The Scientific Worldview

Time 2021-10-29 22:10:22

Web Name: The Scientific Worldview

WebSite: http://thescientificworldview.blogspot.com

ID:215295

Keywords:

The,Scientific,Worldview,

Description:

keywords:
description:
skip to main | skip to sidebarThe Scientific Worldview

This is a blog that takes the name of my magnum opus on scientific philosophy called "The Scientific Worldview." Reviewers have called it revolutionary, exhilarating, magnificent, fascinating, and even a breathtaking synthesis of all understanding. There is very little math in it, no religion, no politics, no psycho-babble, and no BS. It provides the first outline of the philosophical perspective that will develop during the last half of the Industrial-Social Revolution.

20211025 Impossibility of falsifying myths

PSI Blog 20211025Impossibility of falsifying myths

AbhishekChakravartty asks:

You wrote thatcreation is not subject to falsification because it is a myth that belongs to areligious belief system. Can you explain why creation cannot be falsifiedalthough it is a myth?

[GB: Abhi: Pleasereread the Galston link. In summary, myths are present in the heads of people.We have no way of testing them. Falsification is possible only for evaluatingthings and motions that exist or occur outside peoples heads. Anyone can claimthe universe was created by gods, dogs, turtles, dark energy, or what have you.On the other hand, specific claims about actually existing things (i.e., xyzportions of the universe) can be tested. For instance, there are claims thatthe universe was created 6,000 years ago. If we found anything older than that,the claim would be falsified (i.e., shown to be false). I have done that myselfhundreds of times through isotope dating and pedochronology. While that claimhas been put to bed, there could be an endless number of creation claims. Wecould never test all of them in the same way we could never prove there arecauses for all effects. In essence, infinity prevents us fromfalsifying fundamental assumptions, whether they be scientific or religious.

The Big Bang Theory isjust another creation theory, which like more overtly religious versions of the creationmyth, cannot be falsified. Only specific claims for it can be falsified. Forinstance, the discovery of elderly galaxies at the limits of observation falsifies thehypothesized 13.8-billion-year age of the universe. Unbelievers have discoveredmuch more evidence for falsification. George Coyne alone lists 66 flaws in thetheory.[1]Will any one of these bring down the Big Bang Theory? That is doubtful as longas the religious assumption of creation (Matter and motion can becreated out of nothing) holds sway over its opposite, the scientific assumptionof conservation(Matter and the motion of matter can be neither creatednor destroyed).[2]]

---

[1] Coyne,George, 2021, Notfinity Process: Matter in Motion (2nd ed.), JCNPS, 408 p.

[2] Borchardt,Glenn, 2020, Religious Roots of Relativity: Berkeley, California, ProgressiveScience Institute, 160 p. [https://go.glennborchardt.com/RRR-ebk].

Posted byGlenn Borchardtat4:00 AM2commentsLabels:Abhishek Chakravarrty,BBT desperation,creation,elderly galaxies,falsification 20211018 Cosmic acceleration and dark energy do not exist

PSI Blog 20211018 Cosmic acceleration and dark energy do notexist

Thanks to George Coyne for this heads-up:

Hi Glenn,

As you and I do not believe that the Universeis expanding, there was never the acceptance that the misconceived expansionwas accelerating. Now there is a 2019 study debunkingthe acceleration.

Here is the paper:https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.04597.pdf

It is also described in thisBig Think article:

https://bigthink.com/hard-science/new-study-cosmic-acceleration-dark-energy-dont-exist/?fbclid=IwAR3hL03-oDnUNYEMB31vlD9_3nNURyMFCkkmAauJZtC8O57hTioBwYcfxvk

[GB: Note that theNobel Prize was given to Saul Perlmutter, Brian Schmidt, and Adam Riess forthe discovery of the accelerating expansion of the Universe throughobservations of distant supernovae.[1] That was an ad hocproposed as a solution to observed red shifts indicating galactic recession atvelocities greater than c. The choice at that time was: 1) throw outEinsteins light-speed limit for the universe or 2) find some data indicatingthe early universe expanded faster than the usual misuse of the Hubbleconstant allowed:

Astute readers know allthis speculation is based on these erroneous assumptions:

1.Lightconsists of massless particles.

2. Light travels throughperfectly empty space.

3. Light displaysperpetual motion.

4. The cosmologicalredshift is a result of the Doppler Effect or of expanding empty space.

5.Universalexpansion is propelled by matterless motion otherwise known as dark energy.]

---

[1]While I dont agree with the theory, I believe Guth actually was among the firstto propose it:

Guth, A.H., 1997, The Inflationary Universe: The Questfor a New Theory of Cosmic Origins, Basic Books

Guth, A.H., 1998, The Inflationary Universe: The Questfor a New Theory of Cosmic Origins, Basic Books, 384 p.

Guth, A.H., and Steinhardt, P.J., 1984, Theinflationary universe: Scientific American, v. 250, no. 5, p. 116-128, 154.

Posted byGlenn Borchardtat4:00 AM1 commentsLabels:Einsteinian Regression,universal expansion 20211011 Are Extra-Euclidean dimensions falsifiable?

PSIBlog 20211011 Are Extra-Euclidean dimensions falsifiable?

This week's book prize goes to Steve Puetz for his questionon Extra-Euclidean dimensions:

Hi Glenn,

Regarding a "Dimensionality"assumption - All matter and space within the universe has three dimensions(3D), generally referred to as length, width, and height. (It's opposite isnon-3D, multidimensional.)

{This might be close, but I don't see wherereligions propose non-Euclidean dimensions. I think those are ad hocs, which Idon't see as appropriate for fundamental assumptions.}

The problems that I foresee are twofold:

1) In fact, many theoretical physicistspropose that the universe has 4, 6, 8, or 11 dimensions, etc. Just perform aGoogle web-search on "dimensions of the universe" and you will find141 million items.

2) More importantly, none of the original 10assumptions prohibit these non-3D theories,as far as I can tell. We needsome way (either from the 10 assumptions, or a new assumption) to prohibitthese theories, when embracing the neomechanicalworldview.

Regards,

Steve

[GB: Thefundamental assumption that forbids extra-Euclidean dimensions is theFirst Assumption of Science, materialism (The external worldexists after the observer does not). Its opposite is the First Assumption ofReligion, immaterialism (Material things have no objective existence,strictly being products of consciousness). This dichotomy is so stark that mostphilosophers find ways to soften the blow. Another way of stating thisirrevocable opposition is through the concepts of reality vs. ideality.

Reality vs. Ideality

Reality concerns the external world and idealityconcerns the inner world. As Einstein characteristically said Imagination ismore important than knowledge.[1] Realistsassume only the external world exists, containing material things (i.e., XYZportions of the universe), while idealists assume their dreams and imaginingsexist. Thus, while materialists and realists are constrained by the threedimensions supported by observing or experimenting with everyday objects,immaterialists and idealists are not. They can have as many dimensions as theirmath or thoughts can manage. As long as these imaginings remain microcosmic,that is, present only in brains, they are not amenable to falsification.However, whenever these are communicated to the macrocosm (outside world) theyare subject to falsification just like any other claim made about the externalworld. That is why scientific tests of prayers always result in falsification.[2] Onthe other hand, scientific idealizations can escape that fate because they maygive some semblance to things that actually exist in the universe. Forinstance, ideally the Moon is spherical, while in reality it is an oblatespheroid just like Earth. The match between scientific idealization and realityis never perfect because the universe is infinite. Scientists expect slightvariations like that, while the non-scientist imbued with the Ninth Assumptionof Religion, absolutism (Identities exist, that is, any two things mayhave identical characteristics) might not.

Falsifiability and Myth

Here is an interesting blog entry by David Galston onfalsifiability and religion:

http://www.questcentre.ca/blogs/view/falsifiability-and-religion

Does falsifiability apply to religion? Philosophersof religion have loved this question, and have loved to answer this questionwith both a "yes" and a "no." On the yes side are those whowill say that evolution does indeed prove creation is false. Or, in anotherway, the theory of creation is falsifiable and has been demonstrated to be false.We can verify that the earth is about 4.5 billion years old and thisverification falsifies the claim that the earth was created about 6,000 yearsago.

There is, however, a problem with claiming thatcreation like evolution is falsifiable. The problem is that on this levelcreation and evolution are both accepted as science. So, philosophers ofreligion will also answer our question with a no. Creation is not subject tofalsification because it is a myth that belongs to a religious belief system.Creation-language is a separate language-game from scientific evolution. Itsnot possible to apply the rules of science to a myth.

Extra-Euclidean Dimensions as Symptoms of the ComingDemise of Regressive Physics

Similarly,extra-Euclidean dimensions, beingpurely imaginary, cannot be falsified because they are not properties of realobjects. There have been attempts to bring those imaginings into the externalworld through reification or objectification, that is, by considering motionas matter. That was Einsteins most important mistake.[3]Time is motion. Time is not an object; it is whatobjects do. It does not exist, it occurs. The "4th dimension" in GRTstems directly from Einstein's sleight of hand substituting "l"(length) for "t" (time) in SRT. That has nonetheless been acceptableto idealists not concerned with illegal category switching--as long as itconfirms their long-standing imaginings. "String Theory," whichinvolves up to 26 so-called "dimensions" has not been, nor will itever be, supported by observation and experiment. Even regressive physicistssuch as Lee Smolin have doubts that it will ever result in objectivepredictions.[4]

The upshot: Extra-Euclidean dimensionsare imaginary. Likegods, heaven, and hell, they are not testable parts of the external world. Theyare not falsifiable because they do not exist.]

---

[1]Viereck, G.S., 1929, What life means to Einstein:The Saturday Evening Post, October 26, p. 17, 110-117.

[2]Masters, K.S., Spielmans, G.I.,and Goodson, J.T., 2006, Are there demonstrable effects of distant intercessoryprayer? A meta-analytic review: Annals of Behavioral Medicine, v. 32, no. 1, p.21-26. [10.1207/s15324796abm3201_3]. See also: Borchardt, Glenn, 2020,Religious Roots of Relativity: Berkeley, California, Progressive ScienceInstitute, 160 p. [https://go.glennborchardt.com/RRR-ebk].

[3]Borchardt, Glenn, 2011, Einstein's most importantphilosophical error, in Volk, Greg, Proceedings of the 18th Conferenceof the Natural Philosophy Alliance: College Park, MD, Natural PhilosophyAlliance, Mt. Airy, MD, v. 8, p. 64-68 [10.13140/RG.2.1.3436.0407].

[4]Smolin, Lee, 2007, The Trouble with Physics: TheRise of String Theory, the Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next, MarinerBooks; Reprint edition, 420 p.

Posted byGlenn Borchardtat4:00 AM0commentsLabels:4-D,BBT desperation,ideality,Masters,reality,RRR,Steve Puetz 20210920 Steve Bryant video interview on Einsteins math mistakes

PSI Blog 20210920 Steve Bryant video interview onEinsteins math mistakes

Email from Steve Bryant, author of Disruptive,[1]which I reviewed here:

"Hey Glenn, not sure if you caught my presentation / discussionwith David a couple of Saturdays ago. If possible, would you be willing toshare the video with your followers/community?

Heres the link:

http://stevenbbryant.com/2021/08/einstein-says-10-which-is-incorrect-and-invalidates-relativity-theory/

Hope all is going well!

Steve"

---

[1]Bryant, S.B.,2016, Disruptive: Rewriting the Rules of Physics: El Cerrito, California, InfiniteCircle Publishing, 312 p. [http://go.glennborchardt.com/Bryant16].

Posted byGlenn Borchardtat4:00 AM0commentsLabels:Einsteins math,relativity 20210913 Consupponibility and falsifiability

PSI Blog 20210913 Consupponibility andfalsifiability

StevePuetz gets this weeks book prize:

I have a couple of questions. If you cananswer them, it will be a tremendous help....

What benefits do fundamental assumptionsprovide (such as the 10 Assumptions of Science) if they do not contribute tosome type of testability (falsifiability) of theoretical formulations?

[GB: Unbeknownst to Collingwood or Popper,fundamental assumptions are not falsifiable because they all involve infinity.For instance, we assume there are physical causes for all effects. This worksfor us most of the time, but when it doesnt, we assume there are causesanyway. Kinetic theories are like that. For instance, gravitation currentlyis obvious and even has an equation although a physical cause has not beenfound. That is why Aether Deceleration Theory is the best gravitation theorybecause it hypothesizes aether as the collider necessary to produce theobserved acceleration of gravitation. The beauty of The Ten Assumptions ofScience is the consupponibility among them. Regressive physicists and reformistshave learned to live with the cognitive dissonance engendered by the historicalmiss-mass needed to conform with religious ideas.[1]]

Regarding the demise of the philosophy ofscience in the 20th century. Can you send me some references to describe whathappened here? As I recall, many majoruniversities fired philosophers who were opposed to Einstein's ideas.

[GB: Steve, just check this PSI Blog:

http://thescientificworldview.blogspot.com/2012/01/censorship-in-regressive-physics.html.That involved UC Berkeley, where I once was a visiting prof (but not in physics).I dont know how widespread the firings of dissident physicists were. If you oranyone else has a reference, I would love to have it.

Also, here is the NPA Charter written by Dr. JohnChappell:

http://thescientificworldview.blogspot.com/2020/02/natural-philosophy-alliance-npa-charter.html.It provides a little background on what we are up against.]

---

[1] Borchardt, Glenn,2020, Religious Roots of Relativity: Berkeley, California, Progressive ScienceInstitute, 160 p. [ https://go.glennborchardt.com/RRR-ebk ]

Posted byGlenn Borchardtat4:00 AM0commentsLabels:John Chappell,NPA,Steve Puetz,UCB 20210906 Faster than light speed?

PSI Blog 20210906Faster than light speed?

This weeks bookprize goes to Joe Lennon, who asks:

Glenn, I was thinking aboutsomething concerning faster travel thru Outer-space. What holdseverything up out there, and what also slows objects traveling via that mediumis baryonic matter. So, isnt the key to increasing travel velocityhaving an electromagnetic emission
unit. Electro-magnetic, and weaknuclear" matter (whatever that is) severs or unravels atomic bonds.Wouldnt a unit that emits either of these properties break apart the baryonicmatter that slows a vehicle's speed. It makes sense that light travels sofast if it is an electromagnetic wave.Such a wave would sunder all of thebaryonic matter that it encounters.The same should work for a vehicleequipped with machines that emits Electromagnetic matter, right?

Also, wouldnt g-force on acrew piloting such a vehicle also be lessened this way? This should apply toachieving high Mach speed in a planets atmosphere as well.

[GB: Thanks for the questionJoe. Many readers probably wonder why I havent answered the old faster thanlight question before. Mostly, it is because the velocity of wave motion isdetermined by the medium. The question itself appears to descend from Einsteinsad hoc considering light to be a particle. A particle is a microcosm, an XYZportion of the universe, so the obvious conclusion would be that any microcosm,no matter how large, also would be limited to the speed of light. That is, ifyou believed, Einsteins misuse of the Lorentz Correction Factor (see Infinite Universe Theory, p. 315) and that light is a masslessparticle with perpetual motion through perfectly empty space.

You are correct in implying outerspace contains baryonic matter (space junk, asteroids, hydrogen atoms, etc.)that would tend to slow travel and might even destroy the rocket (or flyingsaucer). The resulting resistance would increase as a function of velocity. Itwould take over 80 years to reach the nearest star via todays tech. It wouldtake 4 years even at the speed of light.

So far, throughout our examinationsof 4.5 billion years of geological formations, we have not found one footprint orone piece of exotic metal from anyone from Alpha Centauri. Looks like we wontbe returning the hypothesized favor imagined by UFO buffs anytime soon.]

Posted byGlenn Borchardtat4:00 AM0commentsLabels:FTL,outer space,UFO 20210830 Water pressure vs aether pressure

PSI Blog 20210830Water pressure vs aether pressure

Abhi asks:

It hasalways been observed that objects with densities greater than that of watersink in water and objects with densities less than that of water float onwater. This means that water has a tendencyto push objects with densitiesgreater than itself towards the baryonic matter on which the water is placedand also a tendency to push objects with densities less than itself away fromthe baryonic matter on which the water is placed. Can you explain why water hassuch tendencies?

[GB: Thanks, Abhi for an easy one. Remember that thedirection a microcosm (i.e., object) moves is determined by the univironment.In this case, we can be concerned mostly with the macrocosm, that is, thesupermicrocosms that tend to collide with a particular microcosm. The heavyobject is pushed toward the center of Earth by highly active water moleculesand aether particles. The light object is pushed toward the surface of thewater by highly active, massive water molecules that produce collisions whoseF=ma is greater than the F=ma of the countervailing collisions produced by tinyaether particles.

Another way of looking at this phenomenon is with NewtonsFirst Law of Motion. A microcosm is accelerated when a supermicrocosm collideswith it; and decelerated when that microcosm collides with anothersupermicrocosm. This may appear a bit complicated because the pressure in water(baryonic matter) increases toward Earth because it is pushed toward Earth byhighly active aether particles during gravitation. The pressure in the aether mediumincreases away from Earth as we surmised in our explanation of the Pound-Rebkaexperiment.[1]EM waves moving away from Earth traveled faster than those traveling towardEarth. Because of the slightly increased velocity, the waves were redshifted(further apart).[2]This implies short-range aether particle motion was greater as well. Havinghigher velocities means the force (F=ma) engendered by each particle wasgreater also, revealing that aetherial pressure increased with distance fromEarth (collisions per cm²). Once those aether particles collide withbaryonic matter, they decelerate, producing a low-pressure halo containing darkmatter around baryonic matter.[3] Thisis both a result of gravitation and a cause for further gravitation since allmicrocosms tend to move from high to low pressure areas.

Baryonic matter, which is simply complexed aether particles,moves similarly, but with the more massive microcosms crowding out the lessmassive ones. Many types of wood and other lighter microcosms are no matchfor heavy water molecules. These provide more force to their Earthward sides,causing them to float despite the relatively meagre impacts of the nitrogen, oxygen,and aether particles above them.

I like this explanation because it removes the contradictionposed by Newtons gravitational attraction hypothesis. One could naively ask:If everything is pulled toward Earth, how come the wooden object floating onthe water is not pulled likewise. You also could ask Einstein why his perfectlyempty space-time doesnt do a better job on the wooden object.]

---

[1] Borchardt, Glenn, and Puetz, S.J., 2012,Neomechanical gravitation theory, in Volk, Greg, Proceedings of theNatural Philosophy Alliance, 19th Conference of the NPA, 25-28 July:Albuquerque, NM, Natural Philosophy Alliance, Mt. Airy, MD, v. 9, p. 53-58 [10.13140/RG.2.1.3991.0483].

[2] Note that Pound and Rebka used the old time dilationtrope to explain this. Time is motion and cannot dilate.

[3] Borchardt, Glenn, 2018, ThePhysical Cause of Gravitation: viXra:1806.0165.

Posted byGlenn Borchardtat4:00 AM0commentsLabels:attraction,curved empty space,univironmental analysis 20210823 Reading List for Neomechanics

PSI Blog 20210823Reading List for Neomechanics

[GB: Thanks so muchto Joe Lennon, one of our most avid readers, for compiling this list. Joerecognizes ideas dont just pop out of nowhere. As the old cliché goes: We allstand on the shoulders of giants. Joe awaits comments leading to additionalreferences and removal of others.]

by Joe Lennon

Why did I create this list?

When Im interested in something,I want to obtain as much of a view of the world related to, and surroundingthat topic, as I can find. I do this in order to learn the truth aboutit. This brings it out of isolation for me, and provides me with a largerperspective. I didnt include information about opposing theories in thislist, as Dr. Borchardt has given practical, logical, and scientific,non-fantastical reasons for astronomical phenomena and the origins of theuniverse; that is all that Im interested in. If I want the opposing information,I can tune in to syndicated episodes of any science fiction program, go read anovel, or listen to, read or watch the lies that are passed off as the truthabout these topics.

I have listed past researchersthat Dr. Borchardt has mentioned in his interviews. I think that ties to thepast are important as they have never failed to provide me with additionalinformation about what Im interested in, and in many occasions have shown menew horizons that I would not have found any other way. Original sourcematerial is essential to learning the truth about anything.

Logic and the Scientific Methodare the cornerstones of Physics and all other sciences. Unfortunately,these disciplines are not commonly taught in schools today. I wasfortunate to have to study them as an undergraduate. I dont believe thatit is possible to discern the truth of a matter without formal Logic and theScientific Method.

I dont believe that discoveriesin Physics can be made without Math. Unfortunately, Math has certainlybeen used to contaminate Physics, replacing what is probable and improbable,with what is theoretically possible and impossible. Most people have beentaught to love the latter, however, Ido not. So, in my search for a Math that would be helpful with Physics, Ifound some older texts, and some new ones that contained what seemed to me tobe the basic information needed if I wanted to do research of my own inPhysics. However, at my age, this is mostly for passing information on toothers who will be doing their own research someday.

I put all of this under therubric of Dr. Borchardts Neomechanics, as for my purpose, this gives me aworld view of a consistent, honest, hard-nosed, unrelenting search for thetruth concerning the origin and Physics of the Universe.

THE NEOMECHANICAL GESTALT

The Scientific Worldview, withAssociated Assumptions, Logic, and Scientific Method

Causality and Chance in ModernPhysics Reissue Edition

by David Bohm

An Essay on Philosophical Methodby

R. G. Collingwood

Dialectics of NaturebyFrederick Engles

An Introduction to Logic andScientific Methodby Morris R. Cohen (Author), ErnestNagel (Author)

Cosmological Physics Ground Rulesand How to Evaluate Cosmology IdeasCopyright1999-2010 David J. Dilworth

http://www.cosmologyscience.com/COSPHYSICSGROUNDRULESDILWORTH.PDF

The Ten Assumptions of Science:Toward a New Scientific Worldview: Borchardt, Glenn: 9780595311279:Amazon.com: Books

Religious Roots of Relativity:Borchardt, Glenn: 9798559631448:Amazon.com:Books

The Scientific Worldview: BeyondNewton and Einstein: Borchardt, Glenn: 9780595392452:Amazon.com: Books

Science Based Non-EinsteinPhysics

Sears, F.W., and Zemansky, M.W.,1960, College Physics (3rd ed.)Reading,MA, Addison-Wesley, 1024 p (2^nd ed.)

The Principia: The AuthoritativeTranslation and Guide: Mathematical Principles of Natural PhilosophyPaperback February 5, 2016

by Sir Isaac Newton (Author), I.Bernard Cohen (Translator)

Pushing Gravity

New perspectives on Le Sage'stheory of gravitation

Edited by Matthew R.Edwards

http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/exlibris/aleph/a23_1/apache_media/I4TNEQS187PS8S47CHTT57IP5UE6LR.pdf

Matter and Motion

by J. Clerk Maxwell

The Electrical Researches

by J. Clerk Maxwell

Catalogue of Discordant RedshiftAssociations

by Halton C. Arp

Seeing Red: Redshifts, Cosmologyand Academic Science

by Halton Arp

Disruptive: Rewriting the rulesof physics

by Steven B Bryant

Mathematical Methodology withInnovative and Classic Mathematics

How to Solve It: A New Aspect ofMathematical Method

by George Polya

Mathematics and PlausibleReasoning[Two Volumes in One] by George Polya

Mathematical Discovery CombinedEd: On Understanding, Learning and Teaching Problem SolvingbyGeorge Polya

Symmetry Math (SM) versus BrokenSymmetry (BS) Math: Why is SM needed? Is it heresy to show that BS math isillogical and produces numerous incorrect answers!(Kindle)

by Jack Kuykendall

https://www.slideserve.com/regina/symmetry-math-sm-by-jack-kuykendall

www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6525.pdf

Speed Mathematics Simplified

by Edward Stoddard

Euclid's ElementsLaterPrinting Edition

by Euclid (Author), Dana Densmore(Editor), T.L. Heath (Translator)

Trigonometry

by Alfred Monroe Kenyon (Author),Louis Ingold (Author)

Basic MathematicsbySerge Lang

https://www.docdroid.net/K1VENuF/basic-mathematics-serge-lang-pdf#page=13

Geometric Algebra Hardcover

by E. Artin

Differential and IntegralCalculus, Vol. One

by Richard Courant

Differential and IntegralCalculus, Vol. 2

by Richard Courant

Collected Papers of SrinivasaRamanujan

by Srinivasa Ramanujan Aiyangar(Author), G. H. Hardy (Author), P. V. Seshu Aiyar (Author), B. M. Wilson(Author)

Neomechanics

Note: "neomechanics"(classicalmechanics + the infinity assumption) was invented by Borchardt, Glenn, 1984,The Scientific Worldview [review manuscript]: Berkeley, California, ProgressiveScience Institute, 343 p. [10.13140/RG.2.2.16123.52006].)

The Scientific Worldview: BeyondNewton and Einstein: Borchardt, Glenn: 9780595392452:Amazon.com: Books

Universal Cycle Theory:Neomechanics of the Hierarchically Infinite Universe: Puetz, Stephen J,Borchardt PhD, Glenn: 9781432781330:Amazon.com: Books UTCis only in paperback now.

Infinite Universe Theory:Borchardt, Glenn: 9781973399056:Amazon.com:Books

Notfinity Process: Matter-In-Motion:Coyne, George S: 9781775158806:Amazon.com:Books

Posted byGlenn Borchardtat4:00 AM0commentsLabels:Precursors to TSW Older PostsHomeSubscribe to:Posts (Atom)Search Comments and PostsThe Scientific Worldview (most recent Blogs)Loading...TranslateBlog Archive 2021(41) October(3) Oct 25(1)Impossibility of falsifying myths Oct 18(1) Oct 11(1) September(3) Sep 20(1) Sep 13(1) Sep 06(1) August(5) Aug 30(1) Aug 23(1) Aug 16(1) Aug 09(1) Aug 02(1) July(4) Jul 26(1) Jul 19(1) Jul 12(1) Jul 05(1) June(4) Jun 28(1) Jun 21(1) Jun 14(1) Jun 07(1) May(5) May 31(1) May 24(1) May 17(1) May 10(1) May 03(1) April(4) Apr 26(1) Apr 19(1) Apr 12(1) Apr 05(1) March(5) Mar 29(1) Mar 22(1) Mar 15(1) Mar 08(1) Mar 01(1) February(4) Feb 23(1) Feb 15(1) Feb 08(1) Feb 01(1) January(4) Jan 25(1) Jan 18(1) Jan 11(1) Jan 04(1) 2020(54) December(5) Dec 28(1) Dec 21(1) Dec 18(1) Dec 14(1) Dec 07(1) November(8) Nov 30(1) Nov 23(1) Nov 20(1) Nov 16(1) Nov 09(2) Nov 05(1) Nov 02(1) October(4) Oct 26(1) Oct 19(1) Oct 12(1) Oct 05(1) August(5) Aug 31(1) Aug 24(1) Aug 17(1) Aug 10(1) Aug 03(1) July(5) Jul 29(1) Jul 27(1) Jul 20(1) Jul 13(1) Jul 06(1) June(4) Jun 29(1) Jun 22(1) Jun 15(1) Jun 08(1) May(5) May 29(1) May 25(1) May 18(1) May 11(1) May 04(1) April(5) Apr 27(1) Apr 20(1) Apr 13(1) Apr 07(1) Apr 06(1) March(5) Mar 30(1) Mar 23(1) Mar 16(1) Mar 09(1) Mar 02(1) February(4) Feb 24(1) Feb 17(1) Feb 10(1) Feb 03(1) January(4) Jan 27(1) Jan 20(1) Jan 13(1) Jan 06(1) 2019(55) December(5) Dec 30(1) Dec 23(1) Dec 16(1) Dec 11(1) Dec 04(1) November(4) Nov 27(1) Nov 20(1) Nov 13(1) Nov 06(1) October(5) Oct 30(1) Oct 23(1) Oct 16(1) Oct 09(1) Oct 02(1) September(4) Sep 25(1) Sep 18(1) Sep 11(1) Sep 04(1) August(4) Aug 28(1) Aug 21(1) Aug 14(1) Aug 07(1) July(5) Jul 31(1) Jul 24(1) Jul 17(1) Jul 10(1) Jul 03(1) June(5) Jun 26(1) Jun 19(1) Jun 15(1) Jun 12(1) Jun 05(1) May(5) May 29(1) May 22(1) May 15(1) May 08(1) May 01(1) April(4) Apr 24(1) Apr 17(1) Apr 10(1) Apr 03(1) March(5) Mar 27(1) Mar 20(1) Mar 13(1) Mar 06(1) Mar 01(1) February(4) Feb 27(1) Feb 20(1) Feb 13(1) Feb 06(1) January(5) Jan 30(1) Jan 23(1) Jan 16(1) Jan 09(1) Jan 02(1) 2018(34) December(4) Dec 26(1) Dec 19(1) Dec 12(1) Dec 05(1) November(3) Nov 28(1) Nov 19(1) Nov 14(1) August(3) Aug 15(1) Aug 08(1) Aug 01(1) July(3) Jul 18(1) Jul 11(1) Jul 04(1) June(4) Jun 27(1) Jun 20(1) Jun 13(1) Jun 06(1) May(6) May 30(1) May 25(1) May 23(1) May 16(1) May 09(1) May 02(1) April(3) Apr 25(1) Apr 18(1) Apr 11(1) March(2) Mar 21(1) Mar 07(1) February(2) Feb 14(1) Feb 07(1) January(4) Jan 31(1) Jan 24(1) Jan 17(1) Jan 10(1) 2017(35) December(3) Dec 27(1) Dec 20(1) Dec 13(1) November(2) Nov 08(1) Nov 01(1) October(1) Oct 25(1) August(3) Aug 23(1) Aug 09(1) Aug 02(1) July(4) Jul 27(1) Jul 19(1) Jul 12(1) Jul 05(1) June(4) Jun 28(1) Jun 21(1) Jun 14(1) Jun 07(1) May(5) May 31(1) May 24(1) May 17(1) May 10(1) May 03(1) April(4) Apr 26(1) Apr 19(1) Apr 12(1) Apr 04(1) March(5) Mar 29(1) Mar 22(1) Mar 15(1) Mar 08(1) Mar 01(1) February(2) Feb 16(1) Feb 08(1) January(2) Jan 21(1) Jan 13(1) 2016(43) December(2) Dec 14(1) Dec 07(1) November(2) Nov 17(1) Nov 02(1) October(4) Oct 26(1) Oct 19(1) Oct 12(1) Oct 05(1) September(1) Sep 28(1) August(4) Aug 24(1) Aug 17(1) Aug 10(1) Aug 07(1) July(4) Jul 27(1) Jul 20(1) Jul 13(1) Jul 06(1) June(5) Jun 29(1) Jun 22(1) Jun 15(1) Jun 08(1) Jun 01(1) May(4) May 25(1) May 18(1) May 11(1) May 04(1) April(4) Apr 27(1) Apr 20(1) Apr 13(1) Apr 06(1) March(5) Mar 30(1) Mar 23(1) Mar 16(1) Mar 09(1) Mar 02(1) February(4) Feb 24(1) Feb 17(1) Feb 10(1) Feb 03(1) January(4) Jan 27(1) Jan 20(1) Jan 13(1) Jan 06(1) 2015(52) December(5) Dec 30(1) Dec 23(1) Dec 16(1) Dec 10(1) Dec 02(1) November(4) Nov 25(1) Nov 18(1) Nov 11(1) Nov 04(1) October(4) Oct 28(1) Oct 21(1) Oct 14(1) Oct 07(1) September(5) Sep 30(1) Sep 23(1) Sep 16(1) Sep 09(1) Sep 02(1) August(4) Aug 27(1) Aug 19(1) Aug 12(1) Aug 05(1) July(5) Jul 29(1) Jul 22(1) Jul 15(1) Jul 08(1) Jul 01(1) June(4) Jun 24(1) Jun 17(1) Jun 10(1) Jun 03(1) May(4) May 27(1) May 20(1) May 13(1) May 06(1) April(5) Apr 29(1) Apr 22(1) Apr 15(1) Apr 08(1) Apr 01(1) March(4) Mar 25(1) Mar 18(1) Mar 11(1) Mar 04(1) February(4) Feb 25(1) Feb 18(1) Feb 11(1) Feb 04(1) January(4) Jan 28(1) Jan 21(1) Jan 14(1) Jan 07(1) 2014(53) December(5) Dec 31(1) Dec 24(1) Dec 17(1) Dec 10(1) Dec 03(1) November(4) Nov 26(1) Nov 19(1) Nov 12(1) Nov 05(1) October(5) Oct 29(1) Oct 22(1) Oct 15(1) Oct 08(1) Oct 01(1) September(4) Sep 24(1) Sep 17(1) Sep 10(1) Sep 03(1) August(4) Aug 27(1) Aug 20(1) Aug 13(1) Aug 06(1) July(5) Jul 30(1) Jul 23(1) Jul 16(1) Jul 09(1) Jul 02(1) June(4) Jun 25(1) Jun 18(1) Jun 11(1) Jun 04(1) May(4) May 28(1) May 21(1) May 14(1) May 07(1) April(5) Apr 30(1) Apr 23(1) Apr 16(1) Apr 09(1) Apr 02(1) March(4) Mar 26(1) Mar 19(1) Mar 12(1) Mar 05(1) February(4) Feb 26(1) Feb 19(1) Feb 12(1) Feb 05(1) January(5) Jan 29(1) Jan 22(1) Jan 15(1) Jan 08(1) Jan 01(1) 2013(53) December(4) Dec 25(1) Dec 18(1) Dec 11(1) Dec 04(1) November(4) Nov 27(1) Nov 20(1) Nov 13(1) Nov 06(1) October(5) Oct 30(1) Oct 23(1) Oct 16(1) Oct 09(1) Oct 02(1) September(4) Sep 25(1) Sep 18(1) Sep 11(1) Sep 04(1) August(4) Aug 28(1) Aug 21(1) Aug 14(1) Aug 07(1) July(6) Jul 31(1) Jul 24(1) Jul 17(1) Jul 10(1) Jul 03(2) June(4) Jun 26(1) Jun 19(1) Jun 12(1) Jun 05(1) May(5) May 29(1) May 22(1) May 15(1) May 08(1) May 01(1) April(4) Apr 24(1) Apr 17(1) Apr 10(1) Apr 05(1) March(4) Mar 27(1) Mar 20(1) Mar 13(1) Mar 06(1) February(4) Feb 27(1) Feb 20(1) Feb 13(1) Feb 06(1) January(5) Jan 30(1) Jan 23(1) Jan 16(1) Jan 09(1) Jan 02(1) 2012(50) December(5) Dec 26(1) Dec 20(1) Dec 19(1) Dec 12(1) Dec 05(1) November(4) Nov 28(1) Nov 21(1) Nov 14(1) Nov 07(1) October(5) Oct 31(1) Oct 24(1) Oct 17(1) Oct 10(1) Oct 03(1) September(4) Sep 26(1) Sep 19(1) Sep 12(1) Sep 05(1) August(5) Aug 29(1) Aug 22(1) Aug 15(1) Aug 09(1) Aug 01(1) July(4) Jul 25(1) Jul 18(1) Jul 11(1) Jul 04(1) June(4) Jun 27(1) Jun 20(1) Jun 13(1) Jun 06(1) May(6) May 30(1) May 24(1) May 23(1) May 16(1) May 09(1) May 02(1) April(3) Apr 18(1) Apr 11(1) Apr 04(1) March(4) Mar 28(1) Mar 21(1) Mar 17(1) Mar 09(1) February(2) Feb 22(1) Feb 15(1) January(4) Jan 25(1) Jan 18(1) Jan 11(1) Jan 04(1) 2011(39) December(4) Dec 28(1) Dec 21(1) Dec 14(1) Dec 07(1) November(5) Nov 30(1) Nov 23(1) Nov 16(1) Nov 09(1) Nov 02(1) October(5) Oct 26(1) Oct 19(1) Oct 12(1) Oct 10(1) Oct 05(1) September(1) Sep 30(1) August(2) Aug 10(1) Aug 04(1) July(4) Jul 26(1) Jul 19(1) Jul 15(1) Jul 06(1) June(4) Jun 30(1) Jun 15(1) Jun 08(1) Jun 01(1) May(4) May 25(1) May 18(1) May 11(1) May 05(1) April(1) Apr 16(1) March(2) Mar 09(1) Mar 03(1) February(4) Feb 23(1) Feb 16(1) Feb 09(1) Feb 02(1) January(3) Jan 26(1) Jan 19(1) Jan 05(1) 2010(34) December(6) Dec 29(1) Dec 22(1) Dec 15(1) Dec 09(1) Dec 08(1) Dec 02(1) November(3) Nov 24(1) Nov 11(1) Nov 03(1) October(1) Oct 27(1) September(1) Sep 01(1) August(5) Aug 27(1) Aug 18(1) Aug 11(2) Aug 02(1) July(4) Jul 31(1) Jul 27(1) Jul 21(1) Jul 14(1) June(2) Jun 23(1) Jun 21(1) May(4) May 26(1) May 19(1) May 12(1) May 05(1) April(1) Apr 28(1) March(2) Mar 19(1) Mar 05(1) February(2) Feb 24(1) Feb 05(1) January(3) Jan 25(1) Jan 18(1) Jan 13(1) 2009(38) December(1) Dec 09(1) November(3) Nov 19(1) Nov 13(1) Nov 04(1) October(3) Oct 31(1) Oct 21(1) Oct 03(1) September(5) Sep 30(1) Sep 23(1) Sep 16(1) Sep 09(1) Sep 04(1) August(3) Aug 28(1) Aug 14(1) Aug 05(1) July(5) Jul 30(1) Jul 22(1) Jul 15(1) Jul 09(1) Jul 02(1) June(3) Jun 24(1) Jun 16(1) Jun 08(1) May(4) May 21(1) May 15(1) May 06(1) May 03(1) April(1) Apr 03(1) March(2) Mar 28(1) Mar 05(1) February(3) Feb 25(1) Feb 11(1) Feb 04(1) January(5) Jan 28(1) Jan 21(1) Jan 14(1) Jan 06(1) Jan 02(1) 2008(21) December(2) Dec 26(1) Dec 03(1) November(3) Nov 26(1) Nov 19(1) Nov 05(1) September(1) Sep 02(1) August(1) Aug 30(1) July(4) Jul 27(1) Jul 25(1) Jul 16(1) Jul 14(1) June(3) Jun 28(1) Jun 24(1) Jun 03(1) May(3) May 30(2) May 06(1) April(1) Apr 20(1) January(3) Jan 23(1) Jan 21(1) Jan 15(1) 2007(9) December(1) Dec 26(1) October(1) Oct 24(1) September(1) Sep 22(1) August(1) Aug 21(1) July(1) Jul 16(1) June(4) Jun 29(2) Jun 27(1) Jun 26(1)Visitors since Aug. 11, 2011Page ViewsFollowersEMAIL SUBSCRIPTIONFeedsPosts Atom PostsAll Comments Atom All CommentsAbout MeGlenn BorchardtI have over 50 years of theoretical, experimental, and observational experience as a scientist especially interested in scientific philosophy. Although I have produced over 500 scientific reports, including journal articles, chapters, books, consulting reports, and computer programs, the best by far is my book, "The Scientific Worldview: Beyond Newton and Einstein." It introduced univironmental determinism as the universal mechanism of evolution and the proper basis for scientific philosophy. It challenges the current, wildly popular, though absurd claim that the universe is finite and that it exploded out of nothing. This theme was developed in detail in my recent book, "Infinite Universe Theory." Both books are completely logical from beginning to end in support of infinite universe theory as a replacement for the Big Bang Theory. The switch from the assumption of finity to the assumption infinity will result in the Last Cosmological Revolution.View my complete profilePopular Posts (last 7 days)Impossibility of falsifying mythsPSI Blog 20211025 Impossibility of falsifying myths Abhishek Chakravartty asks: You wrote that creation is not subject to falsification...Why is Velocity Squared? From henk: Glenn, thanks for your answers. I am still thinking about kinetic energy. In the 17th century, experiments by Willem Jacob attitude is based on the assumption that the truth may be known through obs...More evidence falsifying the Big Bang Theory"The most distant galaxy is upending our model of the universe's history"PSI Blog 20210104 More evidence falsifying the Big Bang TheoryThe most distant galaxy is upending our model of the universes his...Theory FormulationThe question has been asked: In what way is theory formulated? 1. Theory formulation begins with fundamental presuppositions (uncons...Cosmic acceleration and dark energy do not existPSI Blog 20211018 Cosmic acceleration and dark energy do not exist Thanks to George Coyne for this heads-up: Hi Glenn, As you and I...Time is Motion Steve asks: I still disagree with the statement.... Time is motion. To be more precise, it should be worded as....Time...Meet Steve PuetzSteve Puetz (pronounced pits), mathematician, statistician, and financial expert, has agreed to head the Hawaii Regional Office of the Pro...Does Energy Have Mass?Bill: Glad you are enjoying www.scientificphilosophy.com and TTAOS (Borchardt, 2004). I hope you were able to see the media file (Borchardt...Welcome to The Scientific Worldview This is a blog that takes the name of my magnum opus on scientific philosophy called The Scientific Worldview: Beyond Newton a...LinksSUBSCRIBE TO THIS BLOGProgressive Science InstituteThe Scientific WorldviewMost Popular Posts (all time)What is the Scientific Worldview? The recent popularity of atheistic books, such as Dawkins The God Delusion and Hitchens God is Not Great...What is the meaning of curiosity in scientific attitude? Curiosity involves an inquiry outside oneself. The scientific attitude is based on the assumption that the truth may be known through obs...Time is Motion Steve asks: I still disagree with the statement.... Time is motion. To be more precise, it should be worded as....Time...Theory FormulationThe question has been asked: In what way is theory formulated? 1. Theory formulation begins with fundamental presuppositions (uncons...Why is Velocity Squared? From henk: Glenn, thanks for your answers. I am still thinking about kinetic energy. In the 17th century, experiments by Willem Jacob Space always contains ...Welcome to The Scientific Worldview This is a blog that takes the name of my magnum opus on scientific philosophy called The Scientific Worldview: Beyond Newton a...Does Energy Have Mass?Bill: Glad you are enjoying www.scientificphilosophy.com and TTAOS (Borchardt, 2004). I hope you were able to see the media file (Borchardt...Meet Steve PuetzSteve Puetz (pronounced pits), mathematician, statistician, and financial expert, has agreed to head the Hawaii Regional Office of the Pro...Does Infinite Universe Theory Mean That Everything is Possible? Daniel Ismail writes: I wanted to take the time to commend you on your work in the paper Infinite Universe Theory. As has been dis...
$26.95 at www.thescientificworldview.com

TAGS:The Scientific Worldview 

<<< Thank you for your visit >>>

Hot Websites