and the Bar Council. Michael has been a visiting Lecturer at Birmingham University Medical School where he taught subjects such as the law of abortion, patient choice, and euthanasia. Michael has also provided a guest lecture on criminal law at Birkbeck College, University of London.Michael has been awarded the following awards and scholarships:• Middle Temple Harmsworth Scholar (Major Scholarship);• Middle Temple International Internship Award; • South Eastern Circuit scholarship to attend the Gerald T. Bennett Prosecutor and Public Defender Trial Training Program at the University of Florida College of Law;• London School of Economics and Political Science Anniversary ScholarshipMichael also voluntarily work for youth charity the Renaissance Foundation as the Skills for Life Programme Director. This involves putting together and running a practical skills programme with expert speakers and practical exercises for underprivileged young people.During the Coronavirus crisis Michael set up and ran Fuel Our Frontline which delivered over 14 tonnes of groceries to frontline NHS staff members at over 30 British hospitals. Publications and Seminars Polak, M.J. The Jadhav case and the right to consular assistance: ‘confessions’, spies, and remedies in international law. Indian Journal of International Law 57, 385–409 (2017).Interpretation of Legislation under the Human Rights Act, November 2016Westlaw Insight article on INTERPOL Notices, November 2015Domestic Workers’ Rights Booklet, You and Your Rights, the Black Sash, South Africa, 2010Constitutional Rights of Children Booklet, You and Your Rights, the Black Sash, South Africa, 2010Sierra Leone: Blanket Ban on Political Rallies and Public Meetings Illegal, Article 19, 2010Net Neutrality: Stronger Rules Needed in US and EU, Article 19, 2011The Exclusion of Evidence in Criminal Law, Brunel University, January 2017Visiting Lecturer at Birmingham University Medical School teaching subjects such as the law of abortion, patient choice, and euthanasia, 2015-current Professional Memberships Member, Foreign and Commonwealth Office Pro Bono PanelExecutive Committee, Human Rights Lawyers AssociationExecutive Committee South-Eastern CircuitHonourable Society of the Middle TempleCriminal Bar AssociationYoung Fraud Lawyers AssociationPanel Member, Bar Pro Bono UnitMember, Law Society International Action TeamEuropean Criminal Bar AssociationAmnesty InternationalExtradition Lawyers AssociationAnglo-Australasian Lawyers SocietyPresident of Middle Temple Young Barristers’ Association Education 2015-2017 Master of Law (LLM)(Public International Law) London School of Economics and Political Science Merit (Distinction in Law of War, UK Human Rights, and Dissertation published by Indian Journal of International Law https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40901-018-0077-8 )2014-2015 Peacekeeping & International Conflict Resolution, Peace Operations Training Institute.2011-2012 Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC), Kaplan College, London. Very Competent.2007-2010 Bachelor of Law, City University London, Upper 2nd Class Honours, 66.7%, Ranked 5/120 (top 4%) 1st Class in International Human Rights Law, European Law, and Public International Law R v DW Michael secured a unanimous s18 GBH, Wounding, and Assault Trial acquittal after a 4 days trial at Birmingham Crown Court. R v H Michael successfully represented the defendant who was found not guilty in a case of Sexual Touching of Someone under the Age of 13. This case involved pre-recorded evidence and the cross-examination of the 10 y.o complainant. R v AG Michael represented an Italian national who was facing 5 counts of sexual assault. Michael obtained the taped interview of the defendant which showed that the transcript was incorrect in that the defendant had not be properly cautioned before the interview commenced despite the transcript stating that he had. Michael successfully argued that the interview could not be relied upon ending the prosecution’s case against the defendant. R v BB Michael made successful submissions to the Court of Appeal in regards to the length of the sentence and application of an extended sentence for the appellant who had been convicted of a serious armed robbery and burglary. After hearing Michael’s submission the Court shortened the length of sentence. R v M Michael appeared in a multi-handed 2 day sentencing hearing in regards to ‘sham’ marriages which were conducted in two locations on the same day. His defendant was one of a very small number of defendants not to receive an immediate custodial sentence. P v YA Michael is currently instructed to privately prosecute an ABH matter which occurred when a taxi driver struck another taxi driver in a dispute over a carparking space causing permanent damage to his vision. Michael undertook all work on this case from its inception including the drafting of the information that was laid before the court, written submissions to the court as to why a summons should be granted, a successful application for a witness summons requiring the Detective Constable to produce all documents that the police have in regards to this incident, and appearing at all hearings in this matter. Michael is particularly keen on using the Public Prosecution procedure to prosecute Police misconduct and other cases where the authorities fail to live up to their duties. Borough of Redbridge v ATT Michael represented an Islamic Community Centre for failure to comply with an enforcement notice restricting the hours of operation of the centre. After lengthy mitigation submissions the defendant was fined only £100 per offence, an unusually low fine. FW v Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service Michael drafted a number of written representation on behalf of a small business which had been investigated by the Fire Service for a number of breaches of fire safety laws. After Michael’s representation’s the Fire Service agreed to work with the company to remedy the breaches rather than to pursue enforcement actions and prosecute as they had said they would. RF v MS Michael successfully represented the mother of an Italian/Russian girl who was the respondent in a Hague Convention child abduction matter. The matter was concluded in the mother’s favour. Michael was instructed by the Treasury Solicitor’s Department on large scale, ongoing litigation into the alleged abuses by the Colonial Government in Kenya against the Mau Mau as part of the BB scheme. Treasury Solicitor’s Department RB v Ministry of Justice Michael is currently instructed in a civil Human Rights Act claim against the Ministry of Justice in regards to a Jewish prisoner who alleges that the prison where he was detained failed to follow the policy correctly in not giving him two kosher meals daily. EG v Ministry of Justice & NHS Michael is currently instructed in a civil claim by a prisoner who contracted HIV after being bitten by a fellow prisoner who subsequently died from AIDS. Estelle is a measured and effective advocate, regularly appearing in both the Crown Court and the Magistrates’ Court. Estelle’s friendly and compassionate approach with clients, teamed with her robust and fearless style in the courtroom has allowed her to develop an impressive criminal junior practice. Estelle recently completed a 9-week...Read more Estelle is a measured and effective advocate, regularly appearing in both the Crown Court and the Magistrates’ Court. Estelle’s friendly and compassionate approach with clients, teamed with her robust and fearless style in the courtroom has allowed her to develop an impressive criminal junior practice.Estelle recently completed a 9-week trial as junior counsel acting for 1 of 6 defendants indicted in a multi-million pound class A, B and C sophisticated drugs conspiracy and money laundering matter at Inner London Crown Court [January 2019 – March 2019].In the Summer of 2018, Estelle was instructed as Independent Disclosure Counsel for HMRC as part of a large scale investigation involving an alleged tax fraud connected with football transfer fees [April 2018 – August 2019]. Estelle also acted as junior defence counsel in an 8-week trial at Leicester Crown Court which involved 12 defendants accused of conspiring to commit violent disorder, culminating in an attempted murder [February 2018 – April 2018].Prior to commencing her pupillage, Estelle worked as a paralegal in the Crown Court Department of a busy criminal defence firm in central London and in the Catastrophic Injury Team of a leading City Law Firm; Estelle appreciates the demands placed upon instructing solicitors in modern-day practice and the importance of clear communication and impeccable client-care.Reported Cases [2018]:Regina v Kay Strugnall [2018] EWCA Crim 2895 – Estelle appeared on behalf of the defendant at the initial Sentencing Hearing in the Crown Court and the subsequent Attorney General’s Reference Hearing at the Court of Appeal in November 2018. This Judgment highlights the restrictions on the imposition of Drug Rehabilitation Requirements attached to Community Orders in place of ‘short to moderate’ custodial sentences. The Judgment can be found here:“Full Court Transcript of Regina v Kay Strugnall [2018] EWCA Crim 2895″Andrew Randell v DPP [2018] EWHC 1048 (Admin) – Estelle successfully stated a case for the Opinion of the High Court following the outcome of a Magistrates’ Court trial. The client’s convictions for Arson and Theft were subsequently quashed at the High Court and no re-trial was ordered; this case reaffirmed the principle that a witness’ best evidence is given live, where it can be open to challenge. This case further confirmed that statutory provisions, not the Criminal Procedure Rules, determine the admissibility of Hearsay Evidence. A short commentary on the case by UK Practical Law is available here:“UK PLC Case Comment on Andrew Randell v DPP [2018] EWHC 1048 (Admin)” R v G [June 2018] Croydon Magistrates’ Court: Estelle’s client was acquitted of two charges involving assault, including an alleged assault upon his child. The evidence against the Defendant included body worn footage of injuries to the Complainant and the child immediately following the alleged assault. R v H [January 2018] Luton Magistrates’ Court: The Defendant was acquitted in respect of one charge of Causing Unnecessary Suffering to an Animal, contrary to s.4(1) of the Animal Welfare Act 2006. The trial involved independent witnesses for the Crown and legal submissions on behalf of the Defence. R v N (A Youth) [December 2018] Croydon Youth Court: Successful application inviting the recusal of a District Judge following a two-day youth trial. This application was made by Estelle after her 12-year-old client’s previous convictions were introduced by the Co-Defendant’s representative without notice. The matter was listed for legal arguments to be heard; despite the usual position that as Judges of fact and law, District Judges are able to put hearsay and bad character ‘out of their minds’, the Judge accepted Estelle’s submissions and recused himself. R v S [October 2017] Bromley Magistrates’ Court: Estelle successfully argued mitigating circumstances (‘Exceptional Hardship’), allowing her client to avoid mandatory disqualification and to continue driving with 15 points on their licence. R v O and Others [February 2018 – May 2018] Leicester Crown Court: Estelle acted as Junior Counsel in this 9-week trial involving 12 Defendants accused of charges ranging from Attempted Murder to multiple Conspiracies to Commit Violent Disorder. R v I [February 2018] Luton Crown Court: Estelle’s client was unanimously acquitted of a knifepoint robbery following a 4-day trial. R v C [January 2018] Cambridge Crown Court: A custodial sentence imposed in respect of Possession with Intent to Supply Class A Drugs (MDMA) was suspended following mitigation; the Judge accepted the Defence’s submissions that the case fell outside the usual applicable bracket of the Sentencing Guidelines. R v CU [November 2017] Stafford Crown Court: Not guilty verdicts recorded following a two-day trial in respect of one Count of section 18 Grievous Bodily Harm with intent, contrary to the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. The allegation involved a stabbing using improvised weapons and pouring of boiling water over the victim. R v CO [August 2017] Wolverhampton Crown Court: Client unanimously acquitted by a jury following a trial in respect of two Counts of dwelling burglary. R v H [Inner London Crown Court] Privately instructed Counsel in Possession with Intent to Supply Class A matter (36 wraps of cocaine); matter was discontinued post PTPH following successful representations made to the CPS by Counsel. R v D [Central Criminal Court] Privately instructed Defence Counsel in Possession with Intent to Supply Class A and False ID with Intent matter. R v A [Croydon Crown Court] Secured not guilty verdict in Category 1 Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm allegation involving weapon; Jury deliberated for less than 40 minutes. R v I [Camberwell Magistrates’ Court] Matter of Assault involved cross-examination of 8-year-old child in Court. R v R [Bromley Youth Court] Secured acquittal after trial in alleged Assault upon Store Manager by youth Defendant. Ciara is a committed defence barrister who is regarded as a first class advocate with over 12 years experience in the Criminal and Appellate courts. Ciara has an enormous capacity for complex criminal cases and has the ability to assimilate large quantities of evidence. Ciara is highly regarded for her...Read more Ciara is a committed defence barrister who is regarded as a first class advocate with over 12 years experience in the Criminal and Appellate courts. Ciara has an enormous capacity for complex criminal cases and has the ability to assimilate large quantities of evidence. Ciara is highly regarded for her meticulous preparation of cases, her impressive court room manner and her ability to form an instant rapport with clients. Ciara is regularly instructed in cases involving allegations of murder, large scale complex frauds, sexual offences and serious and organised crime.Current InstructionR v I: Multi handed murder and attempted murder.R v X: Multi handed case involving the supply of several kilos of class A drugs.R v H: Defendant charged with supplying 11 kilos of class B drugs.R v L: Defendant charged with possession with intent to supply (6 kilos of cocaine and 11 kilos of cannabis)R v W: Instructed to represent the Defendant in respect of allegations of rape and violent assault. Prison Law/Actions Against Police & Prisons Regular appearances before the parole boards for lifer prisoners.HDC applications, ROTL and re-categoristaion applications for serving prisoners.Representation of prisoners at adjudication hearings for offences committed in prison. R v S 2020 (Operation Carnival) Represented 1st Defendant of 13 as Leading Counsel in £20 million fraud involving Transport For London (TFL). The Defendant, together with others ran a highly sophisticated operation, fraudulently producing counterfeit rail cards on a massive scale. The Defendant was head of the distribution and manufacturing chain and was at the pinnacle of the operation. This case involved vast quantities of electronic telephone evidence. R v B (2019) (Operation Sneaton) Represented 1st Defendant in multi- handed large scale banking fraud which took place across England & Wales involving involving the use of cards which were adapted with false chips and magnetic strips encoded with legitimate bank card numbers to make large cash withdrawals. This case involved the manipulation of the cash withdrawal system resulting in huge financial losses to Barclay's Bank and Royal Bank of Scotland. R v A (2019) (Operation Italici) Represented Defendant following NCA investigation into the large scale import, export and distribution of Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS). Over 600 kilos of AAS was seized from Heathrow Airport which led to the investigation and arrest of the Defendants who were an organised crime group which was the most prolific of its kind ever uncovered in the world and likely to be the biggest global players in the AAS market. This case involved complex legal arguments surrounding breaches of the relevant PACE provisions and hundreds of hours of surveillance evidence. R v T & R v G (2018 & 2019) Perverting the Course of Justice- Represented two defendants in separate trials in an operation involving a total of thirty Defendants. This case revolved around the activities of a former employee of EMS Limited, a Ministry of Justice appointed electronic monitoring company. It was alleged that EMS employees arrange wholly outside of the proper scope of their dues and /or any legitimate authority, to use genuine issued equipment to tamper with electronic monitoring equipment. It was alleged that the equipment was tampered with in an effort to evade the practical restrictions which electronic monitoring necessarily involves. This case involved a vast quantity of raw scientific data and lengthy cross examination of the Crown's scientific experts. R v C (2016) Complex banking fraud involving transferred funds amounting to several million pounds. Bogus shelf companies were created with the intention of defrauding major banks of significant sums of money. R v M (2019) Appeal against conviction and sentence in a baby shaking murder case. Instructed post conviction to advise on the merits of an appeal and draft fresh grounds of appeal (Pro-Bono). This case involved expert medical evidence on the correlation between spinal injury and the respiratory system. R v N (2017) Represented Defendant charged with murder which was committed in custody. This case involved complex issues regarding diminished responsibility. R v MH (2018) Represented Defendant in stranger rape case in which the Complainant was drugged, physically assaulted and violently raped over an extended period at the Defendants address. R v K (2018) Represented Defendant charged with the rape of a female on the premises of a Bar/Nightclub. R v H (2019) Represented Defendant charged with large scale, multi-kilo supply of class A & B drugs involving. Case involved surveillance evidence and a large quantity of telephone raw data. Gregory specialises in general crime, corporate offending and regulatory matters with extensive experience beyond his year of Call having worked previously as a fee-earning paralegal for a leading niche private client firm and thereafter for 18 months at the Financial Conduct Authority. Gregory is well placed to understand the pressures...Read more Gregory specialises in general crime, corporate offending and regulatory matters with extensive experience beyond his year of Call having worked previously as a fee-earning paralegal for a leading niche private client firm and thereafter for 18 months at the Financial Conduct Authority. Gregory is well placed to understand the pressures on instructing solicitors and the importance of effective case preparation and managing lay client’s expectations. He is described as approachable, dependable and with an ability to instal trust and confidence in those that he represents.Gregory is a Level 3 CPS Advocate and has membership of both the Specialist Fraud Panel and Serious Crime Panel. To that end, Gregory both prosecutes and defends in the broad spectrum of criminal law, believing the same makes for a more rounded, measured advocate. Recent instructions include robbery, matters of significance violence, firearms offences and the like.In addition to criminal matters, Gregory has also developed a vast amount of experience in a Regulatory setting. Having first been on secondment with The Nursing and Midwifery Council as a case presenter, Gregory continues to advocate at tribunals both on behalf of the NMC and on behalf of registrants. Gregory is willing to be instructed in all regulatory matters, including cases concerning the General Pharmaceutical Council and the General Dental Council.Whilst currently focusing predominantly on crime and business crime, Gregory has previously accepted instructions in all areas of general civil litigation, including relief from sanctions and the like. He remains happy to provide pre-litigation strategic advice in writing or in conference. Gregory is well versed in those matters which cross the civil/criminal divide including regulation and health and safety.Gregory was former pro-bono advocate before the Armed Forces Compensation Tribunal and has a long standing interest in military law and ensuring the adequate representation of military personnel. Equally, he has an interest in sport law and representing those with legal issues in the sporting world having played for the Saracens Amateur team. Professional Memberships and Appointments The Honourable Society of Lincoln’s Inn (Wolfson Scholarship)CPS Panel, Grade 3Criminal Bar Association Nottingham Law School, LLBKaplan Law School, BVC (Kaplan Advocacy Scholarship) Operation Hornet Retained by Thames Valley Police and the CPS in an advisory role as disclosure counsel to aid a 9-month fraud trial. R v A (Central Criminal Court) Secured an acquittal at the Central Criminal Court where the Defendant was charged with possession of class A drugs with intent to supply after a six day trial. R v O (Inner London Crown Court) Prosecution on behalf of the CPS for a S.18 GBH in a domestic setting after a 4 day trial. R v M (Snaresbrook Crown Court) Successful defence of a gang member charged with armed robbery and threatening an individual with a knife after an 8 day trial R v W (Aylesbury Crown Court) Secured an acquittal at Aylesbury Crown Court where the Defendant was charged with possession of a firearm with intent after 5 day trial. R v G (Uxbridge Magistrates’ Court) Defence Counsel in a complex four-day trial concerning the neglect of three children aged 9, 10 and 14 by their mother this included the cross examination of all three young children and expert witnesses from Social Services. R v H (Woolwich Crown Court) Defence Counsel on a serious matter of racial violence; privately instructed. R v L (Chelmsford Crown Court) Defence Counsel in two weeks trial concerning a conspiracy to supply Class A Drugs; multi handed cases. R v W (Blackfriars Crown Court) Defence Counsel in seven day trial where defendant faced section 18 GBH committed in prison. NMC v G (2017) Represented registrant facing numerous assault allegation against patients through inappropriate restraint techniques. NMC v JC (2017) NMC case presenter where registrant had allegedly maintained an inappropriate relationship with numerous patients. NMC v J (2017) NMC case presenter where registrant allegedly caused a patient’s death. NMC v A (2017) NMC case presenter where registrant allegedly contributed to the death of a patient. Caroline is a hardworking, cogent and dedicated advocate. Caroline enjoys the ability to easily engage with clients from a variety of backgrounds to create a rapport. Caroline’s naturally compassionate approach to clients along with her persuasive and passionate advocacy is recognised and appreciated by both lay and professional clients. Prior...Read more Caroline is a hardworking, cogent and dedicated advocate. Caroline enjoys the ability to easily engage with clients from a variety of backgrounds to create a rapport. Caroline’s naturally compassionate approach to clients along with her persuasive and passionate advocacy is recognised and appreciated by both lay and professional clients.Prior to coming to the Bar Caroline gained a wider knowledge and experience of a number of areas of law. These included International Criminal Law, Human Rights law, Civil Law, Corporate Crime and Capital punishment. As a former intern for Judge Osaki at the International Criminal Court, Caroline assisted in drafting a section of the Judgment on the Ntaganda case. Caroline spent over a year and a half working as a Paralegal on the Tesco Fraud case, this experience honed her capacity to deal with documentation and issue heavy cases as well as her Disclosure review abilities. Caroline interned with Amicus, working on Death Row cases as a Mitigation Investigator for the State Public Defender in Jackson, Mississippi. This experience focussed Caroline’s empathy for her clients to enable her to best mitigate their circumstances for the sentencing stage of their upcoming Death penalty trials. Caroline also has experience of working as a paralegal for a Magic Circle firm and one of the largest city firms.Caroline remains close to Amicus, supporting the charity in writing articles for their newsletter and interviewing prospective interns. Caroline was also a former pro-bono advocate for the Free Representation Unit representing clients at Social security Tribunals.As a result of Caroline’s previous experience she has an invaluable understanding of the pressures on instructing solicitors and the importance of effective case preparation and client care. Caroline is frequently instructed in a variety of matters from driving matters to theft or violent matters.Whilst currently focussing predominantly on Crime and Business Crime, Caroline has received instructions in Family and Civil matters.Caroline remains interested in International Criminal Law and Human Rights Law and is keen to continue to gain experience in these areas and to apply her knowledge and experience gained through her time at the International Criminal Court to do so. Awards The Honourable Society of Lincoln’s Inn International Criminal Court (ICC) Internship Scholarship (6 month placement), The Hague, 2017The Honourable Society of Lincoln’s Inn Continuing Education Fund, Amicus Internship, Jackson, Mississippi, 2016The Honourable Society of Lincoln’s Inn Bursary – European Court of Human Rights Visit, Strasbourg, July 2015The Honourable Society of Lincoln’s Inn Bursary – International Criminal Court (ICC), June 2015 Professional Memberships & Appointments The Honourable Society of Lincoln’s InnCriminal Bar AssociationAmicusYoung Fraud Lawyers Association Amy has shown herself to be an able, versatile and dedicated advocate whose client care is widely recognised. Throughout her time in Chambers, Amy’s hard work, understanding of the law and measured approach has earnt her numerous plaudits from clients and solicitors. Prior to commencing pupillage, Amy worked as a...Read more Amy has shown herself to be an able, versatile and dedicated advocate whose client care is widely recognised. Throughout her time in Chambers, Amy’s hard work, understanding of the law and measured approach has earnt her numerous plaudits from clients and solicitors.Prior to commencing pupillage, Amy worked as a Parliamentary Researcher and as a county court advocate.During law school, Amy strengthened her experience in a variety of areas including employment law as a FRU representative and volunteering as Housing Law advisor. She also volunteered for Street Law and the Citizens Advice Bureau. This has provided her with a wealth of knowledge, particularly when dealing with vulnerable clients. Awards • Lord Diplock Scholar - The Honourable Society of the Middle Temple (2014 – 2015)• Blackstone Entrance Exhibition Award - The Honourable Society of the Middle Temple (2014 – 2015)• Commercial Bar Association (COMBAR) Scholar – (2015)• Graduate Diploma in Law - City Law School, University of London (2013 – 2015) • CPS - External Advocates Panel (Grade I)• Government Legal Department 'Junior Junior' Scheme Following in the footsteps of his father, Sir Victor, Gavin Glover was a State Scholar in 1980 and read Jurisprudence as the Anderson Scholar at Balliol College, Oxford University. He was called to the Bar of England and Wales at the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple in 1985, and...Read more Following in the footsteps of his father, Sir Victor, Gavin Glover was a State Scholar in 1980 and read Jurisprudence as the Anderson Scholar at Balliol College, Oxford University. He was called to the Bar of England and Wales at the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple in 1985, and joined the Mauritian Bar the same year. He started his own practice in 1985; he acted as part time Prosecuting Counsel from 1987 to 1990.In 2003, he was appointed a member of the Steering Committee on the Liberalisation of the Legal Profession. Mr. Glover was an active member of the Mauritius Bar Association where he successively occupied the functions of Treasurer in 2000 and 2001, Secretary in 2002 and President in 2003. Mr. Glover took silk in June 2010. He is presently the Head of Chambers and is one of the top litigators on the island with a wide range of clientele. He also advises a number of local and international companies in Mauritius. He is an accredited arbitrator of the MCCI Arbitration and Mediation Center.Areas of practice: Civil Law, Criminal Law, Corporate and Commercial Law Litigation, Arbitration, Labour Law, Family, Insurance Law and Public Procurement. Michael D. Weinstein is an American lawyer who specializes in capital habeas cases. Michael was called to the California State Bar in 2008. During his first two years as a lawyer, he served as a judicial law clerk to two federal trial judges in the Central District of California, the...Read more Michael D. Weinstein is an American lawyer who specializes in capital habeas cases.Michael was called to the California State Bar in 2008. During his first two years as a lawyer, he served as a judicial law clerk to two federal trial judges in the Central District of California, the Honorable Philip S.Gutierrez (2008-09) and the Honorable J. Spencer Letts (2009-10). In helping both judges manage dockets of over 300 civil and criminal cases, Michael would research and clarify issues for them before drafting courtopinions on a weekly basis.Michael’s clerkships led to a position with the Office of the Federal Public Defender for the Central District of California. As a Deputy Federal Public Defender, Michael primarily works on capital habeas cases, challenging the constitutionality of his clients’ first-degree murder convictions and death sentences . He also works on non-capital habeas cases, federal trials, and direct criminal appeals. Due to the nature of habeas litigation, Michael has gained in-depth experience in state and federal court, handling cases filed in all California state courts, including the California Supreme Court, various California-based district courts, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court.Because of Michael’s vast experience, Los Angeles law schools regularly invite him to sit on panels to discuss the criminal justice system and what it is like to be a public defender. He also helps supervise a capital habeas litigation clinic based out of Loyola Law School, Los Angeles. In 2014, the American Inns of Court selected Michael and one other American lawyer to serve as Pegasus Scholars. He spent six weeks in London in the spring of 2015 studying the English legal system.Licensed to practice before all California state courts, the Northern District of California, the Central District of California, the Southern District of California, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court Anne is an associate member (Accredited Mediator) at Church Court Chambers. Second Floor Goldsmiths Buildings Temple EC4. Anne is a registered Mediator with the CMC (Civil mediation council) and holds full professional indemnity insurance. She is a uniquely qualified full time Certified and Accredited Mediator of 8 years standing. She...Read more Anne is an associate member (Accredited Mediator) at Church Court Chambers. Second Floor Goldsmiths Buildings Temple EC4. Anne is a registered Mediator with the CMC (Civil mediation council) and holds full professional indemnity insurance.She is a uniquely qualified full time Certified and Accredited Mediator of 8 years standing.She is available to undertake a full range of Workplace, Civil and Commercial disputes within the UK and overseas. Anne holds a specialist interest in matters of Workplace /Employment and family business disputes.Anne is a Mediator with an unique Legal and Business background, with over 25 years experience in settling disputes, prosecutions and claims in her careers as a litigator at several London Chambers ranked LEGAL 500 firmsAnne’ also has additional valuable “people management “experience as the Managing Director of her own FSA authorised financial service regulated business, before choosing to Mediate exclusively.These experiences provided her with excellent communication skills, insight and expertise to the tasks of problem solving.Never afraid to reality test through tough and probing questions, whilst remaining tuned into the sensitivities of the participants. Anne is able to offer the participants a new perspective of their dispute which is focused firmly on their wider interests.Anne is highly adaptable in her approach, based on the dynamics at play in each room. Participants appreciate her strategy, speaking plainly and avoiding unnecessary jargon, she is warm, engaging and approachable which makes her particularly popular with nervous clients and in disputes of a sensitive nature.Reasons to appoint Anne Powell as your MediatorEstablished Mediator handles substantial contentious issues:Experienced in Public and third Sector Workplace and Employment disputes.Works exclusively within ADR and the court systemMediates extensively across the UK with high 90% success rateHas the experience to open doors to settlement and deal sensitively but robustly with Life changing Cases;ResolvingSenior management employment disputesAllegations of bullying and Harassment within the workplaceDisputes with Financial institutionsPreviously failed MediationsDirectors and Shareholders disputesToLATA and asset DisputesCapacity InheritanceCohabitation claimsConstructive and /or resulting TrustsCare home fees outstanding on the estate of the deceasedEasement right of way and TrespassCommercial DisputesHarassment cultural conflictProfessional backgroundLondon Mediation .tm (Accredited Mediator)http://londonmediator.uk/Church Court Chambers (Accredited Mediator)HomeJeffrey Green Russell Solicitors W1Senior associate LitigationElliot Company EC4 “Mark is astute and commercial, as well as being dependable and widely admired.”“Very calm, level-headed, approachable and methodical. He’s forceful without being aggressive.”“He has excellent commercial awareness and, having seen him in court, he is an exceptional advocate.” “He is very organised, clear and a very nice chap.”“An impressive advocate who is highly approachable, very practical and structured in his thinking and gives sensible commercial advice with no waffle.”“He’s very thorough, personable and incisive. An excellent advocate who focuses on the key issues.” Chambers UK 2018 ‘He has a great bedside manner with clients.’ Legal 500 2018 'A team player throughout the litigation process.’ Legal 500 2017 “The speed at which he can turn things round is incredible. He is a great advocate who is quick at thinking on his feet, and his way with the judiciary is great.”“He is fantastic.”“His reputation is excellent and he gives a first-rate service to clients.” “He is very pragmatic, very user-friendly and very good on his feet.”“He’s always a very safe pair of hands – excellent and good with clients, he is short and succinct in his advice, which goes down well.” “He’s a class above most and very good on his feet before a judge.”“An excellent trial advocate who excels at tough cross-examination.” “He’s always a very safe pair of hands. He’s excellent, good with clients, and short and succinct in his advice which goes down well.” Chambers UK 2017 “Technically excellent.”“A safe pair of hands and very commercial.”Recent work: Represented Travel Counsellors against Barclays Bank in claims alleging the mis-selling of an interest swap product and the improper deduction of ‘fees’ from accounts.“An extremely capable lawyer and a very hard worker. He leaves no stone unturned in seeking out the detail of a matter and is confident in his own abilities. He has the hallmark of quality.”“Forthright, exceptionally commercial and gets straight to the nub of the issue – exactly what the clients want.” Chambers UK 2016 “He’s pragmatic and very user-friendly, and his advocacy is also excellent.”“When you see that you’re against him your heart sinks.” “He’s an astute tactician. He doesn’t sugar the pill, and clients certainly appreciate that.”“He is quietly and efficiently effective.”“He is very quick at spotting the issues and distilling them down into simple advice and action.” Chambers UK 2015 “He always gives a consistent performance in court. He is softly spoken, measured and always gets on with judges – that’s how he wins cases.”“He provides a superb all-round service, combining strong technical skills with a personable approach. He is regarded as one of the best in his field in commercial litigation.”“He is very bright and effective – I would not hesitate to instruct him.” Chambers UK 2014 “A must-go-to junior counsel” Legal 500 2014 “Mark Harper is a barrister with a strong commercial chancery practice. He focuses largely on unfair prejudice petitions. According to one interviewee: “You can drop him into any situation and he will rise to the challenge.”“Mark Harper receives praise for his “strong advocacy skills.” He is especially adept at cross-examination as “he is able to identify and exploit weaknesses in his opponents to great effect. “He has notable expertise in matters such as shareholder and commercial disputes, professional negligence cases and restraint of trade matters”“Mark Harper who is sought out by instructing solicitors for his experience in the asset finance sector. He is recommended “ Chambers UK 2013 Mark is a member of the Chancery and Commercial team in Chambers and has developed what is recognised as one of the leading litigation practices in these areas having in recent years been involved in some of the largest and most high profile cases to be heard in the Chancery...Read more Mark is a member of the Chancery and Commercial team in Chambers and has developed what is recognised as one of the leading litigation practices in these areas having in recent years been involved in some of the largest and most high profile cases to be heard in the Chancery and Mercantile Courts outside London including his representation (with Paul Chaisty QC) of Wayne Rooney in his successful restraint of trade challenge to this Image Rights Representation Agreement (see below) and his representation (in 2014) of Sir Bradley Wiggins in defending the claims brought by his former management company following his termination of their retainer.His areas of specialism are Banking Finance, Civil Fraud, Commercial Litigation, Company, Insolvency, Partnership, Professional Negligence and Sport.As is evidenced by his “Recommendations” he is widely regarded (both by his peers and the solicitors’ profession) as one of the leading and most sought after juniors in his areas of practice.He has been described as the “complete all-rounder” being equally adept at all aspects of the role of the advocate coupled with tactical and strategic acumen and an affable and approachable personality that commends him to his peers, solicitors and clients alike.PARTNERSHIPMark has developed a leading junior practice in the area of partnership law (as recognised by his recommendation in this field in Chambers Partners). His practice in this area involves advice and representation in relation to all aspects of partnership law (including the applicability of Equality Legislation in the context of partnership disputes) and he is a regular “port of call” for professional partnerships in the North West (or individual partners within such partnerships) when advice is needed in connection with partnership matters, in particular exclusion of partners, breakdown in relationships between partners and the protection of partnership assets consequential upon the same.OFFICE HOURSMon Fri 08.30 18.00 PUBLICATIONS “Can I have my deposit back please” (insolvency position where consumer deposits are used to fund insolvent companies) [2014] 6 CRI 225“Fiduciary Duties owed to the excluded shareholder” (with Lesley Anderson QC) Law & Financial Market Review January 2013 QUALIFICATIONS AND AWARDS Downing College, Cambridge – Law MA Hons (1989 – 1992)Hardwicke Scholar (Lincoln’s Inn) Sara Fairclough obtained an LLB (Hons) in 1991 and completed the Bar Vocational Course, Gray’s Inn in 1992. She obtained LLM (Corporate Commercial) with Merit from King’s College University, London. In 1992, Sara was admitted as a Barrister to the Bar of England Wales. In 1999, after practising...Read more Sara Fairclough obtained an LLB (Hons) in 1991 and completed the Bar Vocational Course, Gray’s Inn in 1992. She obtained LLM (Corporate Commercial) with Merit from King’s College University, London. In 1992, Sara was admitted as a Barrister to the Bar of England Wales. In 1999, after practising at the Bar in London, Sara joined a law firm in the British Virgin Islands and was admitted as a Barrister of Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court ( British Virgin Islands). She has practiced in both the British Virgin Islands and London. Prior to joining Hunte Co. in 2008, Sara practised in Hong Kong with another leading offshore law firm.Her primary areas of practice are Banking Finance; Commercial and Corporate Transactions; Commercial Litigation; Cross-border disputes; and Trusts. Anne has been practising in asylum, immigration and human rights since 2000. She has represented appellants at all levels; from the First and Upper Tier Tribunals (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) up to the Court of Appeal. She has experience of conducting judicial review cases, including out of hours injunctions. Anne’s...Read more Anne has been practising in asylum, immigration and human rights since 2000. She has represented appellants at all levels; from the First and Upper Tier Tribunals (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) up to the Court of Appeal. She has experience of conducting judicial review cases, including out of hours injunctions.Anne’s practice entails meeting people of different nationalities from diverse cultural backgrounds. She is always able to empathise with her clients without losing objectivity.Anne has given CPD accredited lectures covering a range of topics. She is happy to share her knowledge and experience. Anne is qualified to undertake public access work.Anne continues to learn new languages and enjoys practising these when on holiday. She is a voracious reader of crime and science fiction/fantasy. Chris’ areas of specialisation include business immigration and crime. As a criminal advocate Chris has defended across the gamut of offences including fraud and white-collar crime, drugs offences, property offences, sexual and violent assaults and offences by and against children. Chris took a career sabbatical in 2016 to experience big...Read more Chris’ areas of specialisation include business immigration and crime. As a criminal advocate Chris has defended across the gamut of offences including fraud and white-collar crime, drugs offences, property offences, sexual and violent assaults and offences by and against children. Chris took a career sabbatical in 2016 to experience big business and the corporate world. Returning to the law, he is currently the founder of a Business Immigration Consultancy.Post Grad. Diploma in Law – College of Law, GuildfordBar Vocational Course – Inns of Court School of Law Tre Sky [2000] 2 Cr. App. R. (S.) 260 Appeal against sentence. Administering a noxious substance with intent. R (Hunt) v Criminal Cases Review Commission [2001] Q.B. 1108; [2001] 2 W.L.R. 319; [2000] S.T.C. 1110; [2001] 2 Cr. App. R. 6; 73 T.C. 406; [2001] Crim. L.R. 324; [2000] S.T.I. 1608; Times, November 24, 2000 Judicial Review, junior counsel for the claimant led by Robert Rhodes QC and Simon Stafford Michael – Power of the Commissioners of the Inland Revenue to prosecute on indictment without the consent of the Attorney-General. R (Lonergan) v Lewes Crown Court, [2005] EWCA Crim 457 (Admin) : [2004] EWCA Crim 3358; [2005] 2 Cr. App. R. (S.) 37; (2005) 149 S.J.L.B. 26; Times, December 23, 2004: [2004] EWCA Crim 3358; [2005] 2 Cr. App. R. (S.) 37; (2005) 149 S.J.L.B. 26; Times, December 23, 2004 Judicial Review, junior counsel for the claimant led by Alan Newman QC. Leading case on Anti-Social Behaviour Orders R v Page et ors [2004] EWCA Crim 3358; [2005] 2 Cr. App. R. (S.) 37; (2005) 149 S.J.L.B. 26; Times, December 23, 2004 Appeal against sentence. Guideline case on sentencing for theft. R v AS, Snaresbrook Crown Court. Rape and assault by penetration within marriage. AS acquitted of all rape charges. R v V, Snaresbrook Crown Court Rape, robbery and assault. Having admitted the assault V was acquitted of rape and robbery. R v P, Birmingham Crown Court Assault by penetration with a broken table leg and section 18 GBH on an alleged young prostitute. P was acquitted on the count of assault by penetration. R. v Cleary (Christopher) [2006] EWCA Crim 1375 Case of historic sexual assault. R v J, Wolverhampton Crown Allegations of attempted rape and sexual assault against an 11 year old complainant. R. v S (S P) [2009] EWCA Crim 1959 Wounding with intent, knife crime. S admitted stabbing the victim but denied any intent to do grievous bodily harm. Defence of automatism as a result from withdrawal from alcohol was successful. The sentence passed down for the alternative section 20 allegation was successfully appealed. R v T, Wolverhampton Crown Court Wounding with intent, knife crime. Allegation that husband had stabbed wife and left her for nearly 24hours before the emergency services were called. Defence of self-inflicted wounds was successful – acquitted. R v T, Inner London Crown Court Multiple robberies and wounding with intent. The defendant was only 12 years of age at the date of the alleged stabbing R v A et ors, Harrow Crown Court Conspiracy to supply firearms. Defence of duress was successful. A was the only defendant acquitted. R v SC et ors, Winchester Crown Court Conspiracy to supply class A drugs. Junior counsel. 9-handed multi-million pound drugs conspiracy. R v R et ors, Wolverhampton Crown Court Conspiracy to supply class A drugs. Successful submission of no case to answer based on the nature of the conspiracy indicted. R v C et ors, (CA) Case Number 9803759 X2 (Butte Mining Plc) Second junior counsel for the defendant (led by Robert Rhodes QC and David Stern) on a renewed application for leave to appeal. Serious fraud involving the flotation of a mining company (Butte Mining plc). The case involved complex technical allegations concerning geology, mining engineering and hydrology as well as detailed considerations of the “Yellow Book”. Application was subsequently made to the European Court of Human Rights. R (Hunt) v Criminal Cases Review Commission [2001] 2 WLR 319 Judicial Review, second junior counsel for the claimant – Power of the Commissioners of the Inland Revenue to prosecute on indictment without the consent of the Attorney-General. R v A et ors Maidstone Crown Court Junior counsel led by Christopher van Hagen. Multi-handed identity fraud. A was the only defendant to avoid a custodial sentence. R v B et anor, Winchester Crown Court Junior counsel led by Christopher van Hagen. Allegation of misfeasance in public office surrounding the provision of services to the newly formed Afghan police force. acquitted. R v S et ors, Southampton Crown Court & Court of Appeal Counsel for the first defendant in a multi-handed conspiracy to defraud, alleged to have been worth hundreds of thousands of pounds. The defendant was acquitted on the most serious count on the indictment following submissions of no case to answer based on whether the single count actually alleged a “rolled-up” conspiracy. The prosecution attempted to appeal the terminatory ruling, however the Court of Appeal sent the case back to the Crown Court for formal not guilty verdicts. R v M, Southwark Crown Court Junior counsel led by Christopher van Hagen. Serious and complex fraud attracting large scale media attention. Richard has a common law practice, specialising in family and criminal law. He also has a particular expertise in rent/mortgage possession proceedings. FAMILY LAW Richard is an experienced family advocate at all levels up to and including the High Court, with a practice that includes both public and private child...Read more Richard has a common law practice, specialising in family and criminal law. He also has a particular expertise in rent/mortgage possession proceedings.FAMILY LAWRichard is an experienced family advocate at all levels up to and including the High Court, with a practice that includes both public and private child law as well as matrimonial work.In private law cases he has a wealth of experience across the spectrum, dealing with issues of contact and residence, including issues of removal from the jurisdiction, and internal/international relocation. He has acted for relatives in applications for special guardianship orders. He is particularly well regarded for his ability in lengthy fact finding hearings, drawing on his criminal advocacy skills in this most adversarial area of child law.He has considerable experience in public law work, with an emphasis on care proceedings. Primarily he has acted for parents against Local Authorities. Many such cases have begun life in the Family Proceedings Court but have been subsequently transferred to the Principal Registry owing to length and/or complexity. They have covered a range of issues from physical abuse including cultural chastisement cases and non-accidental injuries through to sexual abuse and neglect. He has considerable experience of cross-examining experts across the whole spectrum of child care cases. He deals with cases where possible from the commencement of proceedings through to trial in both simple and complex cases as he understands the reassurance clients take from continuity of counsel throughout. This of course includes a considerable amount of drafting, both of submissions, applications, skeleton arguments and orders.He also appears in divorce proceedings, including financial relief on divorce/judicial separation from first appointments through to final hearings and interventions by the Queen’s Proctor.He also is experienced in applying for/defending applications for injunctions (non-molestation /occupation /prohibited steps orders etc) including fact finding hearings.CRIMINAL LAWRichard regularly prosecutes in the crown court in all areas of crime, either as a led junior or appearing alone. Such work includes CPS instruction in relation to sexual and violent offences (robbery, S.18 GBH), child cruelty and firearms offences as well as drug supply and importation, fraud and firearms offences. He also prosecutes on behalf of the probation service and the vehicle inspectorate.His defence practice is similarly varied, including serious sexual offences such as rape, violent offences (affray, robbery, GBH, arson etc), multi-handed cases involving drug importation and fraud, firearms offences. He also has defended in a number of cases involving trademark/copyright infringement. He has a particular specialty in ‘mental health’ cases (insanity at the time of the offence/ lacking mens rea etc). He has also appeared in the Court of Appeal.MORTGAGE-RENT/POSSESSION PROCEEDINGSRichard has acted for both claimants and defendants in possession proceedings both private and legal aid, from short applications to fully contested hearings. Philip Kazantzis Qualified as a Solicitor in 1998; obtained his Higher Rights of Audience in 2001 and thereafter was called to the Bar in 2004. When Philip first practised as a Criminal Defence Solicitor he worked his way up to partnership level at Saunders Solicitors, a specialist Criminal Defence Solicitor’s...Read more Philip Kazantzis Qualified as a Solicitor in 1998; obtained his Higher Rights of Audience in 2001 and thereafter was called to the Bar in 2004.When Philip first practised as a Criminal Defence Solicitor he worked his way up to partnership level at Saunders Solicitors, a specialist Criminal Defence Solicitor’s firm. Whilst at Saunders, Philip headed the Complex Fraud department which involved not only dealing with complex legal matters but also the management of a team of lawyers. Philip cross-qualified as a barrister in 2004 so that he could focus on advocacy rather than managing a legal practice.Philip now focuses his practise in the areas of Crime and the Regulatory sector, where he has gained experience conducting both complex and heavyweight proceedings.He is regularly instructed in criminal cases alleging complex fraud, false imprisonment, possession of firearms, murder, robbery, rape, drugs supply, importation and serious assaults such as section 18 Grievous Bodily Harm (GBH) and attempted murder. He has also acted as both leading and led junior advocate in a number of complex frauds, large-scale drug conspiracies and murder cases. He has acted on behalf of a number of high-profile individuals whose cases have been the subject of extensive international media coverage.Philip’s experience and his ability to conduct both complex and heavyweight proceedings is well regarded by his peers where he is known for his creative approach combined with an excellent understanding and application of the law. The extensive experience Philip has gained working both as a Criminal Defence Solicitor and a Criminal Defence Barrister means his clients gain an exceptional approach to the work on their case. He is a strong team leader who is capable of providing the requisite analysis of a case, which often gives rise to successful submissions being put before the court both in writing and orally.Philip is particularly well known for his ability to use his strong computer skills in the preparation and presentation of complex cases. Having worked on a large number of Very High Costs Cases (VHCC), which in some cases have involved the necessity to consider material in excess of 100,000 pages of used evidence, he has proved his ability to digest enormous amounts of material and present cases in a format easily understood by the jury.Whilst a large focus of Philip’s career has been on heavyweight Criminal Defence Cases, he has also undertaken various cases in the fields of Employment and Regulatory work.Philip has undertaken a number of Police Disciplinary Hearings, where he has appeared on behalf of police officers at different levels from the disciplinary panel to Chief Constables and thereafter before the Police Appeals Tribunal. He is familiar with the workings of the Police National Computer (PNC) and has dealt with cases relating to data protection issues arising from the alleged misuse of the PNC. Called to the Bar 2004Qualified as solicitor 1998 (Higher Rights of Audience 2001)College of Law Guildford – Legal Practice Course – 1996Brunel University – LLB (Hons) 1995 The London Criminal Courts Solicitors’ AssociationCriminal Bar Association R. v. MW [2012] EWCA Crim 2664 Reduction in sentence for what was described by the Court as a “massive scale importation” of class A drugs. The case also considered the impact of the aggregate sentence to be served by the defendant due to a similar conviction in Holland prior to his extradition back to England. C v SL (In Administration) UKEAT/0487/11/DM – 7 March 2012 The Employment Appeal Tribunal upheld the appeal insofar as compensation for sex discrimination ought to have been joint and several between the responsible respondents. However, this did not apply to the 25% uplift. Finally, the Employment Tribunal ought to have awarded compensation for loss of earnings, on a joint and several basis, for sex discrimination, although the same loss was awarded as unlawful deductions against the employer only. Link: http://www.employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed11896 R. v. NA [2006] EWCA Crim 3281 Reduction in sentence due to circumstances and in particular the disability and the difficulties which that created for the applicant in coping with the prison environment, the sentence of nine months imprisonment was excessive and the appropriate sentence ought to have been four months. R. v. DA [2006] EWCA Crim 2680 Sentences should have reflected the delay with its consequent anxiety and concern for the defendants. An adjustment should be made as a matter of principle but is bound to be modest. R. (on the application of M) v. ICC [2005] EWHC 363 (Admin DC.) Judicial review lies in respect of a refusal of bail in the Crown Court; and that decisions as to bail do not fall within the exclusion of judicial review in respect of “matters relating to trial on indictment” under section 29(3) of the Supreme Court [Senior Courts] Act 1981. R. v. VS – The Crown Court at Wood Green – 2018 Philip was leading junior counsel, where he led, Graham Lloyd, a very experienced solicitor advocate in this case which lasted 25 days. The case concerned three complex frauds where the loss amounted to almost £2.5 million whilst the risk of loss before discovery was a little over £4 million. The case also involved money laundering, and possession of banking paraphernalia used in the course of the fraud, and possession of genuine and false identity documents. Philp and Graham acted for the first defendant and so had to take the lead on much of the work throughout the trial. Instructed by Jas Virdee of Virdee Solicitors. R. v. IU – The Crown Court at Inner London – 2017 A trial lasting thirty-three days, where Philip was led by Alisdair Williamson QC of Raymond Buildings, in what was a tragic murder case. The certificate extending the Representation to allow for Queen’s Counsel and Junior advocate was only granted some twelve days before trial. This was a difficult trial where their client faced charges of Murder, Conspiracy to Cause GBH, Conspiracy to Cause ABH and Possession of an Offensive Weapon. The murder alleged to have been committed on a joint enterprise basis, for which the prosecution relied on a vast number of texts and other social media messages, months of mobile phone data, in addition to many hours of CCTV evidence. Their client was acquitted of the murder charge and the alternative of manslaughter, so avoided a life sentence being imposed. Instructed by Emma Rahman and Stuart Harris of HP Gower Solicitors. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5206649/Teenage-killer-knifed-student-egg-row-jailed.htmlhttp://news.met.police.uk/news/teenager-guilty-of-murder-mile-end-280304 R. v. XX – The Crown Court at Reading – 2017 A nine-day trial, where Philip represented a 17-year old youth jointly charged with another 17-year old on a count of attempted murder with an alternative count of wounding with intent. The case arose from the youth’s plan to steal 1 ounce of cannabis from a supplier. On running off with the drugs, the dealer gave chase and was ultimately stabbed with a very large kitchen knife whilst in an altercation with the co-defendant. The dealer asserted that Philip’s client had shouted “kill him” before he had been stabbed. Issues in the case related to who had initial possession of the knife, and whether Philip’s client had shouted the words “kill him” or offered some other assistance or encouragement to the co-defendant such as by being armed with the hammer. A classic joint enterprise case. The defendants were stopped very shortly after the incident with the co-defendant found in possession of the blooded knife and the cannabis, whilst Philip’s client was found in possession of a claw hammer. Philip’s client was acquitted of both counts, whilst the co-defendant was convicted by majority of the wounding with intent count. Instructed by Reena Hunjan of Wells Burcombe LLP. R. v. MR – The Crown Court at Kingston – 2017 hilip was instructed very late in this case, as previous counsel could not attend the trial. This was a case charged as Conspiracy to Supply Class A drugs, namely Cocaine. Philip’s client, was a lorry driver whose vehicle had been logged on Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) on two occasions at a place that was 30 miles off his expected route. There was also CCTV of the latter visit showing a co-defendant’s vehicle stopping by his lorry for a short period of time before both vehicles leaving the area within minutes of each other. That co-defendant ran a defence based on his belief that he was dealing in Cannabis and stated someone had placed the drugs into his vehicle. A defence witness had to be organised to give evidence over the video link from Poland. The two co-defendants were found within a flat the following day with two others who had earlier pleaded guilty. Police found some 61 kg of Cocaine within the flat. Both co-defendants’ were convicted by majority, whilst Philip’s client was acquitted. Instructed by Alexander Goscimski of Goscimski & Associates. R. v. FG – The Central Criminal Court – 2017 A short five-day trial following guilty pleas by two defendants and a third being severed to a trial at a later date. An allegation of conspiracy to supply class A drugs, namely Cocaine, where the defendant was one of three males that had been in a vehicle within which the drugs were found. The postcode of the “meeting place” had been sent from the defendant’s cheap Nokia phone to an unknown number. Unanimously acquitted by the jury, despite difficulties with phone evidence. Philip acted as junior counsel alone. Instructed by Lesley-Anne Perry of Wells Burcombe LLP R. v. SL – The Crown Court at Maidstone – 2016 This client transferred representation to Philip as litigator following guilty pleas and sentence. The Confiscation proceedings were extremely complex. The Crown asserted a benefit figure of more than £22 million with identifiable realisable assets of just short of £1 million and asserted hidden assets so that the full amount of £22 million should be deemed payable. Philip spent many hours assessing various aspects of the case and instructed numerous experts on various issues including drugs valuations, phone analysis and handwriting comparison. Philip also submitted detailed skeleton arguments raising complex legal issues resulting from the defendant having been extradited from Spain to face the initial criminal proceedings. The final orders made were a benefit figure of just under £2 million with a realisable amount of £450,000. R. v. PL – The Central Criminal Court – 2016 Philip represented the first of six defendants as junior counsel alone in a re-trial lasting some seven weeks. His client faced three allegations of false imprisonment in addition to counts of Kidnap, Robbery and possession of an imitation firearm with intent to commit an indictable offence. His client was found not guilty of the firearm offence whilst the jury were unable to decide on the remaining verdicts. The Crown decided it was not in the public interest to proceed to a third trial and so offered no evidence on all the remaining charges. Instructed by Jas Virdee of Virdee Solicitors. R. v. DP – The Crown Court at Croydon – 2015 Philip was led by Jonathan Higgs QC of 5 King’s Bench Walk, whilst co-defending with Lewis Power QC of Church Court Chambers, in what was a very difficult gang related double attempted murder case. Complex issues relating to Gun Shot Residue, DNA and phone analysis had to be carefully scrutinised and tested at trial. After four days of deliberations, the jury acquitted their client of all charges faced by him. Instructed by Jas Virdee of Virdee Solicitors. R. v. RS – The Crown Court at Southwark – 2015 This was the Crown Currency Exchange trial which lasted 46 days. Before the Company’s collapse in October 2010 it was one of the country’s largest personal currency exchange businesses. Philip was led by Sallie Bennett-Jenkins QC of 2 Hare Court. This was a highly complex case which had over 163,000 pages of used prosecution evidence in addition to many thousands of pages of unused material. Having worked on the case since September 2013, many hours had to be set aside to meticulously work through the vast amount of material in order to fully prepare for trial. All the evidence was served electronically and this was one of the first cases to be presented before the jury electronically with the use of iPads. Instructed by Alan Burcombe of Wells Burcombe LLP. R. v. VL – The Crown Court at Isleworth – 2014 The defendant was indicted on counts of Conspiracy to Cause Grievous Bodily Harm with Intent and Violent Disorder. The case related to a serious incident of public disorder in Southall Park in August 2013, during which a 23 year old man was stabbed to death and a number of others were seriously injured. Philip was leading junior advocate where he led an independent solicitor advocate, Judith Benson. The case required careful and considered analysis of a substantial amount of CCTV material and complex telephone data. A successful submission of no case to answer was made in respect of the Conspiracy Count and then after some six weeks of trial their client was acquitted of the remaining count of violent disorder. Instructed by Jas Virdee of Virdee Solicitors. R. v. MM – Central Criminal Court – 2013 Philip was the leading junior advocate where he led Steve Garratt, an independent solicitor advocate in this trial, which lasted just short of seven weeks. Throughout the proceedings, the indictment had contained counts of Murder, Manslaughter, Kidnapping, False Imprisonment, Preventing a Lawful and Decent Burial of a Body, Blackmail and Handling Stolen Goods. Philip’s client was unanimously acquitted of all the charges he faced. Instructed by Alexander Goscimski, consultant at Imran Khan & Partners. R. v. MC – The Crown Court at Salisbury – 2013 A case of Murder where Philip was led by Ian Glen QC. Their client walked into the offices of a solicitor who was acting for an opposing party and shot him with a sawn-off shotgun. The case raised issues of Diminished Responsibility and Loss of Control. Instructed by Suezanne King of Wells Burcombe LLP. R. v. IC – The Crown Court at Isleworth – 2013 The defendant was acquitted of an allegation of rape despite the complainant asserting that she was asleep at the time and the defendant being unable to recollect having had sexual intercourse with her. The forensic evidence confirmed that sexual activity had taken place. The case involved a successful application in accordance with section 41 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 to cross-examine the complainant about previous sexual activity and required great care in the tactical approach to the case. Instructed by Suezanne King of Wells Burcombe LLP. R. v. HP – The Crown Court at Harrow – 2012 A ten handed complex Conspiracy to Burgle case which also incorporated an additional charge alleging the defendants conspiring to concern themselves in the retention and disposal of the proceeds of crime. Philip acted as leading junior advocate where he led Simon Gledhill of Thomas More Chambers. The case incorporated covert surveillance including what the Crown asserted was their client driving in an “anti-surveillance manner” and conducting “hostile reconnaissance” of prospective venues to burgle. Furthermore, their client’s phone was cell cited at the time and in the vicinity of at least two premises which were burgled as part of this conspiracy. Despite the strength of the Crown’s case their client was just one of only two defendants unanimously acquitted of all charges after a trial lasting just over four weeks. Instructed by Massimo Trebar of Wells Burcombe LLP. R. v. RA – The Crown Court at Reading – 2012 This was a case alleging 6 counts of sexual activity with a child contrary to section 9(1) of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Great care had to be taken in the cross-examination of the young complainant in addition to other family members including her younger brother. In addition a cousin who had made previous complaints of a similar nature and to whom the first complaint was made required careful probing questions to elicit what lead to the complainant opening up to her and to identify inconstancies in the evidence given. The defendant was acquitted of all charges. Instructed by Suezanne King of Wells Burcombe LLP. R. v. KP – The Crown Court at Southwark – 2012 Philip acted as leading junior advocate where he led Simon Gledhill of Thomas More Chambers in a highly complex fraud case lasting 11 weeks. A successful submission at half time was made in respect of the main conspiracy count following which their client was unanimously acquitted of all other charges faced. Instructed by Sundeep Pankhania of HP Gower Solicitors. R. v. MW – The Crown Court at Liverpool – 2012 This was a case involving a large-scale conspiracy to bring drugs and firearms from continental Europe into England and Scotland, for onward supply. The indictment spanned a period of just over 2 years and the conspirators used two known methods to achieve their goals; one was by use of vehicles with hidden compartments and the other was by the use of human couriers or “mules”. There were in excess of 34,000 pages of used material to consider in this case. Philip was led by Icah Peart QC. Instructed by Jas Virdee of Virdee Solicitors. R. v. G.B – The Crown Court at Harrow – 2011 Philip was the sole defence advocate representing a man alleged to have committed indecent and sexual assault on his step-daughter throughout the years 2000 to 2005 whilst she was under that age of 13. This was a difficult trial requiring careful cross-examination of the complainant and her family members in addition to a friend who had apparently been told about the allegations a number of years earlier. The case involved allegations contrary to the Sexual Offences Acts of 1956 and 2003. Philip’s client was unanimously acquitted of all charges. Instructed by Suezanne King of Wells Burcombe LLP. R. v. M.K – The Crown Court at Snaresbrook – 2011 Philip acted as junior alone in this six week trial before the Snaresbrook Crown Court. The case involved allegations of Threats to Kill, Possession of Firearms and Attempted Murder where the complainant was shot seven times. Despite being positively identified by the complainant, Philip’s client was unanimously acquitted of all charges. R. v. C.T – The Crown Court at Woolwich – 2010 The defendant was acquitted of aggravated burglary by majority verdict after a five day trial despite having been recognised by one witness at the scene and picked out on an identification procedure by a second witness. This was a classic identification case. R. v. P.C – The Crown Court at Snaresbrook – 2010 Acted for the Crown in a complex matter which lasted nine weeks and the press reported as a case where the defendants “made ‘James Bond-style’ lethal weapons in a ‘homemade gun factory’” . R. v. D.P – The Crown Court at Reading – 2009 The defendant was acquitted of all allegations faced which included, Kidnapping, Threats to Kill and ABH. R. v. L.C – The Crown Court at Inner London – 2009 A verdict of not guilty in respect of a s.18 GBH allegation made by the defendant’s common law wife who had received very serious knife wounds. R. v. N.A – The Crown Court at Kingston – 2009 A large scale people smuggling and money laundering case which lasted 8 weeks and resulted in unanimous verdicts of not guilty on both counts. R. v. J.J – Central Criminal Court – 2008 Philip was led junior counsel, led by Courtenay Griffiths Q.C. in the murder case of Nisha Patel-Nasri a Special Constable. R. v. P.R. – Court-martial at Catterick Barracks – 2007 Successfully defended in a four day rape allegation upon a fellow soldier. R. v. J.J – The Crown Court at Croydon – 2007 A case where a loaded prohibited firearm was found beneath the driver’s seat of the car the defendant was driving. The car itself was proved to be stolen and showing cloned number plates. Despite the obvious difficulties in the case, the defendant was found not guilty. R. v. C.M – The Crown Court at Kingston – 2005 Philip was led junior counsel in this matter in which his client was acquitted following a three month trial alleging conspiracy to evade the prohibition on importation of cocaine. R. v. J.H – The Crown Court at Southwark – 2005 Said to be the largest mail dumping fraud to date. The Crown offered no evidence against Philip’s client on the second day of trial. R. v. DH – The Crown Court at Bristol – 2019 A very difficult trial, where Philip represented the defendant as junior counsel alone, as despite the prosecution having two counsel and the case being allocated to a High Court Judge, his application for the Representation Order to be extended to permit the instruction of two counsel was refused by the Court. The defendant had pleaded guilty to several offences committed whilst in breach of licence, having been released from an earlier term of imprisonment for public protection (IPP). The defendant denied two counts of attempted murder of police officers and the alternative count of being in possession of a firearm with intent to endanger life. Armed police were approaching a property that the defendant was in, whereby he fired a shotgun out of a first-floor window. He was acquitted of the two attempted murder charges, which had a significant impact on the overall sentence. Instructed by Lesley-Anne Perry of Wells Burcombe LLP https://www.wellsburcombe.co.uk/. Widely spread media coverage: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-somerset-50301124 R. v. LK – The Crown Court at Southampton – 2019 A relatively short but serious trial where Philip’s client faced charges of conspiracy to supply class A and B drugs. The defendant had links to the address where supplies were seen on CCTV to be undertaken in his presence by his co-defendant. Furthermore, the main consignments of drugs were found within various bags contained within a rucksack, his client’s fingerprints were found on a TK Maxx bag, a black plastic bag within that and further grey and black inner bags. In addition to the difficulty regarding fingerprints, at total of £37,873 cash was found in various quantities and locations at his client’s address. The jury returned unanimous verdicts of not guilty in respect of the drugs charges faced at trial. Instructed by Steve Garratt and Raf Demczuk of O’Neill, Wright & Nash Solicitors http://www.ownsolicitors.co.uk/. R. v. AH – The Crown Court at Woolwich – 2018 Philip was leading junior counsel, where he led Patrick Cassidy of Kenworthy Chambers. This was a trial which lasted 43 days, involving various counts of Conspiracy to Assist in the Unlawful Immigration to the UK, between 1 January 2017 and 13 December 2017, in addition to a number of Counts of Converting Criminal Property, being the proceeds of those Conspiracies between the same dates. There were in excess of 14,000 pages of served documentary evidence, in addition to a further 12,000 pages of used digital evidence, much of which related to Viber messaging and so required detailed analysis and consideration. Much of their client’s defence related to his transactions as an unregistered “Hawala” dealer. This required detailed cross-examination of the Crown’s financial expert and resulted in their client being acquitted of being in possession of £107,000 cash upon his first arrest on 15 June 2017 and a further allegation involving possession of £35,800 jointly with another two co-defendants. That was despite some admissions as to involvement in people-smuggling, made both by way of guilty plea and in covert recordings in the defendant’s vehicle before charge and whilst detained in custody. This was a very difficult trial which resulted in a number of not guilty verdicts as against their client. Instructed by Ian Anderson of A&M Solicitors https://www.aandmsolicitors.com/ “Oliver has built a reputation for not shying away from cases that involve complicated legal argument or those that require a detailed consideration of large volumes of disclosure. He approaches all cases in the same fashion, that a successful defence is built and fought from the outset” Lawyer Monthly Awards September 2013. Called to the Bar in November 2003 by the Honourable Society of Lincoln’s Inn. Pupillage completed in 2004 at 2 Bedford Row, Chambers of William Clegg QC. LLB (Hons) 2:1 from Queen Mary College, University of London. Wolfson Scholar of Lincoln’s Inn. Practice areas: Oliver has a predominantly Criminal Defence...Read more Called to the Bar in November 2003 by the Honourable Society of Lincoln’s Inn.Pupillage completed in 2004 at 2 Bedford Row, Chambers of William Clegg QC.LLB (Hons) 2:1 from Queen Mary College, University of London.Wolfson Scholar of Lincoln’s Inn.Practice areas:Oliver has a predominantly Criminal Defence practice, but also takes instruction from the Crown, Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, and Local Authorities.Oliver’s practice is divided into two areas. In the first Oliver has built a considerable reputation for his expertise in business crime, fraud, bribery and corruption, money laundering and proceeds of crime matters, and asset forfeiture – at trial, in confiscation hearings and on appeal. This has now developed into an international practice, which requires the detailed consideration of the laws of multiple jurisdictions, and an appreciation of how these will interact with each other.The second covers all levels of serious violent crime (conducting over 15 Section 18 GBH trials last year alone), rape and sexual assault, drug importation and supply, robbery, kidnap, and blackmail.Oliver is one of the youngest Barristers to ever appear before the Supreme Court. He has been before the Court twice on the now leading confiscation authority of R v Waya [2012] UKSC 51, a case the full 9 man court deemed to be “a matter of great public importance”. This successful appeal provided a wholesale review of the assessment of criminal benefit in confiscation hearings, the effects of re-payment of such benefit prior to final hearing, and whether ‘abuse of process’ principles can apply. A Court now must only make a confiscation order if it is satisfied it is ‘proportionate to the aims of the legislation’ and so compatible with Article 1 of the 1st Protocol of the European Convention on Human Rights. This has given those wishing to challenge confiscation orders significantly greater scope to do so. This landmark judgment has gone a long way to creating a more level playing field for those from whom the State is attempting to take private property.Oliver is often instructed in confiscation or asset forfeiture matters that involve cross-jurisdictional asset tracing. Oliver has sent solicitors everywhere from Jamaica to Nigeria and all across Europe in attempts to establish the legitimate source of client assets.As a result of this international element to Oliver’s practice he now regularly advises a law firm in the Cayman Islands on cases involving fraud, money laundering regulations, asset forfeiture, the bribery act, and general compliance with the regulatory obligations imposed upon companies in the Caribbean, and upon those of them that conduct business abroad.Under the Bribery Act, and other regulations, the law of one jurisdiction can be used to regulate conduct in another. Due to the ‘off shore’ nature of Cayman’s business environment, and its place in a global economy, this can often pose complicated questions as to liability, and ultimately culpability. Oliver has much experience of, and enjoys dealing with, the international nature of such allegations.Oliver is available for conferences via Skype, at times suitable to the time zone for those that instruct.Oliver also advises individuals, law firms, and corporate clients in the United Kingdom on their compliance obligations under the bribery act, the money laundering regulations, and the proceeds of crime act: a growing area of legal services in light of the increased use of enforced ‘self-regulation’ by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority.He also has significant experience in handling complex expert evidence, ranging from telephone and forensic analysis of computers to ballistic, medical and veterinary experts. PUBLICATIONS / LECTURES Oliver provides Bar Standards Board accredited ‘Continuing Professional Development’ lectures given on confiscation, proceeds of crime, bribery, and fraud to barristers, firms of solicitors, and to Local Authorities. These can be provided in Counsel’s Chambers or at Solicitor’s offices.Invited by ‘WestLaw UK Insight’ as a “market leading lawyer” on the Proceeds of Crime Act to provide the 100,000 subscriber legal database with the sole articles on following topics: Confiscation: Overview Confiscation: Criminal Benefit Confiscation: Appeals Proceeds of Crime: Asset forfeiture EDUCATION Called to the Bar in November 2003 by the Honourable Society of Lincoln’s Inn.Pupillage completed in 2004 at 2 Bedford Row, Chambers of William Clegg QC.LLB (Hons) 2:1 from Queen Mary College, University of London.Wolfson Scholar of Lincoln’s Inn. Standing Counsel to ‘Mr. Richard Barton Attorney at Law’, George Town, Grand Cayman Advising on variety of cases usually focusing on fraud matters or involving cross-border money laundering, and subsequent multi-jurisdictional Repatriation Orders. R v Byrd Fraud, false accounting, and money laundering offences relating to Caymans Airways Cargo Company. Proceeds transferred from Grand Cayman to U.S. with assets dissipated via fraudulent property investment vehicles. Detailed analysis required of mirror offences in multiple jurisdictions. R v Woodcock: Money laundering offences relating to proceeds of drug offences being used to purchase property, which is then used as collateral for loans. Issues as to asset tracing, and bona fides purchasers for full consideration (‘equity’s darling’). Matter on going. R v C Charles Regulatory matter relating to medical practitioner. Issue as to insurance liability dispute and employee rights. R v Enyidedie and others Central Criminal Courts. Complex fraud on Royal Sun Alliance. Fraudulent takeover of business accounts in multiple jurisdictions and subsequent money laundering of proceeds through unauthorised investment in long established companies in different jurisdictions. R v A.T. Terrorism investigation. Multiple frauds, and false identity creation to launder proceeds of fraud, to directly finance Islamic State terrorist activity in Syria. R v Hatharb U.K. Money laundering offences by alleged financier for Al-Qaida. Abuse of process on grounds of delay argued where delay was due to intelligence services disagreeing as to whom should fund operation. R v Carpenter and others Led Junior in multi-handed money laundering to Jamaica of funds representing criminal property. Defence case required live video link evidence from Jamaica of over 30 witnesses to disprove existence of ‘sham recipients’. Not Guilty. R v Rizwan Banking fraud relating to the establishing of business accounts for over 20 entirely fictional companies being used to pay into personal bank accounts of expanding non-existent workforces set up to further the fraud. Multiple loans taken out and cheques cashed at once to take advantage of accrued higher credit rating. All proceeds laundered via shell companies to Pakistan within 48-hour period. R v Chitul Fraud on H.M.R.C. V.A.T. rebates with proceeds laundered through casinos and ‘winnings’ sent via MoneyGram under guise of informal money lending to Romanian diaspora around the world. Complex paper trail raising legal arguments as to admissibility. R v S Scott Large scale fraud on Petrochemical company, with funds laundered through multiple companies, charity events in the UK, and mining companies in South America. R v Busari Multiple Frauds involving numerous mortgages, identity, employment and benefit related offences totalling over £800,000. R v Snooks Instructed by Crown in complex False Accounting prosecution involving over 3 years of banking records and stock takes of a major high street clothing store. R v Butler and others Conspiracy to defraud a casino. Instructed on behalf of the roulette croupier alleged to have masterminded the offence. Not Guilty. R v Waya [2013] 1 A.C. 294 Supreme Court appeal relating to approach to assessment of benefit figure in proceeds of crime confiscation hearings, the application of abuse of process principles and the compatibility of decisions with Article 1 1st Protocol European Convention on Human Rights. Case heard in front of full 9-man Court, including Lord Chief Justice, as issues deemed matters of “great public importance”. R v Samar and others Pakistan based international money launderer for numerous criminal drug organisations worldwide. Confiscation order of £162million sought as representing individual benefit figure. Total Confiscation order sought from all defendants of over £600million. Matter on going. R v Johnson Leading Junior. Confiscation application sought assets of over £250million generated from importation of Class A drugs where Crown allege assets hidden abroad in multiple jurisdictions. Investigation required of Land Registry and business interests in 3 countries in Europe and 2 in Africa. Final available assets assessed at only £300,000. R v Enyidedie: ibid. Issues at confiscation proceedings related to differentiation between ‘sham’ and legitimate company assets, and what profits were generated from investment of proceeds of fraud. When Crown allege business set up solely as a vehicle for fraud, legal argument as to extent this justifies ‘piecing of corporate veil’. R v Salopal Instructed by Prosecution for confiscation proceedings. Conspiracy to steal high value pharmaceutical drugs. R v Bharya Sophisticated trading standards fraud generating over £800,000 per month, with multiple and overlapping business creation to disguise the recipients of the fraud. R v Robinson Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulation and misleading omissions. Abuse of process raised. Numerous legal arguments led to redrafting of indictment 3 times during trial. R v Shahraki Fraud and breach of Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations by ‘clocking’ of Odometers in motor vehicles. Kent County Council v Hilton Trading standards prosecution involving mis-selling of jewellery relating to quality of stones, purity of metal and value of over 250 items. R v Hindes Led Junior in Operation Trident matter. Daytime gunfight involving Mach-10 machine guns between rival ‘Yardie’ gang members. Dubbed ‘Machine gun mayhem trial’ by Press. R v Palmer Led Junior on Murder at Central Criminal Courts (‘The Old Bailey’). Issues as to liability for the actions of the principle offender in joint enterprise allegations. R v Bailey Led Junior at Central Criminal Court. Multi-handed gang related youth murder. R v Abid Section 18 GBH in the course of a robbery with victim stabbed in the heart. Not Guilty. R v Buente Section 18 GBH. Gang related assault in prison, attempted removal of man’s face with homemade knife. Crown offered no evidence after lengthy pre-trial disclosure hearings overturning Crown’s refusal on grounds of it being contrary to public interest to release any intelligence, CCTV, or telephone records from a prison. Not Guilty. R v Barlow Section 18 GBH. Alleged attempt to decapitate with gardening equipment. Not Guilty. R v Neziraj Section 18 GBH. Glassing to the face in a nightclub. Not Guilty verdict returned within15 minutes. R v Musse Section 18 GBH. Defendant alleged to have bitten off complainant’s ear. Not Guilty. R v Saini Use of motor vehicle in attempt to run over own wife and child. Not Guilty. R v Wickson Section 18 GBH. Defendant bit off, and was alleged to have chewed and swallowed, cheek of complainant. R v Brown Section 18 GBH. Assault of policeman during chase where said to have pushed his hand onto spike on railings to make good an escape. R v Charlery Section 18 GBH and Robbery of son on father. Not Guilty to the GBH. R v Kwik Section 18 GBH and lesser violence stemming from a family fight involving 15 in-laws. Guilty plea to 1 common assault only. R v Saleh and others 3-month multi-handed rape and sexual activity offences. Detailed consideration required of large volume of social service records, Doctors records, and multiple complainant accounts. R v Wilson Led Junior in historic child rape and sexual assault allegations. Not Guilty. R v Shahzad Multiple sexual assaults by private Koran teacher on 11 year old pupil. Not Guilty. R v Gocaj and others Conspiracy to import and supply 600 kilo of cocaine over 12 months from South America by Albanian ‘mafia’. £80 million identifiable proceeds laundered via money exchanges back to Albania. R v Barnes Armed robbery in the home. Comparison between multiple mobile telephone data evidence and automatic number plate reading technology on motorways, involving challenge from numerous experts. R v Wallace Led Junior in Conspiracy to commit armed robbery. This case was the most expensive prosecution in relation to compilation of mobile telephone evidence. Attracted extensive broadsheet, tabloid and television interest. R v Francis Conspiracy to rob approximately £800,000 worth of watches and jewellery in an alleged sham sale to Chelsea footballer Ashley Cole. R v Francis 30 Defendant Operation Gorgas. Conspiracy to supply Class A. Not Guilty R v Emmanuel Conspiracy to commit ‘cash in transit’ robberies. Guilty plea to single substantive robbery. R v Bishop Smash and grab robbery of jewellery store targeting over £100,000 of Rolex watches. R v Vella Witness intimidation of known member of Essex criminal underworld by 55 year old Grandmother. R v Waya Landmark decision that provides the guideline authority for assessment of benefit from criminal conduct in all confiscation applications. R v Tabali Appeal against conviction for murder, where issue related to new evidence of number of DNA strands found and implications for secondary transfer of bloodstains. Matter on going. R v Ishmail Successful appeal against sentence for robbery, clarified position as to credit for guilty plea. The Sentencing Guidelines Council tariff for youths amended as a result. R v Nassralla Appeared for Crown in response to Defence appeal against conviction arising from guilty plea to lesser alternative charge when trial conviction is on greater substantive charge. This case established the correct procedure to follow. Operation Branfield Junior for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs in multi-case collective appeal relating to use of ‘participating informants’ in drug importations over a 20 year period. Vast pre-appeal disclosure exercise undertaken prior to the substantive appeal. Following in the footsteps of his father, Sir Victor, Gavin Glover was a State Scholar in 1980 and read Jurisprudence as the Anderson Scholar at Balliol College, Oxford University. He was called to the Bar of England and Wales at the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple in 1985, and...Read more Following in the footsteps of his father, Sir Victor, Gavin Glover was a State Scholar in 1980 and read Jurisprudence as the Anderson Scholar at Balliol College, Oxford University. He was called to the Bar of England and Wales at the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple in 1985, and joined the Mauritian Bar the same year. He started his own practice in 1985; he acted as part time Prosecuting Counsel from 1987 to 1990.In 2003, he was appointed a member of the Steering Committee on the Liberalisation of the Legal Profession. Mr. Glover was an active member of the Mauritius Bar Association where he successively occupied the functions of Treasurer in 2000 and 2001, Secretary in 2002 and President in 2003. Mr. Glover took silk in June 2010. He is presently the Head of Chambers and is one of the top litigators on the island with a wide range of clientele. He also advises a number of local and international companies in Mauritius. He is an accredited arbitrator of the MCCI Arbitration and Mediation Center.Areas of practice: Civil Law, Criminal Law, Corporate and Commercial Law Litigation, Arbitration, Labour Law, Family, Insurance Law and Public Procurement. Michael D. Weinstein is an American lawyer who specializes in capital habeas cases. Michael was called to the California State Bar in 2008. During his first two years as a lawyer, he served as a judicial law clerk to two federal trial judges in the Central District of California, the...Read more Michael D. Weinstein is an American lawyer who specializes in capital habeas cases.Michael was called to the California State Bar in 2008. During his first two years as a lawyer, he served as a judicial law clerk to two federal trial judges in the Central District of California, the Honorable Philip S.Gutierrez (2008-09) and the Honorable J. Spencer Letts (2009-10). In helping both judges manage dockets of over 300 civil and criminal cases, Michael would research and clarify issues for them before drafting courtopinions on a weekly basis.Michael’s clerkships led to a position with the Office of the Federal Public Defender for the Central District of California. As a Deputy Federal Public Defender, Michael primarily works on capital habeas cases, challenging the constitutionality of his clients’ first-degree murder convictions and death sentences . He also works on non-capital habeas cases, federal trials, and direct criminal appeals. Due to the nature of habeas litigation, Michael has gained in-depth experience in state and federal court, handling cases filed in all California state courts, including the California Supreme Court, various California-based district courts, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court.Because of Michael’s vast experience, Los Angeles law schools regularly invite him to sit on panels to discuss the criminal justice system and what it is like to be a public defender. He also helps supervise a capital habeas litigation clinic based out of Loyola Law School, Los Angeles. In 2014, the American Inns of Court selected Michael and one other American lawyer to serve as Pegasus Scholars. He spent six weeks in London in the spring of 2015 studying the English legal system.Licensed to practice before all California state courts, the Northern District of California, the Central District of California, the Southern District of California, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court Anne is an associate member (Accredited Mediator) at Church Court Chambers. Second Floor Goldsmiths Buildings Temple EC4. Anne is a registered Mediator with the CMC (Civil mediation council) and holds full professional indemnity insurance. She is a uniquely qualified full time Certified and Accredited Mediator of 8 years standing. She...Read more Anne is an associate member (Accredited Mediator) at Church Court Chambers. Second Floor Goldsmiths Buildings Temple EC4. Anne is a registered Mediator with the CMC (Civil mediation council) and holds full professional indemnity insurance.She is a uniquely qualified full time Certified and Accredited Mediator of 8 years standing.She is available to undertake a full range of Workplace, Civil and Commercial disputes within the UK and overseas. Anne holds a specialist interest in matters of Workplace /Employment and family business disputes.Anne is a Mediator with an unique Legal and Business background, with over 25 years experience in settling disputes, prosecutions and claims in her careers as a litigator at several London Chambers ranked LEGAL 500 firmsAnne’ also has additional valuable “people management “experience as the Managing Director of her own FSA authorised financial service regulated business, before choosing to Mediate exclusively.These experiences provided her with excellent communication skills, insight and expertise to the tasks of problem solving.Never afraid to reality test through tough and probing questions, whilst remaining tuned into the sensitivities of the participants. Anne is able to offer the participants a new perspective of their dispute which is focused firmly on their wider interests.Anne is highly adaptable in her approach, based on the dynamics at play in each room. Participants appreciate her strategy, speaking plainly and avoiding unnecessary jargon, she is warm, engaging and approachable which makes her particularly popular with nervous clients and in disputes of a sensitive nature.Reasons to appoint Anne Powell as your MediatorEstablished Mediator handles substantial contentious issues:Experienced in Public and third Sector Workplace and Employment disputes.Works exclusively within ADR and the court systemMediates extensively across the UK with high 90% success rateHas the experience to open doors to settlement and deal sensitively but robustly with Life changing Cases;ResolvingSenior management employment disputesAllegations of bullying and Harassment within the workplaceDisputes with Financial institutionsPreviously failed MediationsDirectors and Shareholders disputesToLATA and asset DisputesCapacity InheritanceCohabitation claimsConstructive and /or resulting TrustsCare home fees outstanding on the estate of the deceasedEasement right of way and TrespassCommercial DisputesHarassment cultural conflictProfessional backgroundLondon Mediation .tm (Accredited Mediator)http://londonmediator.uk/Church Court Chambers (Accredited Mediator)HomeJeffrey Green Russell Solicitors W1Senior associate LitigationElliot Company EC4 Church Court Chambers is a leading London barrister chambers with a proud reputation for being professional, approachable and modern. Our Members, including 7 Queen’s Counsel and 48 juniors, have an enviable back catalogue of high-profile and complex matters across a range of practice areas. Working in partnership with Glover Chambers, Mauritius.Chambers of Gavin Glover SC Church Court Chambers Church Court Chambers is a leading London barrister chambers with a proud reputation for being professional, approachable and modern. Our Members, including 7 Queen’s Counsel and 48 juniors, have an enviable back catalogue of high-profile and complex matters across a range of practice areas.Barristers Regulated by the Bar Standards BoardChambers provides an out of hours service. If you call Chambers main number you will be diverted to the clerk on call who will be able to deal with your enquiry.

TAGS:Court Church Home 

<<< Thank you for your visit >>>

Church Court Chambers is a leading London barrister chambers with a proud reputation for being professional, approachable and modern. Our Members, including 7 Queen’s Counsel and 48 juniors, have an enviable back catalogue of high-profile and complex matters across a range of practice areas. Barristers Regulated by the Bar Standards Board

Hot Websites