The Political Hat | Politics, News, and Drollarity with a Tip of the Hat

Time 2020-10-14 07:03:25

Web Name: The Political Hat | Politics, News, and Drollarity with a Tip of the Hat

WebSite: http://politicalhat.com

ID:81508

Keywords:

Politics,News,Hat,

Description:

Animal cyborg development has been increasing in recent years, with breakthroughs with synthetic DNA, artificial organs/skin, and in vitro growth of brain tissue.   However, the possibility of brain-computer interfaces has been the most intriguing. Now, Elon Musk may be on the verge of making the technology necessary for successful cyborg catgirls real.“With a device surgically implanted into the skull of a pig named Gertrude, Elon Musk demonstrated his startup Neuralink s technology to build a digital link between brains and computers. …“The demonstration shows the technology to be significantly closer to delivering on Musk s radical ambitions than during a 2019 product debut, when Neuralink only showed photos of a rat with a Neuralink connected via a USB-C port. It s still far from reality, but Musk said the US Food and Drug Administration in July granted approval for ‘breakthrough device’ testing.“Musk also showed a second-generation implant that s more compact and fits into a small cavity hollowed out of the skull. Tiny electrode ‘threads’ penetrate the outer surface of the brain, detecting an electrical impulse from nerve cells that shows the brain is at work. In line with Neuralink s longer-term plans, the threads are designed to communicate back, with computer-generated signals of their own.”Thank you Elon-kun!This implant would allow a brain to interact with and control limbs and organs, or to receive external stimuli such as from the sense of touch. The capacity for “conceptual telepathy” is also possible (presumably to allow said cyborg catgirls to communicate with their beloved humans). Continue reading Tweet “Sealioning” is defined by þe olde Urban Dictionary thusly:“A subtle form of trolling involving ‘bad-faith’ questions. You disingenuously frame your conversation as a sincere request to be enlightened, placing the burden of educating you entirely on the other party. If your bait is successful, the other party may engage, painstakingly laying out their logic and evidence in the false hope of helping someone learn. In fact you are attempting to harass or waste the time of the other party, and have no intention of truly entertaining their point of view. Instead, you react to each piece of information by misinterpreting it or requesting further clarification, ad nauseum.”An example recently presented itself to your humble author on Twitter.Often anything that does not fit the narrative is labeled as propaganda. Have anything cogent that isn’t a generic label to add to the discourse? I’ve read some of his stuff, I’m all ears Joe G (@JRGWolf24) September 17, 2020 Note the dead give-away that this is Sealioning: The honest-looking call for evidence while providing nothing in response to a statement.Well, the question was answered with an example, and replied to with another question.I would not say I noticed that but perhaps an example, happy to look it up for context. Preferably something material. Joe G (@JRGWolf24) September 17, 2020 If one is going to make a claim, one ought to know of examples to back it up, as your humble author did.so in other words, your entire opinion on this, isn t based on anything you ve actually read and analyzed but what you ve been told to think by a Joe McCarthy apologist. That checks out. Joe G (@JRGWolf24) September 17, 2020 Notice how even though they expect the person they are Sealioning to not only have read all relevant and related works and be able to write a dissertation on the spot, they never find it necessary to read writings to the contrary, or even to argue a single point from the writings that you yourself are expected to read in order to even posit an opinion. Continue reading Tweet Human beings are a sexually dimorphic species, with physical and physiological differences between the sexes, that reproduce via sexual congress of the two sexes. It is only natural and normal, then, that most people have a sexual interest in members of the opposite sex (particularly those who seem to be healthy and most capable of reproduction).Oh, people aren’t all straight or engage in carnal activities with other people (or things or whatever) to reproduce, since the sexual drive that serves to perpetuate the species can be satisfied in other ways. However, many people who support transgenderism as normal need to denormalize the very normal natural instinct of human beings to reproduce, and they do so by reducing a person’s biological sex to just a question of what genitals one has and that differences in genitals carries the same, or even less, consideration as some other superficial feature, with even fertility being a subjective preference such as preference for a hobby or hair length.In other words, people are attracted to another’s biological sex, not to another’s gender identity beyond indicators of reproductive suitability.Some try to argue this… but do so poorly.People of each sex are indeed diverse in a myriad number of ways. But one’s sex isn’t just one of many relatively co-equal possible aspects, but the central defining one when it comes to perpetuating the species.A transgender person could fit that bill if that transgender person is someone one could have offspring with, but since there are non-genital physical and actual physiological differences between the sexes people are more likely to prefer those of the opposite sex that embody those aspects more likely to be held by the opposite sex than not—but this focus on genitals and fertility being but a fetish makes it clear that screwing a “transgender person” of the opposite sex is still “transphobic” for some people.People who are intersex tend to be infertile or carry other complications that indicate health problems and a decreased chance (if any at all) of reproducing. But yet again we see attraction based on sex being reduced to practically a fetish for one genital shape or another.Not being attracted to people who can’t have children with you is not only not “kinda odd”, it is indeed a normal inclination that humans have to perpetuate the species. And it’s not just a question of if the transgender person could have offspring, but if they could have offspring with you and be able to provide for you your healthy offspring. Continue reading Tweet With all the Social Justice warriors, eco-zealots, Antifa, ‘twould seem that Portland is the center of madness. Is there a reason for this? In all seriousness, YES.This was supposed to be a thread about the pathology of fear, but while researching that, I came across a stat that sent me down a rabbit hole. pic.twitter.com/05NX1a2PCA

TAGS:Politics News Hat 

<<< Thank you for your visit >>>

Hot Websites